Left arrow Mur Lura

Court Notices published in Govt. Gazette No. 19,221 of 14th March 2014

Date Icon 01/01/2014

Notice 412

412
By means of a decree given on the 7th February, 2014 by the Civil Court First Hall, in the records of the Sworn Application in the names Farrugia Joseph et vs NFR Limited (C 49560), application number 1167/13 SM, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the respondent company in terms of Article 187 (3) et seq. of Cap. 12.
By means of a Sworn Application filed in the First Hall Civil Court, in the names Joseph Farrugia and Karmenu Farrugia vs NFR Limited (C 49560), on the 6th December, 2013 the applicant Joseph Farrugia and Karmenu Farrugia asked this Honourable Court:
To declare that the defendant company is their debtor in the sum of €54,481 mentioned in the application, and condemn them to pay this sum.
With costs as demanded, the representatives of the defendant company are summoned so that a reference to their evidence be made.
Applicant: 1. Joseph Farrugia, ‘Santa Katerina’, Triq Ġużeppi Mattew Callus, Żurrieq.
2. Karmenu Farrugia, ‘Woytila’, Triq Matteolo Saliba, Żurrieq.
Defendant: 11/13, Triq Gio Dei Mediċi Mallia Tabone, Mosta.
The Sworn Application in the names Joseph Farrugia et vs NFR Limited, application number 1167/13 SM, has been deferred for hearing to the 20th March, 2014 at 9.00 a.m.
Adv. Frank Portelli, LL.D.
For the Registrar Civil Courts and Tribunals
11 Marzu 2014

Notice 413

413
It is hereby notified that by a decree dated the 20th February, 2014 the Court of Magistrates (Gozo) Superior Jurisdiction, General Section, ordered the publication of the extract reproduced hereunder for the purpose of service in terms of Articles 187 (3) and 931 (3) of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure.
Whereas by a decree dated the 20th February, 2014 by this Court upon an application of Moses and Mary, spouses Caruana,(identity card numbers 37151G and 20363G respectively), whereby it was ordered that deputy curators be nominated in terms of law to represent the unknown persons who are entitled to receive the herein mentioned ground rent, and this in the records of schedule of deposit and concurrent redemption of ground rent bearing number 29/2014 in the names Moses Caruana et versus deputy curators, to represent the unknown persons who are entitled to receive the herein mentioned groundrent,filed on the 18th February, 2014 in the Court of Magistrates (Gozo) Superior Jurisdiction, General Section, as well as in all the other related and subsequent acts.
This schedule of deposit relates to the redemption of groundrent of €4.61c imposed on two tracts of land known as Ta’ Falzuna, in the limits of Żebbuġ, Gozo, measuring one of them circa 5,030 square metres, and the other circa 2,107 square metres, as better described in the said schedule of deposit, and which tracts of lands were acquired by the depositors by virtue of a deed in the records of Notary Doctor Paul George Pisani, of the 26th March, 2002.
Whoever is interested to be nominated as a curator is hereby called upon to call at this Registry within six (6) days and make known their interest through a declaratory note to accept such an assignment, and in default, this Court will proceed to nominate an official curator.
Issued by the aforementioned Court of Magistrates (Gozo) Superior Jurisdiction, General Section, under the signature of Doctor Paul Coppini, a Magistrate of the said Court.
Anthony Mizzi
For the Registrar Gozo Courts and Tribunals
10 Marzu 2014

Notice 414

414
By means of a decree given on the 3rd March, 2014 by the First Hall Civil Court, in the names Mafimex Limited vs Cities Entertainment Limited, Sworn Application number 85/14 JZM, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the defendant company in terms of Article 187 (3) et seq. of Cap. 12.
By means of a Sworn Application filedin the First Hall Civil Court, in the names Mafimex Limited (C 7396) vs Cities Entertainment Limited(C 16222), on the 29th January, 2014 the applicant company asked this Honourable Court:
To decide this cause without proceeding to a hearing for the purpose of Articles 167 to 170 of Cap. 12 of the Laws of Malta, condemn the defendant company to pay the amount of (€38,606.07), representing balance of price of fruit and vegetables sold and delivered to the defendant company by the plaintiff company.
With costs as demanded and legal interests till the day of effective payment against the defendant company summoned that a reference to its evidence be made.
Applicant: Mafimex Limited, Triq l-Idward, Ta’ Qali, limits of Attard.
Respondent: Cities Entertainmet Limited, No 34, The Great Siege of Malta.
Cafe Premier Complex, Republic Square, Republic Street, Valletta.
The Sworn Application in the names Mafimex Limited vs Cities Entertainment Limited, application number 85/14 JZM, has deferred for hearing to Thursday, 20th March, 2014 at 9.00 a.m.
Adv. Frank Portelli, LL.D.
For the Registrar Civil Courts and Tribunals
10 Marzu 2014

Notice 415

415
By a judgement given by the Civil Court First Hall, on the 27th January, 2014 on the Application Number 647/1998 AE in the names Michael Lungaro et vs Salvino Lungaro et, of Thursday, 24th April, 2014 at half past ten in the morning (10.30 a.m.), has been fixed for the Sale by Auction to be held in the first floor of these Courts of Justice, Republic Street, Valletta, of the following properties:
The tenement ‘Jampson’, number twenty two (22), in Triq Antonio Micallef, Żejtun, valued at two hundred and twenty two thousand and one hundred Euro (€222,100), and the tenement number two (2), in Triq San Franġisk, Żejtun, valued at fifty two thousand Euro (€52,000).
The said tenements are the property of Michael, Emanuel, Salvino, Paul, and Anthony, brothers Lungaro.
N.B. The said tenements will be sold as described in the judgement given on the 27th January, 2014 and in the acts of file number 3/14.
Marvic Farrugia
For the Registrar Civil Courts and Tribunals
10 Marzu 2014

Notice 416

416
It is hereby notified that by an application filed in the Court of Magistrates (Gozo) Voluntary Jurisdiction, on the 11th of March, 2014 (Application number 11/2014), John Bajada and others, requested the opening of the Succession ofEmanuel Bajada,Bachelor, son of the late Fortunato and Maria née Bonello, born in Xagħra, Gozo, where he used to reside, and who died in Victoria, Gozo, on the sixth of November, of the year two thousand and thirteen, testate, and which opening of succession is to be made in favour of John and Joseph Bajada as to half share each one of them.
Wherefore any person who considers to have an interest in the matter is hereby called upon to appear before the said Court, and to bring forward his objections hereto by a minute to be filed within fifteen days from the posting of the banns.
Maureen Xuereb
For the Registrar Gozo Courts and Tribunals
11 Marzu 2014

Notice 417

417
By a decree of the Court of Magistrates (Malta), of the 22nd January, 2014 the publication of the following extract was ordered for the purpose of service in terms of Article 187 (3) of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12).
Bank of Valletta plc (C 2833) of 1/5 Misraħ San Ġorġ, Valletta VLT 1190,filed a Claim on the 11th September, 2013 whereby they asked the Court to condemn Veronica Brincat (ID 222865M), ofFlat 4, Block K 1, Triq it-Trinċetta, Mosta,to pay the plaintiff company the sum of €8,424.45 which amount is due to the plaintiff company.
With costs andinterests.
The case (Notice Number 265/13MF) is deferred for the 17th March, 2014 at 9.30 a.m.
Alexandra Debattista
For the Registrar Civil Courts and Tribunals
11 Marzu 2014

Notice 418

418
NOTICE
Whereas the plaintiff Gary Lee Grima (ID 119586M), filed an application under oath (No. 34/14 AL), demanding Corrections in the Act of Birth of the minor Kieran Grima, number 3630/2009 in the Public Registry.
Whosoever may have an interest therein and wishes to oppose that demand, is hereby called upon to do so by means of a note to be filed in the Registry of these Courts within fifteen days from the day of the publication of this present notice in the Government Gazette.
Those who within the aforesaid time shall have filed such note, shall be notified by the service of a copy of the said application under oath of the day which will be appointed for the hearing of the case.
By order of the Court.
Rita Mangion
For the Registrar Civil Courts and Tribunals
07 Marzu 2014

Notice 419

419
It is being notified that by a decree dated 7th March, 2014 given by the Court of Magistrates (Malta) as a Court of Criminal Inquiry (Magistrate Dr Natasha Galea Sciberras LL.D.), Compilation number 237/2014 in the case: The Police (Inspector Jonathan Ferris) versus Francis Caruana, 55 years, Public Employee,son of George and Giuseppa née Bugeja, born in Marsaxlokk, on the 6th February, 1959 and residing at 90, ‘Ġiżimin’, Melqat Street, Marsaxlokk, and holder of identity card bearing number 144559M, ordered the attachment in the hands of third parties in general all monies and other movable property due, or pertaining, or belonging to Francis Caruana, and prohibits the said accused from transferring, pledging, hypothecating or otherwise disposing of any movable or immovable property, and this according to Article5 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, Cap. 373 of the Laws of Malta, and to Article 23A of the Criminal Code, Cap. 9 of the Laws of Malta.
The Court ordered that the said accused may receive thirteen thousand nine hundred and seventy six Euro and twenty four cents (€13,976.24) per year, and any social benefits to which he might be entitled.
Dr Yvette Borg LL.D.
For the Registrar Criminal Courts and Criminal Tribunals
11 Marzu 2014

Notice 420

420
By a decree of the 27th February, 2014 given by the Court of the Magistrates, the Court ordered that the extract hereunder mentioned be published for the purpose of service according to Article 187 (3) of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12).
That by the application filed by Bettina Vossberg on the 20th of December, 2013 is asking for the withdrawal of the amount of €36,348.00 is deposited by the Schedule of Deposits numbers 1600/04, 1601/04, 1749/04, 1870/04, 957/05, 1871/04, 2198/04, 2199/04, 2203/04, 2204/04, 185/05, 186/05, 338/05, 504/05, 505/05, 656/05, 657/05, 806/05, 807/05, 956/05, 1109/05, 1111/05, 1268/05, 1269/05, 1694/05, 1695/05in the names of Andreas Wilhelm Gerdes vs Bettina Vossberg.
Marvic Farrugia
For the Registrar of Courts and Civil Tribunals
07 Marzu 2014

Notice 421

421
By a decree given by the Civil Court First Hall, on the 11th March, 2014 on the application of Palm City Limited, ofWednesday,7thMay,2014attenin the morning (10.00 a.m.), has been fixed for the Sale by Auction to be held at the unnumbered yard, in Triq Dun Ġużepp Barbara, Kirkop, of the following items seized from the property of Dolphin Industrial Services Ltd et.
Toyota Crew Cab with the registration number CBO 508 coloured white, and Fiat Doblo vanwith the registration number JGV 046 coloured white.
N.B. The said objects will be sold as described in the acts of file number 2/14.
Marvic Farrugia
For the Registrar of Civil Courts and Tribunals
11 Marzu 2014

Notice 422

422
By means of a decree given on the 25th February, 2014 by the Civil Court First Hall, in the records of the Sworn Application in the names Frank Borda Limited (C 446) vs En Route Malta Drive Limited (C 25799) et, Application number 1179/13 JZM, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the defendants in terms of Article 187 (3) of Cap. 12.
By means of a Sworn Application filed in the First Hall Court, in the names Frank Borda Limited (C 446) vs En Route Malta Drive Limited (C 25799), and Julie Barbara (ID 320973M) in solidum on the 10th December, 2013 the applicant Frank Borda Limited asked this Honourable Court:
To decide the cause without proceeding to a hearing in terms of Article 167 of Cap. 12, and condemn the respondents in solidum between them to pay the sum of €59,854.89 for the reasons premised.
With costs and with interests from the 1st July, 2012 against the respondents summoned so that a reference to their evidence be made.
Applicant: Frank Borda Limited, Gala Centre, Testaferrata Street, Msida.
Respondents: 1. En Route Malta Drive Limited, Wembley Services Station, St. Andrew’s Road,St. Andrews.
2. Julie Barbara, Wembley Services Station, St. Andrew’s Road, St. Andrews.
The Sworn Application in the names Frank Borda Limited (C 446) vs En Route Malta Drive Limited (C 25799) et, Application number 1179/13 JZM, has been deferred for hearing to the 20th March, 2014 at 9.00 a.m.
Adv. Frank Portelli, LL.D.
For the Registrar Civil Courts and Tribunals
12 Marzu 2014

Notice 423

423
By a decree of the Small Claims Tribunal, ofthe 20th November, 2013 the publication of the following extract was ordered for the purpose of service in terms of Article 187 (3) of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12).
Mobisle Communications Limited(C 24655) of Fra Diego Street, Marsa MRS 1501, filed a Claim on the 19th July, 2013 whereby they asked the Tribunal to condemn Martin Cachia (ID 235859M), of238, Casa Martina, Triq l-Imħallef William Harding, Pembroke,to pay the plaintiff company the sum of€257.22, which amount is due to the plaintiff company.
With costs andinterests.
The case (Claim Number 432/13YMS) is deferred for the 20th March, 2014 at 12.30 p.m.
Alexandra Debattista
For the Registrar Civil Courts and Tribunals
07 Marzu 2014

Warrant of Prohibitory Injunction

424
By means of a decree given by the Civil Court First Hall, on the 27th February, 2014 in the records of the Warrant of Prohibitory Injunction, in the names Aurelia Enforcement Limited vs Kumitat Reġjonali Xlokk et, application number 18/14 JRM, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the respondents in terms of Article187 (3) et seq. of Cap. 12.
By means of an Application filedin the First Hall Civil Court, in the names (Applicant) Aurelia Enforcement Limited against (Respondents):(1) Kumitat Reġjonali Xlokk; (2) Reġjun Xlokk;(3) The Attorney General;(4) Department of Contracts on the 8th January, 2014 the applicant Aurelia Enforcement Limited as represented respectfully pleaded:
That the applicant has an interest to safeguard its rights.
That the applicant to safeguard its rights wishes to hold the respondents from:
Carrying out or continuing with the adjudication, or giving, or signing the contract, or give execution to the contract following the call: Tender for the provision of Local Warden Services –Reġjun Xlokk RX/1/10, and this because there is a wrong application of the law in the procedures.
1. Wrong Application of the Laws.
That in the considerations that brought about the decision of the Honourable Court of Appeal, in the names Aurelia Enforcement Limited vs Kumitat Reġjonali Xlokk u Reġjun Xlokk (296/2013), it was indicated that:
The fact that the Regional committee is not authorised according to law (Schedule of the Judicial Notice 296/10) to administer ‘their own public acquistion’ does not mean that the Committees are not competent to proceed procedures for the calling of offers
...........omissis...........
That with respect to such conclusion,the applicant company contends that the call for offers could never and had to be issued on the part of the Reġjun Xlokk.
...........omissis...........
That the call merit of the case in questionwasadministered by the Reġjun Xlokk, which in the first place is not an entity legallyconstitutedbut is not authorised by the Regulations 296 of 2010 to administerits own public acquistion.
That oncethe Reġjun Xlokk or the Regional Committee which takes care of the interestsof the Xlokk are not authorised to administer the public acquistion,the contracting authorities which is legally competentto issue and safeguard such calling is the Department of Contracts.
Here it is a case of wrong application of the law.
The Local Councils and the Regional Committee, and/or the Regions are so differentthat the legislator used different defitions to explain the composition, functions, and powers as well as the obligations of these entities.
...........omissis...........
2. Lack of Fair hearing
That the applicant company submits that it is being deprived of its right of access to the Court set up by Law, and is protected by security of tenure, and which is impartial.
That the applicant company submits that althoughthe adjudicator decides the case according to the establised rules the members of the Board of Revisionregarding Public Contracts,from now on called ‘the Board’,do notadjudicate but make recommendations.Thus, the procedures before the Board bring about a disproportionate and unjustifiedlimitation of the right of access to the Court.
That furthermore the applicant company submits also that the independence of the Board including the Chairman it also lacks the elements which create security of tenure which one expects inthe frameworkof a Board which determines administrative rights.
...........omissis...........
3. Furthercomplaints
That the call was issued by and in the name of the Reġjun Xlokk,and such is indicated in the call and in various other documents.
That the entity Reġjun Xlokk does not exist and much less existedif ever the only entity that existsin this sense and which carries out the work that the Reġjun Xlokk is stating that it is legally competent to do is the entity known as ‘Kumitat Reġjonali’, which takes care ofthe interests tax-Xlokk.
The following is not only being stated by the applicant company, but was also specifically indicated on thepart of the regional committee which takes care of the interests of the North.
That when one analises well the law, one reaches the conclusionthat it is the caseof an inexistent entity which is issuing a call in its name, and this because by Act V of 2011, which was approved during the sitting 339 of the House of Representatives on the 13th July, 2011the Regional Committees, and/or the Regionwere set up, it is clear and unequivocal since the act is using the words:
‘Addition of new Article 37A to theprincipal Act’.
...........omissis...........
1. That in the eventwality that the requests brought forward in the cause by the applicantcompanyare upheld by thisHonourable Court,but as the process of adjudication and assignment,or the execution still goes on, the applicants shall lose any opportunityto be assigned the contract, and thus the right granted by law to the applicants to secure the rightsby means of a cause shall be futile, and without any purpose, if this warrantis not witheld.
2. ...........omissis...........
3. ...........omissis...........
4. That as that which the Applicant is asking the respondentsto be withheld from doing is urgent and imminent, as well as in view of the serious prejudice that the applicant shall suffer if the respondents are not withheldas demanded in this application in view of the imminent, the applicant company is asking this Honourable Court to order the issuingofaWarrant of Prohibitory Injunction herein demanded provisionally till it decides definitely regarding the same, and this in terms of Article 875 (2) of Cap. 12 of the Laws of Malta.
That the applicant shall be prejudiced if the respondent is not withheld as stated.
Thus, the applicants humbly prays that this Honourable Court orders the issuingofa Warrant of Prohibitory Injunction in order to be witheld from carrying out the acts above mentioned.
Sgd. Advocate Dr. Adrian Delia LL.D.
Confirmed before under oath after I reads its contents, and in the presence of as witness of identity and filed by PL E Montanaro.
Republic of Malta
To the Court Marshall
Whereas the above application has been presented and there occur the elements required by law for the under mentioned order.
Given by the Civil Court First Hall with the evidence of the Hon. Mr Justice Mark Chetcuti LL.D.
Applicant: Aurelia Enforcement Limited, Vinci Buildings, Triq B. Bontadini, Birkirkara.
Respondents: Reġjun Xlokk and Kumitat Reġjonali Xlokk, 97, Triq Santa Marija, Tarxien.
Department of Contracts, Notre Dame Ravelin, Floriana.
Attorney General, The Palace, Valletta.
Execution: (1) Department of Contracts, Notre Dame Ravelin, Floriana; and /or
(2) Reġjun Xlokk, 97, Triq Santa Marija, Tarxien; and/or;
(3) any otherplace that this Honourable Court deems fit.
The Application Warrant of Prohibitory Injunction in the names, Aurelia Enforcement Limited vs Kumitat Reġjonali Xlokk et, application number 18/14 JRM, has been deferred for hearing to the 27th March, 2014 at 12.30 p.m.
Adv. Frank Portelli, LL.D.
For the Registrar Civil Courts and Tribunals
12 Marzu 2014

Notice 425

425
It is being notified that by a decree dated 11th March, 2014 given by the Court of Magistrates (Malta) as a Court of Criminal Judicature (Magistrate Dr Audrey Demicoli LL.D.) in the case: The Police(Assistant Commissioner Neil Harrison) versus Spiridione Vella,50 years, son of Alfred and Catherine née Sammut, born in Ħamrun on the 22nd October, 1963 and residing at 45, Cameron Street, Gżira, and holder of identity card bearing number 564963(M), ordered the Cancellation of the Attachment order of all the assets of the said Spiridione Vella given by the Court of Magistrates (Malta) as a Court of Criminal Inquiry by a decree dated 4th September, 2000.
This notice is being published according to Article 22A (2) (b) (6) of the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance, Cap. 101 of the Laws of Malta.
Dr Yvette Borg LL.D.
For the Registrar Criminal Courts and Criminal Tribunals (Malta)
13 Marzu 2014

Notice 426

426
By means of a decree given on the 27th February, 2014 by the Civil Court First Hall, in the records of the Sworn Application, in the names Cutajar Nicholas et vs Fiott Maria, application number 1079/13 LSO, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the party called into the suit in terms of Article 187 (3) et seq. of Cap. 12.
By means of a Sworn Application filed in the First Hall Civil Court, in the names Nicholas and Antonia, spouses Cutajar, (ID 890250M and ID 764253M), of 48,Millers Lodge,TriqLorenzoGafà,Siġġiewi,DorisSammut(ID 587948M), of 40, Emdor, Triq tal-Għolja, Siġġiewi, Paul and Nathalie, spouses Ciantar (ID 461165M and ID 491166M), of 68, Redeemer, Triq Patri Gużeppi Delia, Siġġiewi, Joseph Ciantar (ID 354867M), of Dar il-Merill, Triq Gużeppi Busuttil, Siġġiewi, Therese Gatt (ID 33170M), of 13, Redeemer, Triq Angelo Melilli, Ħaż-Żebbuġ, Malta, and Antonia, sive Tania Caruana (ID 162671M), of 1, Daril-Merill, Triq Espeditu Catania, Ħaż-Żabbar, and by a decree of the 30th January, 2014 Carmen Cutajar was called into thesuitvsMariaFiott(ID301651M),SaviourCutajar(ID276452M),NicolaCutajar (ID 988254M), Josephine Cutajar (ID 108154M), Antonia Camilleri (ID 398456M),MargaretBorg (ID 31068M),Francesco Saverio Cutajar (ID 36366M), Michael Angelo Cutajar (ID 556663M), Joseph Cutajar (ID 597557M), and Peter Paul Cutajar (ID 195660M), on the 11th November, 2013 the applicant Nicholas Cutajar, Doris Sammut, Paul Ciantar, Joseph Ciantar, Therese Gatt, and Antonia, sive Tania Caruanaasked the respondents to state why this Court should not:
Declare if necessary by the appointment of Architects that the common property between the parties consisting in aportionoflandorratherfieldoftheareaofcirca (715.2 square metres), accessible from Alley Number 3, in Triq San Ġiovanni, Siġġiewi, which land or rather field forms part of a larger land called ‘Ta’ San Bartilmew’, or ‘Ta’ Pupulju’, and one half undivided part of the room in it, in Siġġiewi, is easily divisible between the two parties in equal shares between them.
With costs as demanded against the defendants summoned so that a reference to their evidence be made.
Notify: Carmen Cutajar, Villino Cutajar, Sqaq San Nikola, Numru 2, Triq San Nikola, Siġġiewi.
The Sworn Application in the names Cutajar Nicholas et vs Fiott Maria et, application number 1079/13 LSO, has beendeferredforhearingtothe27th March, 2014 at 9.30 a.m.
Adv. Frank Portelli, LL.D.
For the Registrar Civil Courts and Tribunals
13 Marzu 2014

Notice 427

427
Bymeans of a decree given on the 27th February, 2014 by the First Hall Civil Court in the records ofthe Sworn Application, in the names 81 &82 Limited (C 55435) vs Piscopo Paul et, application number 1135/13 LSO, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service ofthe respondent in terms of Article 187 (3) et. seq.ofCap. 12.
By means of a Sworn Application filed in the First Hall Civil Court, in the names 81 &82 Limited (C 55435), of ‘Bilom’,TriqVictor Denaro, Msida vs (1) Paul Piscopo (ID 713051M), (2) Ronald Piscopo (ID 616682M), (3) Lorraine Piscopo (ID 479276M), 81, TheStrand, Sliema, on the 27th November, 2013 the commercial partnership 81 & 82 Limited (C 55435),asked the respondents to state why this Honourable Court should not:
Decide this cause according to the demand without proceeding to a hearing in terms of Article 169 et. seq. of Cap. 12, saving any necessary declaration, decide that the respondents are occupyingthe premises with official number 81, inTriq ix-Xatt, (The Strand), Sliema, without a valid title at law, and uphold the other demands in the application,including the return of the vacant possession to the applicant company.
With costs and the payment of damages as demanded against the respondents summoned so that a reference to their evidence be made.
Notify: Paul Piscopo (ID 713051M).
The Sworn Application in the names 81 & 82 Limited (C 55435) vs Piscopo Paul et, application number 1135/13 LSO, has been deferred for hearing to the 27th March, 2014 at 9.30 a.m.
Adv. Frank Portelli, LL.D.
For the Registrar Civil Courts and Tribunals
13 Marzu 2014

Notice 428

428
By a decree of the 20th February, 2014 given by the First Hall Civil Court, the Court ordered that the extract hereunder mentioned be published for the purpose of service according to Articles 187 (3) and 338 (1) of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12).
That by Application and a Schedule of set-off filed contemporaneously by Bank of Valletta Malta plc on the 28th October, 2013 the approval of the said judicial acts is being demanded for the amount of €27,000 following judicial Sale by Auction 81/12 in the names Bank of Valletta Malta plc vs Salem Benhalim et held under the Authority of the said Court on the 24th October, 2013.
According to Article 338 (2) of Chapter 12. Any person who may have an interest and the persons so served shall be allowed the time of twenty days to file an answer stating in detail the reasons for their opposition and the amounts in contestation, and where such opposition is based on a claim against the proceeds of sale and alleged cause of preference, they are to state the amount of such claim and the basis for the preference. Such persons shall with the answer file all relevant evidence to substantiate their opposition.
Marvic Farrugia
For The Registrar Civil Courts and Tribunals
13 Marzu 2014

Notice 429

429
By a decree of the 12th September, 2013 given by the Civil Court First Hall, the Court ordered that the extract hereunder mentioned be published for the purpose of service according to Article 187 (3) of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12).
That by an Application filed by the Rita Caruana, on the 12th February, 2014 is asking for the withdrawal of the amount of €90,803.99 deposited by Schedule of Deposit number 69/14, lodged by Rita Attard after the Sale by Auction 34/13. The Court ordered the notification of this application with a four day period to file a reply.
MARVIC FARRUGIA
For the Registrar Civil Courts and Tribunals
13 Marzu 2014