Court Notices published in Govt. Gazette no 20,777 of 1st February 2022

ARB/C006/2022 – FREEZING ORDER

IT IS BEING NOTIFIED that by a decree dated 25th January, 2022, given by the Court of Magistrates (Malta) as a Court of Criminal Inquiry (Magistrate Dr Donatella Frendo Dimech, LLD). Compilation Number 523/2021, in the case:

The Republic of Malta

Versus

OMAR AZZOPARDI, self-employed, 38 years, son of the late Alfred and Georgina née Spiteri, born in Tal-Pietà, Malta, on the 29th March, 1983, and residing at Block A, Flat 3, Triq is-Sliem, Marsa, and holder of Maltese identity card bearing number 200983M.

MARLISE CARUANA, waitress, 35 years, daughter of Mario Azzopardi and Theresa Azzopardi née Camilleri, born in Pietà, Malta, on the 23rd August, 1986, and residing at 117, Triq San Filippu, Ħal Għaxaq, and holder of Maltese identity card bearing number 404286M.

ANĠIE AZZOPARDI, waitress, 33 years, daughter of the late Alfred and Georgina née Spiteri, born in Tal-Pietà, Malta on the 27th September, 1988, and residing at Block A, Flat 3, Triq is-Sliem, Marsa, and holder of Maltese identity card bearing number 450488M.

AND

ZANAH LIMITED, incorporated on the 13th April, 2015, with Maltese registration number C70018 and registered address at Central Business Centre, Room 1, Level 1, Suite 2, Mdina Road, Ħaż-Żebbuġ, Malta.

ORDERED the attachment in the hands of third parties in general of all moneys and other movable property due to or pertaining or belonging to OMAR AZZOPARDI, MARLISE CARUANA, ANĠIE AZZOPARDI and ZANAH LIMITED and prohibits the said accused from transferring, pledging, hypothecating or otherwise disposing of any movable or immovable property, and this in terms of Article 5 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, Cap. 373 of the Laws of Malta.

The Court AUTHORISED the said accused to receive the amount of thirteen thousand, nine hundred and seventy-six euro and twenty-four cents (€13,976.24) per year (or the amount of six hundred euro (€600) every fifteen (15) days as per Article 36 of the Proceeds of Crime Act, Cap. 621 of the Laws of Malta), provided that every financial entity is ordered to present a note by which it informs the Court in which account or from which account these moneys are taken or the accused themselves may indicate to the Court from which account they are perceiving the moneys indicated.

Any person who acts in contravention of the court order as mentioned in Article 5 referred to above shall be guilty of an offence and shall on conviction be liable to a fine (multa) not exceeding eleven thousand and six hundred and forty-six euro and eighty-seven cents (€11,646.87), or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding twelve months, or to both such fine and imprisonment.

Any transfer or other disposal of any property made in contravention of the said Court order shall be null and without effect at law.

Director, Asset Recovery Bureau

By means of a decree given, by the Court of Appeal (Superior Jurisdiction) on the 9th December, 2021, in the names Victor Buttigieg vs Director Public Registry et, Application number 130/2013 AL, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the respondents Patricia Fenech and Franco Fenech, in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of Cap. 12.

By means of an Application, presented in the Court of Appeal, (Superior Jurisdiction) in the names Victor Buttigieg (ID 474072M) vs 1) Director Public Registry, 2) George Fenech (ID 812351M), 3) Carmen Fenech (ID 696452M), 4) Emanuel Fenech (ID 636558M), 5) Raymond Fenech (ID 137260M), 6) Anthony Fenech (ID 193656M), 7) Moira Fenech (ID 91970M), 8) Angela Attard Fenech (ID 445177M), 9) Karl Fenech (ID 597181M), 10) and by means of a decree dated 28th October 2013, Raymond Fenech was confirmed curator to represent the interests of the deceased Tumas Fenech, 11) and by means of a decree dated 3rd June 2014 Anna Fenech (ID 489555M) was called into the cause 12 and by means of a Deceree dated 16th November 2020, the records were transferred in the name of Pactricia Fenech, Yorgen Fenech and Franco Fenech to take over the records of the cause and represent the deceased George Fenech, on the 19th July 2021, the applicant Raymond Fenech (ID 137260M) in his own name as well as in his capacity of deputy curator to represent the interests of the deceased Tumas Fenech, Emanuel Fenech (ID 636558M), Anthony Fenech (ID 1936561M), Carmen Fenegch (ID 696452M), Moira Fenech (ID 91970M), Anna Fenech (ID 489555M), Angela Attard Fenech (ID 445177M), and Karl Fenech (ID 597181M), respectfully pleaded:

1.Preliminary

1. That the plaintiff Victor Buttigieg filed the present procedures before the Honourable Civil Court (Family Section)on the basis of Article 77 of the Civil Code by means of which a clarification was asked about his paternity and the substitution of the details of his mother's husband by those of his alleged biological father. This since the plaintiff is alleging that his biological father is the late Tumas Fenech, father of the defendants,

… omissis …

3. That by means of the appealed decree of the 8th June, 2021, the Honourable First Court rejected all the objections brought forward by the interpellants and upheld the demand of the plaintiff for the exhumation of the corpse of the deceased father of the interpellants with the understanding that a genetic sample be taken from him and this decree is to apply also as regards the plaintiff's application of the 9th July, 2015;

4. That the interpellants felt aggrieved by this decree;

5.That the grievances of the plaintiffs are clear and manifest and consist in the following,

The Grievances

6. The First Grievance

6.1 That in the first place the decree appealed is procedurally defective and should be cancelled due to lack of observance of the principle of natural justice audi alteram parte,

… omissis …

6.4 That the decision given in violation of the principle audi alteram partem is considered in the jurisprudence of the Maltese Courts as a decision that 'should not and could not be legally given;

… omissis …

7. The Second Grievance

7.1 That without prejudice to the above the decree appealed should be revoked since the Honourable First Court exercised powers that were not given to it by law by creating a procedure which is not contemplated in the law,

7.2 That it is not contested that the law does not provide any procedure for the execution of scientific tests for the clarification of relationships in the case where the scientific tests for the clarification of paternity in case where the presumed father is deceased .The Honourable First Court made a wide interpretation of the law and interpreted the phrase 'as the case may be' in Article 70A of the Civil Code as meaning that it is granted power to order the exhumation of a corpse and the taking of genetic samples from the corpse or the relatives of the deceased for the purpose of clarification of relationships,

7.3 That with all due respect this consideration of the First Court is manifestly mistaken,

… omissis …

7.7 From a reading regarding the provisions of the law which regulate the clarification of the relationships of the individual it is clear that the law does not speak about genetic tests on a deceased person or its relatives. This as has been acknowledged ex admissis by the First Court itself. Even the parliamentary debates which the First Court quotes do not support the conclusions reached by it,

7.8 That thus it was not legally permissible for the First Court to extend the effects of these provisions to circumstances not contemplated in the law,

7.9 There is no doubt that in the law there is a lacuna because it does not regulate what is to be done in case that the presumed father has already died before the necessary genetic tests for the purpose of clarification of the relationship have been made. This does not mean however that the Court can provide for this lacuna by itself creating a procedure and to decide when and in which circumstances this procedure is to be applied,

… omissis …

7.11 That even if this argument was to be accepted for the sake of argument only, that it is legally possible that a corpse is exhumed, in order to carry out genetic tests for the purpose of clarification of a relationship, this cannot be made without the consent of the relatives according to jurisprudence;

8. The Third Grievance.

8.1 That without prejudice to the above the First Court was mistaken when it rejected the objection of the appellants that the demands of the plaintiff are untimely;

… omissis …

9. The Fourth Grievance

9.1. That without prejudice to the above the Honourable First Court made a wrong evaluation of the facts when it considered that there was not enough proof to show the existence of a nexus between the applicant and the deceased Tumas Fenech,

9.2 That as indicated in the decree hereby appealed this decree follows various other decrees on the same merit in this same cause in virtue of which decrees the Court of First Instance rejected the demand of the plaintiff contained in the same decree appealed;

… omissis …

10. Demands

For these motives the appellants humbly pray this Honourable Court:

1. To declare the decree of the Civil Court (Family Section) of the 8th June, 2021, given in the records in the names Victor Buttigieg vs Director Public Registry et. null and consequently order its cancellation, or

2. revoke contrario the decree mentioned for the reasons in this appeal.

