DECISIONS TAKEN BY THE ARBITER OF THE CONSUMER CLAIMS TRIBUNAL DURING THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2001

C.C.T. No.

Date

Claim

Decision

29/00

15.02.2001

Refund of Lm90 which was a deposit for wood works which were never carried out

Trader ordered to refund Lm90 to consumer

27/00

15.02.2001

Refund of Lm70 being price of a suit which got ruined after Dry Cleaning Process.

Trader ordered to pay the sum of Lm25 to consumer

100/00

15.02.2001

Refund of Lm145.29 paid by consumer to be supplied with internet service and which service was withdrawn without any notice.

Consumer's claim not upheld

157/00

15.02.2001

Refund of Lm70 being price of a car battery which got damaged whilst still under guarantee.

Trader ordered to refund Lm70 to consumer

106/00

15.02.201

Refund of Lm60 which was an overcharge on the repair of a new washing machine plus a claim for moral damages.

Trader ordered to refund Lm60 but consumer was refused the claim for moral damages

195/99

15.02.2001

Consumer claimed a refund of Lm500 as compensation for bad workmanship in furniture supplied by a Furniture Co.

Trader ordered to pay consumer Lm250 plus the Lm34.50 paid by consumer to get expert report from National Laboratory Co. Ltd.

102/0

15.02.2001

Refund of Lm168 plus Lm25.20 being price of a windscreen and Vat. The windscreen got damaged when the mirror got detached.

Trader ordered to pay Lm193.20 to consumer

88/00

15.02.2001

Refund of Lm30 which consumer was asked to pay to Enemalta when this charge was not due.

Contractor ordered to refund consumer the sum of Lm30