Court Notices published in Govt. Gazette no 20,787 of 18th February 2022

By means of a decree of the 7th December, 2021, handed down by the Court of Magistrates (Malta) in the records of the judicial letter number 2493/2021 in the names Motors Inc Limited vs Christian Griscti the following publication was ordered for the purpose of effecting service in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of Cap. 12.

In the Court of Magistrates (Malta)

To Christian Griscti (ID 496480M) of 56, Triq Sant'Agata, Tas-Sliema

By the present, Motors Inc. Limited (C75758) of Cars International Limited, Triq l-Imdina, Ħal Qormi, whilst making reference:

i) to the value of the bill of exchange number 46 of value €627 dated 24 th July, 2017, and which bill of exchange was due on the 24th May, 2021; the value of the bill of exchange number 47 of value €627 dated 24th July, 2017, and which bill of exchange was due on the 24th June, 2021; the value of the bill of exchange number 48 of value €627 dated 24th July, 2017, and which bill of exchange was due on the 24th July, 2021; the value of the bill of exchange number 49 of value €627 dated 24th July, 2017, and which bill of exchange was due on the 24th August, 2021; the value of the bill of exchange number 50 of value €627 dated 24th July, 2017, and which bill of exchange was due on the 24th September, 2021 (Doc. MIL1-MIL 5).

ii) the value of the bill of exchange number 03 of value €760 dated 15th October, 2020, and which bill of exchange was due on the 24th January, 2021; the value of the bill of exchange number 04 of value €760 dated 15th October, 2020, and which bill of exchange was due on the 24th February, 2021; the value of the bill of exchange number 05 of value €760 dated 15th October, 2020, and which bill of exchange was due on the 24th March, 2021; the value of the bill of exchange number 06 of value €760 dated 15th October, 2020, and which bill of exchange was due on the 24th April, 2021; the value of the bill of exchange number 07 of value €760 dated 15th October, 2020, and which bill of exchange was due on the 24th May, 2021; the value of the bill of exchange number 08 of value €760 dated 15th October, 2020, and which bill of exchange was due on the 24th June, 2021; the value of the bill of exchange number 09 of value €760 dated 15th October, 2020, and which bill of exchange was due on the 24th July, 2021; the value of the bill of exchange number 10 of value €760 dated 15th October, 2020, and which bill of exchange was due on the 24th August, 2021; the value of the bill of exchange number 11 of value €760 dated 15th October, 2020, and which bill of exchange was due on the 24th September, 2021 (Doc. MIL 6-Doc. MIL 9) solicits you so that within two (2) days from the notification of this judicial letter you pay the total amount of €9,975 that is the total amount of the pending bills of exchange and this besides the interest due from the due date of each bill of exchange.

This solicitation is being made for all the effects and purposes of law, especially in terms of Article 253(e) and of Article 256(2) of Cap. 12 of the Laws of Malta.

In terms of Article 253(e) of Cap. 12 of the Laws of Malta, you are being warned with the right given to you in terms of the same dispositions of law to oppose the execution of the bills of exchange above mentioned by means of an application filed within twenty (20) days from the notification to you of this judicial letter, by means of which you can request the competent Court to suspend their execution, all or part of them because the signatures on the same bills of exchange are not yours or of your mandatory, or for other grave and valid reasons to oppose such execution.

So much so you may know how to regulate yourself and to avoid useless judicial costs.

With costs and with legal interests from the due date of each bill of exchange till the date of the effective payment in its entirety as claimed.

Alexandra Debattista

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decree given by the Court of Appeal, on the 27th October 2021, Application in the names Bank of Valletta plc (C2833) vs Tower Manor Ltd et, Application number 559/16, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the parties John Debono and Carmela Xerri, in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of Cap. 12.

By means of an Application of Appeal, presented, records Application of Appeal, Application number 559/16, in the names Bank of Valletta plc (C2833) vs Tower Manor Ltd (C30168) on the 4th August, 2021, by Joseph Quattromani in his own name and in the name and in representation of the company Tower Manor Limited (C30168) the appellant respectfully pleaded:

That by means of a Sworn Application, presented, on the 11th July, 2016, the respondent plaintiff company premised and asked the First Hall Civil Court;

1. That by means of two contracts one in the records of Notary Carmelo Mangion of the 31st January 2005 and the other of Notary Doctor Malcolm Mangion, of the 30th October 2006, the plaintiff company granted Banking facilities to the company Tower Manor Limited;

2. That the plaintiff company is a creditor of the company Tower Manor Limited, in the sum of one million three hundred and five thousand five hundred and eleven euro and thirty three cents (€1,305,511.33) balance of debt in the 'Loan Accounts' of Tower Manor Limited, with the Bank of Valletta plc, together with further interests from the 27th January, 2016, till the date of effective payment;

… omissis …

6. That the defendants John Debono and Carmen Xerri, Joseph and Maria Magdalena spouses Quattromani, and the company Tower Manor Limited, were called upon to pay debt above mentioned but remained in default;

… omissis …

That the defendants John Debono and Carmela Xerri, did not present any reply and remained in default during the proceedings,

That by means of a judgement given by the Honourable First Hall Civil Court, on the 15th July, 2021, the Court of First Instance passed on for the reasons therein premised in that judgement whilst it upheld the fourth plea raised by the defendants Tower Manor Limited and Joseph and Maria Magdalena Quattromani, limitedly in regard to Maria Magdalena Quattromani and rejected it in regard to the appellants Tower Manor Limited and Joseph Quattromani, rejected also the first three pleas of the defendant and as for the rest decided as stated in this application,

That the defendant appellants Tower Manor Ltd and Joseph Quattromani, in his personal name felt aggrieved by this judgement and are filing this humble appeal,

That the grievances of the appellants are clear and manifest and consist in the following:

The First Grievance

1. That when the Court of First Instance reached its conclusion that the plea of untimeliness was to be rejected that Court made a misaken evaluation of the proof brought before it;

2.That the respondent Bank based its cause against the appellants as acknowledged by the Honourable First Courty on two criteria;

A. … omissis …,

B. … omissis …;

3.That in its judgement the Honourable Court of First Instance quotes a judgement of this Honoureable Court of Appeal,in the names Nicola Callus et vs Nicolina Farrugia, where reference is made to the fact that who is bound to be freed from his responsibilities in case of a fortuitous case or force majeure or other reason for exemption from responsibility it is stated that effectively it results from the records of the proceedings that the appellant company Tower Manor Limited, was freed from the responsibility to make the payments due by it according to the terms established in the contract and not to be exempted from ever paying as the Court of First Instance seems to be saying;

… omissis …

4.That the appellant company Tower Manor Limited pleaded in its first plea that the cause which was commenced by the creditor Bank was untimely;

… omissis …

5. That it also resulted from the proof that evidence given by Joseph Quattromani is corroborated by nobody except by the respondent Bank itself;

6. … omissis …;

7. … omissis …;

8. That in the considered opinion of the appellants the argument of the creditor bank justifying the action it took for the recovery of credit makes little sense;

B. Violation of the contractual obligations in so far as some appartments were leased without the consent of the respondent creditor Bank;

9. … omissis …;

10. … omissis …;

11. That without prejudice to that above brought forward it is pointed out that this element of lease without consent was never specifically indicated in the sworn application as that contractual violation on which the action of the creditor Bank was founded;

… omissis …

13. That in that part of the judgement of the Honourable Court of First Instance, where it upheld the first demand of ther plaintiff Bank and declared that the defendant appellant Joseph Quattroman defaulted in other obligations assumed in the same contract and private writings, amongst which that he leased to third parties immovables hypothecated in favour of the Bank without the consent of the plaintiff Bank it is pointed out that the Honourable First Court made a wrong evaluation of the proof.

Faults and deficiencies on the part of the respondent creditor Bank which the Honourable First Court did not consider.

