Go Back
Court Notices published in Govt. Gazette No. 19,296 of 14 August 2014
01/01/2014
Notice 1274
1274By means of a decree on the 7th March 2013, in the records of the judicial letter number 721/13, in the names The General Soft Drinks Company Limited vs Anthony Abela et,the Courts of Magistrates (Malta) ordered the following publication for the purpose of service in terms of Article 187(3) of Cap. 12.
By means of a judicial letter filed in the Courts of Magistrates (Malta) against Anthony Abela (ID 274354M) and Nadine Abela (ID 317660M) of 23, Triq il-Palm, Santa Marija Estate, Mellieħa,on the 21st February 2013, The General Soft Drinks Company Limited (C-1591) of Marsa Industrial Estate, Marsa, whilst referring to the deed in the acts of Notary Dottor Mario Rosario Bonello dated 26th August 2009, solicit you so that within one month you pay the sum of €3,515.49 due by you according to the terms of the same deed and this besides the interest with the rate of eight per cent (8%) per annum from the 1st April 2010 till the date of effective payment.
This judicial letter is being sent in terms of Article 256(2) of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12 of the Laws of Malta) and this is intended to render the notorial deed above mentioned executable, which deed constitutes executive title according to article 253(b) of Cap. 12 of the Laws of Malta.
In default of payment, the interpellant company warns you that further procedures according to law in execution of its executive title will be taken against you without further notice.
So much of your own guidance.
With costs.
Alexandra Debattista
For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Notice 1275
1275By means of a decree on the 5th September 2014, in the records of the judicial letter number 1779/13, in the names United Acceptances Finance Ltd vs Joseph Brincat, the Court of Magistrates (Malta) ordered the following publication for the purpose of service of the respondent in terms of Article 187(3) of Chapter 12.
By means of a judicial letter filed in the Courts of Magistrates (Malta) against Joseph Brincat (ID 8661M) of Marica Apts, Flt 7, Triq Gulju, San Pawl il-Baħar, on the 18th June 2013, United Acceptances Finance Ltd (C360) of Mizzi House, National Road, Blata l-Bajda, refers to the seven (7) bills of exchange signed and accepted by you, which bills of exchange lapsed but were not paid for, copies of this bill of exchange are annexxed and marked with numbers 39 to 45.
The interpellant calls upon so that within two day you pay the sum of €2,198 value of bills of exchange above mentioned, besides legal interest from the date due till the effective payment.
In default of payment the interpellant company informs you that they shall proceedagainst you without any other notice according to law.
So much so that you may know how to regulate yourself.
You are warned that you have the right to oppose the execution of these bills of exchange by means of an application that has to be done within twenty days from the service of this judicial act and this in terms of Article 253 Cap. 12 of the Laws of Malta.
This judicial act is being made to render executable the bills of exchange in terms of Article 256(2) of Cap. 12 of the Laws of Malta.
With costs.
Alexandra Debattista
For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Notice 1276
1276By means of a decree on the 23rd January 2014, in the records of the judicial letter number 1786/13, in the names United Acceptances Finance Ltd vs Jason John Joseph Mallia et, the Court of Magistrates (Malta) ordered the following publication for the purpose of service of the respondent in terms of Article 187(3) of Cap. 12.
By means of a judicial letter filed in the Courts of Magistrates (Malta) against Jason John Joseph Mallia (ID 396393M) of59, Flat 3, Archbishop Street, Valletta and Ritianne Busutil (ID 230685M) of 57, Triq Sidtna tal-Anġli, Zebbug and/or 82, Triq San Ġorġ St Venera and/or Papanis Wine & Bistro, 55, Strait Street, Valletta as surity in solidum, on the 18th June 2013, United Acceptances Finance Ltd (C360) of Mizzi House, National Road, Blata l-Bajda, refers to the four (4) bills of exchange signed and accepted by you, which bills of exchange lapsedbut were not paid for, copies of this bill of exchange are annexxed and marked with numbers 69 to 72.
The interpellant calls upon so that within two day you pay the sum of €845.82 value of bills of exchange above mentioned, besides legal interest from the date due till the effective payment.
In default of payment the interpellant company informs youthat they shall proceedagainst you without any other notice according to law.
So much so that you may know how to regulate yourselves.
You are warned that you have the right tooppose the execution of these bills of exchange by means of an application that has to be done within twenty days from the service of this judicial act and this in terms of Article 253 Cap. 12 of the Laws of Malta.
This judicial act is being made to render executable the bills of exchange in terms of Article 256(2) of Cap. 12 of the Laws of Malta.
With costs.
Alexandra Debattista
For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Notice 1277
1277By means of a decree of the 30th May 2014 by the Civil Court First Hall in the records of the judicial letter number 1197/14, in the names Commissioner for Revenue vs Michael Ciappara pro et noe, ordered the following publication for the purpose of service in terms of Article 187(3) et seq of Cap. 12.
In the First Hall of the Civil Courts
To Michael Ciappara (ID 216337M) in his own name and as director and for and behalf of the company Lukanda Limited (C 9246) of 41, Triq San Ġwann, Bormla
By the present the Commissioner for Revenue of Centre Point Building, Ta’ Paris Road, Birkirkara calls upon you for of the purposes and effects of the Act of 1997 regarding the Customs and Excise Duty so that within two days (2) from the service of this letter you pay the sum of €131,479.55 representing the amount due by you pro et noe as tax in terms of the same Act.
In default, the interpellant will take further legal action against you including the issue of the opportune warrants.
With costs and further interest till the date of effective payment.
So much so that you may know how to regulate yourself.
Alexandra Debattista
For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Notice 1278
1278By means of a decree of the 13th June 2014 by the Civil Court First Hall in the records of the judicial letter number 1195/14, in the names Commissioner for Revenue vs Lukanda Limited,ordered the following publication for the purpose of service in terms of Article 187(4) and (5) of Cap. 12.
In the First Hall of the Civil Courts
To Lukanda Limited (C 9246) ofEuroclub Hotel, Triq il-Fliegu, San Pawl l-Baħar.
By the present the Commissioner for Revenue of Centre Point Building, Ta’ Paris Road, Birkirkara calls upon you in terms of Article 59 of Act XII of 1994so that within two days (2) from the service of this letter you pay the sum of€378,823.41 representing the amount due by you as Value Added Tax according the to the said Act XII of 1994.
With costs and further interest till the date of effective payment.
This calling is being made for all effects and purposes of law in particularly but not exclussivly, to render the executive title that the Commissioner of Revenue has against you by means of a Notice sent to you;
In default, the interpellant warns you that he is going to execute the said executive title that he has against you by means of the opportune warrants.
So much so that you may know how to regulate yourself.
Alexandra Debattista
For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Notice 1279
1279By means of a decree of the 30th May 2014 by the Civil Court First Hall in the records of the judicial letter number 1196/14, in the names Commissioner for Revenue vs Lukanda Limited, ordered the following publication for the purpose of service in terms of Article 187(5) of Cap. 12.
In the First Hall of the Civil Courts
To: Lukanda Limited (C 9246) of 41, Triq San Gwann, Bormla
By the present the Commissioner for Revenue of Centre Point Building, Ta’ Paris Road, B’Kara calls upon you for of the purposes and effects of the Act of 1997 regarding the Customs and Excise Duty so that within two days (2) from the service of this letter you pay the sum of€131479.55 representing the amount due by you as tax in terms of the same Act.
In default, the interpellant will take further legal action against you including the issue of the opportune warrants.
With costs and further interest till the date of effective payment.
So much so that you may know how to regulate yourself.
Alexandra Debattista
For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Notice 1280
1280By means of a decree of the 21st May 2014 in the First Hall of the Civil Courts in the records of the judicial letter number 709/14 in the names Bank of Valletta p.l.c. vs Kurt Pace, ordered the following publication for the purpose of service in terms of Article 187(3) of Cap.12.
By means of a judicial letter filed in the First Hall of the Civil Courts against Kurt Pace (ID 65190M) of 56, Edmar, Flat 3, Triq Ruzar Mizzi, Mosta on the 10th March 2014, Bank of Valletta p.l.c. of 1/5, Misraħ San Ġorg, Valletta, VLT 1190, calls upon you so that within two days you pay the sum of €14,318.87 balance of debt in your Loan Account with Bank of Valletta p.l.c. together with further interests from the 25th November 2013 till the date of effective payment.
The interpellant company warns you that if you fail they shall be constrained to proceed against you according to law.
