Court Notices published in Govt. Gazette No. 19,110 of the 16th July 2013
Notice 1153
1153By decree given by the COURT OF MAGISTRATES (GOZO) SUPERIOR JURISDICTION, GENERAL SECTION, on the 26th June 2013 on the application of Joseph Galeain the records of judicial sale by auction number 6/2013 (subsequent to warrant of seizure number 29/2013) in the names of Joseph Galea vs Joseph Axiaq et Monday 5th August 2013 at 10.00a.m. and until the highest bid is adjudicated, has been fixed for the SALE BY AUCTION to be held at the Gozo Court’s edifice in Cathedral Square, Victoria, Gozo, of the following items:
Furniture items including wallunits, cupboards, sofas and armchairs, and others.
A number of appliances including televisions, fridges, an air-conditioner, sewing machines, an oven and others.
Decorating items including picture frames, chandeliers, grandfather clocks and others.
More details regarding the seized objects to be sold can be acquired from page 7 of the same acts.
The said items are the property of Joseph (27148G) and Mary (80646G) spouses Axiaq.
Jaclyn Magrin
For the Registrar
Gozo Courts and Tribunals
Notice 1154
1154By decree given by the COURT OF MAGISTRATES (GOZO), SUPERIOR JURISDICTION, GENERAL SECTION, on the 8th July 2013 on the application of HSBC Bank Malta Plc in the records of judicial sale by auction number 17/2012 in the names of HSBC Bank Malta Plc vs Emanuel Vella Monday 16th September 2013 at 10.00am and until the highest bid is adjudicated, has been fixed for the SALE BY AUCTION to be held at the Gozo Court’s edifice in Cathedral Square, Victoria, Gozo, of the following property:
One half undivided part (1/2) of the unnumbered and unnamed farm, known as ‘Ir-Razzett ta’ Ras il-Bajjada’ in Ras il-Bajjada Road, limits of Munxar, Gozo. The property consists of land measuring 1,124 sq.m., which includes a slaughter house and a shop, which together measure 498 sq.m. The property consists of a slaughterhouse at the ground floor, an office on the first floor and an underground space. The property also enjoys countryside views.
Small variations from the permits as well as the fact that the property consists of two undivided halves was also taken into consideration with respect to the total value of the property, valued at €150,000.
Tenement known as ‘Valle Dijonem’, Triq San Domenica, Victoria, Gozo, on land measuring approximately 343 sq.m., valued at €410,000.
The said half undivided share of the farm as well as the tenement are the property of Emanuel Vella (ID: 61160G) and are to be sold as described in the report sworn to by AIC Edwin Mintoff on the 21st June 2013 and 15th March 2013 respectively.
Superior Jurisdiction,
General Section,
Jaclyn Magrin
For the Registrar, Gozo Courts And Tribunals
Notice 1155
1155By decree given by the CIVIL COURT, FIRST HALL on 2nd May, 2013, on the application of SANT FOURNIER SANDRA, Thursday, 25th July, 2013 at half past ten in the morning (10:30 a.m.) has been fixed for the SALE BY AUCTION to be held on THE FIRST FLOOR OF THESE LAW COURTS, REPUBLIC STREET, VALLETTA of the following property.
Apartment internally marked number eight (8) in the third floor of a block named “Highclere Court”, in Triq Raddet ir-Roti, St. Paul’s Bay, free and unencumbered, valued at one hundred and ninety-five thousand euro (€195,000).
The said tenement is the property of Jason Sammut ID: 478074(M) and Dr. Joseph Ellis was nominated by a decree of the 14th February 2013 and Legal Procurator Noel Scerri was nominated by a decree of the 28th June 2013 to represent the absent Jason Sammut.
N.B. The said tenement will be sold as described in the acts of file number 29/12.
