Court Notices published in Govt. Gazette No. 20,062 of 28th September 2018

By a decree of the Court of Magistrates (Malta) of the 20th July 2018, the publication of the following extract was ordered for the purpose of service in terms of Article 187(3) of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12).

Calamatta Cuschieri Investment Services Limited (C 13729) of Europa Business Centre, Triq Dun Karm, Birkirkara, filed a Claim on the 21st May, 2018, whereby they asked the Court to condemn Alex Azzopardi (ID 304761M) and Maria Elena Azzopardi (ID 191774M) of 42, Triq il-Ġamar, Ħ’Attard  ATD 2461, to pay the plaintiff company the sum of €5683, which amount is due to the plaintiff company.

With costs and legal interests

The case (Application number 122/18SG) is deferred to the 17th October, 2018, at 9.00 a.m.

ALEXANDRA DEBATTISTA

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By a decree of the Small Claims Tribunal of the 4th May, 2018, the publication of the following extract was ordered for the purpose of service in terms of Article 187(3) of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12).

Go plc (C 22334) of Triq Fra Diegu, Marsa MRS 1501, filed a Claim on the 25th April, 2018, whereby they asked the Tribunal to condemn Christina Suda (ID 306307L) of 227, Triq l-Imħallef William Harding, Pembroke, to pay the plaintiff company the sum of €1337.05, which amount is due to the plaintiff company.

With costs and legal interests

The case (Claim number 173/18AM) is deferred on the 11th October, 2018, at 12.30 p.m.

ALEXANDRA DEBATTISTA

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By a decree of the Small Claims Tribunal of the 9th February, 2018, the publication of the following extract was ordered for the purpose of service in terms of Article 187(3) of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12).

Amelia Patricia Quiano Lomas (Norwegian passaport number 30111092M) of 36, Triq Inguanez, Rabat, filed a Claim on the 12th December, 2017, whereby they asked the Tribunal to condemn Paul Beaumont and Maria Geraldine Beaumont of Tal Harruba, 33, Triq is-Sajjieda, San Ġiljan, to pay the plaintiff the sum of €4000, which amount is due to the plaintiff.

The case (Claim number 554/17AM) is deferred on the 11th October, 2018, at 12.30 p.m.

ALEXANDRA DEBATTISTA

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of an application filed in Civil Court of Voluntary Jurisdiction Section, on the 10th August, 2018, Application number 1225/2018, by Mary Carabott whereby they prayed that it be declared open in favour of brothers and sisters of the decujus that is Mary Carabott, George Pulo, Joseph Pulo and Richard Pulo in the quota of one eighth (1/8) undivided share each one of them and in favour of the mother of the decujus Andreana in the quota of one half (1/2) undivided share the Succession of Alfred Pulo, bachelor, son of the late Saviour and Andreana née Psaila, born in Birżebbuġa, Malta, resided in Birżebbuġa and died in Birżebbuġa, Malta, on the 12th March, 2018, aged 72, and who held the identity card bearing number 519445M.

Wherefore, any person who considers to have an interest in the matter is hereby called upon to appear before the said Court and to bring forward his objections hereto by a minute to be filed within fifteen days from the posting of the banns and notices according to law.

ALEXANDRA DEBATTISTA

For the Registrar, Civil Court and Tribunals

By decree given by the Civil Court, First Hall on the 3rd of July, 2018, on the application of Zerafa Olivia (ID 282079M), Tuesday, 23rd October, 2018, at half past ten in the morning (10.30 a.m.), has been fixed for the Sale by Auction to be held on the First Floor, Courts of Justice, Triq ir-Repubblika, Valletta:

Half undivided share of a house on three levels numbered 144, in Triq il-Vitorja, Ħamrun, free and unencumbered with all its rights and appurtenances, valued at €65,000.

The said tenement is the property of Charles Sammut (396467M).

N.B. The said tenement will be sold as described in the acts of judicial sales number 86/2016.

