Court Notices published in Government Gazette No. 19,985 of 30 April 2018

By means of adecree given by the First Hall Civil Court, on the 5th February, 2018, in therecords of the Sworn Application, in the names Schembri Alexander et vsCommissioner of Police et, Application number 1115/17 JPG,the followingpublication was ordered for the purpose of service of the Bord tal-Pulizija(Appelli) (Police Appeals Board) in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of Cap.12.

By means of anApplication, presented, in the First Hall Civil Court, in the names 1) SchembriAlexander (ID 499666M) and residing 169,Triq’ Sant’Anġlu, Żejtun; 2)RizzoArthur (0179776M) and residing 9, Whitehart, Triq il-Gudja, Ħal Għaxaq; 3)Saliba Manuel (ID 0422175M), and residing ‘Waterlily’ Triq l-Ghassies,Marsaskala; 4) Portelli Anthony (ID 0498379M) and residing Juniper Apps, App 1,Triq Ġanni Vella, Swatar, Birkirkara; 5) Polidano George (ID 0550677M) andresiding 101, Moncherie Triq il-Kbira, Ħal Qormi; 6) Zammit Lambert (ID0351875M) and residing 67b, San Martin , Triq San Ġuzepp, Ħaż-Żabbar; 7)Calleja Gordon (ID 0080872M) and residing Altavista Court, App 4, Triqiċ-Ċirasa, San Ġwann; 8) Vella Kevin (ID 0334875M) and residing 13, Elakev,Triq l-Immakulata Kunċiżżjoni, Ħaż-Żabbar; 9) Gilson Jason (ID 275071M) uresidenti 167, Triq Santa Monika, Raħal Ġdid; 10) Borg Gordon (ID 0472091M) andresiding 9, Triq il-Qalb ta’ Ġesu Rahal Ġdid; 11) Cassar Oliver (ID 0038373M)and residing 25, Triq it-Tramm, Ħamrun; 12) Caruana Ivan (ID 0382076M) andresiding 25/6, Hill Top Maisons, Sqaq Żbibu, San Ġwann; 13) Zammit Joseph (ID503573M) and residing 13, iż-Żenqa, Triq il-Biedja, Ħal Safi; 14) Apap Nigel(ID 0183079M) and residing 5, Sqaq Nru 2, Triq il-Pjazzetta Ħ’Attard; 15)Fenech Mario (ID 214172M) and residing 54, Triq Ġużè Bajada, Ħamrun; 16)Decelis Stefan (ID 0217876M), 59, Triq il-Fuħħarin, Birkirkra; 17) XuerebNorman (ID 135971M) and residing 281 Triq F. S. Caruana, Birkirkara; 18)McCharty Geoffrey, (ID 0426491M) and residing 13/1, Wild Orchid, Triq l-GħansalIkħal, Mosta; 19) Vella Oliver (ID 0440072M) and residing 133, Triq Mons MikielAzzzopardi, Siġġiewi; 20) Bonello Joyce (ID 0468267M) and residing 23, il-KennTagħna, Triq is-Sur, Fgura; 21) Attard Nicolette, (ID 0481873M) and residingPortview, Flt 2, Triq Parisio, Tas-Sliema; 22) Galea Sillato Alexandra (ID0120274M) and residing 169, Triq San Giljan, San Ġwann; 23) Bezzina Steve (ID0182972M) and residing 60, IL-Miġbha, Triq l-Imqades, Żebbiegħ, Mġarr; 24)Kelly Andrew (ID 0359975M) and residing Coral Crt, Flt 2, Triq’Sant’Aristarkus, St Paul’s Bay, vs 1) Commissioner of Police; 2) Minister forHome Affairs and National Security; 3) Bord tal-Pulizija (Appelli) (PoliceAppeals Board); 4) The Honourable Prime Minister, on the 12th December, 2017,the applicant Schembri Alexander (ID 499666M), Rizzo Arthur (ID 0179776M),Saliba Manuel (ID 0422175M), Portelli Anthony (ID 0498379M), Polidano George(ID 0550677M), Zammit Lambert (ID 0351875M), Calleja Gordon (ID 0080872M),Vella Kevin (ID 0334875M), Gilson Jason (ID 0275071M), Borg Gordon (ID0372091M), Cassar Oliver (ID 0038373M), Caruana Ivan (ID 038076M), ZammitJoseph (ID 0503573M), Apap Nigel (ID 0183079M), Fenech Mario (ID 0214172M),Decelis Stefan (ID 0217876M), Xuereb Norman (ID 0135971M), McCarthy Geoffrey(ID 0427491M), Vella Oliver (ID 0440072M), Bonellio Joyce (ID 0468267M), AttardNicolette (ID 0481873M), Galea Sillato Alexandra (ID 0120274M), Bezzina Steve(ID 0182972M), Kelly Andrew (ID 0359975M), respectfully pleaded and the sameAlexander Schembri (ID 499666M),confirmed by oath;

A. That theyoccupied and still occupy the grade of sergeants in the Police Corps within theMinistry of Home Affairs and National Security, whose head is the same respondentCommissioner of Police;

B. That on the4th September, 2013, the respondent Commissioner of Police issued a call inorder that there be filled the posts of Sergeant Majors of the First and SecondClass in the Ministry for Home Affairs and National Security for which poststhe same applicants qualified;

… omissis …

D. That asalready mentioned in the date above mentioned and namely (the 4th September,2013) the respondent Commissioner of Police issued a circular with internalnumber 61/2013.

E. That on thesame date and under the same number (and namely 61/2013) the same respondentCommissioner of Police issued another version of the same circular but thistime clause 4.2 mentioned above was deleted.

… omissis …

H Thateffectively the interviews were held in order to fill up the places ofSergeants Majors as above mentioned.

I. That itresults that the results of the interviews above mentioned and the criteria onwhich the candidates were given points were never communicated to the same candidatesand were never published.

J. That in viewof this all the process is to be considered as if it was not concluded for allintents and purposes of law.

K. That despiteof all this the respondent Commissioner of Police, issued a message by means ofNPS (National Police System)with number GHQ/HR/ 411/ 2013/MSG (copy of it herebyannexed and marked Document D) which had the subject ‘Re: Appointment of First/Secons Class SergeantMajors’.

… omissis …

M. That in factthe persons mentioned, in the said Document D, were so appointed.

N. Thatsubsequently and namely on Thursday 5th May, 2016, the respondent CommissionerPolice issued a further internal NPS message with number GHQ/HR/ 159/2016/MSG(Copy of it annexed Document E) which once again had the subject ‘ReAppointment of First/Second Class Sergeant Majors’

… omissis …

P. That itresults that the promotions which were issued on the 5th May, 2016, in factwere issued in order that justice was done with those same persons in regardsto an injustice which the same persons suffered as a direct result of the nottransparent and unjust manner by which the same selection process forpromotions of the 4th September, 2013, was carried out since till this day notype of result was issued and much less did the respondent Commissioner ofPolice communicate in any manner with the same applicant.

Q. That thesedefects of the selection process of the 4th September, 2013, were acknowledgedby the same Commissioner of Police.

… omissis …

S. That ithappened that the remedy offered by the respondent Commissioner of Police wasoffered in a selective and discrimatory manner with the result that theapplicant’s position was identical with the position of the persons indicatedin Document E annexed were avoided.

T. That infactthe applicants were not even informed with the offer that the respondentCommissioner of Police made to the persons mentioned in Document E.

… omissis …

X. That thus thesame applicants suffered and are suffering injutice and illegal and abusivediscrimnation that the same respondent Commissioner of Police carried out andis carrying out in their regard.

… omissis …

Z.As if all thatexposed is not enough the complaint that the applicants brought before thePolice Board before the latter was dissolved, is not finally decided till thisday and this due to a technicality in the laws as amended.

Thus theapplicants whilst referring to the facts above exposed which shall be provedtill the grade required by law as well as every proof and/ or further documentwhich can br brought to the knowledge of this Honourable Court humbly ask thissame Court;

1. To declare that the selection process above referred to and namelythat by the respondent Commissioner of Police … omissis … is vitiated and thisfor the reasons brought forward in this application and for further reasons ifit be the case that shall be specified during the pleading of this applicationand uphold the other demands made in the application amongst which theliquidation of damages as demanded and payment of the same.

With costs andlegal interest as demanded against the respondents from now summoned so that areference to their evidence be made.

List of DocumentsAnnexed

List of Witnesses

Applicant:Schembri Alexander ID 499666M and residing 169, Triq Sant’Anġlu, Żejtun

Reespondents:

1. … omissis …

2. … omissis …

3. Bordtal-Pulizija (Appelli) Police Appeals Board) 194/2, Triq il-Merkanti, Valletta

4. … omissis …

5. … omissis …

The SwornApplication in the names Schembri Alexander et vs Commissioner of Policeapplication 1115/17 JPG, has been deferred for hearing to the 18th June, 2018,at 12.30, p.m.

Reġistry of theSuperior Courts, today 25th April, 2018

Adv. Frank Portelli, LLD

For theRegistrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

Notice, Registryof the Civil Court, First Hall

Whereas MarkCassar (ID 0523261M) filed an application under oath (No. 357/2018/LSO)demanding Correction in the Act of Birth No: 5232/1961 in the Public Registry.

Whosoever mayhave an interest therein, and wishes to oppose that demand, is hereby calledupon to do so, by means of a note to be filed in the Registry of these Courts,within fifteen days from the day of the publication of this present notice inthe Government Gazette.

Those who, withinthe aforesaid time, shall have filed such note, shall be notified by theservice of a copy of the said application under oath, of the day which will beappointed for the hearing of the case.

By order of theCourt

Josette Demicoli

For Registrar,Civil Courts and Tribunals

It is herebynotified in virtue of the powers conferred on it by Section 257 of the CivilCode, the Court of Revision of Notarial Acts, by a Decree dated the 20th April2018, and this after a written plea Numbered 49/2018, Ordered:

The correction ofthe Act of Birth of Alexander Agius, bearing number 6184 of the year 1935,under the column entitled ‘Name and surname of the father, and whether livingor dead’ and this among the information given with regards to ‘Particularsrespecting the mother’, the surname ‘Cesario’ is to be cancelled andsubstituted with the correct surname ‘Cesareo’.

Janet Calleja

F/Registrar, Court of Revision of NotarialActs

By means of adecree given by the First Hall Civil Court, on the 27th March, 2018, in therecords of the Sworn Application in the names De Maria Jonathan Adv. Dr noe vsWhitmore Barry Michael, Application number 124/18 LSO, the followingpublication was ordered for the purpose of sercvice of the respondent BarryMichael Whitmore, in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of Cap. 12 of the Lawsof Malta.

By means of aSworn Application, filed, in the First Hall Civil Court, in the names AdvocateDoctor Jonathan De Maria (ID 367569M) as special mandatary of the absenteeElisabeth Fraissenon (French ID 110560401083) vs Barry Michael Whitmore (ID377603L) on the 15th February 2018, the applicants asked this Honourable Court,

1. To declarethat the immovable property acquired by the plaintiff and by the defendant incommunity beween them by a contract dated 29th December, 1989, in the recordsof Notary Dr Anthony Attard is not easily divisible in the respective shares ofthe parties which property includes:

a) the property internally marked number eight which is situated in theeight floor (7th floor level) in the blokk of apartments which is situated atnumber 241, Triq it-Torri,Sliema, with the relative rights and appurtenances;b) the washroom/storeroom internally with number six (6) at basement level of thesame blokk, order the sale by licitation of the said premises and uphold theother demands in the application.

With costs,against the defendant, from now summoned so that a reference to their evidencebe made.

Applicant nomine:192, Old Bakery Street, Valletta

Defendant nomine:View Point 5, Five Arches, Triq is-Snajjin, Mellieħa

The SwornApplication in the names De Maria Jonathan Adv. Dr noe vs Whitmore BarryMichael, Application number 124/18 LSO, has been deferred for hearing to the8th May, 2018, at 9.30 a.m.

Adv. Frank Portelli, LLD

For theRegistrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By a decree ofthe Small Claims Tribunal of the 26th March, 2018, the publication of thefollowing extract was ordered for the purpose of service in terms of Article187(3) of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12).

Vodafone MaltaLimited (C 10865) of Skyparks Business Centre, Malta International Airport, ĦalLuqa, filed a Claim on the 21st March, 2018, whereby they asked the Tribunal tocondemn Anthony Scicluna (ID 350435M) of 94, Triq San Martin, Ħaż-Żebbuġ, topay the plaintiff company the sum of €3909.76, which amount is due to theplaintiff company.

With costs andinterests

The case (Claimnumber 105/18CZ) is deferred on the 21st May, 2018, at 12.15 p.m.

Alexandra Debattista

For theRegistrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals.

By a decree ofthe Small Claims Tribunal of 14th September, 2017, the publication of thefollowing extract was ordered for the purpose of service in terms of Article187(3) of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12).

Alf Mizzi &Sons (Marketing) Limited (C 8692) of Zachary House, Industrial Estate, Marsa,filed a Claim on the 15th March, 2017, whereby they asked the Tribunal tocondemn Camen Camilleri (ID 2489G) of Bambina, Triq Dun Nard Mallia, Żurrieq,and The Chop Shop Ltd (C 61506)of 12, Falling Waters, Triq Wignacourt, Birkirkara, to paythe plaintiff company the sum of €3753, which amount is due to the plaintiffcompany.

With costs andinterest

The case (Claimnumber 128/17KCX) is deferred on the 6th June, 2018, at 1.00 p.m.

Alexandra Debattista

For theRegistrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals.

By means of adecree given by the First Hall Civil Court, on the 15th March, 2018, in therecords of the Sworn Application, in the names Equitrade Limited (C 11733) vsFarrugia Joseph, Application number 86/18 LSO, the following publication wasordered for the purpose of service of the respondent Joseph Farrugia (ID168164M) in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of Cap. 12.

By means of aSworn Application, presented, in the First Hall Civil Court, in the namesEquitrade Limited (C 11733) vs Joseph Farrugia (ID 168164M) on the 1st February2018, the applicant Equitrade Limited (C 11733) asked the respondent to statewhy this Honourable Court should not,

1.Declare that the applicant company is the owner of the airspaceoverlying the property or rather barn without number and without nameaccessible from an independent entrance in an alley without number which abuttsin Triq it-Tiġrija, Marsa, which borders as indicated in the application,declare that consequently the objects, the apparatus of the respondent existingin the property of the applicant company and all the belongings of therespondent are there with any right at law and uphold the other demands in theapplication amongst which that all the apparatus existing in its property beremoved.

With costs andlegal interest as demanded in the application.

The respondent issummoned so that a reference to his evidence be made.

Defendant: 1)Joseph Farrugia 2, Upper Ground Stables, Triq it-Tiġrija, Marsa

The Sworn Application in the names Equitrade Limited C 11733 vs FarrugiaJoseph, Application number 86/18 LSO, has been deferred for hearing to the 17thMay, 2018, at 9.30 a.m.

Adv. Frank Portelli, LLD

For theRegistrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decree given by the Civil Court (Commercial Section) onthe 17th April 2018, in the records of the Application in the names Curmi Market vs Hotel Services Limited (C 2594) Application number 737/17 JZM,(previously before the Civil Court First Hall) the following publication wasordered for the purpose of service of the respondent company Hotel ServicesLimited (C 2594) in terms of Art 187(4) and (5) of Cap. 12.

By means of anApplication, presented, in the First Hall Civil Court, in the names Mark Curmi(ID 322564M) and Lucienne Curmi (ID 263667M) vs Hotel Services Limited (C 2594)on the 9th August, 2017, the applicant Mark Curmi (ID 322564M) and LucienneCurmi (ID 263667M) respectfully pleaded and asked this Honourable Court in viewof that premised in this application;

That between theparties there were procedures in the names Hotel Services Limited (C 2594) vsMark and Lucienne spouses Curmi in their name personally and exercisingcommerce in the name M&M Caterers and SKC Caterers (Writ of Summons number2522/97) which were definitely decided by a judgement of the Court of Appeal,of the 29th April, 2016 (copy annexed Doc. A).

That theconsequence of that judgement was that the respondent company Hotel ServicesLimited, was declared a debtor of the applicant in the amount of fifty thousandseven hundred eighty-three euro and twenty-one cents (€50,783.21) besides legal interestwhich ran from the date of the judgement as well as part of the costs.

… omissis …

That it resultsthat the business of the company has been suspended for more than twenty-fourmonths and the same respondent company is not in a position to pay its debts.

Thus, in view ofthe premised the applicants humbly asked this Honourable Court:

1. To declarethat the business of the respondent company has been suspended for more thantwenty-four months;

2. Declare thatthe respondent company is not in a position to pay its debts;

3. Consequentlyuse its discretion in terms of Article 214(2) (a) of Cap. 386 of the Laws of Maltaand order the dissolution and winding up of the respondent company;

4. Give everyopportune provision in order that a liquidator be appointed and there beconducted the consequent winding up according to the provisions of Act XXV of1995 regarding Companies;

With costsagainst the respondent company whose representatives are summoned so that areference to their evidence be made.

Saving anyfurther action due to the applicants at law.

Applicant; 61,In-Naħla, Triq il-Wiżna, Swieqi

Respondent: c/oMark Gatt (ID 337967M) 175, Triq D’Argens, Msida

The Applicationin the names Curmi Mark et vs Hotel Services Limited et (C 2594) was deferredfor hearing to Monday 21st May, 2018, at 9.00 a.m.

Adv. Frank Portelli, LLD

For the Registrar,Civil Courts andTribunals

DKR 311/2014 –Cancellation of a Freezing Order

It is being notified that by a decree dated 19th April, 2018 given bythe Court of Magistrates (Malta) as a Court of Criminal Judicature –(Magistrate Dr Anthony J. Vella LLD), after an application filed by Michael ZwiOros on the 7th March, 2018 and following the execution of what was ordered inthe judgement dated 9th November, 2017 by the same Court, Compilation number887/2014 in the case:

The Police

(InspectorMaurice Curmi)

Versus:

MICHAEL ZWI OROS,37 years, son of Vasile and Ilana née Buchman, born in Stockholm, Sweden on the18th November 1980, residing at number 22, Mapilu Court, Flat 1, Xiber Street,Swieqi Malta and holder of Identity Card number 62798(A).

The Court ORDEREDTHE CANCELLATION of the freezing order of all the assets of the said MichaelZwi Oros which order was given by the Court of Magistrates (Malta) as a Courtof Criminal Inquiry – (Magistrate Dr Doreen Clarke LLD) on the 17th September,2014.

This order isbeing published according to section 5(6) of Cap. 373 of the Laws of Malta.

Dr John Seychell Navarro

Dip.Hlth.Science, Dip. Mgmt Stud, Dip.Not.Pub.,LLB, LLD

AssistantRegistrar, Criminal Courts and Criminal Tribunals

By means of adecree of the 23rd March 2018 of the Rent Regulation Board, in the records ofthe Application in the names Maria Carmela Formosa pro et noe vs JohnAzzopardi, Application Number 2/2018JD, the following publication was orderedfor the purpose of effecting service on the respondent John Azzopardi in termsof Article 187(3) et seq of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap12)

By means of anapplication in the names Maria Carmela Formosa (ID 96267M) in her own name andfor and on behalf of her husband Paul Anthony Formosa (ID 246066M) presentlyabsent from Malta vs John Azzopardi (ID 614952M) filed before the RentRegulation Board on the 15th January 2018, the applicant Maria Carmela Formosapleaded with respect and confirmed on oath:

That theapplicant Paul Formosa is the owner of the garage number 6, Norfolk Street, Tas-Sliema;

The said garagewas leased to the respondent John Azzopardi by Mr Formosa’s father EdgidioFormosa, for a year, which could be extended from one year to the other byagreement between the parties, for the amount of €850 rent each year. Theagreement was that the garage will be used limitedly for domestic use, suchthat the commercial use for the garage de quo was prohibited;      

The last renewalof the lease expired on the 1st Ocotber, 2017, without any agreement betweenthe parties that the lease will be further renewed;   

That some timebefore the applicants had approached the respondent with an informal proposal,where subsequently to the termination of the lease another lease agreementwould eb entered into by means of which the rent previously paid by therespondent was to be increased to €1,700 per year and this so that it betterreflects the true value of the garage on the market today;

The new proposalwas not agreed to by the respondent, and so the lease has expired on the dayabove mentioned. But although the lease was terminated as of the 1st October2017 the respondent was, and still is, refusing to vacate the garage inquestion, and this although he does not have any title at law;

In addition, therespondent is insisting that the applicants are to pay him some form ofcompensation so that he vacates the said premises – this was refused by theapplicants;

For all intentsand purposes, the applicants sent a letter to the respondent on the 21st August2017 where he was once again asked so that if he still had an interest incontinuing to lease the garage of the applicants, he enters into a newagreement with them in accordance with the terms proposed by them. Therespondent was also requested that if he does not accept that the lease isextended on these revised terms, he returns the keys of the premises to theapplicants upon the expiry of the lease and he vacates the said garage from hispersonal belongings;

The respondentreplied by means of an e-mail where he refused the proposal of the applicantsFormosa and in a clear attempt to intimidate the applicants, he reiterated thefollowing (Doc A1):

“On 1st October,I will send you the rent at the old rate;

You will probablyrefuse it,

I will deposit itin Court,

And we lookforward to some +/- three years of Court litigation in front of the RentRegulation Board.”

In fact, from that time till today therespondent ignored the expiry of the lease and sent a new rent book accompaniedwith the payment, that always according to him was in settlement of the rentdue in connection with the months that followed the termination of the lease;

So once the rentde quo was no longer operative after the 1st October 2017 the applicantsrefused this payment and returned the relative cheque to Mr Azzopardi togetherwith the new rent book that he sent (Doc B2);

That the new rentbook sent by the respondent was different from the one before, because itspecifies the words garage/store 6A, Norfolk Street, Tas-Sliema. This implicates thateven when the lease was still operative, the garage in question was being usingfor a commercial purpose, this being a clear breach of the original agreementbetween the parties and that the respondent, through the new rent book, wastrying to extend the permitted use of the premises;

The fact that therespondent is refusing to vacate from the premises, and is occupying the garageillegally although the lease has expired is causing damages to the applicantsconsisting in the loss of rent of the same garage, which is estimated at €1750per year and this as it will be proven during the case;

For the reasonsabove mentioned, in the opinion of the applicants and as far as they know therespondent does not have any defense to the requests of the applicants that arebeing made in these proceedings;

Thus, in terms of the above, therespondent are requesting with respect that this Board will:

1) Decide thiscase without proceeding to trial in terms of Article 16A of Cap. 69 of the Lawsof Malta;

2) Declare forthe reasons mentioned in the application, that the lease of the garage number6, Norfolk Street, Tas-Sliema, is now terminated, because the lease was not extended interms of Article 1531H of Cap. 16 of the Laws of Malta and so the respondent isoccupying the premises without any valid title;

3) Consequently, order the eviction of therespondent John Azzopardi form the premises that is the garage number 6,Norfolk Street, Tas-Sliema;

4) Liquidate thesum representing damages suffered by the applicants for the illegal occupationby the respondent following the termination of the said lease on the 1stOctober 2017 representing loss of rent for the garage number 6, Norfolk Street,Tas-Sliema;

5) Order therespondent to pay the liquidated sum to the applicants.

With costsagainst the respondent, who is as of now, summoned so that reference to hisoath be made.

NotificationRespondent John Azzopardi: 10, Melita Street, Tas-Sliema.

The applicationin the names Maria Carmela Formosa pro et noe vs John Azzopardi ApplicationNumber 2/2018JD has been postponed for hearing to the 1st June 2018 at 9.15a.m.

By order in termsof article 167 (2) of Cap. 12 of the Laws of Malta you have to appear in frontof the Board above mentioned on the day and time that are established andnotified to you after the written procedures are closed.

You are warned interms of Article 16(A)(1)(ċ) of Cap. 69 of the Laws of Malta that these arespecial summary procedures in which procedures the judgment will be given on thefirst day of hearing of the application and if the respondent does not make anappearance at the sitting (does not appear although duly notified) or if hefails to show, during that sitting, that they have a valid defense and reasonsto contest the applicants’ request.

So it is in theinterest of who receives this sworn application to contact a lawyer immediatelyso that the Court will hear what he has to say in the suit.

Alexandra Debattista

For theRegistrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

DKR 22/2018 –Variation of a Freezing Order

It is beingnotified that by a decree dated 29th March, 2018 given by the Court ofMagistrates (Malta) as a Court of Criminal Judicature – (Magistrate Dr JosephMifsud, LLD)following an application filed by Anthony Galea and Gilbert Galea on the 26thMarch 2018, in the case:

The Police

(InspectorJeffrey Scicluna)

(InspectorPriscilla Caruana Lee)

Versus

Gilbert Galea, 26years, son of Anthony and Rita née Caruana, born in Pieta’ Malta on the 27thJanuary 1991, residing at Sueno, Santa Marija, Żurrieq, Malta and holder ofMaltese Identity Card bearing number 88191(M);

and

Anthony Galea, 55years, son of Carmel and Josephine née Grixti, born in Żurrieq Malta on the09th November 1962, residing at Sueno, Santa Marija, Żurrieq, Malta and holderof Maltese Identity Card bearing number 736062(M).

The CourtAuthorized the accused Anthony Galea and Gilbert Galea to renew the insurancepolicies together with the relative payment on the vehicles with registrationnumbers CBC 481, CTY 088 and CTY 082 with Mapfre Middlesea plc.

This variation isbeing published in Article 5 of Cap. 373 of the Money Laundering Act of theLaws of Malta, of Section 22A of the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance, Cap. 101 of theLaws of Malta in accordance with Article 23A of Cap. 9 of the Laws of Maltafollowing a freezing order dated 18th January, 2018 given by the same Court (MagistrateDr Joseph, Mifsud LLD)whereas the Court ordered the attachment in the hands of third parties in ageneral manner, all monies and other movable and immovable property which maybe due to or belonging to Anthony Galea and Gilbert Galea.

Dr John Seychell Navarro

Dip.Hlth.Science, Dip. Mgmt Stud, Dip.Not.Pub., LLB, LLD

AssistantRegistrar

Criminal Courtsand Criminal Tribunals

By means of adecree of the 23rd March 2018 of the Rent Regulation Board, in the records ofthe Application in the names Alfred Calleja et vs Jason Mangion, ApplicationNumber 3/2018JD, the following publication was ordered for the purpose ofeffecting service on the respondent Jason Mangion in terms of Article 187(3) etsequitur of theCode of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap 12)

By means of anapplication in the names Alfred Calleja (ID 750354M) and (ID 0262858M) vs JasonMangion (ID 459373M) filed before the Rent Regulation Board on the 15th January2018, the applicants Alfred Calleja and Antonia Calleja submitted with respectand confirmed on oath:

That theapplicants lease to the respondent the premises, namely the shop officiallymarked 206, Cospicua Road, Paola, and this in terms of the private writing dated 27thSeptember 2014, copy of the said writing is here attached and marked as Doc. A;

That therespondent is in default of the rent payment for several months, that is fromFebruary 2017 till today, and so for over a year, in the amount of €8,580;

That until nowthe amount representing water and electricity bills payable by the respondentto the applicants amounts to €2453.31;

The applicants had to pay these amounts themselves to the companyAutomated Revenue Management Services Limited, because the electricity servicewas disconnected twice during this last year and this because the respondentfailed to pay the amount due although according to clause 10 as stipulated inthe private writing, it is stated that the respondent, as the resident, has topay the water and electricity bills;

Besides therespondent has for long not operated as pizzaiolo or restaurant in the premisesin question from February 2017 and till today has not opened for business,furthermore he abandoned the premises;

The applicantssolicited the respondent several times for payment, amongst which verbally, bytelephone and even by legal letters and a judicial letter, a copy of which isfor all intents and purposes being attached and marked as Doc. B;

The respondentremained in default and did not answer any of those letters;

According to theprivate writing between the parties mentioned above and specifically withrespect to clause number 2, the failure of the respondent to make threepayments, gives the owners and namely the applicants, a right, to terminate thelease ipso iure and to request all payments due;

The applicantsconfirm that they know the facts personally and as far as they know therespondent does not have any defense;

So, in the respectful opinion ofthe applicants, there are all the elements required in Article 16A of theReletting of Urban Property (Regulation) Ordinance (Cap. 69 of the Laws ofMalta) such that this application can be decided without proceeding to trial asthe respondent does not have any defenses to bring to the requests of theapplicant;

Thus, therespondent is requested to state why this Board should not, subject to anydeclaration and order which it deems necessary to give:

Decide this casewithout proceeding to trial in terms of Article 16A of Cap. 69 of the Laws ofMalta;

Declare that as aresult of his default in payment, the respondent committed a material defaultand breach in terms of the private writing dated 27th September 2014, andconsequently the lease will be terminated ipso jure;

Declare thateffectively the respondent abandoned the premises in question and that is 206,Cospicua Road, Paola;

Authorise theapplicants to resume the possession of the premises, and that is the premises206, Cospicua Road, Paola;

Consequently,order the eviction of the respondent from the said premises, and this within ashort and peremptory period that this Board establishes, which request is beingmade in terms of article 9(a)(i) of Cap. 69 of the Laws of Malta;

Declare that therespondent is debtor of the applicants for the sum of €8,580 representing therent arrears of the premises and €2,453.31 as balance due for the bills ofwater and electricity;

Condemn therespondent to pay the amount of €8,580 representing the rent due;

Condemn therespondent to pay the amount of €2,453.31 representing the balance due for thewater and electricity bills.

With costsagainst the respondent, including the judicial letter with registration number3166/2017 and with due reservation for any further right of the applicantswhich results from the law, including the payment of any further sums due tothe applicants by the respondent, who is as of now, summoned so that referenceto his oath be made.

Applicant: 99,Sablet, Triq Tumas Galea, Birkirkara

Respondent: 199,Saint Mary, Triq il-Karmnu, Fgura

The applicationin the names Alfred Calleja et vs Jason Mangion Application Number 3/2018JD hasbeen postponed for hearing to the 1st June 2018 at 9.00a.m.

So it is in theinterest of who receives this sworn application to contact a lawyer immediately

This order in terms of Articel 16A(b) of Cap. 69 of the Laws of Maltayou have to appear before the Court above mentioned on the day and time establishedand notified to you.

Alexandra Debattista

For theRegistrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of anapplication filed in the Civil Court of Voluntary Jurisdiction Section, on the12th April 2018, Application number 529/2018 by Marlene Borg whereby she prayedthat it be declared open in favour of the same Mary Pauline sive Marlene néeFarrugia wife of the decujus in the quota of one half (1/2) undivided share andthe remaining one half (1/2) undivided share in favour of Kim Borg and ConnorBorg, children of the decujus in equal shares between them the SUCCESSION ofJoseph Borg, son of William Borg and Catherine née Bilocca, born in Marsa,resided in Ħamrun anddied in Tal-Qroqq,Msida on the 17th November 2017 aged 59 holding identity card number 00259758M.

Wherefore anyperson who considers to have an interest in the matter is hereby called upon toappear before the said Court and to bring forward his objections hereto by aminute to be filed within fifteen days from the posting of the banns andnotices according to law.

Alexandra Debattista

For the RegistrarCivil Court and Tribunals

By means of anapplication filed in the Civil Court of Voluntary Jurisdiction Section, on the11th April 2018, Application number 516/2018 by Adelina Camilleri et wherebythey prayed that it be declared open in favour of the same Adelina Camilleriwife of the decujus in the quota of one half (1/2) undivided share and theremaining one half (1/2) undivided share in favour of Moira Chetcuti, RuthCamilleri and Carolina Anne Camilleri , children of the decujus that is in thequota of one sixth (1/6) undivided share each one of them the SUCCESSION ofJoseph Camilleri, son of Carmelo Camilleri and Giulia née Rizzo, born inPaola and resided in Mosta anddied in Tal-Qroqq,Msida on the 11th January 2018 aged 85 holding identity card number 605632M.

Wherefore anyperson who considers to have an interest in the matter is hereby called upon toappear before the said Court and to bring forward his objections hereto by aminute to be filed within fifteen days from the posting of the banns andnotices according to law.

Alexandra Debattista

For the RegistrarCivil Court and Tribunals

By means of anapplication filed in Civil Court of Voluntary Jurisdiction Section, on the 25thJanuary 2018, Application number 117/2018 by Joseph Camilleri, whereby mariaAnna Camilleri holding identity number 846952(M), aged 65, wife of JosephCamilleri, daughter of Carlo Bugeja and Carmen Bugeja née Sciberras, born inMtarfa on the 19th November 1952 and residing at Monte Carmel Hospital, Attardaged 65 was interdicted by means of a decree given on the 10th April 2018.

Alexandra Debattista

For the Registrar Civil Court andTribunals

By means of adecree given by the Civil Court First Hall, on the 3rd April 2018,in the records of the ExecutiveWarrant of Arrest of Sea Vessels with number 391/2018 MCH, in the names A&JBaldacchino Boatyard Limited (C 17586) vs Paul Philip Caruana (ID 524386M) thefollowing publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the respondentPaul Philip Caruana (ID 524386M) in terms of Article 187(3) et sequitur of Cap.12.

By means of anApplication, filed, in the First Hall Civil Court, in the names Applicant(A&J Baldacchino Boatyard Limited (C 17586) vs Respondent Paul PhilipCaruana (ID 524386M) on the 9th March 2018, the applicant A&J BaldacchinoBoatyard Limited (C 17586) respectfully pleaded;

That theinterpellant is in the possession of an executive title and wishes to enforceit on the sea vessel herein mentioned, which execution shall be eluded with thedeparture of the sea vessel which is being mentioned in the said application;

That theExecutive title is the following;

Judgement givenon the 27th April 2017, by the Civil Court First Hall, in the names ‘A& JBaldacchino Limited (C -17586) vs Paul Philip Caruana (Identity Card Number524386M) (Sworn App. No 337/2016 LSO) copy hereby annexed as document ‘A’ ,which judgement is res judicata as results from a Certificate that a cause isnot appealed hereby annexed as document ‘B’whereby that Honourable Courtdecided inter alia in the following manner;

a.by means of itssecond ruling condemned the respondent to pay the applicant company the sum of€ 9,206.57, with interest at 8% yearly, from the 27th February 2013;

b.by means of thefifth ruling condemned the respondent to pay the applicant company the sum of €16,028.40 with interest at 8% yearly, which interest shall run as for the sumof € 8,654.75 from the 27th February 2013 and as for the balance of € 7,373.65from the date of the judgement;

c.the costs, including those ofthe judicial letter of the 27th February 2013 and of the precautionary warrantof seizure number 277/2013 to be paid by the respondent.

That thus theamount due by the respondent toward the interpellant company amounts to theglobal sum of thirty-six thousand, five hundred eighty-four euro and forty-nine cents (€36,584.49)representing the following;

a.€12,889.20 and namely €9,206.57as capital and €3,682.63 as interest;

b.€12,116.65 and namely €8,654.75 as capital and €3,361.90 as interest;

c.€7,858.49 and namely €7,373.65as capital and € 484.84 as interest;

d.€3,387.87 lawsuit expenses(Sworn App. No 337/2016 LSO)including the VAT on the advocate’s fee and that of the legal procurator andthis according to an official tax hereby annexed as document ‘C’ VAT amounts to€338.66.

e. €152.45judicial letter expenses (Judicial letter No. 63/2013) including VAT on theadvocate’s fee and that of the legal procurator and this according to anofficial tax hereby annexed as document ‘D’ VAT amounts to €11.17.

f.€179.83 costs of thePrecautionary Warrant of Seizure (Warrant of Seizure Number 277/2013) includingVAT of the advocate’s fee and that of the legal procurator and this accordingto an official taxed bill hereby annexed as document ‘E’ VAT amounts to €16.77.

g.Saving the costs of the presentprocedures and any other necessary procedure so that the interpellant companyrecover the debt due to it be the respondent.

That the seavessel whose arrest is being demanded is the following;

a.Name ‘Omera’

b.Details of Identification ofthe sea vessel;

i.Official Number: 2816.

ii. Flag:Maltese.

iii.Length overall: 10.81 metres.

iv. Gross &Net Tonnage: 10.49

v. Built 1987

c. Place wherethe sea vessel lies: In the boatyard of the company A&J BaldacchinoBoatyard Limited, Hal Far Road, Birżebbuġa.

d. Authority:Maltese Maritime Authority, Wine Pressers’ Wharf, Marsa.

Thus, it is being respectfully askedthat this Honourable Court order the issuing an Executive Warrant of Arrest ofSea Vessels for the credit hereunder mentioned on the sea vessel aboveindicated and (1) and order the sale of the said sea vessel as this Court deemsfit, with costs of the present procedure.

Confirmed beforeme by oath after I read its contents which was presented by PL J. PaceCiscaldi, with five docs.

Warrant of Arrestof Sea Vessels

over ten metresin length

(Decree for Saleby auction given

without the issueof a Decree of Payment).

Republic of Malta

Order of Court

Republic of Malta

Warrant No 391/18EM

Whereas theattached application has been filed, copy of which is hereby annexed and thererecur the necessary elements required by Law for the issuing of a Warrant ofArrest of Sea Vessel.

Thus, this Court is;

Ordering thejudicial sale by auction of the sea vessel indicated in the originalapplication;

Orders theRegistrar in order to appoint experts according to the provisions of Article 89of Cap 12 which may be necessary;

… omissis …

Orders the sameauthority to take the necessary measures so that the Court order be brought tothe notice of third parties;

… omissis …

Fixes a day, timeand place for the sale of the sea vessel as follows;

Orders theRegistrar so that he notifies this decree to the Transport Authority in Maltaor other authority appointed by the Minister and in whose possession or controlthe sea vessel against which the Executive Warrant of arrest has been issued,as well as to the person or the captain or other person who is responsible forthe sea vessel which is being arrested or the agent of that sea vessel.

Applicant:A&J Baldacchino Boatyard Limited,Ħal Far Road, Birżebbuġa

Respondent: PaulPhilip Caruana, St. Mary Triq it-Tengħud tax-Xagħri, Mosta

Notify: MaltaMaritime Authority, Wine Pressers’ Wharf, Marsa

Given by the Hon.Madam Justice Lorraine Schembri Orland,today 9th March, 2018

Adv.Frank Portelli,LLD

For theRegistrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of adecree of the 11th April 2018 of the Civil Court First Hall in the records ofjudicial letter number 4086/17, in the names Montaldo Insurance Agency Limitednoe vs Anthony Cutajar, the following publication was ordered for the purposeof effecting service on Anthony Cutajar in terms of Article 187(3) of Cap. 12.

In the First Hallof the Civil Court

To AnthonyCutajar (ID 426077M) of No 30, Tosca, Trejqet Fleur De-Lys, Sta. Venera.

By the presentMontaldo Insurance Agency Limited (C 1052) for and on behalf of the foreigncompany AIG Europe Limited of 98/2 Melita Street, Valletta, whilst reference ismade to the insurance policy that you have with the interpellant, which policyhas the number P17041306 and covers the vehicle with registration numberIBJ-153 (make Toyota Hi Lux- Double Cab-Pick Up), informs you that it will notcontinue to offer you an insurance cover in view of the fact that you hid amaterial fact on your proposal form;

In terms of paragraphnumber 6 of the General Conditions of the insurance policy you are given 7 daysnotice, from the date of notification of this judicial letter, for thecancellation and termination of the insurance policy and cover above mentioned.

In view of theabove you have to return to the interpellant the Motor Insurance Certificate inquestion. In default of returning such certificate or you do not confirm underoath that this certificate is lost or was destroyed and your default to submitto us such sworn declaration, all constitute criminal offences according tolaw. Thus, you arebeing solicited to abide with the above immediately.

For any purposesand effects of law, a copy of this cancellation and termination of theinsurance policy above mentioned is being notified to the Commissioner ofPolice and to Transport Malta.

So much toregularise yourself

With costs

Alexandra Debattista

For theRegistrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of adecree of the 20th February 2018 in the First Hall of the Civil Courts in therecords of the judicial letter number 4463/17 in the names Bank of Valletta plcvs Christ Scerri et, the following publication was ordered for the purpose ofeffecting service on the respondent Christ Scerri in terms of Article 187(3) etsequitur of Cap.12.

By means of ajudicial letter filed in the First Hall of the Civil Courts against ChristScerri (ID 222392M) of 15, St George’s Court, Flat 2, Triq l-Ispnott, Xgħajraand Nathasha Rita Thornton, on the 28th November 2017, Bank of Valletta plc of1/5, Misraħ San Ġorg, Valletta, VLT 1190, solicits you so that within two daysyou pay together and in solidum between you the sum of €118,734.65 balance ofdebt in your Loan Account with Bank of Valletta plc together with legalinterest from the 19th July 2017 till the date of effective payment.

The interpellantcompany warns you that if you fail they shall be constrained to proceed againstyou according to law.

Alexandra Debattista

For theRegistrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of adecree given on the 20th April 2018, in the records of the judicial letternumber 522/18, in the names Mapfre Middlesea plc et vs Christian Attard et, theCourts of Magistrates (Malta), ordered the following publication for thepurpose of effecting service on the respondent Christian Attard, in terms ofArticle 187(3) of Cap. 12 of the Laws of Malta.

In the Courts ofMagistrates (Malta)

To ChristianAttard (ID 39693M)

2, Blk 4, Flat2,Triq tal-Fieres,  Ħal Kirkop

Elmo InsuranceLtd

By means of thepresent Mapfre Middlesea plc (C5553) of Middlesea House, Floriana as subrogatedin the rights of its insured Charles Formosa and the same Charles Formosa,makes reference to the accident that occurred on the 27th June 2017, betweenthe vehicle with registration number TAXI053M insured by the interpellantinsurance company and property of the interpellant Charles Formosa and thevehicle with registration number IBM 931 driven by the respondent ChristianAttard and insured by the respondent insurance company.

Because for thisaccident the respondent Christian Attard is the sole responsible, because ofnegligence, lack of skill and lack of observation of the traffic regulations onhis part, you are being solicited so that within one week from today you comeforward for the payment of damages suffered by the interpellant as aconsequence of this accident in the amount of €2316.68 representing the repaircosts of the insured vehicle that had been paid by the interpellant insurancecompany besides the loss of use suffered by the insured.

In default ofpayment within the time given, the interpellants will proceed further againstyou without further notice.

So much toregulise your position.

With legalinterest till the date of the final payment.

Alexandra Debattista

For the Registrar,Civil Courts and Tribunals

It is herebynotified that the Court of Magistrates (Malta) by means of a decree given onthe 16th April 2018, in the records of the judicial letter number 435/18, inthe names GasanMamo Insurance Limited et vs Anthony Richard Mario Cauchi et,ordered the following publication for the purpose of effecting service on the defendantAnthony Richard Mario Cauchi, in terms of Article 187(3) of Cap. 12.

In the Courts ofMagistrates (Malta)

To AnthonyRichard Mario Cauchi (ID 39702L) of 23, Amy Maia Triq il-Kbira, Kirkop

Citadel Insuranceplc

By means of thispresent GasanMamo Insurance Limited (C3143) of Msida Road, Gżira GZR 1405 as subrogated inthe rights of its insured Analise Abela both in terms of the comprehensive typeof policy and at law whilst making reference to the accident that occurred onthe 1st October 2017 in Mġarr (Għajn Tuffieħa), in which accident the vehicle withregistration number GBI 013 driven by you Anthony Richard Mario Cauchi wasinvolved and the vehicle with registration number ANA 985 property of theinterpellant Analise Abela, calls upon you so that within four (4) days fromthe date of this judicial letter you pay the sum of €214.73 or more correct sumrepresenting the damages suffered by the interpellant in the accident abovementioned, because this accident occurred solely because of your carelessness,lack of skill and lack of observation of the traffic regulations on your part.

If you remain indefault of payment within the time given, further procedures will be takenagainst you according to law, and this without further notice.

This solicitationis being made directly to your insurance company, for all purposes and effectsat law, and in particular but not limitedly, in terms of Cap. 12, Cap. 16 andCap. 104 of the Laws of Malta.

With costs andinterests.

Alexandra Debattista

For theRegistrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

It is herebynotified that the Court of Magistrates (Malta) by means of a decree given onthe 16th April 2018, in the records of the judicial letter number 456/18, inthe names GasanMamo Insurance Limited et vs Christine Marie Chetcuti et,ordered the following publication for the purpose of effecting service on thedefendant Christine Marie Chetcuti, in terms of Article 187(3) of Cap. 12.

In the Courts ofMagistrates (Malta)

To ChristineMarie Chetcuti (ID 205704L) of 11, Crown Court, Flat 3, Triq Bonavita, SanĠiljan

Argus InsuranceAgency Limited for and behalf of the foreign company Argus Insurance Company(Europe) Limited

By means of this present GasanMamo Insurance Limited (C3143) of MsidaRoad, Gżira GZR 1405 as subrogated in the rights ofits insured Fredrick John Wall both in terms of the comprehensive type ofpolicy and at law and the same Fredrick John Wall (ID 70157A) whilst makingreference to the accident that occurred on the 30th August 2017 in Triqil-Mosta, San Pawl il-Baħar between the vehicle with registration number LDC153 driven by you and the vehicle property of Fredrick John Wall withregistration number TIS 515, calls upon you so that within four (4) days fromthe date of this judicial letter you come forward for the liquidation andpayment of damages suffered by the interpellant as a result of the saidaccident, which accident occurred solely because of your carelessness, lack ofskill and lack of observation of the traffic regulations on your part ChristineMarie Chetcuti.

The interpellant informs you that if the time given to you passesuselessly, they will have no alternative but to proceed further against you byall means permitted by law.

So much so youmay know how to regulate yourself and to avoid useless costs and procedures.

This solicitationis being made directly to your insurance company, for all purposes and effectsat law, and in particular but not limitedly, in terms of Cap. 12, Cap. 16 andCap. 104 of the Laws of Malta.

With costs.

Alexandra Debattista

For theRegistrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of adecree of the 29th January 2018 in the First Hall of the Civil Courts in therecords of the judicial letter number 2586/17 in the names Bank of Valletta plcvs Victor Chetcuti et, the following publication was ordered for the purpose ofeffecting service on the respondent Rosaline Chetcuti in terms of Article187(3) et seq of Cap. 12.

By means of ajudicial letter filed in the First Hall of the Civil Courts against VictorChetcuti, Rosaline Chetcuti (ID 371147M) of Danmark, Triq il-Markiz J.Scicluna, Swieqi and Mark Chetcuti, on the20th July, 2016, Bankof Valletta plc of 1/5, Misraħ San Ġorġ, Valletta, VLT 1190, solicits you so thatwithin two days you pay the sum of €45,532.62 balance of debt in your LoanAccount with Bank of Valletta plc together with legal interest from the 28thFebruary 2016 till the date of effective payment.

This judicialletter is being made without prejudice for other procedures made against you bythe interpellant bank for any other balances due by you.

The interpellantcompany warns you that if you fail they shall be constrained to proceed againstyou according to law.

Alexandra Debattista

For theRegistrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decreeof the 18th August 2017 handed down by the Court of Magistrates (Malta) in therecords of the judicial letter number 1928/2016 in the names Automated RevenueManagement Services Ltd pro et noe vs Jesmond Nappa Licari, the followingpublication was ordered for the purpose of effecting service on theinterpellant Jesmond Nappa Licari in terms of Article 187(3) of Cap. 12.

In the Court ofMagistrates (Malta)

To Jesmond NappaLicari (ID 102764M) of Flat 2, 110, Triq San Ġużepp, Valletta.

By the present,Automated Revenue Management Services Limited (C46054) of Gattard House,National Road, Blata l-Bajda, Malta, in its own name and on behalf of Enemaltaplc and Water Services Corporation, notifies you with the attached sworndeclaration marked as Document A for all the purposes and effects of Article466 of Cap. 12 of the Laws of Malta and solicits you to pay the amount of€5,528.66 which amount is sure, liquid and due and representing the balance duefor the consumption of water and electricity, rent of water and electricitymeter, administrative fees, connection and disconnection fees, together withinterest due on the amount according to Law, regarding the bill holding number101000095825 for the premises Flat 2, 110, Triq San Ġużepp, Valletta, which amounts to €5,528.66.

Despite severalsolicitations by the applicant company for the payment of the amount due, youremained in default and did not pay till the day of the filing of this judicialletter. In addition, there is no valid reason for your failure to pay and younever contested the Amount due.

This act is beingsent to you for all the purposes and effects of law and in default of paymentor opposition on your part within the time mentioned in Article 466 Cap. 12 ofthe Laws of Malta, the applicant company shall proceed to enforce this creditaccording to law.

With costs

Alexandra Debattista

For the Registrar, Civil Courts andTribunals