… omissis …

The Second Grievance

20. That as regards the assertions made by the Honourable First Court regarding the personal guarantees made by the spouses Quattromani in that part of the judgement under the heading that the personal guarantees are invalid it is the humble opinion of the same appellant that the Honourable First Court was mistaken when it did not give weight to the fact that altough the personal guarantee in his regard is signed by him only on the last page of that same guarantee it did not have the initials of the same appellant Joseph Quattromani in all the pages of the guarantee as is usually done in any contract or private writing;

21. … omissis …;

22. … omissis …

Thus, the interpellant whilst referring to the proof produced and that, which can be produced according to law and whilst reserving to make further submissions during the pleading of this appeal humbly pray that this Honourable Court, change, vary and reform the judgement appealed given by the First Hall C ivil Court, of the 15th July 2021, in the names Bank of Valletta plc vs Tower Manor Ltd, John Debono, Carmela Xerri and Maria Magdalena Quattromani by whilst confirming the judgement of the Honourable First Court as demanded in this application , with costs of both instances to be borne by the respondent plaintiff Bank.

Notify ; John Debono, 8, Donna Court, Flt 17, Triq Horatio Nelson, St Paul's Bay

Carmela Xerri, Tower Manor, Blk B, Fl 3, Triq Giuseppe Despott, St Paul's Bay

Adv. Frank Portelli, LLD

For the Registrar, Civil C ourts and Tribunals

By decree given by the Civil Court, First Hall, on the 7th February, 2022, on the application of Bank of Valletta plc (C2833), Tuesday, 21st June, 2022, at eleven in the morning (11.00 a.m.), has been fixed for the Sale by Auction, to be held in room number 78 nearby the Archieves, Level -1, Courts of Justice, Triq ir-Repubblika, Valletta, of the following property:

The tenement officially unnumbered and named 'Santa Maria' in Triq Indri Borg, Ħaż-Żebbuġ, Malta, built on land known as 'Tal-Kandlora', with overlying airspace, free and unencumbered with all its rights and appertanunces bounded on the west by the said street, to the south by property of Philip Vella or his successors in title and to the north by property of Modesta Mallia or her successors in title, valued at five hundred thousand euro (€500,000).

The said tenement is the property of Bugeja Pauline (ID 371461M).

N.B. The said tenement will be sold as described in the acts of judicial sales number 72/2016.

Marvic Farrugia

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

DKR 52/2018 – VARIATION OF A FREEZING ORDER

IT IS BEING NOTIFIED that by a decree dated 10th November, 2021, given by the Criminal Court (Mr Justice Dr Aaron M. Bugeja, LLD) following an application filed by Steven Azzopardi on the 25th October, 2021, Compilation Number 239/2018, in the case in the names:

The Police

(Inspector Roderick Spiteri)

Versus

STEVEN AZZOPARDI, 35 years, son of Peter and Brigitte née Grech, born in Tal-Pietà, Malta, on the 11th July, 1986, residing at number 8, Jan Bert, Sqaq Charlotte, Ħal Għargħur, Malta, and holder of Maltese identity card bearing number 318186M.

The Court ACCEDED to the request of the accused Steven Azzopardi and varies the freezing order de quo only and limitedly as stated below and that is:

(a) Authorizes the applicant to transfer the divided portion of the field ossia agricultural land known as 'Tal-Fanal' or 'Tal-Falkun' or 'Tal-Qortin' within the limits of Ħal Għargħur in accordance with the terms indicated in the exhibited promise of sale, which terms must be reflected in the deed of sale;

(b) Appoint Advocate Dr Anna Portelli to:

i. Whilst being present for the publication of the contract of sale,

ii. Follow the progress of this contract, and

iii. Ensures that the terms of this decree are fully complied with,

iv. Ensures that the applicant's entire share from the proceeds of this sale are duly deposited under the Court Authority and this in order that the proceeds from this sale are to be deemed to be affected by the freezing order de quo,

v. Also to ensure that a copy of this contract is inserted in the acts of these proceedings;

(c) That the deed of sale is to be published by Notary Charmaine Bonnici at a date and time to  be agreed between the parties and Advocate Dr Anna Portelli, provided that a copy of the draft of sale must be given to Dr Anna Portelli prior to the publication of the same deed so that the same Dr Portelli verifies that the terms of this decree are respected.

This variation is being published in terms of Section 5 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, Cap. 373 of the Laws of Malta and Article 23A (2) of the Criminal Code, Cap. 9 of the Laws of Malta following a freezing order given by the Court of Magistrates (Malta) as a Court of Criminal Inquiry (Magistrate Dr Marse-Ann Farrugia, LLD) on the 18th April, 2018, and published in the Government Gazette of the 24th April, 2018, where the Court ordered the attachment in the hands of third parties in a general manner, all monies and other movable and immovable property which may be due to or belonging to Steven Azzopardi.

Marvic Psaila

Deputy Registrar, Criminal Courts and Criminal Tribunals

DKR 60/2004 – CANCELLATION OF A FREEZING ORDER

IT IS BEING NOTIFIED that following judgement dated 21st March, 2005, given by the Court of Magistrates (Malta) as a Court of Criminal Inquiry (Magistrate Dr Antonio Mizzi, LLD), Compilation number 475/2004, in the case in the names:

The Police

Versus

VICTOR MAGRI, 41 years, son of Nazzareno and Carmena née Grech, born in Ħal Qormi, Malta, on the 31st August 1963, residing at number 108, Triq il-Kannizzata, Ħal Balzan, Malta, and holder of Maltese identity card bearing number 506963M.

THE COURT ORDERED THE CANCELLATION of the freezing order of all the assets of the said Victor Magri, which order was given by the Court of Magistrates (Malta) as a Court of Criminal Inquiry on the 1st July, 2004, which was duly published in the Government Gazette of the 3rd August, 2004.

This notice is being published according to section 22A (2)(b)(6) of the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance, Cap. 101 of the Laws of Malta.

Marvic Psaila

Deputy Registrar, Criminal Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decree of the 8th April, 2021, of the Rent Regulation Board, in the records of the Application in the names Tyron Zerafa vs Giovanni Antonino, Application number 21/2021JD, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of effecting service on the respondent Giovanni Antonino in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12)

By means of an application in the names Tyron Zerafa (ID 0267390M)  vs Giovanni Antonino filed before the Rent Regulation Board, on the 8th February, 2021, the applicant Tyron Zerafa (ID 01267390M) requested this Honourable Board to:

1. Decide the cause according to the claims without hearing in terms of Article 16A of Chapter 69 of the Laws of Malta;

2. Orders the respondent to vacate the premises that is the apartmentRet with number 5 known with the name Interlace in Block C, in Trejqet it-Torri, Marsaskala;

3. Order the respondent to pay the pending bills there is with the company ARMS and also with the telephone and internet companies;

4. Order the respondent to pay the rent from October of the year 2020 till February 2021 as he is obliged to do according to the attached agreement done between the parties;

5. Order the respondent to pay the amount of €6000 or any other amount resulting as late payment fees till the date of the return of the premises;

6. Return the keys of the premises regarding this cause within a short and peremptory time that is fixed by this Honourable Board;

7. Authorise the respondent to take back the vacant possession of the same premises according to law;

8. Fix the damages due to the applicant by the respondent in the eventuality that with the termination of the lease damages results in the said premises.

Reserving any right for any other action by the same applicant.

With costs

Applicant:  Tyron Zerafa, 73, Arc El Ciel, Pjazza Patri Redent Gauci, Fgura

Respondent:  Giovanni Antonino, Apt 5, Interlace, Block C, Trejjqet it-Torri, Marsaskala

The application in the names Tyron Zerafa vs Giovanni Antonino, Application number 21/2021JD, has been postponed for hearing to the 21st February, 2022, at 9.00 a.m.

Alexandra Debattista

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decree of the 16th December, 2021, of the Rent Regulation Board, in the records of the Application in the names Mary Buhagiar vs Lewis Sammut et, Application number 801/2021NB, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of effecting service on the respondents Lewis Sammut and Maria Sammut in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12).

By means of an application in the names Mary widow of Joseph Buhagiar (ID 80533M) vs Lewis Sammut (ID 73630M) and Maria Sammut (ID 796930M) and Housing Authority filed in the Rent Regulation Board, on the 29th October, 2021, the applicant Mary widow of Joseph Buhagiar (ID 80533M) requested this Honourable Board why it should not:

1. Order that the means test of the respondents Lewis Sammut (ID 73630M) and Maria Sammut (ID 796930M) in terms of Act XXIV of 2021, be carried out which shall be based on the means test set out in the Rules of the Continuation Tenancies (Means Testing Criteria) issued under Article 1622A of the Civil Code and any regulations that replace them, which test shall be based on the income of the lessee between 1st January and 31st December, 2020, and on the capital of the lessee on the 31st December, 2020, and which means test has to be carried out with particular reference, inter alia to the regulations 4 till 8 set out in the Rule of the Continuation Tenancies (Means Testing Criteria) that has to be applied mutatis mutandi in this case;

2. Declare and decide that in accordance with Act No XXIV of 2021, the rent of the premises 139, Triq il-Vittorja, Ħamrun, shall be revised to an amount not exceeding 2% per year of the free and unencumbered open market value and to establish new conditions regarding the lease if the case may be;

3. Order and condemns the respondents Lewis Sammut (ID 73630M) and Maria Sammut (ID 796930M) start paying the said increased rent in terms of Act XXIV of 2021 with immediate effect from the date of the filing of this application;

4. Orders that in the event that the respondents Lewis Sammut (ID 73630M) and Maria Sammut (ID 796930M) does not meet the criteria of income and capital of the means test, the eviction of the same respondent from the said premises within a short and peremptory time established by this Board by not later than two (2) years from the 1st June, 2021.

With costs against the respondents who are from now summoned so that a reference to his oath be made and without prejudice to any other action that may eventually be filed.

Applicant: 18, Josmar, Triq Santa Venera, Msida

respondents: Lewis Sammut (ID 73630M) and Maria Sammut (ID 796930M), 139, Triq il-Vittorja, Ħamrun

Housing Authority

The application in the names Mary Buhagiar vs Lewis Sammut et, Application number 801/2021NB has been postponed for hearing to the 25th February, 2022, at 9.40 a.m.

Alexandra Debattista

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decree of the 17th September, 2021, of the Rent Regulation Board, in the records of the Application in the names Maria Rosa sive Rosaria Vella et vs Pius Zammit et, Application number 200/2021NB, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of effecting service on the respondent Pius Zammit in terms of Article 187(3) et seq of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12).

By means of an application in the names Maria Rosa sive Rosaria widow of Giuseppe Vella (ID 0498834M and Philip Ellul (ID 0300942M) vs Pius Zammit (ID 490560M) and Housing Authority filed before the Rent Regulation Board, on the 18th June, 2021, the applicant Maria Rosa sive Rosaria widow of Giuseppe Vella (ID 0498834M) requested this Honourable Board to:

1. Order that the means test of the respondent Pius Zammit (ID 490560M) be carried out in terms of Act XXIV of 2021, based on the criteria of the means tests set out in the Rules of the Continuation Tenancies (Means Testing Criteria) issued under Article 1622A of the Civil Code and any regulations that replace them, which test shall be based on the income of the respondent between 1st January and 31st December of the year 2020 and on the capital of the lessee on the 31st December of, 2020, and which means test has to be made with particular reference, inter alia, for regulation 4 till 8 of the Rules of the Continuation Tenancies (Means Testing Criteria) that has to be applied mutatis mutandi in this case.

2. Declare and decide that in terms of Act XXIV of 2021, the rent of the premises 27, Guzeppina, Triq Ħal Lew, Qrendi, has to be revised in the amount that does not exceed the value per year of the free and unencumbered open market value and to establish new conditions regarding the lease if the case may be;

3. Order and condemns the respondent Pius Zammit (ID 490560M) to start paying the said increased rent in terms of Act XXIV of 2021 with immediate effect from the date of the filing of this application;

4. Orders that in the event that the respondent Pius Zammit (ID 490560M) does not meet the criteria of income and capital of the means test, the eviction of the same respondent from the said premises within a short and peremptory time established by this Board by not later than two (2) years from the 1st June, 2021.

With costs against the respondent who is from now summoned so that a reference to his oath be made and without prejudice to any other action that may eventually be filed.

Applicant: 19, Casa Romantica, Triq Francesco Buhagiar, Qrendi

Respondent: 27, Guzeppina, Triq Ħal Lew, Qrendi

Housing Authority

The application in the names Maria Rosa sive Rosaria Vella et vs Pius Zammit et, Application number 200/2021NB has been postponed for hearing to the 21st February, 2022, at 9.00 a.m.

Alexandra Debattista

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decree of the 16th December, 2021, of the Rent Regulation Board, in the records of the Application in the names Salvina Ebejer et vs Luiga sive Louise Mcpherson et, Application number 815/2021NB, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of effecting service on the respondent Luiga sive Louise Mcpherson in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12).

By means of an application in the names Salvina Ebejer (KI 248146M), Margaret Ebejer (KI 509841M) vs Luiga sive Louise Mcpherson (ID 714950M) and Housing Authority filed in the Rent Regulation Board, on the 1st November, 2021, the applicant Salvina Ebejer (ID 248146M) et requested this Honourable Board why it should not:

1. Declare and decide that the respondent Luiga sive Louise Mcpherson (ID 714950M) is the lessee of the premises 183, Triq Annibale Preca, Ħal Lija, in terms of Law;

2. Order that the means test of the lessee Luiga sive Louise Mcpherson (ID 714950M) be carried out and has to be based on the means test as set out in the Rules of the Continuation Tenancies (Means Testing Criteria issued under Article 1531F and 1622A of the Civil Code) and any regulations that replace them, which test shall be based on the income of the lessee Luiga sive Louise Mcpherson (ID 714950M) between 1st January and 31st December, 2020, and on the capital of the respondent Luiga sive Louise Mcpherson (ID 714950M) on the 31st December, 2020;

3. Declare and decide that in terms of Act XXIV of 2021, the rent shall be revised to an amount not exceeding 2% per year of the free and unencumbered open market value of the premises that is 183, Triq Annibale Preca, Ħal Lija, and to establish new conditions regarding the lease and in default if the respondent Luiga sive Louise Mcpherson (ID 714950M) does not satisfy the criteria of the income of the means test, the eviction of the same respondent from the premises in question within two years, besides paying a compensation to the applicants for the occupation of the premises during the said period;

4. Order, that in case the respondent Luiga sive Louise Mcpherson (ID 714950M) does not meet the criteria of income and capital of the means test, the eviction of the same respondent Luiga sive Louise Mcpherson (ID 714950M) from the said premises within a short and peremptory time established by this Board after two years from the judgement so that the premises shall be vacated;

With costs against the respondent who is from now summoned so that a reference to her oath be made and without prejudice to any other action that may eventually be filed;

Applicant: 28, Sacro Cuor, Triq N. Cottoner, Ħal Lija

Respondent: Luiga sive Louise Mcpherson (ID 714950M), 183, Triq Annibale Preca, Ħal Lija

Housing Authority

The application in the names Salvina Ebejer et vs Luiga sive Louise Mcpherson et,  Application number 815/2021NB, has been postponed for hearing to the 25th February, 2022, at 9.40 a.m.

Alexandra Debattista

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decree given, by the Court of Appeal, on the 13 th January 2022, Application in the names Alicia Meilak vs Clodomiro Meilak, Application number 174/2014/1, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the respondent Alicia Meilak , in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of Cap. 12.

By means of an Application, filed, in the Court of Appeal, Application 174/2014/1, in the names Alicia Meilak vs Clodomiro Meilak, on the 16th November, 2021, in the names Alicia Meilak vs Clodomiro Meilak, the appellant Clodomiro Meilak (ID 195461M) respectfully pleaded:

That the interpellant has just been notified by this Honourable Court to deposit the global sum of € 1,260 as guarantee for the costs therein indicacted (Doc. Z);

That the interperllant is not in a positjion to pay these costs because the only revenue and income he has is that which he recieves from the Department of Social Security and nothing more as results from the annexed two documents marked (Doc. X and Doc. Y);

That infact it amply results mathematically from the same documents that actually the interpellant appellant recieves circa €59.88 weekly whilst the rest of the benefit is paid directly to his wife as maintenance for their minor son … omissis …

Thus the interpellant appellant respectfully prays this Honoyrable Court for the reason premised to exempt him from the obligation of the payment of the above indicated guarantee.

The Application in the names Alicia Meilak vs Clodomiro Meilak, Application number 174/2014/1, has been deferred for hearing to the 17th March, 2022, at 9.10 a.m.

Notify: Alicia Meilak, Bristol Close, Flat 4, Triq Papa Urbanu, Birkirkara

Adv. Frank Portelli, LLD

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decree given, by the Civil Court First Hall, on the 24th June, 2020, Sworn Application in the names the Director Civil Courts and Tribunals as Registrar vs Bernardette Cilia, Application number 93/2019 JVC, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the respondent Bernardette Cilia.

By means of a Sworn Application,filed, in the First Hall Civil Court, in the names the Director, Civil Courts and Tribunals as Registrar Civil Courts and Tribunals vs Bernardette Cilia (ID 186380M) on the 18th September, 2019, the applicant Director Civil Courts and Tribunals, asked this Honourable Court:

1. To find the respondent guilty of contempt towards its authority in terms of Article 997 and 1003 A of Cap 12 of the Laws of Malta;

2. Condemn the respondent to the penalties indicated in the same Article and condemn her to imprisonment for a period up to one month and to a penalty of not less than two hundred and thirty three euro (€233) and not more than two thousand three hundred thirty euro (€2330) or to a penalty or imprisonment together;

3. Impose any other necessary order on the respondent in terms of Aarticle 997 sub-Article (2) of Cap 12 of the Laws of Malta including the fixing of a peremptory period till these orders are to be satisfied.

With costs, against the respondent from now summoned so that a reference to her evidence be made and saving any right of further action according to law.

The Sworn Application in the names the Director Civil Courts and Tribunals as Registrar vs Bernardette Cilia, Application number 93/2019 JVC, has been deferred for hearing to the 29th March, 2022, at 9.20 a.m.

Notify Defendant: Bernardette Cilia-35, Baħrija Heights, Blk C, Flat 7, Triq il-Qastan, Rabat, Malta

Adv. Frank Portelli, LLD

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By decree given by the Civil Court, First Hall, on 18th November, 2021, on the application of Bank of Valletta plc (C2833), Tuesday, 29th March, 2022, at half past eleven in the morning (11.30 a.m.), has been fixed for the SALE BY AUCTION to be held in room number 78, nearby the Archives, Level -1, Courts of Justice, Republic Street Belt Valletta of the following property:

i) Maisonette on ground floor level in a semi-finished state accessible by common drive in which drive in can also be used from the three (3) car garage, with all its rights and appurtenances resulting from its relative position including possibility but not limited servitudes of overlying windows and balconies and terraces, rainwater, including drains and drainage pipes and any other rights and servitudes from its position valued at two hundred and fifty-five thousand euro (€255,000);

ii) Three car garage (3) on the ground floor level accessible by common drive which also provides to a ground floor level maisonette with all its rights and appurtances and servitudes resulting from its position valued at forty-five thousand euro (€45,000),

iii) Twelve car garage (12) in semi basement level accessible by common drive which abuts in Triq Notabile, Ħ'Attard with all its rights and appurtances and servitudes resulting from its position valued at ninty nine thousand and four hundred euro (€99,400),

iv) One car garage in semi basement level accessible by common drive which abuts in Triq Notabile, Ħ'Attard, with all its rights and appurtances and servitudes resulting from its position valued at seventeen thousand and five hundred euro (€17,500),

The said maisonette and garages are built on a portion of land which previously was built the house name 'Rustica' in Triq Notabile, Ħ'Attard, which portion of land is bounded on southeast by the said street, west by property of Joseph and Carmen Mifsud, north by property of Alfred Grech or his successors in title, free and unencumbered with all its rights and appurtenances;

v) One bedroom (1) penthouse built on a block of four (4) apartments which block is officially numbered seventeen (17) named 'Mdina View Court' in Triq il-Larinġ, Ħ'Attard. The said block is built on plot number twenty (20) from the land of Tal-Bajdun, Ħ'Attard, and including with the penthouse its relative airspace as well pro rata share from the common parts including the system of drains and drainage, free and unencumbered with all its rights and appurtenances and all the servitudes resulting from its relative position sia active and passive

and

One Car garage, unnamed and unnumbered, but privately numbered five (5) underlying flat number (4) situated in a basement of eight (8) garages accessible including its share of the ramp and the common parts accessible from a common ramp, which entrance is unnumbered and abuts in Triq il-Larinġ, Ħ'Attard. The said garage is the second garage on the right when entering the basement from the drive in and has a backyard with a window in it; the backyard has all the drains for the rainwater. The garage is free and unencumbered with all its rights and appurtenances. This garage is bounded by all compass points with the estate of spouses Briffa or their successors,

The penthouse and garage are valued at one hundred and thirty-one thousand euro (€131,000);

vi) Garage in shell form, unnumbered officially and name of 'Mariella', previously known as 'Salvu Garge, in Triq Luigi Rosato, known as Triq Wiġi Rosato and formerly known as new road in Triq San Mikiel, Bormla, with all its right and appurtenances. The said garage bounded on east with the said street, southwest by Triq William and northwest by property of Dr Daniel Piscopo valued at sixty thousand euro (€60,000);

vii) Shell form shop, unnumbered officially and name of 'Mariella', previously known as 'Salvu Garge, in Triq Luigi Rosato, known as Triq Wiġi Rosato and formerly known as new road in Triq San Mikiel, Bormla with all its right and appurtenances. The said garage bounded on east with the said street, southwest by Triq William and northwest by property of Dr Daniel Piscopo valued at twelve thousand euro (€12,000).

The said tenement is the property of Amity Development Limited (C37831).

N.B. The said tenement will be sold as described in the acts of judicial sales number 64/2014.

Marvic Farrugia

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of an application filed in the Civil Court of Voluntary Jurisdiction Section, on the 7th December, 2021, Application number 2138/2021 by Mary Angela Cassar whereby she requested that be declared open in favour of Anthony Camilleri, widower of the decujus, in the quota of one half (1/2) undivided share and the remaining one half (1/2) undivided share in favour of Mary Angela Cassar, Catherine Bugeja and Moses Camilleri brother and sisters Camilleri children of the decujus in equal shares between them the succession of Carmela Camilleri, wife of Anthony Camilleri, daughter of Luigi Bugeja and Giuseppa née Polidano, born in Żurrieq, Malta, resided in Żurrieq, Malta, and died in Żurrieq, Malta, on the 5th August, 2021, aged 87, and who held identity card number 19734M.

Wherefore, any person who believes to have an interest in the matter is hereby called upon to appear before the said Court and to bring forward his objections hereto by a minute to be filed within fifteen days from the posting of the banns and notices according to law.

Alexandra Debattista

For the Registrar Civil Court and Tribunals