With all costs, including those of the procedures before the First Court against the plaintiff.

Whereas the written procedures in the cause before the Court of Appeal between V ictor Buttigieg vs 1) Director of the Public Registry, 2) George Fenech, 3) Carmen Fenech, 4) Emanuel Fenech, 5) Raymond Fenech, 6) Anthony Fenech, 7) Moira Fenech, 8) Angela Attard Fenech, 9) Karl Fenech, 10) and by means of a Decree dated 28th October 2013, Raymond Fenech was confirmed curator to represent the interests of the deceased Tumas Fenech, 11) and by means of a Decree dated 3rd June 2014, Anne Fenech was called into the cause, 12) and by means of a Decree dated 16th November 2020, the records were transferred in the name of Patricia Fenech, Yorgen Fenech and Franco Fenech in order to take over the proceedings and represent the deceased George Fenech, the Court fixed the hearing of this cause to Thursday ninth (9) of December, 2021, at 9.20 a.m. and deferred to the 17th February, 2022, at 11.00 a.m.

Notify: 1) Patricia Fenech, Apt 1152, Blk 11, Vjal Portomaso, Portomaso, St Julian's

   2) Franco Fenech, Apt 2742, Blk 27, Vjal Portomaso, Portomaso, St Julian's

Adv. Frank Portelli, LLD

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decree of the 26th November 2021 of the Rent Regulation Board, in the records of the Application in the names Prof Eugene Buttigieg vs Alfred Caruana, Application Number 682/2021LC, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of effecting service on the respondent Alfred Caruana in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12)

By means of an application in the names Prof Eugene Buttigieg (ID 154461M) vs Alfred Caruana (KI 0697241M) filed in the Rent Regulation Board, on the 28th September, 2021, the applicant Prof Eugene Buttigieg requested this Honourable Board why it should not:

1. Order the means test of the respondent Alfred Caruana according to the dispositions of Article 12B(3)(iii) of Cap. 158 of the Laws of Malta;

2. Gives those orders that it deems opportune, according to the results of the means test, and that is that if the criteria of the means test are not satisfied, orders immediately the eviction of the respondent from the premises mentioned within a peremptory time established by the same Bord; or

3. If the criteria of the means test are met, orders the continuation of the relative lease with new conditions taking into account the relative circumstances including the disproportionate burden for the applicant while stating and deciding that in terms of Act XXVII of 2018 the rent shall be revised to an amount not exceeding 2% per annum of the free and open market value of the premises with number 186, St Gaetan Street, Ħamrun.

With costs and legal interest against the respondent who is from now summoned so that a reference to her oath be made and without prejudice to any other action that may sometimes be brought.

Applicant: c/o Prolegal Advocates, Vjal ir-Rihan, Triq tal-Balal, San Ġwann SGN 9016, Malta

respondent: 186, St Gaetan Street, Ħamrun

Housing Authority

The application in the names Prof Eugene Buttigieg vs Alfred Caruana, Application number 682/2021LC has been postponed for hearing to the 14th February, 2022, at 10.00 a.m.

Alexandra Debattista

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decree of the 26th November, 2021, of the Rent Regulation Board, in the records of the Application in the names Carmelo Grech vs Mario Pace, Application number 650/2021LC, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of effecting service on the respondent Mario Pace in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12)

By means of an application in the names Carmelo Grech (ID 700245M) vs Mario Pace (KI 0782158M) filed in the Rent Regulation Board, on the 17th September, 2021, the applicant Carmelo Grech requested this Honourable Board why it should not:

1. Order the means test of the respondent Mario Pace according to the dispositions of Article 12B(3)(iii) of Cap. 158 of the Laws of Malta;

2. Gives those orders that it deems opportune, according to the results of the means test, and that is that if the criteria of the means test are not satisfied, orders immediately the eviction of the respondent from the premises mentioned within a peremptory time established by the same Bord; or

3. If the criteria of the means test are met, orders the continuation of the relative lease with new conditions taking into account the relative circumstances including the disproportionate burden for the applicant while stating and deciding that in terms of Act XXVII of 2018 the rent shall be revised to an amount not exceeding 2% per annum of the free and open market value of the premises with number 144, Victor Flats, Flat 2, Palm Street, Paola.

With costs and legal interest against the respondent who is from now summoned so that a reference to her oath be made and without prejudice to any other action that may sometimes be brought.

Applicant: Sunflower Court, 186, Flat 1, Triq Ġużè D'Amato, Ħal Tarxien

respondent: 144, Victor Flats, Flat 2, Palm Street, Paola

Housing Authority

The application in the names Carmelo Grech vs Mario Pace, Application number 650/2021LC, has been postponed for hearing to the 14th February, 2022  at 10.00 a.m.

Alexandra Debattista

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decree of the 26th November, 2021, of the Rent Regulation Board, in the records of the Application in the names Autorentals Ltd vs Martin Camilleri et, Application number 734/2021LC, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of effecting service on the respondent Martin Camilleri and Inez Camilleri in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12)

By means of an application in the names Autorentals Ltd (C326) vs Martin (ID 72554M) and Inez (ID 707356M) spouses Camilleri filed in the Rent Regulation Board, on the 13th October 2021, the applicant John Refalo (ID 244439M) for and on behalf of Autorentals Ltd (C326) requested this Honourable Board why it should not:

1. Order the means test of the respondents Camilleri according to the Rules of the Continuation Tenancies (Criteria of the Means Test) and and any regulations which replace them;

2. Declare and decide that in terms of Cap. 69 of the Laws of Malta the rent shall be revised to an amount not exceeding 2% per annum of the free and open market value of the appartment number 41 forming part of a block officialy marked number 10, known as Kappara Court in Triq il-Buqrajn, il-Kappara, San Ġwann, from the 1st January, 2021, and establish new conditions regarding the rent and in default if the respondents do not meet the criteria of income and capital of the means test, the applicant will be permitted to take back the possession of the premises within and not later than two years, during which they will have the right to request a higher rent than the present rent.

With costs against the respondents who are from now summoned so that a reference to their oath be made.

Applicant: Autorentals, Triq San Ġorġ, St Julian's

respondents: Martin and Inez spouses Camilleri – 10 Kappara Court, Flat 41, Triq il-Buqrajq, il-Kappara, San Ġwann

 Housing Authority

The application in the names Autorentals Limited vs Martin Camilleri et, Application number 734/2021LC, has been postponed for hearing to the 14th February, 2022, at 10.00 a.m.

Alexandra Debattista

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decree of the 26th November, 2021, of the Rent Regulation Board, in the records of the Application in the names Mary Spiteri et vs Franky Borg et, Application number 736/2021LC, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of effecting service on the respondent Franky Borg in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12).

By means of an application in the names Mary Spiteri (ID 7232M), Yvonne Wilkinson (ID 111257M) and Raymond Spiteri (ID 381960M) vs Franky Borg (ID 042174M) and Housing Authority filed in the Rent Regulation Board, on the 14th October, 2021, the applicants Mary Spiteri (ID 7232M), Yvonne Wilkinson (ID 111257M) and Raymond Spiteri (ID 381960M) requested this Honourable Board why it should not:

1. Declare and decide that the respondent Franky Borg is the lessee of the premises 48 and 50, Madonnina, Triq San Pawl, Ħal Luqa, and qualifies as the lessee of a residential House on the basis of this definition, in terms of Article 2 of the Reletting of Urban Property (Regulation) Ordinance as amended by Act XXIV of 2021, and thus he is entitled to continue occupying the residential house in terms of Article 2 of the Reletting of Urban Property (Regulation) Ordinance as amended by Act XXIV of 2021.

2. Declare and decide that in accordance with Act No XXIV of 2021, the rent shall be revised to an amount not exceeding 2% of the free and unencumbered open market value of the premises 48 and 50 Madonnina, Triq San Pawl, Ħal Luqa, and to establish new conditions regarding the lease;

3. Order that the means test of the respondent Franky Borg be carried out which shall be based on the means test set out in the Rules of the Continuation Tenancies (Criteria of the Means Test) issued under Article 1622A of the Civil Code and any regulations which replace them, which test shall be based on the income of the lessee between 1st January and 31st December, 2020, and on the capital of the same lessee on the 31st December, 2020;

4. Order that if the respondent Franky Borg (ID 0421674M) does not meet the criteria of income and capital of the means test, the eviction of the same respondent from the premises in question within a short and peremptory time established by this Board;

5. Alternatively, in case the event that the fourth request is rejected because the respondent meets the criteria for income and capital of the means tests, it orders the payment of an increase in the amount of rent, which rent is increased according to the regulations published from time to time by the Minister responsible for housing.

With costs against the respondents who are from now summoned so that a reference to their oath be made and without prejudice to any other action that may eventually be brought.

Applicants: 1) Mary Spiteri, 58, Triq San Pawl, Ħal Luqa

2) Yvonne Wilkinson, Villa Treramleon, Triq Tal-Milord, Mosta

3) Raymond Spiteri, 194, Autumn Leaves, Triq il-Kampanella, Fgura

Respondent: 48/50, Madonnina, Triq San Pawl, Ħal Luqa

Housing Authority

The application in the names Mary Spiteri et vs Franky Borg et, Application number 736/2021LC, has been postponed for hearing to the 14th February, 2022, at 11.00 a.m.

Alexandra Debattista

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decree of the 26th November, 2021, of the Rent Regulation Board, in the records of the Application in the names Michelina Scicluna noe vs Thomas Sant, Application number 702/2021LC, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of effecting service on the respondent Thomas Sant in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12).

By means of an application in the names Michelina Scicluna (ID 738645M) in her role as mandatory of Gemma Morawe (holding German passport number 5001532613) absent from these islands vs Thomas Sant (ID 926244M) filed before the Rent Regulation Board, on the 4th October 2021, the applicant Michelina Scicluna (ID 738645M) in her role as mandatory of Gemma Morawe (holding German passport number 5001532613) absent from these islands as duly authorised requested this Honourable Board to:

1. Appoint a Technical Architect for the purpose of valuating the premises 89, Triq is-Sorijiet, Ħal Tarxien, in the open and unencumbered market;

2. Carry out the means test of the respondent according to law and establish whether the same respondent meets the criteria according to law to remain in the lease;

3. In the event that this Board finds that the respondent does not meet the criteria of the means test of income and capital dissolve the lease in favour of the respondent of the premises 89, Triq is-Sorijiet, Ħal Tarxien, and gives the respondent a short and peremptory time to vacate the premises and release its vacant possession in good condition in favour of the applicant and it shall provide all other appropriate provisions, including setting out the compensation to be paid to the applicants for the use of the premises;

4.  In the event that this Board finds that the respondent meets the criteria of the means tests for income and capital according to law in order to remain in the lease the Board will review and determine the rent to be paid in the amount of €4,400 per annum or any other more substantial amount from 1st January, 2021, and establish such other appropriate conditions in respect to the rent and make such other appropriate provisions in terms of Article 12B Cap. 158 and/or Cap. 69 as the case may be.

Applicants: 25, Triq San Bartilmew, Żurrieq

Respondent: Thomas Sant, 89, Triq is-Sorijiet, Ħal Tarxien

Housing Authority

The application in the names Michelina Scicluna noe vs Thomas Sant, Application number 702/2021LC, has been postponed for hearing to the 14th February, 2022, at 11.00 a.m.

Alexandra Debattista

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decree of the 7th January, 2022, of the Rent Regulation Board, in the records of the Application according to Article 1548A in the names Carmen Curmi vs Joan Mallia, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of effecting service on the respondent Joan Mallia in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12)

By means of an application in the names Carmen Curmi (ID 321463M) vs Joan Mallia (ID 383563M) filed in the Rent Regulation Board, on the 30th September, 2021, the applicant Carmen Curmi (ID 321463M) requested that this Honourable Board:

1.  Set alternative days and times for the applicant, together with Architect Stephan Borg (email: (stephan.borg@crowdnet.com.mt)), by her incharged, to inspect premises 103, Triq Santa Luċija, Valletta, and this in terms of Article 1548A of Cap. 16 of the Laws of Malta and any other relevant law;

2. Orders that this inspection be carried out under the supervision and in the presence of a Court Marshall.

Subject to any other appropriate and timely provision.

With costs against the respondent, who is from now summoned so that a reference to her oath be made.

Applicant:  5/2, Block 2, St Patrick Street, Valletta

Notification:  103, Triq Santa Luċija, Valletta

In the Rent Regulation Board

Magistrate Dr Joseph Demicoli, LLD, M.Jur

The Board,

Saw the application of Carmen Curmi in terms of Article 1548A of Cap. 16,

Orders its notification to Joan Mallia within ten (10) days for the reply.

Alexandra Debattista

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

Notice, Registry of the Civil Court (Family Section)

Whereas the plaintiff Alan Farrugia (ID 235082M) presented an application (number 14/22AGV) demanding corrections in the act of birth of Ivy Maric Muscat 5309/21 in the Public Registry.

Whoever may have an interest therein, and wishes to oppose that demand, is hereby called upon to do so, by means of a note to be filed in the Registry of these Courts, within fifteen days from the day of the publication of this present notice in the Government Gazette.

Those who, within the aforesaid time, shall have filed such note, shall be notified by the service of a copy of the said application under oath, of the day which will be appointed for the hearing of the case.

By order of the Court,

Cettina Gauci

For Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decree of the 16th October, 2020, handed down by the Court of Magistrates (Malta) in the records of the judicial letter number 834/2020 in the names No Deposit Cars Malta Limited vs Darren Moore the following publication was ordered for the purpose of effecting service on the respondent Darren Moore in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of Cap. 12.