RUDOLPH MARMARÀ

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decree of the 21st May, 2018, of the Rent Regulation Board, in the records of the Application in the names Maya Bonello vs Anders Hellkvist et, Application number 35/2018JD, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of effecting service on the respondents Anders Hellkvist and Karl-Gunnar sive Karl Martinsson in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12)

By means of an application in the names Maya Bonello (ID 78881M) vs Anders Hellkvist (passport number 680501-4112) and Karl-Gunnar sive Karl Martinsson (passport number 90615876), filed in the Rent Regulation Board, on the 9th April, 2018, the applicant Maya Bonello (ID 78881M) requested with respect that:

By means of a private writing dated 27th October 2017 the applicant leased to the respondents the premises number 219, Flat 6, Palazzo Rovere, Marina Street, Tal-Pietà, for one year starting from the 27th October, 2017, and this for the rent of €3,000 payable every month in advance and for the repondents to pay also the costs of consumption of water and electricity and the relative meters;

After the 27th October, 2017, the leased premises started to by used by the respondents for commercial purposes and this with the consent of the applicant;

The respondents failed to pay the rent due to the applicant from the 27th January, 2018, onwards and so the respondents are in debt in the sum of €6,000 representing the rent from the 27th January, 2018 till the 26th March, 2018, saving any other amount due because of the occupation of the premises after the 26th March, 2018;

The respondents failed also to pay for the consumption of water and electricity from the said premises and for the relative rent of the meters int the amount of €1,041.56 till the 27th February, 2018, saving any other amount due after the 27th February, 2018;

According to clause O of the said writing above mentioned, in case the tenants are in default of payment for at least one month rent and/or for the payment of the utilities as water and electricity, and remain in default of payment for seven days for the payment of the rent and payments due, the lease will automatically be rescinded automatically and the owner will have the right to resume possession of the leased premises. If the tenants remain in default or refuse to vacate the premises, the tenants will be responsible to pay the owner a penalty amount of €150 every day;

Althought the respondents were solicited to pay the rent due to the applicant and this by means of letters and emails dated 26th March, 2018, the respondents remained in default;

So the lease de quo is ipso iure terminated and the respondents have the obligation to return back the premises to the applicant;

Thus, for the above reasons, the applicant requests this Honourable Board so that it :

1. Declares that the lease of the premises 219, Flat 6, Palazzo Rovere, Marina Street, Tal-Pietà, made by a writing dated 27th October, 2017, is terminated ipso iure, or if it necessary, it terminates the same lease;

2. Authorises the applicant to take back the possession of the same premises and condemns the respondents so that within a short and peremtory period fixed by this Honourable Board they are evicted from the said premises that is number 219, Flat 6, Paolazzo Rovere, Marina Street, Tal-Pietà, and this under the conditions that this Honourable Board deems fit and proper;

3. Condems the respondents so that in solidum between them they pay the applicant the amount of €7,041.56, representing €6000 rent from the 27th January, 2018, till the 26th March, 2018, and €1,041.56 being the payment for the consumption of water and electricity and the rent of the relative meters till the 27th February, 2018.

With interest accrued from the filing of this application and with costs including the letter dated 26th March, 2018, and the Garnishee Order that was filed together with the filing of this act.

Saving any other right that the applicant may have according to law.

Applicant: RS2 Buildings, Fort Street, Mosta

Respondents 219, Flat 6, Palazzo Rovere, Marina Street, Tal-Pietà.

The application in the names Maya Bonello vs Anders Hellkvist et, Application number 35/2018JD, has been postponed for hearing to the 4th October, 2018, at 9.30 a.m. 

ALEXANDRA DEBATTISTA

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decree given by the Civil Court (Family Sectyion) on the 15th May, 2018, in the records of the Application in the names Camilleri Nathalie (previously Attard) vs Attard Noel, Application number 441/17 AL, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the respondent Noel Attard, in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of Cap. 12.

By means of Application, filed, in the Civil Court (Family Section) in)the names Nathaliue Camilleri previously Attard (ID 408377M) vs Noel Attard (ID 13067M) on the 6th November, 2017, the applicant Nathalie Camilleri previously Attard (ID 408377M) asked this Honourable Court,

1. To declare that her marriage with the respondent Noel Attard is dissolved and the parties are divorced for all intents and purposes of law and uphold the other demands in the application.

Applicant: Camilleri Nathalie previously Attard, 79, ‘Camgre’, Fl. 3, Triq Santa Rita, Birżebbuġa

Respondent: Noel Attard, Flat 1, ‘Ritann’, Triq il-Kulunell Mas, Ħal Tarxien

The Application in the names Camilleri Nathalie previously Attard vs Attard Noel, Application number 441/17 AL, has been deferred for hearing to Thursday, 18th October ,2018 , at 9.15 a.m.

ADV. FRANK PORTELLI, LLD

For the Reġistrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By a decree of the Small Claims Tribunal of the 25th April, 2018, the publication of the following extract was ordered for the purpose of service in terms of Article 187(3) of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12).

Go plc (C 22334) of Triq Fra Diegu, Marsa MRS 1501, filed a Claim on the 25th April, 2018, whereby they asked the Tribunal to condemn Chorbadzhiyska Desislava (ID 59232A) of Surfline Apartments, Blokk A, Flat 2, Triq il-Lampuka, Marsaskala, to pay the plaintiff company the sum of €653.06, which amount is due to the plaintiff company.

With costs and legal interests

The case (Claim number 174/18KCX) is deferred on the 4th October, 2018, at 1.00 p.m.

ALEXANDRA DEBATTISTA

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By a decree of the Small Claims Tribunal of the 26th June, 2018, the publication of the following extract was ordered for the purpose of service in terms of Article 187(3) of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12).

Go plc (C 22334) of Triq Fra Diegu, Marsa MRS 1501, filed a Claim on the 25th June, 2018, whereby they asked the Tribunal to condemn Gaetano Schembri (ID 123696M) of Maria, Flat 1, Triq il-Kappillan Mifsud, Ħamrun, to pay the plaintiff company the sum of €543.05, which amount is due to the plaintiff company.

With costs and legal interests

The case (Claim number 284/18KCX) is deferred on the 4th October, 2018, at 1.00 p.m.

ALEXANDRA DEBATTISTA

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By a decree of the Small Claims Tribunal of the 25th April, 2018, the publication of the following extract was ordered for the purpose of service in terms of Article 187(3) of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12).

Go plc (C 22334) of Triq Fra Diegu, Marsa MRS 1501, filed a Claim on the 17th April, 2018, whereby they asked the Tribunal to condemn Sammut George (ID 315962M) of Carmel Apartments, Flat 2, Triq l-Alwetta, Mosta, to pay the plaintiff company the sum of €770.33, which amount is due to the plaintiff company.

With costs and legal interests

The case (Claim number 148/18AM) is deferred on the 11th October, 2018, at 12.30 p.m.

ALEXANDRA DEBATTISTA

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By decree given by the Civil Court, First Hall on the 16th August, 2018, on the application of Farrugia Michael (ID 394570M), Thursday, 25th October, 2018, at half past ten in the morning (10.30 a.m.) has been fixed for the Sale by Auction, to be held on the First Floor, Courts of Justice, Triq ir-Repubblika, Valletta, of the following property:

Property named ‘Lycidas’ in Triq Dun Mikiel Scerri, Ħ’Attard, including its airspace built on two plots named Tal-Irmiedi. The tenementt is free and unencumbered valued at eight hundred and seventy thousand euro (€870,000).

The said tenement is the property of Vassallo Frank (ID 620958M).

N.B. The said tenement will be sold as described in the

acts of judicial sales number 38/2016.

RUDOLPH MARMARÀ

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By decree given by the Civil Court, First Hall on 29th August 2018, on the application of A & J Baldacchino Boatyard Limited (C 17586), Wednesday, 17th October, 2018, at eleven in the morning (11.00 a.m.) has been fixed for the Sale by Auction, to be held at A & J Baldacchino Boatyard Limited, Triq Ħal Far, Birżebbuġa, of the following items seized from the property of Caruana Paul Philip (ID 524386M):

Boat named ‘Omera’ officially numbered 2816 registered in Malta, of the make ‘Feeling’, model 1090, length 10.9 metres, built in 1984, valued at ten thousand euro (€10,000).

N.B.The said boat will be sold as described in the acts of judicial sale file number 7/18.

MARVIC FARRUGIA

For the Registrar of Civil Courts and Tribunals

By decree given by the Civil Court, First Hall on 20th September 2018, on the application of A & J Baldacchino Boatyard Limited (C 17586), Wednesday, 17th October, 2018 at noon (12.00 p.m.) has been fixed for the Sale by Auction, to be held at A & J Baldacchino Boatyard Limited, Triq Ħal Far, Birżebbuġa, of the following items seized from the property of Friggieri Tonio (ID 3870M):

Boat named ‘Tramuntana’ officially numbered 12841, registered in Malta, by Call Sign 9HB2065 built in 1991 of the make Sunseeker model Camargue 46, length 13.83m and width 4.08m, valued at seven thousand and five hundred euro (€7,500). 

N.B. The said boat will be sold as described in the acts of judicial sale file number 6/18.

MARVIC FARRUGIA

For the Registrar of Civil Courts and Tribunals

Republic of Malta 

To the Marshall of the Court

By means of a decree given by this Court, on the 29th August, 2018, following a request of Dr Luigi A. Sansone noe, it was ordered that deputy curators be chosen to represent AL Jajeh Group for Industry & Trading Ltd and Sarl Irennes Imp & Exp De Chaussures,in the records of the Sworn Application number 863/2018 MCH, in the names Dr Luigi A. Sansone noe vs Deputy Curators and in the other relative and subsequent acts .

By means of a Sworn Application, filed,in the First Hall Civil Court , in the names Advocate Doctor Luigi A. Sansone LLB (Hons) LLD (holder of Maltese Identity card number 258269 letter ‘M’) as special mandatary of Giorgio Armani S.p.A., a foreign company of Italian nationality and with an address of Via Borgonuovo, 11, 20121, Milano, Italy vs deputy curators to represent: 1) Al Jajeh Group for Industry & Trading Ltd, a foreign company with an indication of address of Hama-Syria; and 2) Sarl Irennes Imp & Exp De Chaussures,a foreign company with an indication of address of N 92 B (221 Lots) Lootissement Tamachite Batna 0501A02, in Algeria, on the 27th August, 2018, the applicant Advocate Doctor Luigi A. Sansone LLB (Hons)  LLD (holder of Maltese identity card number 258269 letter ‘M’) as special mandatary of Giorgio Armani S.p.A., a foreign company of Italian nationality and with an address of Via Borgonuovo 11,20121, Milano, Italy, for the reasons premised in the application asked this Honourable Court:

1. To declare that the entry without free release for circulation in Malta in the course of business between the defendants of a quantity of objects consisting in sandals which have on them identical trademarks which cannot be distingusihed in their essential aspects from some of those of trhe plaintiff company duly registered as European Union trademarks (EU trademarks) with numbers 000504308, 015743891, 015743801,000504282, 000504258, 0001705185, 001705144 and 0156209388 respectively, which objects are all presently held under the authority of the of the Director General (Customs) after he had found that the containers MRKU 5495930 and MRSU 3524923 which contained them contravene the rights of intellectual property of the plaintiff company as regards the same European Union trademarks as herein indicated;

2. Declare that the same objects and namely a quantity of objects consisting in sandals which all have on them identical trademarks or which cannot be distinguished in their essential aspects from those of the plaintiff company duly registered as European Union trademarks (EU trademarks 000504308, 015743891, 015743801, 000504282, 000504258, 001705185, 001705144 and 015620388 respectively; 

3. Order the Director General (Customs) to detstroy those objects within a short and peremptory period without any compensation to the defendants and at their expense;

4. Take or order the Director Genberal (Customs) to take as regards those objects any other measure in virtue of which they be removed definitely from circulation in the existinbg systems of commerce and the defendant be deprived from the economic benefits of the transaction;

5. Order that the defendantrs are to bear all the other costs in connection with this lawsuit including the costs in connection with the measures ordered in terms of the third and fourth demands of the plaintiffs amongst which those of identification and numbering of the said objects of their transport from the place of storage and the other costs mentioned in the application.

With costs, against the defendants summoned so that a reference to their evidence be made.

Applicant noe: Advocate Doctor Luigi A. Sansone LLB (Hons) LLD (holder of Maltese identity card 258269 letter (‘M’)as special mandatary of Giorgio Armani S.p.A., a foreign company of Italian nationality and with an address of Via Borgonuovo, 1120121, Milano, Italy; 84-85, Triq Melita, Valletta VLT 11209

Notify the Defendants: Deputy Curators to represent: 1) AL Jajeh Group For Industry & Tradsing Ltd, a foreign entity with an indication of address of Hama-Syria; and 2) Sarl Irennes Imp & EXP DE Chaussures, a foreign entity with and indication of industry of No 92B 9(221 Lots) Lootissement Tamachite Batna, 0501A02, in Algeria; Courts of Justice, Valletta (two copies).