Alexandra Debattista
For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Notice 1281
1281IT IS hereby notified that by an application filed in the Court of Magistrates (Gozo) Voluntary Jurisdiction on the 21st of July 2014 (Application number 44/2014) Carmela Said et requested the opening of the SUCCESSION ofJohn sive Jimmy Said, bachelor, son of the late Peter Said and Carmela née Vella, born in Victoria, Gozo and who resided in Marsalforn, limits of Zebbug, Gozo, and where he died on the 2nd of November 2013, intestate, and which opening of succession is to be made inas to half (1/2) undivided share in favour ofCarmela Said, one sixth (1/6) undivided share in favour ofMiriam Borg, one sixth (1/6) undivided share in favour ofJoseph Said, one sixth (1/6) undivided share in favour of Teresa sive Tessie Pace, one sixth(1/6)undivided share in favour of Giorgia sive Giorgina Debono, one sixth (1/6) undivided share in favour ofLydia Said and one sixth (1/6) undivided share in favour of Anthony Said.
Wherefore any person who considers to have an interest in the matter is hereby called upon to appear before the said Court and to bring forward his objections hereto by a minute to be filed within fifteen days from the posting of the banns.
Voluntary Jurisdiction
Maureen Xuereb
For the Registrar, Gozo Courts and Tribunals
Notice 1282
1282By means of an application filed in Civil Court of Voluntary Jurisdiction Section, on the 7th January 2014, Application number 10/2014 by John Zammit, Pauline Zammit, daughter of Andrea and Maria née Polidano, born in Safi on the 24th July 1931 holding identity card number 0467631(M) was INTERDICTED by means of a decree given on the 18th March 2014.
Alexandra Debattista
For the Registrat Civil Court and Tribunals
Notice 1283
1283By means of an application filed in Civili Court of Voluntary Jurisdiction Section, on the 24th July 2014, Application number 694/2014 by Dolores Magro whereby she prayed that it be declared open in favour of the same Dolores Magro and Isaac Magro and this in equal shares between them the SUCCESSION ofher husband Christopher Magro, son of George and Doris née Pullicino, born in Pietà, resided in Fgura and died in tal-Qroqq limits of Msida on the 5th June 2014 aged 42, holding identity card number 161972(M) who died intestate.
Wherefore any person who considers to have an interest in the matter is hereby called upon to appear before the said Court and to bring forward his objections hereto by a minute to be filed within fifteen days from the posting of the banns and notices according to law.
Alexandra Debattista
For the Registrar Civil Court and Tribunals
Notice 1284
1284By means of a decree of the 5th February 2014 handed down by the First Hall of the Civil Court in the records of the judicial letter number 3691/2013 in the names Reuben Bonnici nomine vs Helu Measuring Instruments Ltd, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of effecting service in terms of Article 187(3) of Cap. 12.
In the First Hall of the Civil Court
To Helu Measuring Instruments Ltd of UB Qasam Industrijali, San Ġwann.
By the present, Reuben Bonnici (ID 448471M) for and on behalf of Automated Revenue Management Services Limited (C46054) (ARMS) of Gattard House, National Road, Blata l-Bajda, Malta, in its own name and on behalf of Enemalta Corporation and Water Services Corporation, notifies you with the attached sworn declaration marked as Document A, for all the purposes and effects of Article 466 of Chapter 12 of the Laws of Malta and solicits you to pay the amount of €19,059.91 which amount is sure, liquid and due and respresenting the balance from a greater amount representing pending bills for the consumption of water and electricity, rent of water and electicity meters and administrative costs, together with interest due on the Ammount according to Law, on the premises with address Helu Measuring Inst Ltd of UB3, Qasam Industrijali, San Ġwann, according to the bill number 101000269281.
Despite several solicitations by the applicant company for the payment of the amount due, you remained in default and did not pay till the day of the filing of this judicial letter. In addition, there is no valid reason for your failure to pay and you never contested the Amount due.
This act is being sent to you for all the purposes and effects of law and in default of payment or opposition on your part within the time mentioned in Article 466 Chapter 12 of the Laws of Malta, the applicant company shall proceed to enforce this credit according to law.
With costs.
Alexandra Debattista
For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Notice 1285
1285By means of an application filed in Civili Court of Voluntary Jurisdiction Section, on the 24th April 2014, Application number 387/2014 by Paul Falzon, Carmelo Falzon, son of Leonard and Rosina née Sacco born in Kirkop on the 9th April 1930 holding identity card number 302030(M) was INTERDICTED by means of a decree given on the 14th April 2014.
Alexandra Debattista
For the Registrat Civil Court and Tribunals
Notice 1286
1286By means of a decree of the 20th February 2014 of the Civil Court First Hall in the records of judicial letter number 3723/13, in the names Myriam Bellia vs Brian Schembri, the following publication for the purpose of effecting service on the respondents was ordered in terms of Article 187(3) of Cap. 12.