Diane Mifsud
For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Notice 1156
1156By decree given by the COURT OF MAGISTRATES (GOZO), SUPERIOR JURISDICTION, GENERAL SECTION, on the 8th July 2013 on the application of HSBC Bank Malta Plc in the records of judicial sale by auction number 18/2012 in the names of HSBC Bank Malta Plc vs Emanuel Vella Monday 16th September 2013 at 10.00am and until the highest bid is adjudicated, has been fixed for the SALE BY AUCTION to be held at the Gozo Court’s edifice in Cathedral Square, Victoria, Gozo, of the following property:
One half undivided part (1/2) of the unnumbered and unnamed farm, known as ‘Ir-Razzett ta’ Ras il-Bajjada’ in Ras il-Bajjada Road, limits of Munxar, Gozo. The property consists of land measuring 1,124 sq.m., which includes a slaughter house and a shop, which together measure 498 sq.m. The property consists of a slaughterhouse at the ground floor, an office on the first floor and an underground space. The property also enjoys countryside views.
Small variations from the permits as well as the fact that the property consists of two undivided halves was also taken into consideration with respect to the total value of the property, valued at €150,000.
The said half undivided divided share is the property of Joan sive Jane Vella (ID: 34463G) and is to be sold as described in the report sworn to by AIC Edwin Mintoff on the 21st June, 2013.
Superior Jurisdiction,
General Section,
Jaclyn Magrin
For the Registrar, Gozo Courts and Tribunals
Notice 1157
1157By means of a decree given, by the First Hall Civil Court, on the 10th July 2012, in the records of the Judicial Letter, in thenames Carmel sive Charles Bugeja (ID 63643M) vs R&S Development Limited ( C 42092) the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the respondent company, in terms of Article 187(3) etof Chapter 12.
In the First Hall Civil Court.
To : R& S Development Limited ( C 42092)
Gardel Flas, Flat 2,
Triq ix-Xitwa,
Buġibba, San Pawl il-Baħar.
By the present judicial letter Carmel sive Charles Bugeja (ID 63643M) and his wife Rose Marie Bugeja ( Id 620841M) whilst referring to the private writings of the 31st October 2006 and of the 31st March 2011, in virtue of which the interpellants had given a contract of works to the respondent company, the finishing of the appartment number two (2) forming part of the block of appartments which is situated in Saint Paul’s Bay, Triq il-Kbira, known also as Triq San Pawl,without number, built on a site already occupied by the house number seventeen (17) Main Street, and which works therein indicated had to be completed till ‘not later than the 31st May 2011, notify you for all intents and purposes of law, that till this day you have not carried out the obligations assumed by youso much so that the works indicatedhave not yet commenced and thus you are called upon so that within a week from the service of this act you declare if you are in a position to carry out these works or not.
That in any case you are called upon to come forward to the liquidation of the damages suffered by the interpellant due to your default.
So much so that you may know how to proceed.
With costs and legal interest.
Interpellant: 134, Dawret Ħal Għaxaq, Għaxaq.
Respondent Company: R&S Development Limited,
157, Fleur De Lys Road,
Birkirkara.
Adv. Frank Portelli, LL.D.
For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Notice 1158
1158by a decree of the 24th june, 2013, given by the first hall civil court, the court ordered that the extract hereunder mentioned be published for the purpose of service according to Article 338(1) of the code of organization and civil procedure (cap. 12)
That by application and a Schedule of set-off filed contemporaneously by Franco Buttigieg et, on the 20th June, 2013, the approval of the said judicial acts is being demanded for the amount of €61,662.27 following the judicial sale by auction 23/12 in the names Franco Buttigieg et vs Carmelo Cachia, held under the Authority of the said Court on the 13th June, 2013.
According to Article 338 (2) of Chapter 12: Any person who may have an interest and the persons so served shall be allowed the time of twenty days to file an answer stating in detail the reasons for their opposition and the amounts in contestation; and where such opposition is based on a claim against the proceeds of sale and alleged cause of preference, they are to state the amount of such claim and the basis for the preference. Such persons shall with the answer file all relevant evidence to substantiate their opposition.
Diane Mifsud
For The Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Notice 1159
1159by a decree of the 24th june, 2013, given by the first hall civil court, the court ordered that the extract hereunder mentioned be published for the purpose of service according to article 338(1) of the code of organization and civil procedure (Cap. 12)
That by application and a Schedule of set-off filed contemporaneously by Bank of Valletta plc, on the 3rd June, 2013, the approval of the said judicial acts is being demanded for the amount of €57,000.00 following the judicial sale by auction 21/12 in the names Bank of Valletta p.l.c. vs Doctor Patrick Valentino LL.D. and the Legal Procurator Davina Sullivan, who by a decree of the 25th August 2010 were nominated as deputy curators to represent the vacant inheritance of the late Henry Coleiro, held under the Authority of the said Court on the 28th May, 2013.
