Left arrow Go Back

Court Notices published in Govt. Gazette no. 20,482 of 11th September 2020

Date Icon 11/09/2020

Notice 1170

1170

ARB/C030/2020 – NEW FREEZING ORDER

IT IS BEING NOTIFIED that by a decree dated 6th September, 2020, given by the Court of Magistrates (Malta) as a Court of Criminal Inquiry (Magistrate Dr Natasha Galea Sciberras, LLD). Compilation number 438/2020, in the case:

The Police

(Inspector Justine Grech)

(Inspector Mark Mercieca)

Versus

MICHAEL JOHN MULIETT, pizza chef, 50 years, son of the late Louis and Carmen née Kerr, born in Tal-Pietà, Malta, on the 14th August, 1970, residing at 114, Flat 2, Triq Biċċieni, Sqaq nru.5, Ħaż-Żabbar, and holder of Maltese identity card bearing number 413270M.

ORDERED the attachment in the hands of third parties in general of all moneys and other movable or immovable property due to or pertaining or belonging to MICHAEL JOHN MULIETT and prohibits the said accused from transferring, pledging, hypothecating or otherwise disposing of any movable or immovable property, and this according to Section 22A of the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance, Cap. 101 of the Laws of Malta and Section 23A of the Criminal Code, Cap. 9 of the Laws of Malta.

Any person who acts in contravention of the court order mentioned in Section 22A and Section 23A referred to above shall be guilty of an offence and shall on conviction be liable to a fine (multa) not exceeding eleven thousand and six hundred and forty-six euro and eighty-seven cents (€11,646.87), or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding twelve months, or to both such fine and imprisonment.

Any transfer or other disposal of any property made in contravention of the said Court order shall be null and without effect at law.

The Director, Asset Recovery Bureau

09 September 2020

Notice 1171

1171

Notice Registry of the Civil Court, First Hall

Whereas Abdulrahman Nassar Alagil filed an application under oath (No. 785/20/JVC) demanding the correction of the Act of Public Registry of Albandari Alagil No. 2407/2017 in the Public Registry.

Whosoever may have an interest therein, and wishes to oppose that demand, is hereby called upon to do so, by means of a note to be filed in the Registry of these Courts, within fifteen days from the day of the publication of this present notice in the Government Gazette.

Those who, within the aforesaid time, shall have filed such note, shall be notified by the service of a copy of the said application under oath, of the day which will be appointed for the hearing of the case.

By order of the Court,

KAREN FALZON

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

Notice 1172

1172

Notice Registry of the Civil Court, First Hall

Whereas Abdulrahman Alagil filed an application under oath (No. 768/20/JVC) demanding the correction of the Act of Public Registry No. 2406/2017 in the Public Registry.

Whosoever may have an interest therein, and wishes to oppose that demand, is hereby called upon to do so, by means of a note to be filed in the Registry of these Courts, within fifteen days from the day of the publication of this present notice in the Government Gazette.

Those who, within the aforesaid time, shall have filed such note, shall be notified by the service of a copy of the said application under oath, of the day which will be appointed for the hearing of the case.

By order of the Court,

KAREN FALZON

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

Notice 1173

1173

Notice Registry of the Civil Court, First Hall

Whereas Abdulrahman Nassar Alagil filed an application under oath (No. 784/20/JVC) demanding the correction of the Act of Public Registry of Nouf Alagil No. 2410/2017 in the Public Registry.

Whosoever may have an interest therein, and wishes to oppose that demand, is hereby called upon to do so, by means of a note to be filed in the Registry of these Courts, within fifteen days from the day of the publication of this present notice in the Government Gazette.

Those who, within the aforesaid time, shall have filed such note, shall be notified by the service of a copy of the said application under oath, of the day which will be appointed for the hearing of the case.

By order of the Court,

KAREN FALZON

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

Notice 1174

1174

By means of a decree given on the 5th August, 2020, in the records of the judicial letter number 179/2020, in the names Mapfre Middlesea plc vs Alessandro Orazio Giovanni Pappalardo et, the Courts of Magistrates(Malta), ordered the following publication for the purpose of effecting service on the respondent Alessandro Orazio Giovanni Pappalardo, in terms of Article 187(3) of Chapter 12 of the Laws of  Malta.

In the Courts of Magistrates (Malta)

To

1. Alessandro Orazio Giovanni Pappalardo (ID 168324A) of 27, Astra, Flat 1, Triq is-Sliem, Marsaskala

2. Elmo Insurance Limited

By means of the present Mapfre Middlesea plc (C5553) of Middlesea House, Floriana as subrogated  by policy and at law in the rights of its insured Raymond Schembri (ID 407562M) of  74, Carmlor, Triq San Ġużepp, Birżebbuġa and the same Raymond Schembri, solicits you so that within five days from the date of notification of this judicial letter you come forward to assume your responsabilities for the road accident which occured on the 11th November, 2018, in Triq San Ġużepp, Birżebbuġa, between the vehicle with registration number LQZ284 driven by you Alessandro Pappalardo and insured with Elmo Insurance Limited and the vehicle with registration number UVE112  driven by Lara Marie Schembri and insured by the applicant MAPFRE Middlesea plc, and also to pay the total amount of €535.21 representing the damages incurred by the interpellant.

The interpellant submits that you are solely responsabile for the said accident and this because of recklessness, negligence, lack of skill and lack of observation of the traffic regulations on your part or any one of you.

This letter is being sent for the effects and purposes of law especially in terms of Chapter 104 of the Laws of Malta and serving to interupts the prescription in terms of article 2128 of Chapter 16 of the Laws of Malta.

In default of abiding with that requested, the applicants will have no alternative but to take further legal procedures against you according to law.

With costs of this present and legal interest till the date of effective payment.

ALEXANDRA DEBATTISTA

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

04 September 2020

Notice 1175

1175

Notice Registry of the Civil Court, First Hall

Whereas Monera Alsudairy filed an application under oath (No. 770/20/JVC) demanding the correction of the Act of Public Registry of Albandari Alagil No. 2405/2017 in the Public Registry.

Whosoever may have an interest therein, and wishes to oppose that demand, is hereby called upon to do so, by means of a note to be filed in the Registry of these Courts, within fifteen days from the day of the publication of this present notice in the Government Gazette.

Those who, within the aforesaid time, shall have filed such note, shall be notified by the service of a copy of the said application under oath, of the day which will be appointed for the hearing of the case.

By order of the Court,

KAREN FALZON

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

Notice 1176

1176

Notice Registry of the Civil Court, First Hall

Whereas Norah Alagil filed an application under oath (No. 769/20/JVC) demanding the the correction of the Act of Public Registry No. 1964/2017 in the Public Registry.

Whosoever may have an interest therein, and wishes to oppose that demand, is hereby called upon to do so, by means of a note to be filed in the Registry of these Courts, within fifteen days from the day of the publication of this present notice in the Government Gazette.

Those who, within the aforesaid time, shall have filed such note, shall be notified by the service of a copy of the said application under oath, of the day which will be appointed for the hearing of the case.

By order of the Court,

KAREN FALZON

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

Notice 1177

1177

By means of a decree given by the Civil Court (Family Section) on the 24th August, 2020, following an application of Dr Ivan Sammut (ID 141578M) in the names Dr Ivan Sammut vs Graziella Sammut, Application Number 163/2017 AL, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the respondent Graziella Sammut, in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of Cap. 12.

By means of an Application filed in the Civil Court (Family Section), Application Number 163/2017 AL, in the names Dr Ivan Sammut vs Graziella Sammut, on the 30th July, 2020, the applicant Dr Ivan Sammut (ID 141578M) asked that there be fixed a sitting regarding the interests of the minor and respectfully pleaded:

That on the 1st August, 2019, the Honourable Court held a sitting specifically to address the problem of the children of the spouses Sammut and appointed experts to help the parties and the Court to establish if there is parental alienation and how reunification can take place between the father and the children.

That after a year we arrived so that in May 2020, the experts appointed by this Honourable Court confirmed that this is a case of between moderate to severe alienation.

That as the mental health of the children is getting worse and now we have a situation which is not clear what is the next step where the experts are asking for a direction of the Courts and the Courts on the 1st August, 2019, asked for a direction of the experts, the situation needs to be resolved urgently.

Thus the applicant is asking this Honourable Court:

1. That there be fixed a special sitting like that of the 1st August, 2019, specifically regarding the interests of the children,

and this under any provision that this Honourable Court deems fit and opportune.

Notify respondent: 79, El Shaddai, Triq il-Ħelsien, Ħal Qormi QRM 2907

ADV. FRANK PORTELLI, LLD

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

07 September 2020

Notice 1178

1178

By means of a decree given by the Civil Court (Family Section) on the 24th August, 2020, following an application of Dr Ivan Sammut (ID 141578M) in the names Dr Ivan Sammut vs Graziella Sammut, Application Number 163/2017, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the respondent Graziella Sammut, in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of Cap. 12.

By means of an Application filed in the Civil Court (Family Section), Application Number 163/2017 AL, in the names Dr Ivan Sammut vs Graziella Sammut, on the 4th August, 2020, the applicant Dr Ivan Sammut (ID 141578M) respectfully pleaded:

That the applicant notes that the two decrees of this HonourableCourt of the 31st July, 2020, whereby direction from the experts is being demanded and satisfaction is shown that things are proceeding well.

That because the process of the experts' opinion takes time and time in this case is not a luxury this application is being filed so that requests which are purely short-term in the interest of … omissis … be made.

1. Context

… omissis …

2. The Law of Malta

That despite that in Malta we do not have at present a specialised law which directly relates to parental alienation there are various other laws and jurisprudence which are to guide Maltese Courts as what is to happen in this case.

3. Conclusion - The supreme interest of … omissis …

That in the context that in the near future due to other pending applications this Honourable Court shall be deciding as to other long-term measures in order to address parental alienation and in the context that any process of reunification shall take a lot of time it is important that short-term measures be taken, so that at least no further damage occurs and that there be given a chance that there be a relationship between … omissis … and their father.

Thus the applicant is asking this Honourable Court:

1. To order the respondent to pass to the applicant by electronic means not less than ten 10 photos of … omissis … which were taken between 2018 and 2020.

2. Supervised  access starts to take place with … omissis … once weekly immediately as herein asked.

… omissis …

5. Authorise the applicant in consultation with the current experts or the experts directly always if necessary to find another expert with experience and specialisation in the sphere of parental alienation that can work together with Dr Ellul and Dr Bezzina.

And uphold the other demands in the application, and this under any provision that this Honourabl Court deems fit and opportune.

Notify respondent: 79, El Shaddai, Triq il-Ħelsien, Ħal Qormi QRM 2907

ADV. FRANK PORTELLI, LLD

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

07 September 2020

Notice 1179

1179

By means of a decree given by the Civil Court (Family Section) on the 24th August, 2020, following an application of Dr Ivan Sammut (ID 141578M) in the names Dr Ivan Sammut vs Graziella Sammut, Application Number 163/2017, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the respondent Graziella Sammut, in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of Cap. 12.

By means of an Application filed in the Civil Court (Family Section), Application Number 163/2017 AL, in the names Dr Ivan Sammut vs Graziella Sammut, on the 4th August, 2020, the applicant Dr Ivan Sammut (ID 141578M) respectfully pleaded:

That the applicant notes that the two decree of this Honourable Court on the 31st July, 2020, whereby direction from the experts is being asked and shows satisfaction that things are moving and makes reference to the application regarding … omissis …, filed  at the same time with this application.

… omissis …

That in the context of that brought foward in the application in the near future this Honourable Court shall be deciding as regards long-term measures to address parental alienation and in the context that any process of reunification shall take a lot of time it is important that short-term measures be taken so that at least no further damage is caused and that there be given a chance that there be a relationship between … omissis … and their father always in their interest.

Thus the applicant is asking this Hopnourable Court:

1. To order the respondent to pass by electronic means to the applicant not less than 10 photos of … omissis … which were taken between 2019 and 2020.

2. Order when access is held in Appoġġ, the respondent is not to bring the minors and leave them outside in the street, pretending that they do not want to enter.

3. Authorise the Appoġġ to determine the modality of the handover and authorise them so that if it is necessary they call for the said minors from their home.

And uphold the other demands in this application amongst which that this application be notified to Dr Ellul and Dr Bezzina for the purposes of the demands applicable.

Saving every provision that this Honourable Court deems fit and opportune.

Notify respondent: 79, El Shaddai, Triq il-Ħelsien, Ħal Qormi QRM 2907

ADV. FRANK PORTELLI, LLD

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

07 September 2020

Notice 1180

1180

By means of a decree of the 5th June, 2020, of the Rent Regulation Board, in the records of the Application in the names Frank Borg et vs Lea Radivogcevic Galea, Application number 139/2019SG, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of effecting service on the respondent Lea Radivogcevic Galea in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12)

By means of an application in the names Frank Borg (ID 37056M), John Mary Borg (ID 875754M), Joseph Borg (ID 213662M) and Martin Borg (ID 0609563M) vs Lea Radivogcevic Galea filed before the Rent Regulation Board on the 20th June, 2019, the applicants Frank Borg (ID 37056M), John Mary Borg (ID 875754M), Joseph Borg (ID 213662M) and Martin Borg (ID 0609563M) submitted with respect whilst Frank Borg confirmed on oath:

That they lease the property in Saint John Street bearing the name “Holy Family" and also the garage which is found in Gallu Street with the name “Husky" in Fgura to the respondent at a rent of €256 by means of an agreement dated 30th August, 1965;

That the applicants learnt that the respondent carried out several structural alterations in the prperty and this without their consent and without a permit from the competent Authority;

The lease of the garage has expired since the 30th August, 1982, and during this lease the garage was used solely to park their private vehicle and this does not form part of the lease of their residential home, also leased also by the applicants, because this garage is situated in a different street from that of the respondent's residence;

Although the lease of the garage has not been renewed after the 1st June, 2010, in terms of Article 1531H(1) of Cap. 16, the respondent is not using this garage, it is full of clutter, and is currently completely neglected so much so that it is suffering damages;

The applicants declare that the respondent knows personally about the declared facts and so this law suit had to be made;

As far as the applicants know the respondent does not have any defences to bring against their demands and thus the Board is being requested to decide the request of the applicant in terms of Article 16A of Cap. 69 of the Laws of Malta so that it will be decided without proceeding to trial.

Thus the applicants request this Honourable Board to:

1. Decide this request in terms of Article 16A of Cap. 69 of the Laws of Malta so that it will be decided without proceeding to trial.

2. Orders the respondent to vacate from the property in Saint John Street holding the name “Holy Family" in Fgura and also the garage in Gallu Street with the name “Husky" in Fgura;

3. Return the keys of the property and of the garage within a short and peremptory time fixed to them by this Honourable Board;

4. Orders the applicants to resume the vacant possession of the same property and the garage according to law;

5. Fix the damages due to the applicants by the respondent because she retained the possession of the same garage without any valid title for the period from the 1st June, 2010, till the date of the effective release.

Reserving the right to any other action in favour of the applicants.

With costs

Applicants: Frank Borg, 27 Carmelini Court, Flat 3, Triq Dolmen, Marsaskala

Respondent: 71, Holy Family, Triq San Ġwann, Fgura

The application in the names Frank Borg et vs Lea Radivogcevic Galea, Application number 139/2019SG, has been postponed for hearing to the 28th September, 2020, at 11.20 a.m.

Alexandra Debattista

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

04 September 2020

Notice 1181

1181

By means of an application filed in the Civil Court of Voluntary Jurisdiction Section, on the 10th June 2020, Application number 566/2020, by Theresa Helen Gatt, whereby Alan Gatt, son of Albert and Theresa née Grima, born in Tal-Pietà on the 26th April, 1976, and residing at Jesmin Court, Flat 4, St Joseph Street, Tal-Pietà, and holding identity card number 239776M, was Incapacitated by means of a decree given on the 11th August, 2020, under the conditions therein mentioned.

Alexandra Debattista

For the Registrar, Civil Court and Tribunals

04 September 2020

Notice 1182

1182

It is hereby notified that by a decree dated the 1st of September, 2020, the Court of Magistrates (Gozo) in its Inferior Jurisdiction, ordered the publication of the extract reproduced hereunder for the purpose of service in terms of section 187(3) of the Code of Organization and Civil Procedure, and this with regard to respondent Rohit Lokesh Sood mentioned hereunder.

On the 3rd of June, 2020, Car Sharing Services Malta Limited (C 87864) of 2nd Floor, Kordin Industrial Estate, Paola, filed a Notice in the Court of Magistrates (Gozo), Inferior Jurisdiction, (Notice number 9/2020BS) against Rohit Lokesh Sood of Baron B, Flat 5, Triq Dun Karlu Galea, Rabat, Gozo, and asked the Court:

To condemn respondent to pay the sender company the sum which does not exceed the amount of fifteen thousand euro (€15,000) representing damages and loss of earnings suffered by the sender company consequent to the traffic accident which occurred on the 6th October, 2019, at Triq Selmun, Mellieħa, when Rohit Lokesh Sood were driving vehicle bearing registration number CSH 053 property of the sender company and which accident occurred solely as a result of carelessness, negligence and lack of observance of regulations from his part.

That for all intents and purposes the sender company declares that although the fact that the amount of damages and loss of earnings suffered consequent to the accident is more than the amount of fifteen thousand euro (€15,000), the sender company is limiting its claim for damages and loss of earnings to fifteen thousand euro (€15,000), being the maximum amount falling under this Honourable Court's competence.

With costs and legal interest from the date of filing of this act until the date of effective payment against the defendant, who is called upon to testify by reference to his oath.

And, should he fail to appear on the date and at the time mentioned below, the Court shall decide the case in terms of law.

The lawsuit is set for hearing for the 10th of November, 2020, at 10.45 a.m.

Maureen Xuereb

For the Registrar, Gozo Courts and Tribunals

09 September 2020

Notice 1183

1183

By means of a decree given, by the Civil Court (Family Section) on the 14th August, 2020, in the names Mario Zammit pro et noe (ID 0479968M) vs Rita Zammit (ID 0128268M) Sworn Application number 115/2016 AL, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the respondent Rita Zammit, in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of Cap. 12.

By means of an Application by Urgency, filed, in the Civil Court (Family Section) Application number 115/16 AL, in the names Mario Zammit pro et noe (ID 0479968M) vs Rita Zammit (ID 0128268M) on the 8th May, 2020, the applicant Mario Zammit (ID 0479968M) pro et noe asked this Honourable Court,

1. To order that the community of acquests between the parties be stopped in trerms of Article 55(1) of the Civil Code and uphold the other demands in the application.

Saving any other provision that this Honourable Court deems fit and oportune in the circumstances of the case.

Notify Respondent: 8, Maytime House, Gulielmu Lorenzi Street, Ħaż-Żebbuġ, Malta

Adv. Frank Portelli, LLD

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

09 September 2020

Notice 1184

1184

IT is hereby notified that in virtue of a decree dated 22nd of June of the year two thousand and twelve (2012) given by the Court of Magistrates (Gozo) in its Voluntary Jurisdiction, Decree number 28/2012, the Court has ordered that Sr. Antoinette Mizzi, employed at Dar iċ-Ċenaklu, daughter of the late Paul Mizzi and Maria née Cassar, born in Għarb, Gozo, and resides in 'Dar iċ-Ċenaklu', Anġlu Grima Street, Birkirkara (identity card number 39166G), has been nominated as curator of her interdicted brother Noel Mizzi, unemployed, son of Paul Mizzi and Maria née Cassar, born in Victoria, Gozo, and resides in 'Dar Arka', Għajnsielem (identity card number 17076G) and this in substitution of the precedent curator Maria Mizzi (deceased), pensioner, wife of the late Paul Mizzi, daughter of the late Salvu Cassar and Maria Antonia née Mercieca, born and resides in Għarb, Gozo (identity card number 4435G).

Dorianne Cordina

For Registrar, Courts and Tribunals (Gozo)

09 September 2020

Notice 1185

1185

By means of a decree given, by the Civil Court (Family Section) on the 14th August, 2020, following an application in the names Mario Zammit pro et noe (ID 0479968M) vs Rita Zammit (ID 0128268M) Sworn Application 115/2016 AL, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the respondent Rita Zammit, in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of Cap. 12.

By means of an application, presented, in the Civil Court (Family Section) Application number 115/2016 AL, in the names Mario Zammit pro et noe (ID 0479968M) vs Rita Zamit (ID 0128268M) on the 15th May, 2020, the applicant Mario Zammit (ID 0479968M) respectfully pleaded and asked this Honourable Court:

That the applicant is married to the respondent and presently they are passing through separation proceedings,

That when the interpellant left the matrimonial home he was constrained to rent an apartment in order that he live in it with the minor and the rent amounts to four hundred euro (€400) monthly,

That the financial position of the applicant changed radically from the date of the decree mentioned in this application, in such a manner that the same interpellant is in the impossibility to pay the rate of maintenance in the amount of four hundred euro (€400),

Thus in view of the above the interpellant humbly prays this Honourable Court,

1. To declare that the financial means of the applicant changed and the applicant is in the impossibility to pay the rate of maintenance in the amount of four hundred euro and consequently order the variation of the obligation on the part of the applicant to administer to the respondent the maintenance in favour of the two children  … omissis …  and  … omissis …

Notify Respondent; 8, 'Maytime', Triq Guliermo Lorenzi, Ħaż-Żebbuġ, Malta

Adv. Frank Portelli, LLD

For the Registrar,Civil Courts and Tribunals

09 September 2020

Notice 1186

1186

It is hereby notified that by a decree dated the 2nd of September, 2020, the Court of Magistrates (Gozo) in its Superior Jurisdiction Family Section, ordered the publication of the extract reproduced hereunder for the purpose of service in terms of section 187(3) of the Code of Organization and Civil Procedure, and this with regard to respondent Natalino Chetcuti mentioned hereunder.

On the 17th of October 2019 Rita Chetcuti of 31, Kampanjola, Triq il-Qastan, Marsalskala, Malta, filed a Sworn Application in the Court of Magistrates (Gozo), Superior Jurisdiction, Family Section (Sworn Application number 26/2019BS) against Natalino Chetcuti of Flat 2, Block E, Door A, Triq taċ-Ċawla, Rabat, Gozo, and respectfully submitted:

1. That the parties were married on the 6th of December of the year 1984;

2. That the parties had two children, who are today both major;

3. That both parties were legally separated by virtue of a Court Judgement dated 16th May of the year one thousand nine hundred and ninety seven (1997);

4. There is no hope that the parties reconcile since apart from the fact that they have been separated more that four years, they lead a separated and independent life;

5. That there are no pending issues between parties regarding maintenance;

6. That these facts meet all the criteria contemplated in Article 66B of Cap. 16 of the Laws of Malta and the parties have grounds for a divorce;

Applicant therefore respectfully requested this Honourable Court to:

1. Pronounce divorce, that is dissolution of marriage between the parties;

2. Orders the Registrar of Courts to notify the Director for the Public Registry within a specified term of its decision taken in terms of sub-article four (4) of article sixty six letter A (66A) of the Civil Code, Cap. 16 of the Laws of Malta.

With costs to be borne by the respondent who is being subpoenaed as from today.

The lawsuit is set for hearing for the 11th of November, 2020, at 9.00 a.m.

Superior Jurisdiction, Family Section

Maureen Xuereb

For the Registrar, Gozo Courts and Tribunals

09 September 2020

Notice 1187

1187

By decree given by the Civil Court, First Hall on the 3rd September, 2020, on the application of Caruana Paul (ID 289962M) et, Wednesday, 21st October, 2020, at eleven in the morning (11.00 a.m.) has been fixed for the Sale by Auction, to be held in Garage Number 26, Triq l-Isqof Emm. Galea, Żejtun, of the following items seized from the property of Marinov Dimitrov Konstantin (ID 72220A) et.

Vehicle of the make Vauxhall Vivaroli with Registration Number FCG 682

N.B. The said vehicle will be sold as described in the acts of judicial sale number 16/20

Gaetana Aquilina

For the Registrar of Civil Courts and Tribunals

09 September 2020

Notice 1188

1188

By means of a decree given, by the Civil Court (Family Section) on the 14th August 2020, in the names Mario Zammit pro et noe (ID 0479968M) vs Rita Zammit (ID 0128268M) Sworn Application Number 115/2016 AL, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the respondent Rita Zammit, in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of Cap. 12.

By means of an Application filed, in the Civil Court (Family Section) Application number 115/16 AL, in the names Mario Zammit pro et noe (ID 0479968M) vs Rita Zammit (ID 0128268M) on the 8th May 2020, the applicant Mario Zammit (ID 0479968M) pro et noe respectfully premised and asked :

1. That the applicant refers to the cause in the names premised in order that there be declared the personal separation between the parties;

2. That the parties together have an insurance policy with number 124-521 in the amount of euro 13,900 circa which is insured with the insurance company Global Capital,

5. That keeping in view the lack of agreement between the respondents, the interpellant had no other alternative but to seek the direction of this Honourable Court.

Thus the interpellant humbly asks this Honourable Court,

1. To order the insurance company Global Capital to divide the joint insurance policy in the names of Mario Zammit and Rita Zammit with number 124-521 which matured on the 24th March, 2020, and authorise the insurance company to assign the sum that matured to the parties in equal shares,

and this under any other provision that this Honourable Court deems fit and opportune in the circumstances,

Notify Respondent: 8, Maytime House, Triq Gulielmu Lorenzi, Ħaż-Żebbuġ

Adv. Frank Portelli, LLD

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

10 September 2020

Notice 1189

1189

By means of a decree of the 19th August, 2020, of the Rent Regulation Board, in the records of the Application in the names Joseph Micallef et vs David Vella, Application number 133/2020SG, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of effecting service on the respondent David Vella in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12)

By means of an application in the names Joseph Micallef (ID 325136M), Carmel Micallef (ID 546840M), Mary wife of Edmund Grech (ID 604138M), Rose wife of Gaetano Bugeja (ID 807543M), Victoria widow of Thomas Vella (ID 359945M), Theresa widow of Joseph Chetcuti (ID 508647M), Marcelle wife of Oliver Siracusa (ID 613149M), Maria Stella sive Maris wife of Aldo Borg (ID 392258M), Neil Borg (ID 299686M) and Brian Meli (ID 402866M) vs David Vella (ID 226355M) filed before the Rent Regulation Board on the 23rd July 2020, the applicants Joseph Micallef (ID 325136M) et request with respect and Maria Stella sive Maris wife of Aldo Borg (ID 392258M) confirms on oath in terms of Article 16A of Cap. 69 of the Laws of Malta so that this Honourable Board orders the respondent to appear before the Board on the day and time given by the same Board and in case the respondent is contumacious during that sitting, or otherwise if he fails to appear during the sitting and to show that he has a valid defence to make to rebut the demands of the applicants, the said Rent Regulation Board should:

1. Declare and decide that the respondent David Vella (ID 226355M) can no longer rely on the provisions of the Reletting of Urban Property Ordinance (Cap. 69) to remain in occupation of the premises 14, St Gregory Street, Tas-Sliema, property of the applicants;

2. Declare and decide that the respondent David Vella (ID 226355M) cannot remain in occupation of the premises 14, St Gregory Street, Tas-Sliema, because the lease was terminated ex lege in terms of Article 6 of the Maltese Constitution and Article 3 of the European Convention as it was declared null and without effect at law as it was entered into in terms of Reletting of Urban Property Ordinance (Cap. 69) which occupation violated the fundamental rights of the applicants as was decided by a judgement 125/2018AF in the names Joseph Micallef et vs Attorney General et finally decided on the 1st July, 2020, by the First Hall of the Civil Court (Costitutional Jurisdiction) and every day he remains in occupation of the premises, he is causing damages to the same applicants;

3. Condemn the respondent David Vella (ID 226355M) to vacate from the premises 14, St Gregory Street, Tas-Sliema, within a short and peremptory time that is fixed by this Board.

With costs against the respondent who is from now summoned so that reference to his oath be made and reserving any other action against the respondent Vella – and in addition, the acts of the case 125/2018AF in the names Joseph Micallef et vs Attorney General et that was finally decided by the First Hall of the Civil Court (Constitution Jurisdiction) on the 1st July, 2020, are to be attached to this case and any other evidence that is found in the aforementioned proceedings is to be considered as evidence in this case.

Applicant: Arcadia, Triq San Anard, Ħal Tarxien TXN 9018

Respondent : 14, St Gregory Street, Tas-Sliema

The application in the names Joseph Micallef et vs David Vella, Application number 133/2020SG, has been postponed for hearing to the 17th September, 2020, at 11.45 a.m.

Alexandra Debattista

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

11 September 2020

Notice 1190

1190

By means of a decree given, by this Court, on the 5th June, 2020,following a request of St. John Anthony O'Reilly ,it was ordered that deputy curators be chosen to represent Robin O' Reilly, in the records of the Sworn Application 78/20 AGV, in the names 'St. John Anthony O' Reilly vs Deputy Curators and in the other relative and the other relative and subsequent acts.

By means of an Application, filed, in the in the Civil Court (Family Section), Sworn Application in the names St. John Anthony O'Reilly (passport of Ireland number PG4698703) vs Deputy Curators appointed to represent Robin O'Reilly, on the 4th June, 2020, the applicant St. John Anthony O'Reilly, premised,

That the parties had married on the 22nd May, 1993, in New York in the United States of America;

That the marriage of the parties had been dissolved by a decree of divorce given by the Dublin Circuit Court, on the27th March, 2007;

That following the above mentioned decree the defendant went to live in London together with the children of the contending parties;

That the applicant has lived in Malta since June 2004;

That as explained in this application and for the reasons therein mentioned the applicant cannot pay the defendant the maintenance or otherwise pay his other analogous obligations mentioned in the application, thus in view of the premised the applicant St. John Anthony O'Reilly humbly asked this Honourable Court,

1. To order and declare that following the granting of the order given by the Dublin Circuit Court, mentioned in the application of the 27th March, 2007, in the names St. John Anthony O'Reilly vs Robin O'Reilly,there was a substantial reduction since the 1st January of the year 2020, in the income and means of the applicant so much so that the applicant cannot satisfy any more and carry out any more the obligation of the payment of maintenance to the defendant monthly for her néeds and for reasons mentioned in the applicatiopn.

With costs, as demanded in the application

Applicant: 'Mariner', Triq Sant' Klara, Baħar iċ-Ċagħaq, Naxxar NXR 5219

Defendant: 12d, 188, East 70th Street, New York, New York, 10021, USA

You are therefore ordered to affix an official copy of this bann at the entrance of this Superior Court and to summon whosoever wishes to act as curator to appear before this Registry within six days and by means of a minute to submit a declaration that he wises so to act.

You are also ordered to inform each one that if he fails to make this declaration within the stipulated time, this Court will proceed to the selection of Curators of Office.

And after so acting or if you encounter any difficulty in the execution of this bann you are to inform this Court forthwith.

Given by the Civil Court (Family Section) above mentioned with the witness of the Hon. Mr Justice Lawrence Mintoff, LLD, Doctor of Laws.

Adv. Frank Portelli, LLD

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

10 September 2020