Court Notices published in Govt. Gazette No. 19,426 of 15 May 2015

By means of a decree given on the 21st April 2015, by the Court of Appeal, in the records of the Appeal Application, in the names Edith Galea vs Joseph Degiorgio, Application number 865/2009, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the respondent Ronald Galea in terms of Article 187 (3) et. seq. of Cap. 12.

By means of an Appeal Application filed in the Court of Appeal, in the names Edith Galea as heir of Ġanni Saliba and Dolores née Farrugia, and by a decree of the 2nd March 2015, following the death of Edith Galea, the records were transferred in the name of her husband Ronald Galea (ID 258841M) vs Joseph Degiorgio, on the 20th July, 2011, the applicant Edith Galea (ID 1109344 M) respectfully pleaded:

That in virtue of a judgement given by the First Hall Civil Court, on the 11th July 2011, whilst rejecting the first plea did not pronounce itself on the second and upheld the third and fourth plea of the defendant and rejected the plaintiff’s requests, with costs. The cause was about a simulated contract that the plaintiff’s father Ġanni Saliba did with the defendant.

That the applicant felt aggrieved by the said judgement, and is thus filing this appeal therefrom.

That the grievance is clear and manifest and consists in the following:

(1) That the Honourable Court of First Instance whilst rejecting the first plea stated that between the first cause which had been decided by the Court of Appeal, whereby the plaintiff is proceeded against Joseph Degiorgio, who during the proceedings was representing her deceased father Ġanni Saliba, the present action is completely different from that which there was in the other cause decided by the Appeal with number 1758/01 CFS.

In that cause, the Honourable Court of Appeal had stated that since Ġanni Saliba had died, his heir had inherited his obligations. The basis of that cause was that her father Ġanni Saliba, against whom the plaintiff had also proceeded in the beginning, had sold the share of the premises 3, Sant Angelo Street, Saint Julians, which she inherited from her mother.

However she had also inherited all the rights resulting from such inheritance amongst which every judicial action which was possibile.

That here, the Honourable First Court made an evident mistake which emerges from the following paragraph.This is the paragraph which comes before the operative part of the judgement and commences with the words ‘That it is therefore evident that the causes and allegations of the plaintiff in both causes are irreconciliable’.

The Court continues to state that in the other cause the applicant and her father declared that the said father thought that he could transfer his wife’s share already deceased is now alleging that father was induced into a mistake because he thought that he was leaving a legacy to the defendant and not transferring the property in question. The mistake is clear that in the other cause her father had not been notified, in fact the cause is being made against him and not that the applicant and her father declared something together. The father infact was the defendant and the cause was made both against him and against Degiorgio and at that time she was acting as heir of her mother’s share.

In this cause, the principal issue was what Ġanni Saliba himself had commenced.

At the suspected time as results from the records he had appointed Advocate Dr Joseph Schembri, who confirmed a letter there is in the records, and Ġanni Saliba had appointed him to write to Degiorgio, that infact he never wanted to enter into a contract of sale of 3, St Angelo Street, Saint Julians.

...........omissis...........

That from that letter there clearly results the surprise that Ġanni Saliba had that the said proprety was infact considered as sold when he only intended and as he spoke with the plaintiff and her husband that he was going to leave in his favour as they were both keen on horses, the barn where the horses were kept.

This action is based on another very similar case of Pulè and this specifically that the contract of sale was effectively simulated ...omissis.. the argument of the Honourable First Court was that because the contract declares that the price was paid or is being paid it means that the contract was not simulated.

...........omissis...........

In this case also Ġanni Saliba, the plaintiff’s father was of the same opinion, but it was found that it was a contract of transfer.

In this case, Giovanni Saliba had died. However there was a very important factor, and namely, the evidence of Advocate Dr Joseph Schembri who was appointed by the same Giovanni Saliba who wrote to Degiorgio that the said contract had to be cancelled because he never knew that he was transferring property to him.

He thought that he was doing a will to leave a barn because both of them were keen on horses.

...........omissis...........

That the Court motu proprio in the cause Pulè stated also that the price was manifestly not realistic and rather low.

.................omissis.............

Another factor which was taken into consideration in the judgement Pulè was that Ġanni Saliba was a person who had no education. He operated horse carriages and as regards money and office work he entrusted Ronnie Galea, who also testified in this cause.

That keeping in view all the evidence there is Giovanni Saliba never wanted to transfer the property to Joseph Degiorgio during his life.

Relevant also that in this case differently from that of Pulè, Ġanni Saliba went and made a transfer not only of his share but also of his wife’s share who was already deceased, and thus one has to see his personal circumstances and the age he has and infact he could not do such transfer.

..............omissis..........

Thus, the plaintiff is the sole heir of her father in all the actions competent to him.

................omissis.............

Naturally when she filed the first lawsuit she was acting as her mother’s heir and she was dealing about one half undivided share. Her father was the defendant. Today this lawsuit is being made as the heir of her father and mother, and she is attacking the whole contract as simulated.

.............omissis...............

Thus, the applicant respectfully prays that this Honourable Court reforms the judgement appealed by in the first place confirming it as regards the rejection of the first plea and in the second place revoke as for the rest and send back the records to the Honourable First Court for a decision on the merit after the rejection of all the pleas. With costs.

By means of an application dated 2nd February 2015, presented in the Appeals Court, in the records of the Application 865/09, in the names Edith Galea vs Joseph Degiorgio, the applicant Joseph Degiorgio et respectfully pleaded:

That following application dated 29th April 2014, and the decree of this Honourable Court, dated 27th June 2014, the applicants are presenting a copy of the testamentary certificates of the deceased Edith Galea issued by the Public Registry (Doc. A) and by the Civil Court (Voluntary Jurisdiction Section) (Doc. B) as well as the last will of the same Edith Galea, in the records of Notary John Gambin, and dated 9th December 2013 (Doc. C), whereby it results that the decujus left as her sole universal heir her husband Ronald Galea (ID 258841M), of 51, Triq il-Karmnu, Saint Julians.

Thus and with reference to the application of the 29th April 2014, the applicants asked this Honourable Court to order that the proceedings wherever there occurs the name of Edith Galea be transferred on to that of her husband Ronald Galea, and this under all those provisions that this Honourable Court deems fit to impose.

Court of Appeal

His Honour the Chief Justice Silvio Camilleri, LLD

Hon. Mr Justice Giannino Caruana Demajo, LLD

Hon. Mr Justice Noel Cuschieri, LLD

Writ of Summons Number 865/2009

Edith Galea vs Joseph Degiorgio

The Court

Having seen the application once again and the documents exhibited.

Upholds the request and orders the opportune annotations.

Whereas the written procedures in the cause before the Court of Appeal between Edith Galea as heir of Ġanni Saliba and Dolores née Farrugia vs Joseph Degiorgio, the Court fixed the hearing of the cause on Monday, the second (2nd) of February 2015, at 9.30 a.m. and deferred to the 27th April 2015 at 9.00 a.m. By order of the same Court above mentioned of the 27th April 2015, the cause was deferred to the 8th June 2015, at 9.00 a.m.

Notify: Ronald Galea, 51, Triq il-Karmnu, Saint Julians.

Adv. Frank Portelli, LLD

For the Registrar Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decree given on the 8th May 2015, by the Civil Court (Family Section), in the records of the Letter in the names Jonathan Sant vs Dasha Pisani, Letter number 397/2012, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the defendant in terms of Article 187 (3) et. seq. of Cap. 12.

By means of an Urgent Application filed in the Civil Court (Family Section), in the records of the letter in the names Jonathan Sant vs Dasha Pisani, Letter number 397/2012, the applicant Jonathan Sant respectfully pleaded:

That this is an application so that the applicant be granted access to the minor on the day of Saturday, 16th May 2015, because the applicant’s brother shall get married.

That the applicant has a stable relationship with Nadine Livori, and together they have a boy and all the family shall be present at the wedding, and it is desired that even ...omissis... be present for the same wedding.

That the church is that of Tal-Ħerba, Birkirkara, and afterwards they shall have a wedding at Palazzo Parisio, in Naxxar.

That the vendicative acts of the respondents to limit the access of ...omissis... after a series of influences on the girl and attacks on the applicant and his partner have now reached their climax.

That this is a unique occasion because the applicant’s brother is going to get married.

That the respondent always does her utmost so that she is not notified as results from the records.

Thus, the applicant humbly prays that:

1. He be authorised to notify the respondent today during the assess at 5.30 p.m. at the address, Block 1, Door A, Flat 2, Eucalyptus Street, San Ġwann.

2. That the respondent be given a short term to reply that she does not oppose this request as she had stated that she was going to do.

3. In default of agreement grant access to the applicant in favour of his daughter ...omissis... on the 16th May 2015, from 3.00 p.m. to 9.00 p.m. and this saving any provision which may be imposed.

Applicant: Tal-Grazzja, Triq Loreto Manchè, Ħ’Attard.

Respondent: Block 1, Door A, Flat 2, Eucalyptus Street, San Ġwann.

Adv. Frank Portelli, LLD

For the Registrar Civil Courts and Tribunals

IT IS BEING NOTIFIED that by a decree dated 9th May, 2015, given by the Court of Magistrates (Malta) as a Court of Criminal Judicature (Magistrate Dr Miriam Hayman, LLD), Compilation number 151/2015 in the case:

The Police

(Inspector Pierre Grech)

(Inspector Jonathan Cassar)

Versus:

GEORGE CUTAJAR, 23 years, Pastry Chef, son of Noel and Rita née Stellini, born in Tal-Pietà, Malta, on the 11th June, 1991, residing at ‘Majru’, Flat 2, Ċern Street, Saint Paul’s Bay, Malta, and holder of Maltese Identity Card bearing number 377491M.

ORDERED the attachment in the hands of third parties in general all monies and other moveable property due, or pertaining, or belonging to GEORGE CUTAJAR, and prohibits the said accused from transferring, pledging, hypothecating or otherwise disposing of any moveable or immovable property, and this according to Article 22A of the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance, Cap. 101 of the Laws of Malta, and of Article 23A of the Criminal Code, Cap. 9 of the Laws of Malta.

Marvic Psaila

Deputy Registrar Criminal Courts and Criminal Tribunals (Malta)

By means of a decree given on the 28th April 2015, by the Civil Court (Family Section), in the records of the Judicial Letter in the names Matthew Camilleri vs Natalie Vivien Grech, Letter number 95/2014, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the respondent Natalie Vivien Grech in terms of Article 187 (3) et. seq. of Cap. 12.

By means of a Judicial Letter filed in the Civil Court (Family Section) against Natalie Vivien Grech, Paradise, Flat 2, Triq San Albert, Gżira, on the 9th October 2014, Matthew Camilleri, holder of identity card number 529286(M) residing in the Corrective Facility of Kordin, whilst referring to the relationship he had with the respondent from which relationship ...omissis... was born on the 30th October 2004, the interpellant informs the respondent that he wishes to acknowledge his son and wishes to register this information on the birth certificate of the same minor, and calls upon the respondent so that within two months from the service of this judicial act she presents in the records of this judicial letter her consent so that such registration be made.

In default of this, the interpellant shall proceed further against the respondent without another prior notice.

So much so that you may know how to regulate yourselves and avoid useless expenses.

This judicial letter is being made in terms of Article 86 of Cap. 16 of the Laws of Malta.

With costs.

Adv. Frank Portelli, LLD

For the Registrar Civil Courts and Tribunals

By a decree of the 27th April, 2015, given by the First Hall Civil Court, the Court ordered that the extract hereunder mentioned be published for the purpose of service according to Article 187 (5) of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12).

By the application filed in the Civil Court First Hall on the 27th Februrary, 2015, by Nicholas Pace (ID 442484M), in the judicial sales act number 100/13, Nisso Limited vs Unibuild Company Limited, respectfully submitted that:

That as indicated in the Liberation document of the 16th December 2014, of the mentioned judicial sale, the apartment internally marked number four (4), forming part of a block of flats named ‘Antonin’, in Triq Sant’ Agatha, Sliema, was liberated for the price of one hundred and twenty thousand Euro (€120,000) under the same conditions, after a Judicial Sale held on the 6th of October 2014.

In the liberation act, the said apartment was described as:

“Apartment internally marked number four (4), on the second floor, on the semi basement level, part of a block of apartments consisting of a basement andsemi-basement garages and overlying six floors. The mentioned apartment is underlying and overlying properties of third parties forming part of a block of flats without number named ‘Antonin’, in Triq Sant’ Agatha, Sliema”.

On the 28th May 2014, in the judicial sales act, in the report presented by architectMario Axisa where in paragraph 18 is said that the mentioned apartment has the following rights:

(a) the common freehold andperpetual right with other flats in the same block of those parts in the block that are of common use with exception of the roof and airspace of the same block.

(b) the right to erect a water tank of five hundred liters (lt. 500), and connect a common aerial or communal satellite dish on the said roof with right of access in case of maintenance and repair of the same.

(c) has the drains and drainage system common with other properties in the same block, and includes the right of access in the underlying property in case of maintenance and repair of the same in reasonable times.

It results that these rights where not included in the liberation act of the 16th December 2014, and for that cannot be registered in the Public Registry.

The offer has been made based on the report of Architect Perit Mario Axisa, including the rights mentioned, and so he has every interest that his acquisitions registered in the Public Registry with all the rights described in the report.

The applicant is asking the Honourable Court to order the correction in the liberation act numbered 100/2013 and order to include the abstractment extracted from the report of architect Mario Axisa presented in the judicial sales act for the purpose of service according to Article 175 et. seq. of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12 of the Laws of Malta), and this under the provisions, and orders that this Honourable Court deems fit and opportune.

Rudolph Marmarà

Deputy Registrar

By a decree given by the Civil Court First Hall, on the 4th May, 2015, on the application of Alberta Fire & Secruity Equipment, Wednesday, 17th June, 2015, at ten in the morning, has been fixed for the Sale by Auction to be held at 149, Triq id-Dejqa, Valletta, of the following items seized from the property of Fenech Paul pro et noe.

3 seater sofa and 2 armchairs pink in colour, Television of the make Samsung, Stereo, two speakers of the make AIWA and other various items.

N.B. The said objects will be sold as described in the acts of the judicial sales 7/14.

Marvic Farrugia

For the Registrar of Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decree given by the First Hall Civil Court, on the 27th April 2015, in the records of the Application in the names Galleria Properties Limited vs Cassar & Schembri Marketing Ltd et, application number 75/2015 JZM, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the respondent company Cassar & Schembri Marketing Limited in terms of Article 187 (3) et. seq. of Cap. 12.

By means of an Application filed in the First Hall Civil Court, in the names Galleria Properties Limited (C 38989) vs Cassar & Schembri Marketing Ltd (C 33174) and MORE Supermarkets (Fgura) Limited (C 61496) on the 28th January 2015, the applicant Galleria Properties Limited (C 38989) respectfully pleaded:

1. That the interpellant company is the owner of the premises from which More Supermarkets Ltd used to operate.

2. That the interpellant company granted on lease the premises to Cassar & Schembri Marketing Ltd, which started to operate as More Supermarkets until the company More Supermarkets (Fgura) Limited was formed, of which Cassar & Schembri Marketing Ltd remained the principal shareholder and More Supermarkets (Fgura) Ltd started to operate from the premises property of the interpellant with the consent of the interpellant as assignee of the lease.

3. That until Cassar & Schembri Marketing Ltd and More Supermarkets (Fgura) Ltd vacated the premises and the lease agreement above mentioned was terminated, there accumulated ninety two thousand eight hundred and seventeen Euro (€92,817), in arrears of rent and expenses due to the interpellant, including the relative Vat disbursed by the interpellant and the water and electricity bills.

4. That the insolvency of the two companies is unfortunately today well known, but unfortunately various warrants are being made against the two companies including in the property of the interpellants which can seriously obstruct the liquidation of the same companies according to law and according to the ranking of the creditors.

Thus, the interpellants for the reasons premised humbly ask this Honourable Court to order the liquidation of the respondent companies in terms of Art. 214 (2) (a) (ii) of Cap 386, appoint a liquidator or liquidators to liquidate the two companies together in view of the relationship between them (without prejudice to the connection of such liquidation with other liquidations of related companies) and order that there be taken by the curator/curators all the necessary actions in order that there be safeguarded the assets of the companies in liquidation, including that there be given every necessary order to stop the execution of every warrant both precautionary or executive in terms of Art. 222, Cap. 386, and this together with any other order that this Honourable Court may give.

Notify: Cassar & Schembri Marketing Ltd et, Anton Complex, Tal-Ħandaq Road, Ħal Qormi.

The Application in the names Galleria Properties Limited vs Cassar & Schembri Marketing Ltd et, application number 75/2015 JZM, has been deferred for hearing to Tuesday, 26th May 2015 at 9.30 a.m.

Adv. Frank Portelli, LLD

For the Registrar Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decree given on the 8th May 2015, by the Civil Court (Family Section), in the records of the Sworn Application in the names, Midolo Susan vs Mifsud Michael Gerald, Application number 128/15 AL, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the respondent in terms of Article 187 (3) et. seq. of Cap. 12.

By means of a Sworn Application presented in the Civil Court (Family Section), in the names Susan Midolo vs Michael Gerald Mifsud, on the 24th March 2015, the applicant Susan Midolo (ID 43873M), asked this Honourable Court:

To order the dissolution of the marriage between the parties registered by the Act of Marriage mentioned in the application which bears the number 1044/2004, and order the Registrar to inform the Director Public Registry with all this, and uphold the other demands in the application.

Applicant: Susan Midolo, 32/10, Carlton Heights, Triq Ferdinand Von Hompesch, San Pawl tat-Tarġa.

Respondent: Michael Gerald Mifsud, Desirée Court, Blokk A, Flat 8, Triq il-Kukkanja, Santa Venera.

The Sworn Application in the names Midolo Susan vs Mifsud Michael Gerald, application number 128/15 AL, has been deferred for hearing to Thursday, 28th May 2015, at 9.15 a.m.

Adv. Frank Portelli, LLD

For the Registrar Civil Courts and Tribunals

IT IS BEING NOTIFIED that by a decree dated 9th May, 2015, given by the Court of Magistrates (Malta) as a Court of Criminal Judicature (Magistrate Dr Miriam Hayman, LLD), Compilation number 150/2015 in the case:

The Police

(Inspector Pierre Grech)

(Inspector Jonathan Cassar)

Versus:

STEFAN ASENOV IVANOV, 22 years, Unemployed, son of Nella née Andonova, born in Plovdiv, Bulgaria, on the 26th November 1992, residing at ‘Tower Place’, Flat 5, San Ġeraldu Street, Saint Paul’s Bay, Malta, and holder of Maltese Identity Card bearing number 72521A.

ORDERED the attachment in the hands of third parties in general all monies and other moveable property due, or pertaining, or belonging to STEFAN ASENOV IVANOV, and prohibits the said accused from transferring, pledging, hypothecating or otherwise disposing of any moveable or immovable property, and this according to Article 22A of the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance, Cap. 101 of the Laws of Malta, and of Article 23A of the Criminal Code, Cap. 9 of the Laws of Malta.

Marvic Psaila

Deputy Registrar Criminal Courts and Criminal Tribunals (Malta)

IT IS BEING NOTIFIED that by a decree dated 9th May, 2015, given by the Court of Magistrates (Malta) as a Court of Criminal Inquiry(Magistrate Dr Miriam Hayman, LLD), Compilation number 415/2015 in the case:

The Police

(Inspector Pierre Grech)

(Inspector Jonathan Cassar)

Versus:

TODD ROBERT HEDERSON-DRAKE, 23 years, Chef, son of Rob Henderson and Diana Drake, born in Manchester, United Kingdom, on the 1st July 1991, residing at ‘Andrew’, Cullingham Street, Qawra, Malta, and holder of Maltese Identity Card bearing number 64945A.

ORDERED the attachment in the hands of third parties in general all monies and other moveable property due, or pertaining, or belonging to TODD ROBERT HEDERSON-DRAKE, and prohibits the said accused from transferring, pledging, hypothecating or otherwise disposing of any moveable or immovable property, and this according to Article 22A of the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance, Cap. 101 of the Laws of Malta, and of Article 23A of the Criminal Code, Cap. 9 of the Laws of Malta.

Marvic Psaila

Deputy Registrar Criminal Courts and Criminal Tribunals (Malta)

By means of a decree given by the First Hall Civil Court, on the 6th May 2015, in the records of the Warrant of Prohibitory Injunction, in the names Charles Schembri vs Victor Vella, Application 691/15 JPG, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the respondent Victor Vella in terms of Article 187 (3) et. seq. of Cap. 12.

By means of an Application presented in the First Hall Civil Court, in the names (Applicant) Charles Schembri (ID Number 702556M), son of the late Joseph and the deceased Josephine née Calleja, born in Floriana and residing at Naxxar, against (Respondent) Victor Vella (ID Number 20386G), son of Carmel and Margaret née Azzopardi, born in Victoria, Gozo, and residing in Marsalforn, Gozo, on the 27th April 2015, the applicant Charles Schembri respectfully pleaded:

That the applicant in order to safeguard the credit hereunder mentioned against the respondent humbly pleaded that this Honourable Court ordered the issuing of a Warrant of Prohibitory Injunction against the respondent in order that he be withheld from selling, alienating, transferring or disposing inter vivos both by onerous or gratuitous title any property, and in particular:

(1) The apartment internally marked number one (1), forming part of a Block of apartments without official number but with the name ‘Padre Pio Court’, in Triq l-Esperanto, Imsida, which block was built instead of house 13, Villino Farnham, Triq l-Esperanto, Imsida.

(2) On the shares he has in the company V & M Vella Imports Limited (C 49044).

(3) On the shares he has in the company Deluxe Properties Limited (C 63762).

Thus the applicants humbly ask this Honourable Court to order the issuing of a warrant of Prohibitory Injunction in question against the respondent.

Credit: € 33,500 (thirty three thousand and five hundred Euro).

Title: Price of boat as demanded in a lawsuit between the same parties, Sworn Application number 140/14, Mr Justice J. Zammit Mckeon.

Advocate: Adv. R. Fenech Adami.

Confirmed before under oath after I read its contents, and in the presence of PL D. Sullivan, as witness of identity and presented by Charles Schembri.

Warrant of Prohibitory Injunction (where the demand exceeds €9,317.49).

Republic of Malta

Courts of Justice

To the Court Marshall

Whereas the above application was present, and there recur the necessary elements according to law for the undermentioned orders.

And after doing this, or if you encounter any difficulty in the execution of this warrant, you are to inform this Court forthwith.

Given by the First Hall Civil Court with the witness of the Hon. Madam Justice Jacqueline Padovani Grima, Doctor of Laws.

Applicant: Techno Marine, Triq Wied l-Għasel, Burmarrad.

Respondent; Flat 1, Calypso Court, Gwardamanġa Hill, Gwardamanġa.

Execution: (1) Director Public Registry, Evans Building, Valletta.

(2) MFSA Malta Financial Services Authority, Imrieħel.

The Application Warrant of Prohibitory Injunction in the names Schembri Charles vs Vella Victor, application number 691/15 JPG, was deferred for hearing to the 25th May 2015, at 10.15 a.m.

Adv. Frank Portelli, LLD

For the Registrar Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decree given by the Rent Regulation Board, on the 6th May 2015, in the records of the Application, in the names Dalli Joseph vs Ellul Francis, application number 6/15 GG, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the respondent Francis Ellul in terms of Article 187 (3) et. seq. of Cap. 12.

By means of an Application filed in the Rent Regulation Board, in the names Joseph Dalli (ID 621750M) vs Francis Ellul (ID 34776M), on the 26th January 2015, the applicant Joseph Dalli (ID 621750M) asked that he be authorised by this Honourable Board to take back possession of the premises number forty two (42), Alley Number two (2), Misraħ is-Suq, Ħal Tarxien, and for this purpose fix a short and peremptory period.

With a clear reservation for any action that the applicant has against the respondent.

Respondent; 42, Alley Number 2, Misraħ is-Suq, Ħal Tarxien.

The Application in the names Dalli Joseph vs Ellul Francis, application number 6/15 GG, has been deferred for hearing to Monday, 15th June 2015, at 10.00 a.m.

Adv. Frank Portelli, LLD

For the Registrar Civil Courts and Tribunals

By a decree given by the Civil Court First Hall, on the 11th May, 2015, on the application of Borg Mary Carmen et, Thursday, 25th June, 2015, at noon, has been fixed for the Sale by Auction to be held in the first floor of these Courts of Justice, Republic Street, Valletta, of the following properties:

The farm known as ‘Tal-Busuf’, that today bears the name ‘Razzett Ħniena Divina’, with no number, in Triq it-Torri Tal-Għallies, L-Għallies, limits of Naxxar, together with the land annexed of approximately of two thousand four hundred and ninety three point seventy five square metres (2,493.75 square metres), free and unencumbered, with all its rights and appurtenances, valued at five hundred and fifty thousand Euro (€550,000).

The house number fifty one (51), in Triq il-Kbira, Ħas-Sajjied, Birkirkara, in a corner with Alley number one (1), Triq Ħas-Sajjied, free and unencumbered, with all its rights and appurtenances, valued at ninety thousand Euro (€90,000).

The house named ‘Cadeau’ and the garage in Triq Dun Amabile Sisner, Pembroke, subject to an annual and perpetual groundrent of two hundred and sixteen Euro and sixty nine cents (€216.69), valued at three hundred and forty five thousand six hundred and sixty six Euro and sixty cents (€345,666.60).

The said tenements are the property of Muscat Leone (ID 406045M) and Muscat Antonia (ID 45648M).

N.B. The said tenement will be sold as described in the acts of file number 35/14.

Marvic Farrugia

For the Registrar Civil Courts and Tribunals

By means of a decree given, on the 18th May 2015, by the Civil Court, (Family Section) in the records of the Sworn Application, in the names Cachia Mary Grace vs Cachia Mario, application number 242/14 AL, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the respondent, in terms of Article 187(3) et seq. of Cap. 12.

By means of a Sworn application, filed, in the Civil Court (Family Section) in the names Mary Grace Cachia (ID 444264M) vs Mario Cachia (ID 494368M) on the 30th October 2014, the applicant Mary Grace Cachia (ID 444264M) admitted to the benefit of legal aid, asked this Honourable Court;

1. To declare and pronounce the personal separation between the parties and this due to the faults solely and exclusively imputable to the respondent as explained in the application, authorise the applicant to live separately from the respondent and uphold the other demands, amongst which that the applicant be authorised to continue to reside in the matrimonial home, namely the premises ‘Spring Valley’ 140, Triq Blat il-Qamar, Siġġiewi, to the exclusion of the defendant.

With costs, as demanded against the defendant summoned so that a reference to his evidence be made.

Applicant: ‘Spring Valley’ 140, Triq Blat il-Qamar, Siġġiewi.

Respondent: No. 12, St Tereża House, Triq Blat il-Qamar, Siġġiewi.

The Sworn Application in the names Cachia Mary Grace vs Cachia Mario, application number 242/14 AL, has been put for hearing to the 2nd June 2015, at 9.15 am.

ADV. FRANK PORTELLI, LLD

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By a decree of the Small Claims Tribunal of the 16th April 2015, the publication of the following extract was ordered for the purpose of service in terms of Article 187(3) of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12).

Elmo Insurance Ltd (C3500) as subrogated in the rights of its insured Carmine di Cicco (ID 30718A) and the same Carmine di Cicco of Elmo Insurance Agency, Abate Rigord Street, Ta’ Xbiex, filed a Claim on the 16th March 2015 whereby they asked the Tribunal to condemn David Farrugia of Capricorn Lodge, Triq Karmenu Pirotta, Birkirkara, to pay the plaintiff company the sum of €1,268.64 which amount is due to the plaintiff company.

With costs.

The case (Claim Number 176/15YMS) is put off on the 20th May 2015 at 12.30 p.m.

ALEXANDRA DEBATTISTA

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals.

By a decree of the Small Claims Tribunal of the 9th April 2015, the publication of the following extract was ordered for the purpose of service in terms of Article 187(3) of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12).

Go plc (C22334) of Fra Diego Street, Marsa, MRS 1501, filed a Claim on the 23rd January 2015 whereby they asked the Tribunal to condemn Simon Camilleri (ID 437970M) of Magdalene Crt, Flat 9, Triq il-Wied tal-Imsida, l-Imsida, to pay the plaintiff company the sum of €655.83 which amount is due to the plaintiff company.

With costs and legal interests.

The case (Claim Number 60/15KPS) is put off on the 26th May 2015 at 12.30 p.m.

ALEXANDRA DEBATTISTA

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals.

By means of an application filed in the Civil Court of Voluntary Jurisdiction Section, on the 5th May 2015, Application number 441/2015 by Maria Concetta Azzopardi and Theresa Azzopardi whereby they prayed that it be declared open in their favour in equal shares between them the SUCCESSION of their father Nazzareno Azzopardi, son of the late Annunziato and Theresa née Formosa, born and residing in Żejtun and died in Tal-Qroqq, Msida on the 11th January 2013 aged 85, intestate, holding identity card number 0610527(M).

Wherefore any person who considers to have an interest in the matter is hereby called upon to appear before the said Court and to bring forward his objections hereto by a minute to be filed within fifteen days from the posting of the banns and notices according to law.

ALEXANDRA DEBATTISTA

For the Registrar Civil Court and Tribunals

By means of a decree of the 8th May 2015 following an application of Michael Fenech filed on the 7th May 2015 in the acts of Application Number 450/2015 this Court ordered the publication of the inventory of the assets of the late Salvatore Fenech, son of the late Michele and Maria née Borg, born in Mellieħa, resided in Msida and died in tal-Qroqq, Msida on the 4th January 2014 aged 91 holding identity card number 0320122(M).

This publication is going to be held on Monday 8th June 2015 at eleven o’clock in the morning (11.00 a.m.) at the office number 85, Triq San Ġwann, Valletta, by a deed of Notary Doctor Sean Critien.

ALEXANDRA DEBATTISTA

For the Registrar Civil Court and Tribunals

By a decree of the Court of Magistrates (Malta) of the 12th November 2014, the publication of the following extract was ordered for the purpose of service in terms of Article 187(5) of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12).

Go p.l.c. (C22334) of Spencer Hill, Marsa filed a Claim on the 20th August 2014, whereby they asked the Court to condemn David Vernice for and on behalf of Naxas S.R.L. (OC358) of Flat 1, Highgate Flats, 48, Main Street, San Ġiljan, to pay the plaintiff company the sum of €9,796.24 which amount is due to the plaintiff company.

With costs and interests.

The case (Notice Number 288/14MLF) is put off to the 1st June 2015 at 9.30 a.m.

ALEXANDRA DEBATTISTA

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals

By a decree of the Court of Magistrates (Malta) of the 11th February 2015, the publication of the following extract was ordered for the purpose of service in terms of Article 187(3) of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12).

P.J. Sutters (Marketing) Limited (C35984) of Valletta Road, Luqa, filed a Claim on the 24th October 2014, whereby they asked the Court to condemn John Bugeja (ID 328766M) of 27, Triq il-Freres, Sliema, to pay the plaintiff company the sum of €3,735 which amount is due to the plaintiff company.

With costs and interests.

The case (Notice Number 350/14CSH) is put off to the 10th June 2015 at 9.00 a.m.

ALEXANDRA DEBATTISTA

For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals