Left arrow Go Back

Speech by HE Nicole Fontaine, President of the European Parliament - ‘The future of Europe’, at the University of Malta, 20 November 2001

pr1745
Date Icon 20/11/2001
President of the University,Members of the teaching body, Students, Ladies and Gentlemen,
Your kind invitation gives me an opportunity to takeup in public some aspects of the discussions and talks I have been able to hold with the authorities of your country in the course of this official visit.
I should like to record my gratitude and appreciationto be able to give a speech at this university, an important centre of learning, culture and youth.
The united Europe which we shall shortly be seekingto bring to fruition together, with passion and perseverance, owes much to its universities.
Throughout Europe’s tormented history, theuniversities have offered a haven in which the most open and most enlightened minds of their respective eras have shaped, by means of a constant process of intense discussion, the shared humanist values which form today the basis of our national and regional cultures. The universities were the anvils on which knowledge and the spirit of universal, tolerant humanism were forged.
Your archipelago, which has been fought over so oftendown the centuries, remains a melting pot of all the European and Mediterranean civilisations which have succeeded one another on these islands over a period of almost 3,000 years: the Phoenicians, the Carthagenians, the Roman Empire, the Arabs, the Crusades, Charles V’s multi-ethnic empire, the French led by Napoleon and, finally, the English. The source of so many problems in the past is now a source of unexpected opportunities at a time when trade and cultural exchanges are taking on a global dimension as never before.
In line with its own wishes, in 2004 Malta should, wehope, become a full member of the European Union family. This will only be fair, given the way we have experienced the vicissitudes of history together. Malta has always found itself at the crossroads between two or even three continents. Malta is open to the world, since two Maltese out of three live outside their home country. Rest assured that your country will be given an enthusiastic welcome into the European Union.
Over recent years Malta has demonstrated itsdetermination to comply with the political and economic acccession criteria laid down at the Copenhagen European Council and to make substantial progress towards incorporating the acquis communautaire into its national law.
The European Parliament is monitoring thesefavourable developments closely and welcomes the firm link created by the meetings of the joint parliamentary committee, the result of which has been greater insight, mutual understanding and cooperation.
Malta already takes part in a number of Communityprogrammes. I would like to evoke those which have a more direct bearing on universities and further education, such as Leonardo or Socrates. However, we are also aware of its commitment to the implementation of the common foreign and security policy. The tragic events of 11 September highlighted the vital need for such a policy, whether the objective is police and judicial cooperation against terrorism, cutting off terrorism's sources of funding, the approximation of our respective criminal laws and the fight against money laundering, an activity towards which no leniency must be shown in any country belonging to or wishing to join the European Union.
We are also aware of Malta's determination to act asa bridge between the two shores of the Mediterranean, and, with that aim in view, to give practical form to the Euro-Mediterranean partnership launched in Barcelona in 1995. The era ushered in by the events of 11 September has left Malta in an even more important position, since this Barcelona process can make a vital contribution to strengthening links among the peoples of the Mediterranean.
You asked me to focus in my speech on the future ofEurope, that is to say the ultimate form which will be taken by the united Europe which you are preparing to enter, should the Maltese people, at the appropriate time, endorse that choice.
In the immediate aftermath of the horrors of theSecond World War, the founders of the new Europe felt that they should not seek to build it in one fell swoop, but instead shape it gradually and pragmatically, by means of practical measures which, by their very nature, would generate solidarity.
That intuition has borne much fruit, but the processis not yet complete. It will be incumbent on you, just as much as on the states which are already members of the Union, to finish that work.
What is the state of play in a Europe which todaybrings together 15 states representing 380 million citizens? What is the inspiring project which can be laid before your fellow citizens, and above all the young people who will shape the future of your country, with a view to securing their support? Will Malta run the risk of losing its identity in this community of nations, as some people seem to fear?
I shall endeavour to reply honestly to thesequestions.

A Europe of peace

In the European Union, what we have already created,and what we propose to build on with the countries seeking to join us, is a Europe of peace embracing a unified continent.
This is the first time in their shared history thatthe countries of Europe have not been at war with one another for more than half a century. The result is that recent generations regard peace in Europe as natural, and war as simply unimaginable.
However, the events we have seen in recent years, onthe Union's doorstep in Croatia, Bosnia, Kosovo and Macedonia, should leave us in no doubt that ethnic hatred can at any time provide the spark which re-ignites the flames of war and its atrocities, even on the European continent.
The more completely the states of Europe committhemselves to a process of economic and political integration, the more likely it is that nationalist thinking will give way to a Community approach, the more likely it is that war will become unthinkable.
This is the first reason why the European Union feelsthat its interests and its duty lie in expanding to take in all the countries of Europe which are seeking and are ready to join the Union, both those in Central and Eastern Europe where freedom and democracy have been restored, for over 10 years now, and those which, like Malta and Cyprus, form part of the Mediterranean Basin and are following in Greece’s footsteps.

A Europe of economic freedom founded on solidarity

In the European Union, what we have already created,and what we intend to build on with the countries seeking to join us, is also a Europe of economic freedom founded on solidarity.
We can point to a series of extraordinary,unprecedented successes:
  • The common agricultural policy has saved the human fabric of the rural world and the European farming industry from a devastating decline which seemed inevitable;
  • The single market has made the European Union the world’s largest economic centre, one which is fully open to fair, stimulating competition and which is better able to cope with the disruption caused by problems affecting the other major economies;
  • The mutual recognition of professional qualifications and freedom of establishment for all professions, albeit regulated at national level, will enable coming generations to think in terms of Europe as a whole, rather than simply their home countries, when planning their studies and their private and working lives;
  • The Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund have enabled those countries or regions which are handicapped by their geographical situation or which are underdeveloped to achieve a level of economic activity which would otherwise have been out of reach. However, this approach based on solidarity, which has generated economic booms in, for example, Spain, Ireland and Greece, has also ultimately benefited the countries which provided the aid by opening up new markets for their products;
  • Finally, the euro has done away with the destabilising impact of fluctuations in the value of European currencies and has forced all our Member States to achieve a much greater degree of convergence in their policies in the areas of the budget deficit, public debt and inflation.

A Europe founded on shared values

In the European Union, what we have already created, and what we intend to build on with the countries seeking to join us, is also a Europe founded on shared values.

Many of those values have been engraved on our collective consciousness by more than one thousand years of shared history.

We have enshrined those values in the Treaties of Rome, Maastricht and Amsterdam and in the very substantial case law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities.

The re-emergence of barbarism in Bosnia, and subsequently in Kosovo, forced Europeans to consider once again forms of behaviour which could not be tolerated, in particular on the soil of Europe itself. It is today significant thatthe degrading treatment of women by the Taliban regime in Afghanistan is providing similar food for thought for European public opinion.

The first World Congress on the Universal Abolition of the Death Penalty, held at the European Parliament in June 2001, demonstrated that a united Europe is increasingly taking on a role as a moral authority, alongside its status as an economic power. It gathered the Presidents of national parliaments, and your President, Prof de Marco gave us the important honour of his attendance.

In December 2000 we sought to highlight these shared views by proclaiming, in Nice, the European Charter of Fundamental Rights.

That document is clearly destined to form the preamble to a constitution of the European Union which we need:

- in order to undo the tangle of Treaties and make them accessible to the public;

- in order to clarify the distribution of responsibilities, on the basis of the subsidiarity principle, between Europe, the Member States and regional and local authorities;

- in order to acknowledge, without creating institutional confusion, the role played by the national parliaments, the primary depositories of national sovereignty.

A social Europe

The European Union, that we have already started tocreate, and that we intend to build on with the countries seeking to join us, is also a genuine social Europe.
The aim is to reduce disparities in living standards,welfare protection and rights among Europeans, regardless of their country of origin.
The economic liberalisation which is now gainingground throughout the world, a policy whose superiority, not least in social terms, to state control of the economy cannot seriously be questioned, is acceptable and beneficial only if it takes account of the human dimension represented by the men and women who work and, thereby generating increased wealth.
Although some progress has been made in this area,the resistance being put up by some states is still acting as a serious hindrance to the emergence of an authentic European social model. However, every year we are moving forward.

A common area of security, freedom and justice

In the European Union, what we have already startedto create, and what we intend to build on with the countries seeking to join us, is also a genuine common area of security, freedom and justice.
It is often suggested that Europe moves forward underthe pressure of significant outside events. Thus, the appalling tragedies which occurred in New York and Washington have prompted all the European states to grasp the nettle and recognise the need for a qualitative step forward in an area where such progress seemed impossible, given its close bearing on one of the most sensitive aspects of traditional national sovereignty: the establishment of an authentic common area of freedom, security and justice.

Everybody is aware of the need for

- our respective national laws to be made compatible,

- the principle of the mutual recognition ofpowers and court decisions to be established through the introduction of a European arrest warrant,
- a common policy, one which is both generous andrigorous, to be adopted in the sphere of immigration to help the fight against those who exploit clandestineimmigration.

A Europe founded on common defence

In the European Union, what we have already started to create, and what we intend to build on with the countries seeking to join us, is a Europe founded on common defence, so that Europe can take greater responsibility for its own security and intervene outside Europe if world peace is threatened or if fundamental human rights are violated, as recently in the Balkans and as now in Afghanistan.

A political Europe

In the European Union, what we have already startedto create, and what we intend to build on with the countries seeking to join us, is a genuine political Europe.
Before its reunification, Germany was said to be aneconomic giant but a political minnow.
It would be unfair to say that the same is true ofthe European Union today. The European Union itself is a presence on the world stage; when it speaks with a single voice, the voice is listened to.
However, its influence does not yet fully match up towhat it actually represents.
This can be seen from the fact that the United Statesrecently turned its back on the Kyoto agreements on reducing the greenhouse effect and unilaterally granted itself the right to continue to be one of the world's leading polluters because that is where its economic interests lie at the moment.
Further proof is provided by the negotiations onworld trade, where Europe's divisions over cultural issues are sorely undermining its ability to stand up to the huge influx of products from a dominant subcontinent.

A Europe founded on universal solidarity

Inside the European Union, we have already embarkedon - and wish to take further with countries wishing to join us - the process of building a Europe founded on universal solidarity with countries, in Africa and South America in particular, which are sliding slowly but surely a little further each year into underdevelopment.
Europe is already the continent which makes thegreatest contribution to the fight against poverty, but that contribution still does not match up to the scale of the poverty and human misery which it is attempting to combat.
In this new millennium, the huge gap between the richcountries, which continue to live in comfort, and the countries where underdevelopment and civil war hold two billion people in the grip of hunger, disease, enslavement or terror, simply cannot be allowed to continue or, worse still, to widen.

A people's Europe

Lastly, what we want to achieve - even though it mustbe acknowledged that we still have a lot of progress to make in this area - is to build a people's Europe, since, without popular support, there can be no political union.
After a long period marked by extremely widespreadand genuine - but rather passive - support for European integration, the European public is becoming increasingly aware of the fact that an effective response to its overriding concerns can come from the European level alone, through the ever-closer integration of our States. An increasing number of people are advocating closer integration in areas which traditionally have been the strongest preserves of national sovereignty such as defence, justice, taxation, the environment and immigration. According to the latest opinion polls, more than two thirds of the public feel that these issues would be dealt with more effectively if the European Union's powers were strengthened vis-à-vis those of the Member States.
Several recent events have served to reflect andfoster an awareness of the European identity. These include maritime disasters, the BSE and foot-and-mouth epidemics, illegal immigration, the casual attitude taken by some countries on other continents towards the growing threat of environmental disaster, and, perhaps most of all, the new waves of barbaric violence seen in Bosnia and then in Kosovo. All these events have helped to shape a new awareness of the meaning of European citizenship.
The challenge now facing us is to ensure that, with27 or more Member States, the European Union will be able both to reinforce its ability to take decisions in a properly democratic fashion and to maintain its spirit of solidarity.
The debate on the type of Europe we wish to build isnow in progress all around Europe with a view to a decision being taken in 2004. You are already involved in that debate.

Unification of the continent of Europe

With the new Treaty signed in Nice, the European Union firmly committed itself to uniting within the Union all the States and peoples of the continent wishing to take part in such a process, with a view to consolidating peace and democracy irreversibly within the European Union.

This process is, in fact, called enlargement, but that word fails fully to reflect a nobler and more compelling ambition.

With the adhesion of at least 10 countries in 2004 including your own, the European Union will have a population of close to half a billion men and women living and working in a huge economic area with no internal borders, stretching from the Arctic circle to Gibraltar, Malta and the Ionian Islands, and from Ireland to the Russian border.

It will be no easy task to form a genuine community from all these countries and all these peoples, whose ethnic, historical, social and religious backgrounds are so strong and so firmly rooted. We must not underestimate the difficulties involved, and universities such as yours can play an extremely positive role in this respect, in accordance with their original mission.

This is because what we need to do is not just to make the necessary adjustments to the European institutions but also to change mindsets in the existing Member States and in the applicant countries.

It must be said that after an initial period of spontaneous public support for integration, concerns are now growing in all our countries, leading some of us to draw back in on ourselves. This is why we must lose no time in launching an information campaign to raise awareness of the geo-political issues involved in fully reunifying within the European Union all those European countries willing and able to do so.

The final aim is to reunite an entire continent in a Community of States and peoples whose goal is to make Europe an area of irreversible peace and democracy and, through a deliberate pooling of national sovereignties, to enable it to have more influence on the world stage and, through economic solidarity, to foster better living standards, equally shared among all those living and working in Europe.

A new Intergovernmental Conference has been scheduled for 2004. The European Parliament is keen to ensure that the preparations for this conference are a success and, with this in mind, that a broad public debate takes place. This debate must be open to all sections of civil society, in close cooperation with national parliaments and regional assemblies, and with the involvement of the applicant countries. Our meeting here today is part of this process.

Here in Malta, I am well aware of the fact that questions will be asked during the preparations for such a major decision. This is entirely normal. However, I would hope - and this is the main message I would like to put across here - that all opinion formers help the population to see accession to the European Union as an exciting project which goes far beyond economic integration and whose import for future generations transcends today's partisan divisions. You should not be worried that your country, which in terms of its population is a "small" country which would account for only one hundredth of the overall population of the enlarged Union, would be swamped. The uniqueness of the European Union has been to unite states in a single community where they are all treated equally, regardless of their size, and where their traditions and special cultural characteristic are respected. Luxembourg, which has a smaller population than Malta, is a founding member of the Union whose identity and national sovereignty have been in no way undermined by its membership. It has more influence within the Union than if it stood on its own, precisely because it is a member of a larger body. The main fault line has not been between the "big" and the "small" but between those who want an integrated Europe and those who do not share this conception. In today's world, one can only be strong if one forms part of a team. Concerning Malta, I firmly believe that balanced agreements will be reached on the issues still under negotiation - the free movement of capital, competition, fisheries, and the environment which repsect the special needs of Malta. We have already come most of the way, and this stands us in good stead for the rest of the journey.

This is the sincere and open message which I wished to put across to you today in a spirit of true friendship.

Thank you.

Share this Press Release Icon socials Icon socials Icon socials Icon socials

Other Press Releases:

STQARRIJA MILL-UFFIĊĊJU TAL-PRIM MINISTRU  “Sodisfatt bil-qbil bejn il-mexxejja tal-UE għax Malta ilha mill-bidu nett timbotta favur soluzzjoni għall-paċi” – Il-Prim Ministru Robert Abela

PR261926

STQARRIJA MILL-UFFIĊĊJU TAL-PRIM MINISTRU “Sodisfatt bil-qbil bejn il-mexx...

PRESS RELEASE BY THE MINISTRY FOR EUROPEAN FUNDS, SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND CONSUMER PROTECTION  European funding through the Erasmus+ programme to strengthen educators’ professional development

PR261925EN

PRESS RELEASE BY THE MINISTRY FOR EUROPEAN FUNDS, SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND CONSU...

More Press Releases Right arrow