Court Notices published in Government Gazette no 21,498 of 29th August 2025 ​

By means of a decree given by the Civil Court, First Hall, on the 5th January, 2024, in the records of the Sworn Application number 1428/2023TA, in the names: The Commissioner of Revenue and Customs vs Remi Jack Jorgensen, the following publication was ordered, in terms of Article 187 et sequitur of Cap. 12, for the purpose of service of the respondent.

By means of an application in the names: The Commissioner of Revenue and Customs vs Remi Jack Jorgensen filed in the Civil Court, First Hall, on the 19th December, 2023, the applicant asked this Honourable Court to:

1. Order the registration of the document annexed to this application as an official copy thereof so that the same document constitutes an executive title;

2. Order that a copy of the application and of the document attached thereto be notified to the respondent company according to the relevant provisions of Cap. 12 of the Laws of Malta, as if this application and this document were a judicial act.

The Sworn application number 1428/2023TA in the names mentioned above is postponed to 8th October, 2025, at 9.30 a.m.

Notification respondent: Remi Jack Jorgensen, 71, Triq San Piju V, Tas-Sliema

GABRIEL MANGION

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decree delivered by the Constitutional Court on the 23rd of June, 2025, in the records of Constitutional Application Number 79/2021/1 in the names Bernard Baldacchino (384655M) vs George Micallef (353166M) and the State Advocate, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of effecting service on George Micallef in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of Cap. 12.

By means of Constitutional Appeal Application number 79/2021/1 filed on the 2nd February, 2023, the State Advocate felt aggrieved by the judgment delivered on the 31st January, 2023, by the Honourable First Hall Civil Court (Constitutional Jurisdiction) on the ground that the non-pecuniary compensation liquidated by the Honourable First Court is excessive and should be reduced to reflect an amount which is in line with jurisprudence.

Therefore, the appellant respectfully requests this Honourable Constitutional Court to reform the judgment in the names premised delivered by the First Hall Civil Court in its Constitutional jurisdiction on the 31st January, 2023, in the sense that it substantially reduces the compensation for non pecuniary damages of twelve thousand euro (€12,000) to a substantially inferior amount whilst confirming the judgment of the 31st January, 2023, as to its remainder, with costs of both instances against the respondent applicant.

Constitutional Appeal Application number 79/2021/1 in the names Bernard Baldacchino vs George Micallef (353166M) and the State Advocate, has been deferred for hearing to the 27th October, 2025, at 8.30 a.m.

Notification: George Micallef, 35, Atlantis Court, Flat 3, Triq Papa Piju XII, Birkirkara

DR FRANCO BONDIN, LLD, M. Jur.

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decree delivered by the Constitutional Court, on the 31st July, 2025, in the records of Constitutional Application number 346/2021 in the names George Falzon and his wife Rosaria Falzon vs The State Advocate and Raymond Buttigieg, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of effecting service on George Falzon and his wife Rosaria Falzon in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of Cap. 12.

Whereas in Constitutional Appeal Application Number 346/2021 filed on the 31st December, 2024, the State Advocate feels aggrieved by the judgment of the First, Hall Civil Court (Constitutional jurisdiction) in the names premised delivered on the 11th December, 2024, on the grounds that this Honourable First Court erred when it found that the application of the Cap. 69 of the Laws of Malta and Act X of 2009 violates the fundamental rights of the applicants for the enjoyment of their property as protected by the Convention For the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms during the period from 11th November, 2008, to 19th October, 2023; the Honourable First Court liquidated excessive pecuniary compensation in favour of the applicants; the Honourable First Court also liquidated excessive non-pecuniary compensation in favour of the applicant and the Honourable First Court erred when it ordered that all the costs of the cause are to be paid by the State Advocate.

Therefore, the applicant requests with respect that this Honourable Court annuls and revokes the appealed judgment of the 11th December, 2024, in its entirety and whilst upholding the pleas raised by the appellant, it dismisses all the demands by the respondent applicants Falzon, or alternatively, in case this Honourable Court considers that the Court of First Instance was correct when it found that the application of the Cap. 69 of the Laws of Malta and Act X of 2009 violates the fundamental rights of the applicants for the enjoyment of their property, reforms the appealed judgment by limiting such lesion to the period between 11th November, 2008 and the end of May, 2010, and consequently reduces the pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages liquidated as the case may be, with costs.

Notification: George Falzon, 4, Block C5, Flt 6, Triq is-Summiena, Fgura

Rosaria Falzon, 4, Block C5, Flt 6, Triq is-Summiena, Fgura

DR FRANCO BONDIN, LLD, M. Jur.

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decree delivered by the Court of Appeal, Superior jurisdiction, on the 16th July, 2025, in the records of Application number 1165/2021 in the names Mary Moore et vs Anthony Fenech et, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of effecting service on Mary Moore and Sandra Maresca in terms of Article 187 (3) et sequitur of Cap. 12.

By means of a Reply to an Appeal and the Cross-Appeal in the records of Appeal Application number 1165/2021 filed on the 2nd June, 2025, Anthony Fenech (ID 193656 M), Matthew Fenech (ID 517483M), Silvan Fenech (ID 587678M) and Turn Invest Limited (C69572) request that the grounds of appeal raised by Mary Moore and Sandra Maresca against the judgment decided on 10th April, 2025, be dimissed, with the costs of this appeal against them. As for the cross-appeal, the same applicants request this Honourable Court to uphold their ground of appeal that is, the Court of First Instance did not make a fair and legal partition of the costs of the main cause and consequently reform the appealed judgment by:

1. Cancelling it wherein it condemned the applicants to pay in solidum four-fifths of the costs of the principal action and instead to pay all the costs of the principal action to the principal plaintiffs;

2. Confirm it for the rest.

With costs of this appeal against the plaintiffs Moore and Maresca.

Notification: Mary Moore and Sandra Maresca, 48, Triq in-Nazzarenu, Tas-Sliema

DR FRANCO BONDIN, LLD, M. Jur.

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribuna​​