In the First Hall of the Civil Court
To: Brian Schembri (ID 27680M) of 9, Triq il-Marsa, Marsa.
By the present Myriam Bellia of 45/18, Strait Street, Valletta, whilst reference is made to the writ of summons in the names Joseph Borg et vs Myriam Bellia et (decided by the First Hall of the Civil Courts on the 26th June 2013 – Sworn Application number 709/11JA) and also the official bill of costs, of the costs and professional fees (copy attached and marked as Doc A) solicits upon you so that within two days from the day of service of this letter you pay the sum of €467.78 resulting from the same bill of costs issued by the Court and warns you that it rendered the attached bill of costs executable in terms of Article 256 (2) of Cap. 12 of the Laws of Malta.
In default the interpellant will proceed furtherly against you without further notice by all the means provided by Law including the issueing of the opportunite warrants.
So much for your own guidance.
With costs.
Pay also the costs of this present.
Alexandra Debattista
For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Bann for Curators
1287Republic of Malta
To The Marshall of the Court.
By means of a decree by this Court, on the 5th August 2014, following a request of Samantha Calleja,it was ordered that Deputy Curators be chosen to represent the absent Sharif Al Shibani, in the records of the Sworn Application number 160/14 AL, in the names Samantha Calleja vs Deputy Curators and in the relevant and subsequent acts.
By means of a Sworn Application filed in the Civil Court (Family Section), Application number 160/14AL, in the names Samantha Calleja (ID 167089M) vs Deputy Curators in order to represent the absent Sharif Al Shibani (ID 338168M) on the 23 rd July 2014, the applicant asked the defendant to state why this Court should not:
1. Decide and declare that the marriage celebrated on the 24th March 2008, was null and invalid for all intents and purposes of law and uphold the other demands in the application.
With costs, against the defendant summoned so that a reference to their evidence be made.
Applicant: 329, Triq il-Bwieraq, Birkirkara.
You are therefore ordered to affix an official copy of this bann at the entrance of this Superior Court and to summon whosoever wishes to act as curator to appear before this Registry within six days and by means of a minute to submit a declaration that he wishes so to act.
You are also ordered to inform each one that if he fails to make this declaration within the stipulated time, the Court will proceed to the selection of Curators of Office.
And after so acting or if you should encounter any difficulty in the executionof this bann, you are to inform forthwith this Court.
Given by the Civil Court (Family Section) above mentioned,with the witness of the Hon. Mr. Justice Tonio Mallia, LLD, Doctor of Laws.
Adv. Frank Portelli, LLD
For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Notice 1288
1288By means of a decree given, on the 29th April 2014, by the Court of Appeal, in the records of the Appeal applcation, in the names Carmen Pecorella pro et noe vs Lino Stafrace et, Application Number 1111/00, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the respondent AIC Philip Azzopardi, in terms of Article 187(3) et. seq. of Cap. 12.
By means of an Application filed in the Court of Appeal, Writ of Summons Number 1111/00, in the names Carmen Pecorella in her own name and on behalf of her absent siblings, Maria Victoria sive Miriam Spanò resident in Sicily, and Maria Teresa Menabue resident in Italy, Joe Vella, Richard Vella and Paul Vella, in their own name and on behalf of the absent George Vella, residing in Australia, all siblings Vella, as heirs of their deceased mother Rita Vella vs Lino and Angele Stafrace, Architect Philip Azzopardi, Carmel Raymond Micallef in his own name and on behalf of RC Construction Limited and Raymond Calleja, on the 5th June 2014, the applicant Carmen Pecorella in her own name and on behalf of her absent siblings Maria Victoria sive Miriam Spanò residing in Sicily, and Maria Teresa Menabue, residing in Italy, Joe Vella, Richard Vella and Paul Vella in his own name and on behalf of the absent George Vella, residing in Australia, all siblings Vella, as heirs of their deceased mother Rita Vella, respectfully pleaded;
That the applicant premised that their mother Rita Vella, owner of the premises 25, Cathedral Street, Sliema, lost her life when the building collapsed as a result of works which were being carried out in the premises number 24, property of Lino and Angele Stafrace.
That the applicants asked the Court:
1.To declare that the incident of the 12 th April 2000, in Cathedral Street, Sliema, occurred due to negligence, imprudence, carelesness and lack of observance of the traffic regulations on the part of the defendants or either of whom.
2. Declare them responsible for the death of their mother Rita Vella.
3. Declare them responsible for the structural collapse of the premises 25, Cathedral Street, Sliema, which was the property of their mother.
4. Declare them responsible for all the consequential damages.
5. Liquidate all the damages suffered by the plaintiffs.
6. Condemn the defendants or either of whom to pay the damages so liquidated and declared due.
With costs.
....................omissis.............
That in virtue of a judgement in the names premised given on the 16th May 2014, the Honourable First Court Civil Hall decided so;
For these reasons the Court decided the cause by;
1.Rejecting the first plea of the spouses Stafrace, with costs against them.
........omissis...............
11. Condemn Architect Azzopardi so that in solidum with the other defendants he pays the sum of ten thousand and eight hundred ewro (€10, 800).
Costs to be borne by Carmel Raymond Micallef, RC Construction Limited, and as for 25% to be borne by Architect Azzopardi, in solidum with the other defendants. Architect Azzopardi is to bear his costs.
That the applicants felt aggrieved by the above mentioned judgement and are filing an appeal therefrom before this Honourable Court.
That the facts in brief are as follows.
That the lawsuit relates to the collapse of the premises number 25, Cathedral Street Sliema, which occurred on the 12th April 2000. In this premises there lived Rita Vella, mother of the plaintiffs, her son Joseph Vella and her brother Anthony Mifsud... omissis... as a result of the collapse of the building, they lost the furniture, their belongings and personal effects.
That the grievance of the applicants is clear and manifest and consists in the following:
1. That the Honourable Court of First Instance, although it reached the right conclusion regarding the cause of the collapse of the building and regarding the grave failings encountered it did not reach the entirely correct conclusions regarding the legal responsbility of the defendants.
2..............omissis..............
3. Unfortunately the Honourable First Court, exonerated from the legal responsibility the owners of the premises which was being demolished and this despite that there was specific proof against the owners Lino and Angele spouses Stafrace.
4. One of the points that the applicants state to have resulted it that the defendant Lino Stafrace gave instructions to the contractor Carmel Raymond Micallef without the knowledge of Architect Philip Azzopardi in order to excavate as deeply as possible so that the underlying tenement which was intended as ‘commercial premises’ shall not be much higher than the street level.
.....................omissis................
It results that Architect Philip Azzopardi testified during the sitting of the 9th April 2010, that when he asked the contractor why he had excavated so much ‘He told me that in the first place the material is very soft and in the second place they did not wish to have so many steps to go up to the groundfloor’. So much so that Architect Azzopardi confirmed this during the sitting of the 24th October 2011.
...............omissis...........
That whilst the Court of First Instance stated that it’ not look likely that Stafrace gave orders to the contractor to excavate further deeply, the applicants feel that the evidence is more thruthful in the sense that Micallef declared to Architect Azzopardi ‘expost facto’ that he had gone down further in order to avoid the steps from the street to the shop.
5. Without prejudice to this dispute regarding the judicial expenses of the defendants Lino and Angele spouses Stafrace , the applicants shall submit that they should not be borne by them, but in any case they should be borne by the defendants condemned for the payments of damages.
6. Another grievance refers to the limitation contained in the judgement appealed is that regarding the legal responsibility of Architect Philip Azzopardi. He was held responsible because he failed to take the necessary precautions as set down by the building trade.
..................omissis.............
What the Court of First Instance referred to as ‘Architect Azzopardi cannot disassociate himself from the responsibility of others. Being the Architect responsible for demolition and construction works does not mean that the Architect has only the responsibility to plan, decide , apply for permits and give directives only. One of the most important aspects of his functions is that to supervise, both the construction, as well as the demolition of the old buliding and more important and dangerous the excavation with the building of third parties. But in the present case this did not happen. Architect Azzopardi, planned, decided, applied and gave directives, but did not carry out well and full diligence the duty to supervise the demolition and excavation with the building of third parties and this was exactly what brought about the tragedy.
.........omissis........
By his consipicuous absence and failure to carry out the duty of diligence and surveillance, Architect Azzopardi rendered himself responsible. Had the building been at Bubaqara or Cirkewwa one could say that the site was very far away and outside of his way although not even this is a valid excuse, but when he accepted to be responsible for works at a site which is situated in Cathedral Street, when he himself lived n Sliema, Architect Azzopardi does not have an excuse not to visit the site for the development of which he was responsible. Thus with the utmost respect towards the Honourable First Court, the conclusions reached by it...omissis... are both wrong conclusions. Had Architetct Azzopardi commenced to visit the site after the permit in order that the works be commenced was issued and had he continued to pass by the site in Sliema, itself, at the relevant time, ( and this appart frequent contacts with the two contractors Micallef and Calleja) Architect Azzopardi would have kept himself informed verbally and personally by what happened. He failed to do this.
...............omissis.............
Thus the judgement appealed in so far as it declared that the architect is not guilty for the damage caused in the building of third parties ( the applicant) is legally and factually incorrect.
7. Another grievance refers to the liquidations of damages resulting from the death of their mother Rita Vella. When their mother Rita Vella, died on the 12th April 2000, she was 84 years. The death in tragic circumstances is considered as 100% permanent disability. The applicants feel aggieved that the Honourable First Court liquidated the damages for her death in the amount of 10,800. The applicants do not agree at all with the liquidation of damages under this head.
...........omissis.......
The applicants do not agree at all with the mode how our Courts applied the Civil Law regarding damages, which does not acknowledge moral damages in civil matters. The applicants are bringing forward this appeal so that till this appeal, filed by them is appointed, there shall have been introduced this reform in the sphere of civil matters and there shall come into force moral damages or rather damages ‘for pain and suffering’.
8. Another grievance refers to the damages liquidated under the heading ‘Premises number 25, Cathedral Street, Sliema. In the judgement appealed the Court of First Instance, remarked that the techincal opinion of the appointed Architect should not have been ignored. Despite of all this the figure determined by the Judicial Referee of (€ 93,174) was abandoned without justification and the damages were liquidated in the amount of forty thousand ewro (€40,000).
9. Another grievance refers to the liquidation of the value of the movables. The movables had a value of much more than €6, 000. The lists exhibited show this. Both the movables as well as the documents regarding the purchase of the movables finished under the debris and were lost. The versions of the applicants are not good proof, much less the best proof required by law.
10. Another grievance concerns the loss of use of the premises number 25. The premises which collapsed was the residential house of Joseph Vella. He not only ended without a house but lost all he possessed. From his clothing till his personal belongings. He lost everything...omissis.. Thus this loss should be quantified ‘arbitrio bono viri’ because there existed the right of use and habitation.
11. Reference has also been made to the grievance regarding judicial expenses. When the cause was instituted the inquiry had not been concluded the proof had not been heard regarding what had happened between the defendants Micallef, Calleja, Azzopardi and Stafrace. It was only known that their mother died due to works which their neighbour Lino Stafrace and his wife commenced without their being taken the necessary precautions set down by the building trade. It does more sense that one states that ‘ prima facie’ the plaintiffs were right to sue the spouses Stafrace, but once the Court felt, that they should be exonerated their judicial expenses should be borne by the defendants who were declared responsible and condemned to pay the damages.
12. Thus the applicants whilst filing this appeal from the judgement appealed given on the 16th May 2014, in the names premised pray with respect that this Honourable Court, modifies the judgement appealed by upholding this appeal, revoke and cancel the judgement appealed, as demanded in this application...omissis........uphold all the demands of the applicant as demanded in the judicial demands, with costs, against the condemned defendants.
Respondents: Architect Philip Azzopardi, 167, Triq Santa Lucia, Valletta.
Adv. Frank Portelli, LLD
For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Bann for Curators
1289Republic of Malta
To The Marshall of the Court.
By means of a decree by this Court, on the 9th April 2014, following a request of Rober-Victor Magro, it was ordered that deputy curators be chosen to represent the absent Saida Magro,in the records of the letter of Mediation 476/14 RGM, in the names ‘Robert-Victor Magro vs Deputy Curators’ and in the relative and subsequent acts.
By means of a Letter of Mediation filed in the Civil Court (Family Section) in the names Robert-Victor Magro vs Deputy Curators, on the 7th April 2014, Robert-Victor Magro, ID 468463(M), residing, 8, Misraħ San Mattew, il-Qrendi, asked that a mediator be appointed for all intents and purposes of law so that there be commenced the procedure for personal separation from his wife Saida Magro (Tunesian Passport Number V131298, whose residence is unknown.
You are ordered to affix an official copy of this bann at the entrance of this Superior Court and to summon whosoever wishes to act as curator to appear before this Registry within six days and by means of a minute to submit a declaration that he wishes so to act.
You are also ordered to inform each one that if he fails to make this declaration within the stipulated time, the Court will proceed to the selection of Curators of Office.
And after so acting or if you should encounter any difficulty in the execution of this bann, you are to inform forthwith this Court.
Given by the Civil Court First ( Family Section) above mentioned, with the witness of the Hon. Chief Justice Silvio Camilleri, LLD, Doctor of Laws.
Adv. Frank Portelli, LLD
For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals