Court Notices published in Govt. Gazette no 20,515 of 6th November 2020

DKR 192/2012 – Cancellation of a Freezing Order

IT IS BEING NOTIFIED that by a decree dated 8th October, 2020, given by the Criminal Court of Appeal (Madame Justice Dr Consuelo Scerri Herrera, LLD) following an application filed by Jeffrey Busuttil on the 2nd October, 2020, Appeal number 86/2014, in the case in the names:

The Police 

(Asst. Comm. Ian Joseph Abdilla)

Versus

Jeffrey Busuttil, 44 years, son of Francis and Mary Grace née Barbara, born in Tal-Pietà, Malta, on the 25th February, 1976, residing at number 43, Flat 1, Triq il-Parroċċa, Mqabba, Malta, and holder of Maltese identity card bearing number 168076M. 

The Court Ordered the Cancellation of the freezing order of all the assets of the said Jeffrey Busuttil, which order was given by a decree dated 11th November, 2010, by the Court of Magistrates (Malta) as a Court of Criminal Inquiry (Magistrate Dr Audrey Demicoli, LLD) and published in the Government Gazette of the 8th June, 2012.

This order is being published according to section 5(6) of Cap. 373 of the Laws of Malta.

MARVIC PSAILA

Deputy Registrar, Criminal Courts and Criminal Tribunals

By a decree given on the 15th October, 2020, by the Civil Court First Hall, the Court ordered that the extract hereunder mentioned be published for the purpose of service according to Article 187(3) of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12).

By the application filed in the Civil Court, First Hall, on the 18th October, 2019, by HSBC Bank Malta plc (C3177), number of Judicial Sale 54/19 in the names HBSC Bank Malta plc vs Samah Mansour et is being asked that the Court orders the Sale by Auction of the:

The tenement named Whoopie, externally numbered one hundred and thirty-eight (138) in Triq San Albertu, Gżira, with its own airspace and with all its rights and appurtenances. This tenement is overlying third party property together with common drainage system and as well as windows servitudes overlooking onto the said ground floor yard. This property was acquired from the debtor Samah Mansour and Simon Galea as per contract in the acts of Notary Nathalie Pace Asciak dated fifteenth May, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine (15.05.1999). Samah Mansour has been assigned half the share of Simon Galea through a separation contract dated 26th October, 2004, in the acts of Notary Nicholas Briffa.

The said tenement is the property of Mansour Samah (ID 148406L) and Aleaddin Halbie (ID 35069A) for any interest he may have.

MARVIC FARRUGIA

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

It is hereby notified that by a decree dated the the 14th of July 2020 the Court of Magistrates (Gozo) Superior Jurisdiction, Family Section ordered the publication of the extract reproduced hereunder for the purpose of service in terms of section 187(3) of the Code of Organization and Civil Procedure, and this with regard to respondent Nadia Vella of ‘Perla’, Triq Ġużepp Grech, Xewkija, Gozo, mentioned hereunder.

On 14th of July 2020 Joseph Camilleri of ‘Skippy Woodworks’, Ganpet Yard, Triq tal-Ħorob, Xewkija, Gozo, filed an urgent application in terms of Article 836(1)(d)(f) and 836(8)(c)(d) in the Acts of Garnishee Order number 64/2020 in the names of Nadia Vella vs Joseph Camilleri in the Court of Magistrates (Gozo), Superior Jurisdiction, Family Section and where Joseph Camilleri asked the Court:

That applicant has been notified by the garnishee order mentioned above for the sequestered sum of €15,000 filed against him by Nadia Vella;

That between the parties there is a court case pending before the Civil Court – Family Section bearing number 28/2017/BS where the said Nadia Vella is requesting the Court to revoke the decree given on the 2nd July 2016, in the records of the case bearing number 302/12/AL in so far as the Court has ordered Nadia Vella to bear all the expenses incurred in connection with the education and tuition of the minor child Eric Camilleri at St. Martin’s College where he presently attends;

That the facts that arise from the case number 302/12/AL are briefly the following:

On September 3rd, 2014, Nadia Vella had requested the Family Court to authorise her to change the school where the minor child used to attend from St. Edward’s College to Chiswick House School;

On the 10th October, 2014, a joint Note was filed in the records of the case by the defence lawyers of both parties where Nadia Vella had bound herself and took it upon herself that she would be paying and be responsible for all the expenses relating to the education and tuition, transport and extra-curricular activities of the minor child at Chiswick House School, until the minor continues his education in that school;

By a decree of the 27th October, 2014, the Family Court after having seen the mentioned Note, had abstained from taking any further cognizance of her application;

By another application filed on the 14th June, 2016, Nadia Vella had requested the court to order Joseph Camilleri to sign all relative documents that are necessary for the minor to continue his education at St. Martin’s College that together with the Chiswick House School form one educational community, and should he fail to do so, she had requested that the Court authorises her to sign all the relative documentation for the purpose. Together with the application, Nadia Vella had presented a declaration from the school authorities stating that “Eric Camilleri’s continuation in education is merely moving buildings and not schools. SHS (Chiswick House School) and SMC (St. Martin’s College) are one educational community.”;

by virtue of a decree dated 2nd July, 2016, the Court acceded to the pleas made by Nadia Vella and ordered Nadia Vella “to pay all expenses of the minor’s education in this school.” (copy of decree annexed).

That notwithstanding the undertaking made by Nadia Vella in the joint declaration filed on the 10th October, 2014, and notwithstanding that Chiswick House School and St. Martin’s College are one educational community, Nadia Vella is contesting the decree given by the Family Court on the 2nd July, 2016, requesting this Court to order null and void the aforesaid decree, and now she had proceeded further and has asked this Court to order the execution of a precautionary garnishee order against applicant for the amount of €15,000;

That the amount claimed is not prima facie justified. As was decided in the case: ‘Theresa Mangion Galea vs Desmond Stanley Stewart’ on the 21st March, 2006, (Application number 336/05), the Court had decreed that the creditor in order to succeed in his application to keep in force the garnishee order must show a causal connection between the claim and the amount claimed to be sequestered. The Court must in the first place establish whether the creditor has a good cause for his claim, and in the second place whether he has succeeded to prove on a prima facie basis his or her claim in accordance with the amount claimed in the garnishee order;

That it is evident from the above that it is not reasonable in the circumstances that the warrant be held in vigore and applicant is putting forth his request to revoke and annul the garnishee order on the grounds as stated under Article 836(1)(d)(f) of Cap. 12 of the Laws of Malta. The Creditor has not even justified her claim for the sum indicated in the garnishee order to show that she has a prima facie right to hold the retention of sequestered funds in the possession of the garnishees and has not even given at least an account of the expenses incurred for the scholastic years 2017 to 2019 to justify her claim. It is quite evident that this garnishee order was issued unjustly;

That in view of the undertaking made by the Creditor in the records of the case 302/12/AL that she will make good for all the costs and expenses in connection with the child’s education as long as he continues attending at the same school, applicant submits that the garnishee order was applied for in a malicious and vindictive way, and the creditor deserves to be condemned to pay the costs and a penalty as contemplated under Article 836(8)(d) of Cap. 12 of the Laws of Malta. Besides the circumstances of the applicant were such as not to give rise to any reasonable doubt as to applicant’s solvency and as to his financial ability to meet the claims of the creditor should eventually, she succeeds in her claim. And in view of the above and the acts of the case above mentioned bearing number 302/12/AL, the creditor deserved to be condemned to the payments of the penalty in its maximum;

Therefore for the reasons stated above, applicant humbly requests this Honourable Court:

i. to annul and revoke the decree of the 6th July 2020, on the grounds as stated under Article 836(1)(d)(f) of Cap. 12 of the Laws of Malta; and

ii. to condemns Nadia Vella to the payment of the penalty that shall as stated under Article 836(8)(c)(d) of Cap. 12 that shall go in favour of applicant.

Superior Jurisdiction, Family Section
This 30th October, 2020

MAUREEN XUEREB 

For the Registrar, Gozo Courts and Tribunals

By a decree of the Court of Magistrates (Malta) of the 24th September, 2020, the publication of the following extract was ordered for the purpose of service in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap 12) on the defendant Joseph Farrugia in his own name and for and on behalf of the company Acorn Properties Limited.

Composite Solutions Limited (C48263) of Il-Ħarruba, Triq San Martin, San Pawl il-Baħar, filed a Claim on the 1st November 2019, whereby they asked the Court to condemn Joseph Farrugia (ID 186467M) in his own name and for and on behalf of the company Acorn Properties Limited (C37361) of 103, Old Railway Track, Santa Venera, and/or Ilwien, Triq Wied Anġlu, Naxxar, to pay the plaintiff company the sum of €5,843.60 or any other amount that is liquidated by this Court which amount is due to the plaintiff company.