You are therefore ordered to affix an official copy of this bann at the entrance of this Superior Court and to summon whosoever wishes to act as curator to appear before this registry within six days and by means of a minute to submit a declaration that he wishes so to act.

You are also ordered to inform each one that if he fails to make this declaration within the stipulated time, the Court will proceed to the selection of Curators of Office.

And after so acting, or if you should encounter any difficulty in th execution of this bann, you are to inform forthwith this Court.

Given by the Civil Court First Hall, above mentioned, with the witness of the Hon. Mr Justice Anthony Ellul ,LLD, Doctor of Laws.

ADV. FRANK PORTELLI, LLD

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decree given by the Court of Appeal (Inferior Jurisdiction) on the 18th July 2018, in the records of the Application in the names Paul Calleja vs Director Social Security, Application number 2/18 AE, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the respondent Paul Calleja, in terms of Article 187(3) of Cap. 12.

By means of an Application, filed in the Court of Appeal (Inferior Jurisdiction) Appeal number 2/18, Decision of the Arbitrator number 015/18, Paul Calleja (ID 2654M) vs Director General Social Security, on the 23rd February, 2018, the applicant Director General Social Security respectfully pleaded:

That by means of a decision dated 10th January 2018, the Arbitrator upheld the Appeal of Paul Calleja, by means of which he had appealed the decision taken by the Director General Social Security on the 18th March, 2016;

That the appellant felt aggrieved by the decision of the Arbitrator and is filing this humble Appeal in termns of Article 109 of Cap. 318 of the Laws of Malta where the main grievance of the appellant is clear and manifest and consists in fact of the following:

That with all due respect the Arbitrator did not make a good assessment of the proof as was due by him and thus the judgement given is manifestly wrong.

The Facts of the Present Cause

That the respondent applied for the Contributory Pension on the 2nd September, 2015;

That following the request of the respondent , the Department of Social Security made the necessary assessment in order to decide if the respondent was eligible for a Contributory Pension according to Cap. 318 of the Laws of Malta.

That unfortunately the appellant was not satisfied that the respondent had satisfied all the criteria of the law and this since it appears that the respondent over a period of 42 years appears to have paid only 82 contributions, thus the Director appellant proceeded by formally informing the respondent that,

‘With reference to your Demand for a Contributory Pension which bears the date of 2/9/2015, I wish to inform you that you are not entitled to this pension because,

‘The average from year to year of contributions paid by you or accredited to you is less than 20 according to Article 17(5) of the Social Security Act (Cap. 318) of the Laws of Malta.

That following such a decision the respondent presented an appeal before the Arbitrator as he was entitled to do in view of Article 108 of Cap. 318 of the Laws of Malta.

That the Arbitrator in the decision after taking into consideration all the proof brought was of the opinion that whilst ‘Thus the Arbitrator is of the opinion that the decision of the Director General dated 25th April 2016 is not justified and thus does not merit to be confirmed and in the light of the documentation presented in particular the document of Job Plus which shows that between the 20th August 1981 and the 14th August 1989, he was employed full-time with the company Medserv is to be reviewed.

That from such decision the appellant felt aggrieved and thus he is filing this humble appeal according to the provisions provided by law.

The Grievance Wrong Appreciation of the Proof

That as regards proof before the Court of Appeal, the appellant is well aware that the Honourable Court does not have the competence to make a reasessment of the proof as made in the first and second instance by the Director Social of Social Security and the Arbitrator respectively,

That notwithstanding the above it is established in our jurisprudence that a Court of Second Instance does not intervene except in exceptional cases and for grievous motives, in the exercise of trhe discretion of the Tribunal of First Instance’.

That it is exactly for this reason that the appellant is filing this humble appeal because in his decision the Arbitrator although he was conscious that no proof was brought to confirm that stated by the appellant that he had worked in that country, that infact Medserv did not have records which are so old which show that the appellant worked with them with the company. As well as the Department did not find any documentation which shows and confirms that the appellant ever applied so that the contributions in Libya are valid in Malta and nor other records which show that he was employed abroad he still chose to base his decision on the documentation produced by the respondent.

That the respondent although in his Appeal before the Arbitrator did not list on the basis of which grievances he filed this humble appeal he chose to rebutt the decision of the Appellant Dirtecor by means of witness and documentation which shows that he worked in Libya.

That in the opinion of the respondent such documentation and evidence was sufficient to rebutt the decision of the Director.

That truly it was never in the interest of the Director appellant in order to be given a Contributory Pension to verify whether the respondent ever workred in Libya or not but he was interested only whether the respondent paid all the contributions according to Cap. 318 of the Laws of Malta.

That nothwithstanding the above it appears clear that in the opinion of the respondent the reason of the Director on the basis cof which he took his decision of the 18th March, 2016, has no basis so much so that the respondent emphasised in his note (which came to the notice of the Arbitrator on the 26th April, 2017) ‘That during the period he was not obliged and bound to pay the contribution’.

That the arbitrator avoided from taking note of this allegation in his decision, which allegation in the opinion of the Director is of great importance for the appeal de quo and this for the following reasons:

That primarily such allegation if ever had to be proved by means of a disposition of the law where it is shown on black and white that the respondent was in fact exempted from paying contributions. However such proof was never presented by the respondent.

That in the present cause, the respondent, did not bring proof that he submitted the form mentioned in order to regularise himself for the period before 1990 and nor did he bring proof that he paid any contributions in Malta after 1990. The Arbitrator in his decision took notice only of the period before 1990 and emphasised that if ever the company Medserv Ltd had to assume responsibility for the contributions.

That thus the Director appellant is of the humble opinion that the Arbitrator with all due respect did not do a good assessment of the proof produced and this because all the dispute based on whether the appellant is entitled to a Contributory Pension and not whether the respondent worked in Libya or not and with which company he worked or not.

That in the case de quo the appellant is of the humble opinion that he acted in such a way and manner that was expected from him because he applied the law in an equitable, reasonable and uniform manner.

Thus, whilst making reference to all the proof and submissions brought by him before the Arbitrator as a Court of First Instance and whilst reserving the right to produce all the other proof due to him according to Law, at this stage prays with respect that this Honourable Court revoke and annul the judgement given by the Arbitrator of the 10th January, 2018, and consequently pass on to confirm the decision of the Director of the 18th March, 2016.

Whereas the written procedures in the cause before the Court of Appeal between Paul Calleja vs Director General of Social Security have been closed the Court, fixed the hearing of this cause on Monday 4th June, 2018, at 9.15 a.m. and deferred to the 2nd July, 2018, at 9.00 a.m. and deferred to the 30th July, 2018, at 9.00 a.m. and now deferred to the 15th October, 2018, at 10.00 a.m.

Appellant: 38, Triq l-Ordinanza, Valletta

Respondent: ‘Carmen Garage’, Triq l-Iklin, L-Iklin

ADV. FRANK PORTELLI,LLD.

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

It is hereby notified that in virtue of the powers conferred on it by Section 257 of the Civil Code, the Court of Revision of Notarial Acts, by a Decree dated the 18th day of September, 2018, and this after a written plea numbered 166/18, Ordered:

The correction of the Act of Death of Michelina Dimech, bearing number 1391 of the year 2018, in the column entitled ‘Whether married or unmarried, widower or widow’, the word ‘Raymond’ is to be removed and substituted with the correct name ‘Nazzareno’.

JANET CALLEJA

Deputy Registrar, Court Of Revision Of Notarial Acts

By a decree of the 17th september 2018 given by the first hall Civil Court, the Court ordered that the extract hereunder mentioned be published for the purpose of service according to article 338 (1) of the Code of Organization and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12)

That by application and a Schedule of set-off filed contemporaneously by J. Zammit Limited on the 13th September, 2018, the approval of the said judicial acts is being demanded for the amount of €50.00 following judicial sale by auction 8/18 in the names J. Zammit Limited (C 37945) vs Duranovic Coreschi (ID 383484M), held under the Authority of the said Court on the 12th September, 2018.

According to Article 338 (1) of Cap. 12: Any person who may have an interest and the persons so served shall be allowed the time of twenty days to file an answer stating in detail the reasons for their opposition and the amounts in contestation; and where such opposition is based on a claim against the proceeds of sale an alleged cause of preference, they are to state the amount of such claim and the basis for the preference. Such persons shall, with the answer, file all relevant evidence to substantiate their opposition.

MARVIC FARRUGIA

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals