Mur Lura
Court Notices published in Govt. Gazette No. 19,097 of the 11th June 2013
01/01/2013
Notice 971
971By means ofa decree given, on the 22nd May 2013, by the Civil Court (Family Section) in the records of the Sworn Application, in the names Falzon Lawrence vs Falzon Marlene, application number 106/13 AL, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the respondent Marlene Falzon, in terms of Article 187(3) of Cap. 12.
By means of a Sworn Application filed in the Civil Court (Family Section) in the names Lawrence Falzon (I.D. 16760M) vs Marlene Falzon (I.D. 790960M) on the 21st February 2013, the applicant Lawrence Falzon asked this Honourable Court:
1. To pronounce the dissolution of marriage between the parties and uphold the other demands in the application.
Applicant: 45, Flat 2, St. Joseph Flats, St. Rita Street, Sliema.
Respondent: Block 1, Door 1, Flat 1, Housing Project, Gżira Road, Gżira, GZR 1311.
The Sworn Application in the names Falzon Lawrence vs Falzon Marlene, application number 106/13 AL, has been put off for hearing to the 12th June 2013, at 9.15 a.m.
Adv. Frank Portelli,LL.D.
For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Notice 972
972IT IS hereby notified that by virtue of a decree given on the 31st May 2013, the Small Claims Tribunal (Gozo), ordered the publication of the subjoined notice for the purposes of service in respect of the joinder to the suit Michael Zammit of ‘Villa Zammit’, Triq Papa Ġwanni Pawl II, Rabat, Gozo, in terms of section 187(3) of Cap. 12 of the Laws of Malta:
The plaintiffs Paul and Sylvana spouses Azzopardi of ‘Assumption House’, Triq ta’ Rinota, Munxar, Gozo, filed a claim in the Small Claims Tribunal (Gozo) – Case number 8/2013 in re “Paul Azzopardi et vs Noel Attard” – on the 5th April 2013 wherein it requested the Tribunal to condemn the defendant Noel Attard to pay plaintiff company the amount of €2,568, in connection with plastering and finishing works done by the plaintiff on the instruction of the debtor at the residence known as “Nirvana”, Triq San Ġużepp, Qala, Gozo, together with costs, interest and legal expenses.
The hearing of this case is being deferred for the 2nd July 2013 at 8.45 a.m.
Jaclyn Magrin
Deputy Registrar
Notice 973
973By a decree of the 23rdMay, 2013 given by the Court of the Magistrates, the Court ordered that the extract hereunder mentioned be published for the purpose of service according to article 187(3) of the Code of Organization and Civil Procedure (Chapter 12).
That by the application filed by Melita plc on the 13th March 2012 is asking for the withdrawal of the amount of €286.40 deposited by the Schedule of Deposit number 2024/10 in the names of:
Melita plc (C 12715) vs Victor Borg (576459(M))
The Court ordered the notification of this application with two weeks (2) weeks notice for filing a reply.
Marvic Farrugia
For Registrar of Courts and Civil Tribunals
Notice 974
974By means of an application filed in Civil Court of Voluntary Jurisdiction Section, on the 9th May 2013, Application number 452/2013 by Saviour Attard, whereby he prayed that it be declared open in favour of George, Connie Sammut, Carmen Zammit, Silvia Bonnici, Mary Domenici, Catherine Scicluna, Nazzareno, Emanuela Bartolo and Jude Taddeo, brothers and sisters Grima, children of the late Giuseppe Grima, and this in the quota of one part of forty -five (1/45) undivided share each one of them; in favour of Carmelo, Mary Tabone, Gaetano, Felix, Catherine Spiteri, Domenic and Joseph brothers and sisters Grima children of the late George Grima, and this in the quota of one part of thirty five (1/35) undivided share each one of them; in favour ofGeorge, Carmela Tonna, Agnes Azzopardi, Mary, unmarried, Tessie Mifsud, Twanny, Martina Micallef, Alfred and Godwin, brothers and sisters Azzopardi, children of the late Rita née Grima, and this in the quota of one part of forty- five (1/45) undivided share each one of them, in favour of George, Paul, Gaetano, Mario, Giovanna Gatt, Maria Dolores Mallia, Grace Zahra and Saviour, brothers and sisters Attard, children of the late Carmela née Grima and this in the quota of one part of forty (1/40) undivided share each one of them; and in favour of John Falzon, known also asJohn Desira brother of the decujus and this in the quota of one fifth (1/5) undivided share the SUCCESSION ofhis uncle Emanuele Grima, bachelor, son of the late Giorgio and Maria Anna née Desira, born in Victoria, Gozo, resided in Ħamrun and died in tal-Qroqq limits of Imsida on the 20th May 2011 aged 81, intestate,(I.D. 0015730G).
Thus whoever considers that he has an interest is called so that by means of a note he enters his opposition according to Article 537(1) et seq of the Code of Organization and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12).
Alexandra Debattista
For the Registrar Civil Court and Tribunals
Notice 975
975By means of a decree given on the 21st May, 2013,by the Court of Appeal (Superior Jurisdiction) in the records of the Application of Appealm, in the names Atlas Insurance PCC Limited (C 5601) vs IRISL (Malta) Ltd et, application number 53/07 FS, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the company IRISL (Malta) Ltd, in terms of Article 187(3) et of Cap. 12.
By means of an Appeal Application filed in the Court of Appeal (Superior Jurisdiction) Writ of Summons Number 53/07 FS, Decided 05/03/2010,Atlas Insurance PCC Limited (C 5601) as subrogated in the rights of its Insured Magro Brothers (Foods) Limited on the Basis of the Insurance Policy and of Law vs IRISL (Malta) Limited, in its capacity of Agent of the Vessel IRAN ILAM) (IRAN ILAM) as corrected by a decree of the 17th February, 2010, and in representation of the same and Malta Freeport Terminals Limited, on the 25th March, 2010, the applicant company Malta Freeport Terminals Limited (C 27581) respectfully pleaded:
That the respondent plaintiff company filed a sworn application, on the 16th January, 2007, wherein after it premised that it is the insurer of the company Magro Brothers ( Foods) Limited,and after the fire accident of the 26 or 27th April, 2006, occurred, whereinthe merchandiseof the same insured company was damaged amounting to €14,787.96, besides the expenses of €232.94 for the survey report asked the First Hall Civil Court, in order to condemn the defendantsor either of whomin order to pay this sum of damages after it condemned the defendants or either of whom to pay the sum of damages after it declares that the incident occurred solely due to their faults or either of them;
That by means of a judgement of the 5th March 2010, given by the First HallCivil Court, in the names premised that the appellant company was declared solely responsible for the incident de quo and thus condemn the respondent applicant company to pay the sum €15,020.89 besides judicial expenses and interests from the date of the judgement;
That the interpellant company felt aggrieved by this judgement and is thus humbly filing an appeal;
That the facts of the cause can be briefly summed up as follows;
...omissis...
That the grievances are clear and manifest and consist in the following;
A.The lack of tort on the part of the appellants.
The appellant company submits as its first grievance the fact that it is not guilty for the incident which occurred since it did not fail in any manner in its obligations and did not contribute in any manner to the same incident. The Court of First Instance, was mistaken in the appreciation of the proof before it when it concluded that the appellant company was solely responsible for the incident.
...omissis...
Whereas the present cause is one based primarily on the question of tort and precisely on the question as to who is guilty of the incident de quo, an acuteexamination has to be made of the proof brought forward in the records of the cause, in order to establish the followingelements;
The cause of the incident and in this case the origin of the fires on both occassions;
whether the fires took place due to factorswhich could have been forecast, avoided or corrected from before;
Who was in the position to forecast, avoid, correct or uphold these factors so that the accident be avoided;
From the proof produced before the Court of First Instance, the following conclusions can be drawn;
...omissis...
From the considerations given in its judgementit appears that the Court of First Instance concluded that the appellant company was solely responsible for the incident because it had the obligation to take care of the objects as a bonus paterfamilias
...omissis...
With all respect towards the Court of First Instance these conclusionsdo not resultand do not find supportin the proof brought before it. It is stated in the first place that no proof was brought that the appellant company neglected or left the containers in question in a bad state or in abandoned place, or that it failed in its duties qua bonus paterfamilias.
...omissis...
Regarding the rest of the conclusions of the Court of First Instance, or rather the appellant should have supervised or paid attention that there was not another fire on the same container especially in view of the first incident, the appellant company rebuttsthat it could not known what the three million containers whichpass each year contain. It can only rely and exclusively on the declaration that is given by the agentwho is responsiblefor the transport of that container. In this case it was provedthat this declarationhad no indicationthat the product in the container was dangerous or combustible ..omissis.. the appellant company could never forcast or remotely suspectthat a ‘freak incident’ like the present occurred.
B. The Lack of Proof as to when the Damages occured.
As the second grievance the appellant company points out that although it was established and accepted by all the partiesthat theren were two occassions when thecontainer TEXU 1005330 caught fire, or rather aboard the vessel M.V. Iran Ilam...omissis.. the Court of First Instance concluded awtomaticallythat the damage in the merchandise insured by the plaintiff company originated entirely in the second incident.
It appears that the Court of First Instance, reached this conclusion gratuitously and without the slightest proof that the damages ocurred entirely and exclusively in the second fire.
...omissis...
The Court of First Instance chosetoput all the responsibility for the damages which resulted after the second fire (which occurred in the Freeport zone after the containers were unloaded) entirely on the applicantcompanydespite of the lack of proof regarding 1) who was exactly to blame for the fires on both occasions and 2) whether the damagesoriginatedfrom the first and second incident.
C. The Element of Casus.
The appellant company submits as its third grievance that from the proof produced it amply results that the damages claimed by the respondent plaintiff company originated from an accident which occurred due to casus, or rather without any fault or one part or another, but purely due to force or an element on which nobody had any control.
...omissis...
In the circumstances there applies Article 1029 of Chapter 16 which stipulated that ‘that all damages which occurs by incident or force majeure is to be borne by that person or the person whose property is damaged’ ’This Article is being invoked by the appellant company, sincethere does not resultany incorrect behaviouror should not have been done on its part’.
Thus and for the reasons above brought forward the appellant company,humbly prays that this Honourable Court to revoke and cancel the judgement of the First Hall Civil Court , given in the names premised on the 5th March, 2010, and decide the cause by rejecting the plaintiff’s demand in their entirety in its regard whilst upholding all the pleas of the appellant company, with costs of both instances against the respondent plaintiff company.
Appellant company: Malta Freeport Centre,
Port ta’ Kalafrana,
Birzebbugia.
Services: 1...omissis...
2. IRISL (Malta) Limited,
143, Flat 1,
Tower Road,
Sliema ,SLM 1604.
The Application of Appeal in the names Atlas Insurance PCC Limited ( C 5601) vs IRISL ( Malta) Ltd et, application 53/07 FS, was put off to the 2nd July, 2013, at 9.00 a.m.
Reġistry of the Superior Courts (Superior Appeals) today 5th June, 2013.
Adv. Frank Portelli,LL.D.
For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Notice 976
976By decree given by the CIVIL COURT, FIRST HALL on the 14th May, 2013, on the application of HSBC BANK MALTA PLC, Thursday, 18th July, 2013 at half past ten in the morning (10.30 a.m.), has been fixed for the SALE BY AUCTION to be held on THE FIRST FLOOR OF THESE LAW COURTS, REPUBLIC STREET, VALLETTA of the following property.
A field with two unnumbered rooms in it, called ‘Tal-Barumbara’ or ‘Tal-Bużaqqa’, situated in the district of Bubaqra, limits of Żurrieq, with a superficial measurement of approximately six thousand, five hundred and thirty seven square meters (6,537m²), with all its rights and appurtenances, valued at one hundred and fifty thousand euro (€150,000).
Thesaidtenementis the property of V.K. CONSTRUCTION LIMITED (C36787).
N.B. The said tenement will be sold as described in the acts of the file number 66/2012.
Diane Mifsud
For the Registrar Civil Courts and Tribunals
Notice 977
977By a decree given on the 4th June, 2013, by the Civil Court First Hall, the Court ordered that the extract hereunder mentioned be published for the purpose of service according to Article 187 (3) of the Code of Organization and Civil Procedure (Chapter 12).
By decree given by the CIVIL COURT, FIRST HALL on 12th April, 2013, on the application of BANK OF VALLETTA PLC, Thursday, 20th June, 2013, at half past eleven in morning (11.30 a.m.) has been fixed for the SALE BY AUCTION ordered by a decree given in the FIRST FLOOR OF THESE LAW COURTS, REPUBLIC STREET, VALLETTA, of the following property.
The apartment internally marked numbered one (1), forming part from a block of building, without officially number and named ‘Nash’, in Triq il-Ġdida, Paola, free and unencumbered, with all its right and enjoyments valued at sixty five thousand euro (€65,000).
The said tenement is the property of CREMONA WARREN PAUL (I.D. 239272M).
N.B. The said tenement will be sold as described in acts of the file number 77/12.
Marvic Farrugia
For the Registrar of Civil Court and Tribunals
Notice 978
978By means of a decree given, on the 7th May, 2013, by the Civil Court (Family Section) in the records of the Sworn Application, in the names Tanti Josephine vs Tanti Carmelo, application number 305/12 RGM,the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the defendant , in terms of Article 187(3) of Cap.12.
By means of a Sworn Application filed in the Civil Court (Family Section) in the names Josephine Tanti (I.D. 694954M) vs Carmelo Tanti (I.D. 91155M) on the 20th December, 2012, the applicant Josephine Tanti (I.D. 694954M) asked this Honourable Court;
1. To declare and pronounce the personal separation a mensa et thoro between the applicant and her husband Carmelo Tanti for reasons imputable to the respondent and uphold the other demands in the application.
With costs, against therespondent summoned so that a reference to his evidence is made.
Notify: Carmelo Tanti (I.D. 91155M).
The Sworn Application in the names Tanti Josephine vs Tanti Carmelo, application number 305/12 RGM, has been put off for hearing to the 25th June, 2013, at 9.00 a.m.
Adv. Frank Portelli, LL.D.
For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Notice 979
979By means of a decree given on the 23rd January 2013, in the records of the judicial letter number 1732/12, in the names HSBC Bank Malta plc vs Giovanni Buonanno, the First Hall of the Civil Courts ordered the following publication for the purpose of service of the respondent in terms of Article 187(3) of Cap. 12.
By means of a judicial letter filed in the Rent Regulation Board against Giovanni Buonanno (I.D. 19565A) of 27, Triq Hookham Frere, Gwardamanġa, on the 4th June 2012, HSBC Bank Malta p.l.c. of 32, Merchants Street, Valletta warns you that it will not renew the lease of the premises number 25 and 27, Hookham Frere Street, Gwardamanġa, which premises were prima facie lesed to you by Dr Patrick Spiteri in terms of a lease agreement of the 23rd February 2007 for the period of six years from the 1st January 2007 and it which was to be automaticcaly renewed for one year thereafter and therefore up until the 31st December 2013.
Thus you are requested that by not later than the 31st December 2013 to vacate the aforementioned premises, which has been property of HSBC Bank Malta plc (C3177) from the 3rd February 2011, and which premises were released in its favour after a judicialsale by auction bearing referencenumber 19/2008 in the names ‘HSBC Bank Malta plc vs Dr Patrick Spiteri’ and this in terms of Article 1531L of Chapter 16 of the Laws of Malta.
So much for your own guidance.
Alexandra Debattista
For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Bann for Curators
980Republic of Malta
To The Marshall of the Court.
By means of a decree by this Court, on the 21st January 2009, following a request of HSBC Bank Malta plc. it was ordered that Deputy Curators be chosen to represent the unknown owners of the directus dominius of the emphyteutical grant regarding the property, in the records of the Schedule of Deposit in the names HSBC Bank Malta p.l.c. vs Deputy Curators and in the relative and subsequent acts.
By meansof a Scedule of Deposit, filed, in the First Hall Civil Court, in the names HSBC Bank Malta p.l.c. (C 3177)vs Deputy Curators appointed to represent the unknown ownersof the directus dominius of the emphyteutical grant regarding the property hereunder described, on the 16th January 2009, the company HSBC Bank Malta p.l.c. (C 3177) respectfully pleaded;
That the interpellant company is the owner of the tenement with number 38, previously without number and named ‘Rosie’ in Triq Indrì Cilia, previously Triq Montgomery, Hamrun, which tenementin part underlies property of third parties and borders on the South West, with the street, on the North East in part with property of Giuseppe and MonicaValletta, and in part with property of Ernest Micallef and on the South Eastwith property of Angelo Buttgieg.
That this premises was acquired by the interpellant through a judicial sale held on 27th March 2007;
That this property is subject to the annual and perpetual groundrent of €3.06.
That the owners of the directus dominius burdening the same premises are not known.
Thus the interpellants are calling upon this Honourable Court and under the authority of the same depositing the sum of €18.36 representing the sum of €15.20 as for five instalments of groundrent as regards the property and the sum of €3.06 representing payment of laudemium which together represent payment in final settlement for any claim as regards the arrears of groundrent so that this sum be freely withdrawnby the respondentsmentioned after they leave the due receipt according to Law.
Interpellant: 116,Triq l-Arcisqof, Valletta.
Notify: Deputy Curators to represent the unknown owners of the directus dominius of the empytheutical concession regardingthe property above described.
You are therefore ordered to affix an official copy of this bann at the entrance of this Superior Court and to summon whosoever wishes to act as curator to appear before this Registry within six days and by means of a minute to submit a declaration that he wishes so to act.
You are also ordered to inform each one that if he fails to make this declaration within the stipulated time, the Court will proceed to the selection of Curators of Office.
And after so acting or if you ahould encounter any difficulty in the execution of this bann, you are to inform forthwith this Court.
Given by the Civil Court First Hall,above mentioned,with the witness of the Hon. Madam Justice Abigail Lofaro, LL.D., Doctor of Laws.
Adv. Frank Portelli, LL.D.
For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Notice 981
981By a decree of the Small Claims Tribunal ofthe 5th April, 2013, the publication of the following extract was ordered for the purpose of service in terms of Article 187(3) of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap, 12).
Mobisle Communications Limited (C24655) of Fra Diego Street, Marsa filed a Claim on the 31st October, 2012, whereby they asked the Tribunal to condemn Carlos Buttigieg (I.D. 410993M) of24, Triq il-Kbira, Ħaż-Żebbuġ,to pay the plaintiff company the sum of€1,398.44 which amount is due to the plaintiff company.
With costs and legal interests.
The case (Claim Number 738/12GB) is put off on the 14th June 2013 at 12.30 p.m.
Alexandra Debattista
For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Notice 982
982by a decree of the 16th august, 2012, given by the first hall civil court, the court ordered that the extract hereunder mentioned be published for the purpose of service according to article 187(5) and 338(1) of the code of organization and civil procedure (Cap. 12)
That by application and a Schedule of set-off filed contemporaneously by Lombard Bank Malta plc (C1607), on the 25th May, 2012, the approval of the said judicial acts is being demanded for the amount of €958,157.10 following the judicial sale by auction 35/2011 in the names Lombard Bank Malta plc (C1607) vs Venues Company Limtied (C27160), held under the Authority of the said Court on the 22nd May, 2012.
According to Article 338 (2) of Chapter 12: Any person who may have an interest and the persons so served shall be allowed the time of twenty days to file an answer stating in detail the reasons for their opposition and the amounts in contestation; and where such opposition is based on a claim against the proceeds of sale an alleged cause of preference, they are to state the amount of such claim and the basis for the preference. Such persons shall with the answer file all relevant evidence to substantiate their opposition.
Marvic Farrugia
For The Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Court Warrant
983Bymeans of a decree given, by the Rent Regulation Board, on the 14th May 2013,in the records of the Warrant of Prohibitory Injunction, number 657/13 GG, in the names Joseph Grima et vs Herman Mifsud,the following publication was ordered forthe purpose of service of the respondent, in terms of Article 187(3) of Cap. 12.
By means of an Application filed in the Rent Regulation Board, in the names (Applicant) Joseph Grima I.D. 12075M, Nicholas Delia I.D. 585445M and Salvina Delia I.D. 046942M vs (Respondent) Herman Mifsud, on the 2nd May 2013, the applicant Joseph Grima et, respectfully pleaded and confirmed under oath;
That the applicants have an interest to safeguard their rights;
That the applicants in order to safeguard their rights wish to withold the respondent from continuing to carry out structural works and interconnection works into the premises number five (5)beforebeing number three (3) in Triq il-Fawwara, Siġġiewi, and in adjacent property of the applicant.
The applicants are the owners of the premises number five (5) which before was number three (3) in Triq il-Fawwara, Siggiewi, which is granted on lease to Herman Mifsud and they are also the ownersof contiguous property which is not granted on lease to the respondent.
The applicants asked the respondent in order that they be allowed to inspect the property granted on lease to respondent who in virtue of one excuse or the other did not allow them;
The applicants now came to know that the respondent is carrying out structural works and other works in the premises granted on lease to him without their consent and in violation of his obligations of lessee under art. 1564 (1) of the Civil Code and is also trying to interconnect the premises with their other property which is not granted on lease to him;
The applicants thus have an interest to demand the dissolution of the lease due to violation of the obligations of the respondent as lessee and to withold him from continuing to carry out the alterations in their premises.
Thus the applicants humbly pray that this Honourable Court order the issuing of a warrant of prohibitory injunction in order that he be witheldfrom continuing to carry out the works above mentioned.
Sgd. Advocate Adv. Evelyn Caruana Demajo.
Sgd. PL G.Bonello
Confirmed before me under oath after I read its contents and in the presence of PL G. Bonello as witness of identity.
Warrant of Prohibitory Injunction.
Republic of Malta.
To the Court Marshall
Whereas an application has been filed and there recurr all the necessary elements according to law for the undermentioned orders.
Given by the Rent Regulation BoardMagistrate Dr. Giovanni Grixti, LL.D., Doctor of Laws.
Applicant: Casa Delia, Triq San Ġwann, Siġġiewi.
Respondent: 5, Triq il-Fawwara, Siġġiewi.
Execution...do...
In the Rent Regulation Board.
Magistrate.
Dr Giovanni Grixti, LL.D.
In therecords of the Warrant of Prohibitory Injunction number 657/13 in the names;
Joseph Grima et
vs
Herman Mifsud.
The Board,
Having seen the application.
Orders that it be served upon the respondent who has 24 hours to file a reply and this without any prejudice to any decision of this Board regarding its comptence or not in these matters.
Adv. Frank Portelli, LL.D
For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Notice 984
984By means of a decree of the 3rd June 2013 on an application of Sara Blasina proprio et nominefiled on the 28th May 2013, application number 534/2013 this Honorable Court ordered the opening and thepublication of the secret will of Pietro Blasina, husband of Luisa Pedroni, son of the late Massimiliano Blasina and Vittoria Gramegna née Gramegna, born in Trieste Italy and died in Marsaxlokk, Malta on the 19th March 2013 aged 83 holding identity card number 0024833(A).
The opening andpublication of the will is going to be held on Monday, 24th June 2013 at 1.00 p.m. at the Annexe of the Law Courts in 34, Strait Street, Vallettabydeed of Notary Doctor Patricia Hall.
Alexandra Debattista
For the Registrat Civil Court and Tribunals
Notice 985
985IT IS BEING NOTIFIED that by a decree dated 5th June, 2013 given by the Court of Magistrates (Malta) as a Court of Criminal Inquiry – (Magistrate Dott. Neville Camilleri LL.D., Compilation number 544/2013 in the case:
The Police
(Inspector Pierre Grech)
Versus:
Michelle Vella, 30 years, unemployed, wife of Samei Anour and daughter of Lawrence and Catherine Degabriele, born in Pietà on the 8th July, 1982, and residing at 4, Triq il-Ħaddiem, Marsa (I.D. 367682M)
And
Marco Belli, 32 years, unemployed, son of Lino and Miriam née Olivari, born in Pieta’ on the 29th April, 1981, and residing at 8, Triq il-Haddiem, Marsa (I.D. 224481M)
ORDERED the attachment in the hands of third parties in general all monies and other moveable property due or pertaining or belonging to Michelle Vella and Marco Belli and prohibits the said accused from transferring or otherwise disposing of any moveable or immovable property and this according to Section 23A of the Criminal Code, Chapter 9 of the Laws of Malta and Article 22A of Cap. 101 of the Laws of Malta.
Dr John Seychell Navarro
Dip. Hlth Science, Dip Mgmt Stud., Dip. Not. Pub., LL.B., LL,D
Assistant Registrar
Criminal Courts and Criminal Tribunals (Malta)
Notice 986
986By means of a decree given on the 29th May, 2013,by the Civil Court, ( Family Section) in the records of the Sworn Application, number 183/13 AL, in the names Mifsud Oliver vs Mifsud Johanna, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the respondent, in terms of Article 187(3) of Cap. 12.
By means of an application filed in the Civil Court (Family Section) in the names Oliver Mifsud (I.D. 335885M) vs Johanna Mifsud (I.D. 105469M) on the 9th April, 2013, the applicant Oliver Mifsud (I.D. 335885M) in terms of Article 66A of Cap. 16of the Laws of Malta, asked this Honourable Court;
1.To declare that the marriage contracted between the parties on the twenty second (22) of June of the year one thousand nine hundred and ninety (1990) be dissolved and declared as dissolved and uphold the other demands in the application.
Applicant: Oliver Mifsud, 30, Triq De Warsbergh, Gudja.
Respondent; Johanna Mifsud, Gardenia, Triq l-Ispanjolet, Kappara, San Ġwann.
The Sworn Application in the names Mifsud Oliver vs Mifsud Johanna, application number 183/13 AL, has been put off for hearing to the 26th June, 2013, at 9.15 a.m.
Adv. Frank Portelli, LL.D.
For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals