Go Back
Court Notices published in Govt. Gazette No. 19,222 of 14th March 2014
01/01/2014
Notice 430
430By means of a decree given by the First Hall Civil Court, on the 4th February, 2014 in the records of the Warrant of Prohibitory Injunction, in the names Mario Farrugia vs Karl Allmark et, Application number 1876/13 JZM, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the respondents Karl Allmark and Pamela Allmark in terms of Article 187 (3) et. seq. ofCap. 12.
By means of an Application filed in the First Hall CivilCourt, in the names (Applicant) Mario Farrugia (ID 38362M) vs (Respondent) (1) Karl Allmark, son of Kevin and Jacqueline née Marshall, born in Altringham, United Kingdom, and residing at Għargħur (ID 72317A), and English Passport number 706491539, and Pamela Allmark, wife of Karl Allmark, daughter of Saviour Galea and Sylvia Preca, born in Attard and residing at Għargħur (ID 205368M), on the 10th December, 2013 the applicant Mario Farrugia in order to secure the credit hereunder mentioned against the respondent asked this Honourable Court to order the Warrant of Prohibitory Injunction against the respondent so that he be witheld selling, alienating, transferring, or disposing inter vivos both by onerous or gratuitous title the propertymarked with official number sixty two (62), Saint John’s Street, Għargħur.
That by means of a contract of lease dated 1st January, 2013 the applicant conceded and transferred by title of lease to the company Selkia Limited the commercial premises named ‘Bayside’,in Triq Censu Scerri, Sliema.
That on the said lease agreement, the respondent Karl Allmark bound himself as an indivisible andin solidum surety in favour of applicant for the observance of the pacts and conditions of the lease contemplated in the contracts above referred to.
Thus, the applicant humbly asks that this Honourable Court orders the issuing of a Warrant of Prohibitory Injunction against the respondent.
Credit: Fourteen thousand, six hundred and thirty-six Euro and fifteen cents (€14,636.15c).
Title: various payments due by the respondents as indivisible andsurety in solidum in favour of the applicant as explained in greater detail in this application.
Advocate:Adv. Paul Farrugia.
By means of a Notice of hearing of a cause issued by the Registrar Superior Courts, on Tuesday, 10th December, 2013 the Application Warrant of Prohibtory Injunction Number 1876/13 JZM, has been appointed for hearing on Monday, 16th December,2013 at 11.15 a.m. and subsequentlydeferred various times and now deferred for Thursday, 3rd April, 2014 at 9.00 a.m.
Notify: Karl Allmark (ID 72317A) and Pamela Allmark (ID 205368M).
Adv. Frank Portelli, LL.D.
For the Registrar Civil Courts and Tribunals
Notice 431
431By means of a decree given on the 27th February, 2014 by the Civil Court (Family Section), in the records of the Warrant of Prohibitory Injunction number 208/08, in the names Elaine Compagno vs Mohamed Fitouri Mesbah Fitouri, the hereunder mentioned publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the respondent in terms of Article 187 (3) et. seq. of Cap. 12.
By means of an Urgent Application filed in the Civil Court (Family Section),in the records of the Warrant of Prohibitory Injunction to stop a person from taking a minor outside Malta number 208/2008, in the names Elaine Compagno (ID 388079M) vs Mohamed Fitouri Mesbah Fitouri, (ID 28108L), on the 20th February, 2014 the applicant Elaine Compagno (ID 388079M) respectfully pleaded:
1. That the parties separated by means of a contract of separation dated 3rd March, 2009 in which contract, exactly clause 6 (d), it was agreed by theparties that ‘The Parental authority be joint as regards the important decisions regarding health, education, and travelling of the said minors, saving the authority of the competent Court, in case of conflict between the same parties.
2. That at present, the said Warrant of Prohibitory Injunction is withholding the minor children of the parties with the names……omissis…… from being taken outside Malta.
3. That the minor……omissis……, has the opportunity to go on an educational day trip to Rome on the 14th April, 2014.
4. That however the respondent is refuting to give his consent for the said educational trip, and this without a valid reason.
5. That the applicant strongly believesthat it is unjust that the respondent is refuting to give his consent to such an educational trip, and this without a valid reason.
Thus,in view of the above the applicant humbly asks this Honourable Court:
1. In the absence of the consent of the father authorise the minor……omissis……, to leave Malta to attend for the educationaltrip in Rome with her school on the date of the 14th April, 2014.
2. Authorise the Passport Officer to issue a passport in the name of the said minor, and this even without the consent of the father, who is unjustly opposing and this merely due to caprice.
3. Give any other provision that this Honourable Court deems fit and opportune.
Service: Flat 2, Alex Flats, Triq il-Kapuċċini, San Ġwann.
Adv. Frank Portelli, LL.D.
For the Registrar Civil Courts and Tribunals