With costs and interests

The case (Notice number 256/19RM) is deferred to the 12th November, 2020, at 9.10 a.m.

ALEXANDRA DEBATTISTA

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decree given by the Court of Appeal, on the 24th April, 2018, in the records of the Application 684/17 JA, in the names Louis Bonnici vs Maria Magdala Sultana, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of Louis Bonnici, in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of Cap. 12.

By means of an Application, filed, in the Court of Appeal, in the records of the Judicial Letter sent in terms of Article 166A with number 46/2017 and in the records of the Garnishee Order with number 1021/2017 and in the records of the Warrant of Seizure number 1023/2017, all in the names Louis Bonnici (ID 104665M) vs Maria Magdala Sultana (ID 584676M) on the 5th March, 2018, the applicant Maria Magdalena Sultana (ID 584676M) respectfully pleaded:

1. That by means of judicial letter 46/2017, above mentioned the said Louis Bonnici (ID 104665M) had asked for the payment of the sum of (€19,000)which is certain, liquid and due and represents money given to the interpellant during these last months;

2.That on the 5th July, 2017, the same judicial letter was rendered executive;

3. That by means of a Garnishee Order number 1021/2017 and the Warrant of Seizure number 1023/2017, both presented in the names premised, on the 12th July, 2017, the said Louis Bonnici has just rendered executive the said judicial letter against the respondent company;

4. That the interpellant strongly objected to the above mentioned procedures;

… omissis …

6.That thus it is the case that the interpellant company calls upon this Honourable Court, with the purpose that the same Court orders that in terms of the relevant Articles of the Law amongst which Article 166A (5) of Cap 12 of the Laws of Malta, the executive title which was acquired according to Article 166A of Cap 12 of the Laws of Malta be rescinded and declared null and without effect;

… omissis …

That by means of a judgement of the 28th February, 2018, the Honourable First Court, rejected the interpellant’s demands against the applicant Sultana; 

… omissis …

4) That the interpellant felt aggrieved by the said judgement of the 28th February, 2018, and is thus filing this humble appeal therefrom.

5)that the grievances of the interpellant are the following:

The First Grievance

1) That from a look of the demands contained in the original application it results that the interpellant was demanding the intervention of the First Court on the basis of two separate and distinct provisions of Cap 12 of the Laws of Malta, as stated in this application;

… omissis …

6) That from a look of the said judgement the Honourable First Court ignored completely the provisions of Article 166A(5) of Cap 12 of the Laws of Malta … omissis … the mentioned judicial letter did not have the requisites stipulated in sub articles (1) (2) and (3) of Cap. 12 of the Laws of Malta and passed on to decide the interpellant’s application on the basis of the said Artricle 281 of Cap 12 only;

7) That the Honourable First Court reached the erroneous decision regarding the execution of the warrants above mentioned,

The Second Grievance

8) That the second grievance of the interpellant consists in the very wrong interpretation of the applicant’s demands in so far as these were interpreted as results from the judgement appealed in the judgement in the names ‘HSBC Bank Malta plc (C 3177) vs Doris Conchin, decided by the First Hall Civil Court, on the 28th July, 2011, confirmed by the Appeal;

9)That the Honourable First Court had perforce to enter into in the merit of the validity of the above mentioned judicial letter with number 46/2017 in the names above premised even it were to judge the applicant’s demands on the basis of Article 281 of Cap. 12,

The Third Grievance

15) That the third grievance of the interpellant is that the Honourable Court of First Instance did not take notice of the interpellant’s evidence during the hearing of the applicant nor did it take care of its explanation,

The Fourth Grievance

17.That the fourth grievance of the interpellant is that the judgement mentioned of the Honourable First Court, of the 28th February, 2018, does not conform with the law, is not equitable and does not conform with the principle of natural justice and with the provisions of the Constitution of Malta and the First Schedule of Cap 319 of the Laws of Malta,

The Fifth Grievance

20) That the fifth grievance of the interpellant is that the Honourable First Court completely failed to pronounce itself on that part contained in the original application so that the Court stop the execution of the above mentioned judicial letter number 46/2017.

… omissis …

Thus for the reasons above premised and those that shall be given during the course of these proceedings whilst reserving to bring forward all the proof permitted by law, the interpellant prays this Honourable Court to revoke the judgement or rather the decision of the Honourable First Court, of the 28th February, 2018, given in these records as demanded in this application of Appeal.

With costs

By means of a Notice of Hearing of a cause issued by the Registry Superior Courts and as the procedures in this cause before the Court of Appeal between Louis Bonnici and Maria Magdala Sultana, have been closed , the Court, fixed the hearing of this cause on Tuesday seventeeth (17) of November, 2020, at 8.50 a.m.

Appellant: Ta’ Millieri, Block 2, Flat 2, Triq il-Pitiross, Ħal Għaxaq

Notify: Louis Bonnici, 13, Sqaq id-Dulur, Numru 1, Ħamrun

ADV. FRANK PORTELLI, LLD

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By a decree of the Court of Magistrates (Malta) of the 5th March, 2020, the publication of the following extract was ordered for the purpose of service in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap 12) on the defendant John Percival.

13 Distributions Ltd (C21976) of Tal-Ġnejna, Tal-Iskorvit, Mġarr, Malta, filed a Claim on the 31st October, 2019, whereby they asked the Court to condemn John Percival (ID 148120A) of Ta’ Monita Block B, Flat 27, Triq il-Papa Ġwanni Pawlu II, Marsaskala, to pay the plaintiff company the sum of €9,900, which amount is due to the plaintiff company.

With costs and legal interests

The case (Notice number 255/19CG) is deferred to the 23rd November 2020, at 8.50 a.m.

ALEXANDRA DEBATTISTA

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

Republic of Malta 

To the Executive Officer (Courts of Magistrates) Gozo

It is hereby notified that by a decree dated the 2nd November, 2020, the Court of Magistrates (Gozo), Volontary Jurisdiction, ordered the publication of the extract reproduced hereunder for the purpose of service in terms of sections 187(3) and 931(3) of the Code of Organization and Civil Procedure.

Whereas by a decree dated the 2nd November 2020 in the records of the application number 78/2020BS by the Court of Magistrates (Gozo), Volontary Jurisdiction, upon an application filed by Rose Vassallo, retired, wife of Louis Vassallo, daughter of the late Lawrence Cauchi and the late Maria née Vella; George Vella, retired, son of the late Anthony Vella and Carmela née Cauchi; Angelo Cauchi, retired, son of the late Lawrence Cauchi and the late Maria née Vella,; Mary Anne Sultana, assisted transport support officer, wife of Saviour Sultana; Saviour Cauchi, retired, son of the late Lawrence Cauchi and the late Maria née Vella; Helen Cook Cauchi, retired, widow of John Cauchi, daughter of the late Francis Xavier Camilleri and Josephine Philomena née Pace; Judith Cauchi, retired, widow of Joseph Cauchi, daughter of the late Lawrence Cauchi and the late Maria née Vella; Krist Vella, unemployed, son of the late Lawrence Vella and the late Angela née Farrugia; Lorraine Agius, employed, wife of Mark Anthony Agius, daughter of the late Lawrence Vella and Angela née Farrugia; Anthony Vella, a pensioner, son of the late Lawrence Vella and of Angela née Farrugia; Miriam Aquilina, divorced from Victor Aquilina, daughter of Lawrence Vella and Angela née Farrugia; Pawla Vella, retired, unmarried daughter of the late Anthony Vella and the late Rose née Cauchi; Rose Vella, self-employed, unmarried daughter of Louis Vella and Mananni née Vella; Joseph Vella, employed, son of Louis Vella and Mananni née Vella; Mary Anne Catherine Fassler, retired, widow of Robert Emil Fassler, daughter of the late Spiro Camilleri and Josephine née Cauchi; and Alessio Joseph Camilleri, retired, son of the late Spiro Camilleri and Josephine née Cauchi versus Deputy Curator so that s/he may represent the uncertain heirs of the said Peter Vella, a pensioner, son of the late Lawrence Vella and the late Angela née Farrugia, born in Liverpool, UK and who was at some point residing in New South Wales, Australia, filed on the 12th October, 2020, in the Court of Magistrates (Gozo), Voluntary Jurisdiction, as well as the other related and subsequent acts. They respectfully premised:

1. Whereas applicants own the following property in unequal and undivided shares between them and together with Peter Vella:

a) The portion of land known as ‘Ta’ Għajn Abdul’ in the limits of Ta’ Kerċem, Gozo, having an area of one hundred forty five square meters circa (145sqm) and bounded South by the said street, West by property of Lawrence Grech, other boundaries being unknown; or more correct boundaries;

b) The portion of land known as ‘Ta’ Mrejsbiet’ in the limits of San Lawrenz, Gozo, having an area of one hundred and ninety two square meters circa (192sqm) and bounded South-west by a passageway, other boundaries being unknown; or more correct boundaries;

c) The portion of land known as ‘Ta’ Mrejsbiet’ in the limits of San Lawrenz, Gozo, having an area of one hundred and eighty eight square meters circa (188sqm), other boundaries being unknown; or more correct boundaries;

d) The portion of land known as ‘Tal-Mengbin’ in the limits of Ta’ Kerċem, Gozo, having a superficial area of one hundred and eighty eight square meters circa (188sqm), boundaries being unknown;

e) The portion of land in Triq San Lawrenz, San Lawrenz, Gozo, having an area of sixty eight square meters circa (68sqm), bounded on the North by the said street, west by property of the Borg family, other boundaries being unknown; or more correct boundaries;

f) The portion of land known as ‘Ta’ Gordan’ in the limits of Għasri, Gozo, having an area of five hundred and sixty two point two zero square meters circa (562.20sqm), and bounded on the North by property of Frenc Cauchi, East by property of the Axiak family and South by property of Toni Zammit; or more correct boundaries;

g) The portion of land in Triq ir-Rokon, San Lawrenz, Gozo, having an area if two hundred and fourteen square meters circa (214sqm) and bounded on the east by the said street, on the south by property of the Camenzuli family and on the North by property of Carmelo Vella; or more correct boundaries;

2. Whereas applicants (excluding Mary Anne Catherine Fassler and Alessio Joseph ahwa Camilleri) also own in unequal and undivided shares between them and together with the said Peter Vella the following property:

a) An undivided share in the property bearing number seventeen (17), other times referred to as number sixteen letter ‘B’ (16B) in Triq ir-Rokon, San Lawrenz, Gozo;

b) An undivided share in the portion of land in Triq ir-Rokon, San Lawrenz, Gozo, having an area of one hundred and thirty square meters circa (130sqm) and bounded on the West by the said street and on other boundaries with third parties whose details are unknown; 

3. Whereas the said Peter Vella, a pensioner, son of the late Lawrence Vella and of the late Angela née Farrugia, born in Liverpool, UK and who was at some point residing in New South Wales, Australia also enjoys an undivided share in all of the above-mentioned property as follows: 

a) An undivided share of one out of seventy five undivided shares (1/75) out of the property mentioned in clause one (1) above; 

b) An undivided share of one out of sixty undivided shares (1/60) out of the property mentioned in clause two (2) above;

4. Whereas applicants are in the process of selling and transferring their undivided shares in the above-mentioned property in favour of Joseph and Charlene Rose spouses Stellini, and in favour of John and Pauline spouses Abela;

5. Whereas applicants have no information as to the whereabouts of the said Peter Vella, and whereas the said applicants wish to carry on and conclude the said sale this notwithstanding, also bearing in mind that the said Peter Vella enjoys an insignificant undivided share out of the said property; 

6. Whereas the aggregate undivided share held by the applicants in the property referred to in clause one (1) above amounts to 98.34%, and to 98.67% in so far as the property referred to in clause two (2) above is concerned; 

7. Whereas a deputy curator needs to be appointed to represent the interest held by the said Peter Vella on the relative deed/s of sale;

Now, therefore and in view of the aforesaid, applicants humbly request this honourable Court:

1. To appoint a deputy curator so that s/he may represent the uncertain heirs of the said Peter Vella, a pensioner, son of the late Lawrence Vella and the late Angela née Farrugia, born in Liverpool, UK and who was at some point residing in New South Wales, Australia;

2. To authorise the said deputy curator to appear, together with the applicants, on the final deed of sale in terms of which the above-mentioned property shall be sold and transferred in favour of Joseph and Charlene Rose spouses Stellini, and in favour of John and Pauline spouses Abela;

3. To authorise the said deputy curator to deduct any tax and all such other legitimate expenses as may be imputable to the said Peter Vella, and to deposit any remaining balance, after deducting the fees due to the said deputy curator therefrom, in a bank account or with a financial institution as this Court may instruct, 

And this under all such terms and conditions as this Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances.