In the Court of Magistrates (Malta)

To Darren Moore (ID 0165301A) of Scicluna Flats, Blk B, Fl. 2, Triq il-Forn, Marsalforn, Żebbuġ, Gozo

By the present, No Deposit Cars Malta Limited (C85780) of Sharay, Triq il-Fraxxnu, San Ġiljan, is hereby executing and enforcing the following bills of exchange, which bills of exchange are of the total amount of €7,600 (a copy of which bills of exchange is being herein attached and marked as Doc. 1), which bills of exchange have been signed by virtue of the Hire and Purchase agreement dated 19th October, 2018, between the parties (a copy of which is being herein attached and marked as Doc. 2) and are as follows:

1. Bill of exchange number 1 in the amount of €400 issued by the defendant in favour of the company, which bill of exchange was due on the 19th November, 2018, and which sum has to date not been paid;

2. Bill of exchange number 2 in the amount of €400 issued by the defendant in favour of the company, which bill of exchange was due on the 19th December, 2018, and which sum has to date not been paid;

3. Bill of exchange number 3 in the amount of €400 issued by the defendant in favour of the company, which bill of exchange was due on the 19th January, 2019, and which sum has to date not been paid;

4. Bill of exchange number 4 in the amount of €400 issued by the defendant in favour of the company, which bill of exchange was due on the 19th February, 2019, and which sum has to date not been paid;

5. Bill of exchange number 5 in the amount of €400 issued by the defendant in favour of the company, which bill of exchange was due on the 19th March, 2019, and which sum has to date not been paid;

6. Bill of exchange number 6 in the amount of €400 issued by the defendant in favour of the company, which bill of exchange was due on the 19th April, 2019, and which sum has to date not been paid;

7. Bill of exchange number 7 in the amount of €400 issued by the defendant in favour of the company, which bill of exchange was due on the 19th May, 2019, and which sum has to date not been paid;

8. Bill of exchange number 8 in the amount of €400 issued by the defendant in favour of the company, which bill of exchange was due on the 19th June, 2019, and which sum has to date not been paid;

9. Bill of exchange number 9 in the amount of €400 issued by the defendant in favour of the company, which bill of exchange was due on the 19th July, 2019, and which sum has to date not been paid;

10. Bill of exchange number 10 in the amount of €400 issued by the defendant in favour of the company, which bill of exchange was due on the 19th August, 2019, and which sum has to date not been paid;

11. Bill of exchange number 11 in the amount of €400 issued by the defendant in favour of the company, which bill of exchange was due on the 19th September, 2019, and which sum has to date not been paid;

12. Bill of exchange number 12 in the amount of €400 issued by the defendant in favour of the company, which bill of exchange was due on the 19th October, 2019, and which sum has to date not been paid;

13. Bill of exchange number 13 in the amount of €400 issued by the defendant in favour of the company, which bill of exchange was due on the 19th November, 2019, and which sum has to date not been paid;

14. Bill of exchange number 14 in the amount of €400 issued by the defendant in favour of the company, which bill of exchange was due on the 19th December, 2019, and which sum has to date not been paid;

15. Bill of exchange number 15 in the amount of €400 issued by the defendant in favour of the company, which bill of exchange was due on the 19th January, 2020, and which sum has to date not been paid;

16. Bill of exchange number 16 in the amount of €400 issued by the defendant in favour of the company, which bill of exchange was due on the 19th February, 2020, and which sum has to date not been paid;

17. Bill of exchange number 17 in the amount of €400 issued by the defendant in favour of the company, which bill of exchange was due on the 19th March, 2020, and which sum has to date not been paid;

18. Bill of exchange number 18 in the amount of €400 issued by the defendant in favour of the company, which bill of exchange was due on the 19th April, 2020, and which sum has to date not been paid;

19. Bill of exchange number 19 in the amount of €400 issued by the defendant in favour of the company, which bill of exchange was due on the 19th May, 2020, and which sum has to date not been paid;

This judicial letter is being notified to you in accordance with Article 253(e) of Cap. 12 of the Laws of Malta and if you do not oppose the execution of the above bills of exchange within twenty (20) days from notification of the judicial letter by means of an application filed in the acts of the present judicial act, this judicial letter shall be rendered an executive title against you and therefore the credit being claimed by the Company shall become immediately executable.

Notwithstanding that you have been requested to pay the above bills of exchange you have nonetheless remained in default and therefore the Company had to resort to filing this judicial letter against you.

With expenses and legal interest from the expiration of the bills of exchange until effective date of payment.

ALEXANDRA DEBATTISTA

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decree of the 10th January, 2022, in the records of the judicial letter number 4713/2021, in the names Catherine Farrugia vs Marcus Lauri et, the First Hall of the Civil Court ordered the following publication for the purpose of effecting service on the respondents in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of Cap. 12.

In the First Hall of the Civil Court

To Marcus Lauri (ID 242873M) of 232 Belgrave Court, Flat 8, Triq it-Torri, Tas-Sliema

David Lauri (ID 164777M) of 6, Villa Trieste, Fuq il-Ġonna, Swieqi

Fashion Retailers Enterprises Limited (C32325) of Villa Trieste, Fuq il-Ġonna, Swieqi

By means of this present, the company Catherine Farrugia (ID 683055M) solicits you so that within seven (7) days from the notification of this judicial letter you pay and refund the amount of €695,000 representing a balance on the import of a matured bill of exchange and which debt is still unpaid to date and on which amount legal interest due from the time the amount became due to the present day is to be added.

That this amount today is due to Catherine Farrugia, the universal heir of her husband John Farrugia who is the one who lent you the money mentioned above and towards whom you have always obliged yourself to repay. However, you did not make any payment and notwithstanding various proceedings made, you never wanted to reach an amicable settlement.

You are therefore being formally solicited for the last time so that within seven (7) days of being notified by this official letter you pay the total amount of €695,000 including the legal interest calculated at the rate of 8% from the due date to the present day. If, however, you choose to remain in default, the applicant will have no choice but to proceed further against you and do everything necessary to safeguard her rights, including by issuing the necessary and timely precautionary warrants.

This letter is also being sent for the purpose of article 2156 of Cap. 16 of the Laws of Malta.

So much so that you know how to proceed and regulate yourself.

With legal costs and interest deductible further.

Alexandra Debattista

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

Notice Registry of the Civil Court (Family Section)

Whereas the plaintiff Luca Cachia (ID 0050702L) presented an application (number 10/22AGV) demanding corrections in the act of birth of Luca Cachia 507/02 in the Public Registry.

Whoever may have an interest therein, and wishes to oppose that demand, is hereby called upon to do so, by means of a note to be filed in the Registry of these Courts, within fifteen days from the day of the publication of this present notice in the Government Gazette.

Those who, within the aforesaid time, shall have filed such note, shall be notified by the service of a copy of the said application under oath, of the day which will be appointed for the hearing of the case.

By order of the Court,

Cettina Gauci

For Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decree of the 14th September, 2021, handed down by the Court of Magistrates (Malta) in the records of the judicial letter number 1520/2021 in the names Princess Holdings Limited vs Amalia Li Tanedo Co. the following publication was ordered for the purpose of effecting service on the respondent Amalia Li Tanedo Co. in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of Cap. 12.

In the Court of Magistrates (Malta)

To Amalia Li Tanedo Co (ID 0129698A) of 8, Kennedy Bldg, Fl. 2, Triq San Girgor, Gwardamanġa, Tal-Pietà.

By the present, Princess Holdings Limited (C72528) of Sharay, Triq il-Fraxxnu, St Julian's, solicits you so that immediately you pay the amount of €7310 besides legal interest from the date of maturity of each bill of exchange till the date of effective payment, representing 17 bills of exchange, each one of value of €430 and matured on the 19th day of each month starting from January 2020 till May 2021 respectively (copy here attached and marked as Doc. A1-A7).

This judicial letter is being made in terms of Article 253(e) and 256(2) of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure, Cap. 12 of the Laws of Malta and thus the interpellant warns you that if within twenty days from the notification of this judicial letter you do not bring forward before this Court grave and valid reasons to oppose the execution of these bills of exchange, thus this credit will be rendered executive title and executive warrants will be issued against you according to law.