You, the executive officer of the Court of Magistrates (Gozo) are therefore ordered to affix an official copy of these banns at the entrance of this Court, and to summon whosoever would like to act as curator to appear in this Registry within six days, and by means of a minute to submit a declaration that they would like to so act. 

You are also ordered to inform each and every one that if they fail to make this declaration within the stipulated time, the Court will proceed with the selection of official curators. And after so doing, or if you should encounter any difficulty in the execution of these banns, you are to forthwith inform this Court.

Issued by the aforementioned Court of Magistrates (Gozo), Voluntary Jurisdiction, General Section under the signature of Magistrate Dr Brigitte Sultana LLD, LLM (Cardiff), Adv. Trib. Eccl. Melit., a Magistrate of the said Court.

Superior Jurisdiction, General Section

DORIANNE CORDINA

For the Registrar, Gozo Courts and Tribunals

Republic of Malta 

To the Executive Officer (Courts of Magistrates) Gozo

It is hereby notified that by a decree dated the 2nd November, 2020 the Court of Magistrates (Gozo) Superior Jurisdiction, General Section, ordered the publication of the extract reproduced hereunder for the purpose of service in terms of sections 187(3) and 931(3) of the Code of Organization and Civil Procedure.

Whereas by a decree dated the 2nd November, 2020, in the records of the schedule of deposit and redemption of ground rent number 335/2020 by the Court of Magistrates (Gozo), Superior Jurisdiction, General Section upon an application filed by Strada Vescolo Limited (C85355), versus Deputy Curator in the interest of third parties, filed on the 23rd October, 2020, in the Court of Magistrates (Gozo), Superior Jurisdiction, General Section, as well as the other related and subsequent acts. They respectfully premised:

Whereas applicant company owns the property bearing number ten (10), other times referred to as bearing numbers thirteen (13) and fourteen (14) and known by the name ‘Torri Kercem’, other times referred to as ‘Villa Norbel’, and other times also referred to as ‘Villa Klula’ in St Paul’s Fief, previously known as Klula Street, Ta’ Kerċem, Gozo, which property includes two (2) gardens, a pool, two (2) garages without official number which however lead onto the said street, a portion of land having an area of one hundred seventy eight point zero three square meters (178.03sqm), which portion of land has been incorporated into the grounds of the said property, as well as a one half undivided share (1/2) out of a common drive way; which property is better outlined on the site-plan attached herewith as document ‘P’;

Whereas applicant company has acquired the said property by virtue of a deed in the records of Notary Andre Farrugia of the 31st October, 2018;

Whereas and as results from the said deed, this property is subject to an annual and perpetual ground rent of twenty six euro cents (€0.26c), amounting to five euro and twenty cents (€5.20) when the said ground rent is capitalised by the rate of five per cent (5%) in terms of law;

Whereas applicant wishes to redeem the said ground-rent in terms of Article 1501 et sec of Cap. 16 of the Laws of Malta;

Whereas for the avoidance of doubt and dispute, applicant is hereby also depositing the sum of one euro and thirty cents (€1.30) representing ground-rent due in arrears for the past five (5) years;

Whereas applicant has failed to identify the third parties entitled to receive the said redemption;

Now, therefore and in view of the aforesaid, and to free itself of any and all responsibility in terms of law, applicant company is hereby redeeming the said ground-rent and is consequently depositing before this Honourable Court the sum of six euro and fifty cents (€6.50) representing redemption of ground-rent as well as ground-rent due in arrears as aforesaid, which amount may be freely withdrawn by whoever has such right after s/he/they tender due receipt in full and final settlement.

You, the executive officer of the Court of Magistrates (Gozo) are therefore ordered to affix an official copy of these banns at the entrance of this Court, and to summon whosoever would like to act as curator to appear in this Registry within six days, and by means of a minute to submit a declaration that they would like to so act. 

You are also ordered to inform each and every one that if they fail to make this declaration within the stipulated time, the Court will proceed with the selection of official curators. And after so doing, or if you should encounter any difficulty in the execution of these banns, you are to forthwith inform this Court.

Issued by the aforementioned Court of Magistrates (Gozo) Superior Jurisdiction, General Section under the signature of Magistrate Dr Brigitte Sultana LLD, LLM (Cardiff), Adv. Trib. Eccl. Melit., a Magistrate of the said Court.

Superior Jurisdiction, General Section

DORIANNE CORDINA

For the Registrar, Gozo Courts and Tribunals