So much so that you may know how to proceed and regulate yourself.

With costs

ALEXANDRA DEBATTISTA

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decree of the 23rd July, 2021, handed down by the Court of Magistrates (Malta) in the records of the judicial letter number 450/2021 in the names J. Zammit Limited vs Lisa Piccinino the following publication was ordered for the purpose of effecting service on the respondent Lisa Piccinino in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of Cap. 12.

In the Court of Magistrates (Malta)

To Lisa Piccinino (ID 26075M) of 126, Triq is-Sirk, Swieqi

By the present J. Zammit Limited (C37945) of Aries House, Triq l-Imdina, Ħaż-Żebbuġ, Malta, refers you to the bills of exchange signed and accepted by yourself numbered from number thirty one (31) to number fifty one (51) copies of which are hereby being attached together with this judicial letter, and this due to the fact that these bills of exchange should have been paid on the 28th day of every month and that is between the 28th of June of the year, 2019 and the 28th February of the year, 2021, respectively, have remained unpaid despite being due and even though such payment was requested on numerous occasions, is therefore requesting you that within two (2) days from being served with this judicial letter to proceed to pay the company the sum of €3,141.81 which sum represents the sum of the said bills of exchange, which bills of exchange were signed by yourself and remain to be unpaid.

The company informs you that if you fail to abide by the aforementioned it will proceed with the execution of the mentioned bills of exchange according to Article 253(e) of Cap. 12 of the Laws of Malta.

For all intents and purposes of law, be warned that in terms of Article 253(e) of Cap 12 of the Laws of Malta you have a right to present an application within twenty (20) days from the date of when you are served with this judicial letter to oppose the execution of the mentioned bills of exchange due to the reason that the signature on the bills of exchange is not yours or because of a grievous and valid reason.

For you to be guided accordingly.

With costs, including that of the present against you and with legal interest from the date of each respective bill of exchange till the date of effective payment.

This judicial letter is being sent to render the mentioned bills of exchange as enforceable in terms of Article 256(2) of Cap. 12 of the Laws of Malta.

ALEXANDRA DEBATTISTA

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decree of the 26th October, 2021, handed down by the Court of Magistrates (Malta) in the records of the judicial letter number 965/2021 in the names Zammit Finance plc vs Gina Borg the following publication was ordered for the purpose of effecting service on the respondent Gina Borg in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of Cap. 12.

In the Court of Magistrates (Malta)

To Gina Borg (ID 602064M) of 12, Casa Maria Dolores, Tul il-Kosta, St Paul's Bay

By the present Zammit Finance plc (C70870) of Aries House, Triq l-Imdina, Ħaż-Żebbuġ, Malta, solicits you so that immediately you pay the amount of €3,891.75 besides legal interest from the due date of each bill of exchange till the date of effective payment representing 15 bills of exchange each of value €259.45, which bills of exchange were due on the 5th day of each month from January, 2020 till March, 2021, respectively (copies here attached and marked as Doc. A1-Doc. A15).

This judicial letter is being made in terms of Article 253(e) and 256(2) of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure and thus the interpellant warns you that if within twenty day from the notification of this judicial letter you do not show this Court grave and valid reasons to oppose the execution of these bills of exchange, thus this credit will be rendered executive title and all the executive warrants will be issued against you according to law.

Soo much so that you may know how to proceed and regulate yourself and with costs against you.

ALEXANDRA DEBATTISTA

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decree of the 14th January, 2022, in the records of the judicial letter number 3764/2021, in the names Dr Rita Mifsud noe vs Elmo Insurance Limited et, the First Hall of the Civil Court ordered the following publication for the purpose of effecting service on the respondent Alfred Zahra in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of Cap. 12.

In the First Hall of the Civil Court

To Elmo Insurance Limited (C3500) of Triq Abate Rigord, Ta' Xbiex

   Alfred Zahra (ID 905451M) of 30 Samares Court Block B, Flat 2, Triq il-Ħgejjeg, St Paul's Bay

By means of this present, Advocate Dr Rita Mifsud (ID 472696M) as special mandatory of the absentee George Ronald Jack (holding English passport number 556501466), makes reference to the road accident which happened on the 30th December 2017 in Triq il-Qawra, St Paul's Bay, when the vehicle with registration number LCQ507 driven by the respondent Alfred Zahra and insured by the respondent company hit the applicant and because of this accident, the applicant suffered physical and material damages.

The applicant solicits you to come forward for the liquidation of damages caused to him because of the said accident and in default you are warned that further procedures will be taken against you without further notice.

This judicial letter is being sent in terms of article 2128 of Cap. 16.

With costs

So much for your own guidance.

Alexandra Debattista

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decree of the 30th September, 2021, in the records of the judicial letter number 509/2021, in the names Tera Labs Limited vs Satabank plc, the First Hall of the Civil Court ordered the following publication for the purpose of effecting service on the respondent Satabank plc in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of Cap. 12.

In the First Hall of the Civil Court

To Satabank plc (C66993) of 31/6, St Frederick Street, Valletta VLT 1471, Malta

By means of this present, the company Tera Labs Limited (C81144) of Central Business Centre, Room 1, Level 1, Suite 2, Triq l-Imdina, Ħaż-Żebbuġ, refer you to their bank accounts with the bank Satabank plc, which accounts hold the number MT43STBA19116000000001044906401 and MT72STBA19116000200050602816485 in which bank accounts there are the amounts of €66,893.80 and €16,463.50 deposited respectively and whilst it premise that you are refusing to pay the interpellant the money deposited as above mentioned, solicit you so that immediately and in any case by not later than four days from when you receive this letter you refund the interpellant the said money. In this regard, you have to refund the amount in question to the fiduciary company MGI Fiduciary Services Limited (C38710) who is authorised by the interpellant to receive the money in question for and on behalf of its interest. In default, the interpellant reserves to proceed against you according to law without further notice.

With costs and interest according to law till the date of effective payment.

So much for your own guidance.

Alexandra Debattista

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

It is hereby notified that the First Hall of Civil Courts by means of a decree given on the 26th August, 2021, in the records of the judicial letter number 2319/2021, in the names Mapfre Middlesea plc vs Roland Schembri et, ordered the following publication for the purpose of effecting service on the respondent Roland Schembri et, in terms of Article 187(3) of Cap. 12.

In the First Hall of the Civil Court

To: Roland Schembri

Jurgen Schembri of Luojo Fl 1, Triq Herbert Ganado, Tal-Pietà

By means of this judicial letter the company Mapfre Middlesea plc (C555) of Middlesea House, Triq San Publiju, Floriana FRN 1442, and whilst the interpellant company makes reference to the accident which occurred on the 28th September, 2019, in Triq il-Kbira, San Ġużepp, Ħamrun, between the vehicle with registration number EAH-779, property of Roland Schembri and driven by you Jurgen Schembri at the time of the accident and that with registration number KBV-824 is soliciting you so that within two days you come forward for the voluntary and amicable liquidation of damages suffered by the interpellant company in the amount of €8,500 as a result of the breach of the relative insurance policy whilst you Roland Schembri permitted Jurgen Schembri and that is a person under the influence of alcohol and not covered by the same policy to drive the vehicle with registration number EAH-779.

In default of abiding with this letter within the time given, further proceedings will be initiated against you according to law and this without further notice.

So much for your own guidance

With interest and costs of this present

Alexandra Debattista

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of an application filed in the Civil Court of Voluntary Jurisdiction Section, on the 11th January, 2022, Application number 47/2022, by Carmen Muscat whereby she requested that be declared open in her favour the Succession of her mother Carmela Vella, widow of Joseph Vella, daughter of the late Carmelo Saliba and Angela Saliba née Seichel, born in Żejtun, Malta, resided in Ħal Luqa, Malta and died in Ħal Luqa, Malta, on the 29th May, 2021, aged 85 and who held identity card number 844535M.

Wherefore, any person who believes to have an interest in the matter is hereby called upon to appear before the said Court and to bring forward his objections hereto by a minute to be filed within fifteen days from the posting of the banns and notices according to law.

Alexandra Debattista

For the Registrar, Civil Court and Tribunals

By means of an application filed in Civil Court of Voluntary Jurisdiction Section, on the 20th August, 2021, Application number 1397/2021, by Rita Galea and Rose Falzon, whereby following the application Crocefissa Abela, wife of John Mary Abela, daughter of the late Paul Muscat and Maria née Bonello, born in Ħad-Dingli on the 23rd August, 1936, aged 85, and holding identity card number 600236M, was interdicted from all the acts of the civil life by means of a decree given on the 11th October, 2021.

Alexandra Debattista

For the Registrar, Civil Court and Tribunals

By means of an application filed in Civil Court of Voluntary Jurisdiction Section, on the 12th August, 2021, Application number 1372/2021, by Joseph Attard et, whereby following the application Giuseppa Attard daughter of Andrea Mizzi and Rose Mizzi née Magro, born on the 7th March, 1936, and residing in Bormla, aged 85, and holding identity card number 21036G was interdicted from all the acts of the civil life by means of a decree given on the 28th October, 2021.

Alexandra Debattista

For the Registrar, Civil Court and Tribunals

By means of an application filed in Civil Court of Voluntary Jurisdiction Section, on the 24th August, 2021, Application number 1411/2021, by Ruth Laferla and Deborah Zarb, whereby following the application Margherita Laferla, widow, daughter of Joseph Borg and Josephine née Pulis, born in Birkirkara on the 5th November, 1945, aged 75, and holding identity card number 934145M was interdicted from all the acts of the civil life by means of a decree given on the 4th November, 2021.

Alexandra Debattista

For the Registrar, Civil Court and Tribunals

Banns for Curators

Republic of Malta

To the Marshall of the Court

By means of a decree given by this Court on the 6th October, 2021, following a request by Robert John Ducker et it was ordered that deputy curators be chosen to represent the unknown direct emphyteutical owners in the acts of the schedule of deposit number 1817/2021 in the names Robert John Ducker et vs Deputy Curators and in the other relative and subsequent acts.

By means of a schedule of deposit and concurrent redemption of groundrent filed in the First Hall of the Civil Court on the 29th September, 2021, in the names Robert John Ducker (ID 623882M), son of Robert John u Sylvana née Attard, born in Tal-Pietà on the 18th November, 1982, and residing in Mosta; Mandy Ducker Camilleri (ID 443497M), wife of Robert John Ducker, daughter of Albert Camilleri and Nathalie née Borg, born in Melbourne, Australia, on the 15th March, 1982, and residing in Mosta; Mark Briffa (ID 569479M) son of Carmelo and Carmela née Sciberrras, born in Ħ'Attard on the 7th December, 1979, and residing in Mosta; Amanda Jane Briffa (ID 131585M) wife of Mark Briffa, daughter of Andrew Trevers and Anna née Sammut, born in Tal-Pietà on the 6th February 1985 and residing in Mosta; Anthony Diacono (ID 500953M) son of Salvatore and Rita née Wirth, born in Tas-Sliema on the 18th July, 1953, and residing in Burmarrad; Karen Diacono (ID 291655M) wife of Anthony Diacono, daughter of Joseph Serge and Violet née Morgan, born in Tas-Sliema on the 19th April, 1955, and residing in Burmarrad; Colin Galea (ID 83169M) son of Spiridione and Beatrice née Vella born in Tas-Sliema on the 25th February, 1969, and residing in Żejtun and Paul Pace (ID 126164M) son of Emmanuel and Carmen née Schembri born in Gwardamanġa on the 26th February, 1964, for and on behalf of the Malta Union of Midwives and Nurses, known also as M.U.M.N. registered with the authorities as Union 242 with registered address number 1, Tower Apartments, Triq tas-Sisla, Birkirkara vs Deputy Curators to represent the unknown direct emphyeutical owners, the applicants Robert John Ducker et respectfully submitted:

That the applicants Robert John Ducker and Mandy Ducker are the owners of the apartment internally marked as number 1 in the elevated ground floor level, forming part of a block without official number and known with the name Les Lapins, block of four apartments known as block B in Vjal l-Indipendenza, Mosta, subject to the annual and perpetual groundrent of about €1.72 as part of the global annual and perpetual groundrent of €47.87 and this as results in the attached contract in the records of Notary Doctor Bartolomeo Micallef dated 30th July, 2008 (Doc. A);

That the applicants Mark Briffa and Amanda Jane Briffa are the owners of the apartment internally marked as number 2, which is found at the second floor and forming part of a block without official number and without name, but known with the letter B, that on its part forms part of the building complex without number and holds the name Les Lapins Court in Vjal l-Indipendenza, Mosta. That the apartment is subject to about €1.72 as its portion of the global annual and perpetual groundrent of €47.87 imposed on all the land on which the said block is built and payable every year in arrears on the 28th May of each year, and this as results from the attached contract in the records of Notary Doctor Malcolm Licari dated 15th September 2008 (Doc. B);

That the applicant Anthony Diacono and Karen Diacono are the owners of the apartment internally marked as number 4 which is found at the fourth floor and forming part of the block without number and without name, but known as Block B, that on its part it forms part of the building complex without number but holds the name Les Lapins Court in Vjal l-Indipendenza, Mosta. That the apartment is subject to about €1.73 as its share of the global annual and perpetual groundrent of €47.87 imposed on all the land on which the said block is built and payable every year in arrears, on the 28th May of each year and this as results from the attached contract in the records of Notary Doctor Robert John Muscat dated 24th September, 2008 (Doc. C);

That the applicant Malta Union of Midwives and Nursers, known also as M.U.M.N. is the owner of the apartment internally marked as number 3 on the third level floor and forming part of the block without number and without name, but known as Block B, that on its part forms part of the building complex without number and holds the name as Les Lapins Court in Vjal l-Indipendenza, Mosta. That the apartment is subject to about €1.72 equivalent to Lm0.74 as its share from the global annual and perpetual groundrent of €47.87 equivalent to Lm20.55 imposed on all the land on which the said block is built and payable every year in arrears, on the 28th May of each year and this as results from the attached contract in the acts of Notary Doctor Robert John Muscat dated 27th June, 2008, Doc. D;

That the direct empheutical owners are not known by the applicants and this notwithstanding that they tried to establish who they are;

That the spouses Robert John Ducker and Mandy Ducker wish to avail themselves from the option given to them by means of Article 1501 of Cap. 16 and redeem the groundrent;

That the amount of €1.72 capitalised at the rate of 5% amounts to €34.40;

That they are in arrears for the last thirteen (13) years in the payment of the groundrent which amounts to €22.36;

That the spouses Mark Briffa and Amanda Jane Briffa wish to avail themselves of the option given to them by means of Article 1501 of Cap. 16 and redeem the groundrent;

That the amount of €1.72 capitalised at the rate of 5% amounts to €34.40;

That they are in arrears for the last thirteen (13) years in the payment of the groundrent which amounts to €22.36;

That the spouses Anthony Diacono and Karen Diacono wish to avail themselves of the option given to them by means of Article 1501 of Cap. 16 and redeem the groundrent;

That the amount of €1.73 capitalised at the reate of 5% amounts to €34.60;

That they are in arrears for the last thirteen (13) years in the payment of the groundrent which amounts to €22.49;

That the applicants Colin Galea and Paul Pace for and on behalf of M.U.M.N. wish to avail themselves of the option given to them by means of Article 1501 of Cap. 16 and redeem the groundrent;

That the amount of €1.72 capitalised at the reate of 5% amounts to €34.40;

That they are in arrears for the last thirteen (13) years in the payment of the groundrent which amounts to €22.36.

Thus the applicants are humbly calling upon this Honourable Court and under its authority are depositing the amount of €137.80 the price of redemption of the groundrent and the arrears of €89.39 that amounts to a total of €227.19 so that these amounts are withdrawn by the respondents after leaving the relative receipt according to law.

Applicants: Robert John Ducker u Mandy Ducker Camilleri,Flat 1, Les Lapins Court, Blokk B, Vjal l-Indipendenza, Mosta

Mark Briffa u Amanda Jane Briffa, Flat 2, Les Lapins Court, Blokk B, Vjal l-Indipendenza, Mosta.

Anthony Diacono u Karen Diacono, Flat 4, Les Lapins Court, Blokk B, Vjal l-Indipendenza, Mosta

Malta Union of Midwives and Nurses (M.U.M.N.) 1, Tower Apartments, Triq tas-Sisla, Birkirkara

Notification: Director Public Registry, Triq id-Dejqa, Valletta

Registrar of Lands, 1 Casa Bolino, Triq il-Punenet, Valletta

Deputy Curators, Law Courts, Valletta

  You are therefore ordered to affix an official copy of these banns at the entrance of this Superior Court and to summon whosoever wishes to act as curator to appear before this registry within six days and by means of a minute to submit a declaration that he wishes so to act.

You are also ordered to inform each one that if he fails to make this declaration within the stipulated time, the Court will proceed to the selection of Curators of Office.

And after so acting or if you should encounter any difficulty in the execution of these banns, you are to inform forthwith this Court.

Given by the Civil Court First Hall, above mentioned, with the witness of the Hon. Mr Justice Robert G. Mangion. LLD, Doctor of Laws.

Alexandra Debattista

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

Banns for Curators

Republic of Malta

To the Marshall of the Court

By means of a decree given by this Court on the 30th August, 2021, following a request by Fabian Francica et it was ordered that deputy curators be chosen to represent the unknown owners in the acts of the schedule of deposit number 1562/2021 in the names Fabian Francica et vs Deputy Curators and in the other relative and subsequent acts.

By means of a schedule of deposit and concurrent redemption of groundrent filed in the First Hall of the Civil Court on the 19th August, 2021, in the names Fabian Francica (ID 424585M) and Beverly Mizzi (ID 314984M) vs deputy curators to represent the unknown owners of the emphyteusis, the applicants Fabian Francica (ID 424585M) and Beverly Mizzi (ID 314984M) respectfully submitted:

That the applicants are the owners of the premises 90, Triq ir-Rihan, Fgura, as shown from the attached contract marked as FF1 which contract was published by Notary Doctor Andre Farrugia;

That according to document FF1 the applicants are obliged to pay the amount of €66.39 representing the annual and perpetual groundrent;

That the amount mentioned is being rounded up to €67;

It is shown that the last payment was made in 2011 and thus 10 years of groundrent are due, that in terms of article 2156 of Cap. 16 of the Laws of Malta the payment of ground-rent is subject to a period of five years prescription;

That in view of the above the applicants are obliged to pay the amount of €335 representing the groundrent due for the year 2017 till 2021;

That together with this schedule of deposit, the applicants are filing an application for the nomination of deputy curators and this in view that the owner of the emphyteusis is unknown.

Thus, the applicants to safeguard their interest and to exonerate themselves from any responsability are humbly calling upon this Honourable Court and under its authority are depositing the amount of €335 so that this amount is withdrawn by the respondents after leaving the relative receipt according to law.

Applicants: 90, Triq ir-Rihan, Fgura

Notification: 1. Director Public Registry, Triq id-Dejqa, Valletta

Registrar of Lands, 1 Casa Bolino, Triq il-Punent, Valletta

Deputy Curators, Law Courts, Valletta

You are therefore ordered to affix an official copy of these banns at the entrance of this Superior Court and to summon whosoever wishes to act as curator to appear before this registry within six days and by means of a minute to submit a declaration that he wishes so to act.

You are also ordered to inform each one that if he fails to make this declaration within the stipulated time, the Court will proceed to the selection of Curators of Office.

And after so acting or if you should encounter any difficulty in the execution of these banns, you are to inform forthwith this Court.

Given by the Civil Court First Hall, above mentioned, with the witness of the Hon. Mr Justice Ian Spiteri Bailey, LLD, Doctor of Laws.

Alexandra Debattista

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decree of the 18th January, 2022, in the records of the banns for curators in the acts of judicial letter number 2363/2021, in the names Fair View Property Limited (C37844) vs Monarch Holdings Limited (C12484) et, the First Hall of the Civil Court ordered the following publication for the purpose of effecting service on Maria Caruana in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of Cap. 12.

Banns for Curators

Republic of Malta

To the Marshall of the Court

By means of a decree given by this Court on the 3rd August, 2021, following a request by Fair View Property Limited it was ordered that deputy curators be chosen to represent the vacant inheritance of Adrian Busietta in the acts of the judicial letter number 2363/2021 in the names Fair View Property Limited vs Monarch Holdings Limited et vs Deputy Curators and in the other relative and subsequent acts.

By means of a judicial letter filed in the First Hall of the Civil Courts on the 9th June, 2021, by Fair View Property Limited (C 37844) of 1A, Triq Wied Għomor, San Julian's, against Monarch Holdings Limited (C12484) of 13-19, St Albert Street, Gzira GZR 1157, and Deputy Curators to represent the vacant inheritance of Adrian Busietta and John Ripard & Son Limited (C40) of 22 Lascaris Wharf, Valleta, and Tanya Chetcuti (English passport number 702840179) of 608, Villa Esmeralda, Busietta Gardens, Triq il-Fortizza, Swieqi, the interpellant solicits you so that within a maximum period of fifteen (15) days from the notification of this present judicial act, you pay the amount of €12,578.62 representing the payment of the groundrent due for the period from the 1st January, 2010 till 31st December, 2021, for the apartment with number 608, Villa Esmeralda in Busietta Gardens, in Madliena, limits of Swieqi.

You are warned that in default of payment of the said amount within the time given, the interpellant company will file all the judicial proceedings against you including the termination of the emphyteutical concession and for your eviction or of any one of you from the premises above mentioned without further notice.

This letter is being filed inter alia for all the purposes of Article 1519 of the Civil Code (Cap. 16 of the Laws of Malta) and without prejudice to any other arrears that may be due by you or any one of you.

So much so that you know how to regulate yourselves in a timely manner.

With costs

Notify: Maria Caruana, Palazzo Busietta limiti tal-Wardija, St Paul's Bay

You are therefore ordered to affix an official copy of these banns at the entrance of this Superior Court and to summon whosoever wishes to act as curator to appear before this registry within six days and by means of a minute to submit a declaration that he wishes so to act.

You are also ordered to inform each one that if he fails to make this declaration within the stipulated time, the Court will proceed to the selection of Curators of Office.

And after so acting or if you should encounter any difficulty in the execution of these bann, you are to inform forthwith this Court.

Given by the Civil Court First Hall, above mentioned, with the witness of the Hon. Mr Justice Grazio Mercieca, LLD, Doctor of Laws.

Notification: Maria Caruana, Palazzo Busietta, limits of Wardija, St Paul's Bay

Alexandra Debattista

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By a decree of the Consumer Claims Tribunal of 4th November, 2021, the publication of the following extract was ordered for the purpose of service in terms of Article 187(3) of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12).

Godfrey Grech and Doreen Grech of 14, Edelweiss, Apt 1, Triq San Ġlormu, Buġibba, filed a Claim on the 16th November, 2020, whereby they asked the Tribunal to condemn Ian Paul Galea of 12, Windsor, Flat 4, Triq Ananija, St Paul's Bay SPB 0001, to pay the plaintiffs the sum of €2500, which amount is due to the plaintiffs.

The case (CCT number 51/2021) is deferred on the 17th March, 2022, at 12.45 p.m.

Alexandra Debattista

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By a decree of the Court of Magistrates (Malta) of the 25th August, 2021, the publication of the following extract was ordered for the purpose of service in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12).

Pierre Galea Musù (KI 482567M) and David J, Pace (ID 491562M) as partners for and on behalf of the civil company UHY Pace, Galea Musù & Co. (VAT number MT18220013) of UHY Malta, Triq Pantar, Ħal Lija LJA 2021, filed a claim on the 1st February, 2021, whereby they asked the Court to condemn Valletta Freight Services Limited (C3478) of Pinto House, 95, 99, 103, Xatt l-Għassara tal-Għeneb, Marsa HMR 12, to pay the plaintiffs nomine the sum of €8,850 which amount is due to the plaintiffs nomine.

With costs and interests

The case (Notice Number 25/2021MLF) is deferred to the 23rd February, 2022, at 10.30 a.m.

Alexandra Debattista

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

Banns for Curators

Republic of Malta

To the Marshall of the Court

By means of a decree given by this Court on the 23rd August, 2021, following a request by Emanuele Cutajar et it was ordered that deputy curators be chosen to represent the the unknown direct owners in the acts of the schedule of deposit number 1506/2021 in the names Emanuele Cutajar et vs Deputy Curators and in the other relative and subsequent acts.

By means of a schedule of deposit and concurrent redemption of groundrent filed in the First Hall of the Civil Court on the 11th August, 2021, in the names Emanuele Cutajar, pensioner, son of the late Anthony Cutajar and Frangiska Cutajar née Bonnici, born in Żurrieq on the 22nd January, 1950 (ID 133250M) and Josephine Cutajar, wife of Emanuele Cutajar, housewife, daughter of the late Michele Incorvaja and Madalena Incorvaja née Gravina, born on the 22nd August, 1953 (ID 594353M) spouses Cutajar residing at 9 previously 11A, Triq San Franġisk, Marsaxlokk, vs deputy curators to represent the unknown direct owners, the applicants Emanuele Cutajar (ID 133250M) and Josephine Cutajar (ID 594353M), spouses Cutajar and residing at 9 previously 11A, Triq San Frangisk, Marsaxlokk respectfully submitted:

That the applicants are the owners of the premises 9 previously 11A Triq San Franġisk, Marsaxlokk, which premises were acquired from Michele Incorvaja by means of a contract in the records of Notary Joseph Felix Abela dated 10th November, 1981 (Doc. A) and which premises are shown by means of document B;

That originally the premises were acquired by Michele Incorvaja by means of a deed of division in the records of Notary Joseph Felix Abela dated 23rd April, 1955, were Michele Incorvaja acquired the premises in question subject to the annual and perpetual groundrent of 9 pence (Doc. C);

That although the searches were made the emhyteutical session of the original premises cannot be traced (Doc D);

That together with this schedule of deposit an application for the nomination of deputy curators to represent the owner of the original emphyteusis is made;

That the applicants want to redeem the groundrent regarding the said premises and thus they are availing themselves from the option given to them from Cap. 16 of the Laws of Malta article 1501;

That the annual and perpetual groundrent of 9 pence is equivalent to Lm0.03 and €0.07 capitalised with the rate of 5% ammount to €1.40;

That the annual and perpetual groundrent for these last 6 years amounts to €8.40;

Thus the applicants are humbly calling upon this Honourable Court and under its authority are depositing the amount of €9.80 representing the annual and perpetual groundrent capitalisewd at the rate of 5% regarding the premises above mentioned and also the amont of groundrent due for the last 6 years, which amount will be freely withdrawn by the direct dominium owners according to those directions that this Honourable Court deems fit to give.

Applicants: 9 previously 11A, Triq San Franġisk, Marsaxlokk

Notification: Director of Public Registry, Triq id-Dejqa, Valletta

Registrar of Lands, 116, Triq il-Punent, Valletta

Deputy Curators        

  You are therefore ordered to affix an official copy of these banns at the entrance of this Superior Court and to summon whosoever wishes to act as curator to appear before this registry within six days and by means of a minute to submit a declaration that he wishes so to act.

You are also ordered to inform each one that if he fails to make this declaration within the stipulated time, the Court will proceed to the selection of curators of office.

And after so acting or if you should encounter any difficulty in the execution of these banns, you are to inform forthwith this Court.

Given by the Civil Court First Hall, above mentioned, with the witness of the Hon. Mr Justice Christian Falzon Scerri, BA, LLD, Dip. Trib. Eccles. Melit., Doctor of Laws.

Alexandra Debattista

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

IT is hereby notified that in virtue of a decree dated 31st of January, 2022, given by the Court of Magistrates (Gozo) in its Voluntary Jurisdiction, Decree number 127/2021(BS), the Court has ordered that  Carmen Vincensa Micallef, pensioner, born in Australia and resides in San Lawrenz, Gozo (identity card number 0231402L) has been nominated as a curator of the interdicted Lorenzo known as Lawrence Piscopo, pensioner, son of the late Michel'Angelo Piscopo and Carmela née Cauchi,  born and used to reside in San Lawrenz, Gozo (identity card number 7234G) and this in substitution of the precedent curator Dr Jonathan Mintoff holder of identity card number 9495M.

Volontary Jurisdiction

Dorianne Cordina

For Registrar, Courts  and Tribunals (Gozo)

DKR 63/2006 – CANCELLATION OF A FREEZING ORDER

IT IS BEING NOTIFIED that by a decree dated 17th January, 2022, given by the Criminal Court of Appeal  (Madam Justice Dr. Edwina Grima, LLD) following an application filed by Joseph Zerafa on the 24th November, 2021, and following the execution of judgement given by the Criminal Court (Mr Justice Dr Joseph Galea Debono, LLD) on the 28th January, 2010, Bill of Indictment number 31/2007, in the case:

The Republic of  Malta

Versus:

JOSEPH ZERAFA, 46 years, son of Gaetano and Josephine nee' Caruana, born in Żejtun Malta on the 20th May 1976, residing at number 100, 'Holy Redeemer', Triq ix-Xerriek, Marsaxlokk, Malta, and holder of Maltese identity card  bearing number 290475M;

CHARLES JOSEPH FRANCIS CAMILLERI;

AND

ĊENSINA ZERAFA

THE COURT ORDERED THE CANCELLATION of the freezing order of all the assets of the said Joseph Zerafa which order was given by the Court of Magistrates (Malta) as a Court of Criminal Inquiry on the 16th May, 2006 which was duly published in the Government Gazette of the 2nd June, 2006.

This notice is being published according to section 22A (2)(b)(6) of the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance, Chapter 101 of the Laws of Malta.

Marvic Psaila

Deputy Registrar, Criminal Courts and Tribunals