According to Article 338 (2) of Chapter 12: Any person who may have an interest and the persons so served shall be allowed the time of twenty days to file an answer stating in detail the reasons for their opposition and the amounts in contestation; and where such opposition is based on a claim against the proceeds of sale an alleged cause of preference, they are to state the amount of such claim and the basis for the preference. Such persons shall with the answer file all relevant evidence to substantiate their opposition.
Diane Mifsud
For The Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Notice 1160
1160by a decree of the 10th july, 2013, given by the first hall civil court, the court ordered that the extract hereunder mentioned be published for the purpose of service according to article 338(1) of the code of organization and civil procedure (Cap. 12)
That by application and a Schedule of set-off filed contemporaneously by Bank of Valletta plc on the 2nd July, 2013, the approval of the said judicial acts is being demanded for the amount of €30,000 following judicial sale by auction 71/11 in the names Bank of Valletta plc vs Dr. Mark Busuttil LL.D. and Legal Procurator Mario Mifsud Bonnici nominated as deputy curators by a decree of the 15th September 2008 to represent Luvbet.com (Malta) Limited, held under the Authority of the said Court on the 27th June, 2013.
According to Article 338 (2) of Chapter 12: Any person who may have an interest and the persons so served shall be allowed the time of twenty days to file an answer stating in detail the reasons for their opposition and the amounts in contestation; and where such opposition is based on a claim against the proceeds of sale an alleged cause of preference, they are to state the amount of such claim and the basis for the preference. Such persons shall with the answer file all relevant evidence to substantiate their opposition.
Diane Mifsud
For The Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Notice 1161
1161By means of an application filed in Civili Court of Voluntary Jurisdiction Section, on the 14th May 2013, Application number 464/2013 by Stephen William Richards et, Joan Muriel Richards, wife of the late Maurice Alan daughter of Sydney Bird and Muriel née Williams, born in Newport, Wales, United Kingdom, on the 10th February 1925,holding identity card number 11460(A) was INTERDICTED by means of a decree given on the 4th July 2013.
Alexandra Debattista
For the Registrat Civil Court and Tribunals
Notice 1162
1162It is hereby notified that by means of an application filed in the Civil Court (Voluntary Jurisdiction Section) on the 10th of July 2013, number 705/2013 by Thomas and Raymond, brothers Cunningham, wherein they prayed that it be declared open in their favour in quota of one half (1/2) undivided share each, the SUCCESSION of their mother MARIA CARMELA CUNNINGHAM, widow of Charles, daughter of the late Carmelo Vella and the late Giovanna née Mifsud,born at Ħamrun and died at Pietà on the 11th of February 2005, aged 76 years and was a holder of identity card number 0560228(M)
Thus whoever considers that he has an interest is called so that by means of a note he enters his opposition according to Article537(1) et seq.Cap.12 of the Laws of Malta
Marcel Bugeja
For the Registrar Civil Courts and Tribunals
Notice 1163
1163By means of an application filed in Civili Court of Voluntary Jurisdiction Section, on the 28th June 2013, Application number 667/2013 by Rose Mary Cauchi and others, whereby they prayed that it be declared open in favour of the same Rose Mary Cauchi, wife of the decujus and this in the quota of one half (1/2) undivided share; and in favour of Marisa, Romina Rickard and Jesmar, all brothers and sisters Cauchi, children of the decujus and this in the quota of one sixth (1/6) undivided share each one of them the SUCCESSION ofJohn Cauchi, husband of the same Rose Mary Cauchi, son of Vincent and Angela née Azzopardi, born in Ħal Qormi, resided in Ħamrun and died in tal-Qroqq limits of Imsida on the 13th February 2013 aged 68 holding identity card number 0525044(M) who died intestate.
Thus whoever considers that he has an interest is called so that by means of a note he enters his opposition according to Article 537(1) et seq of the Code of Organization and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12).
Alexandra Debattista
For the Registrat Civil Court and Tribunals
Notice 1164
1164It is hereby notified that by a decree dated the 5th July 2013, the Court of Magistrates (Gozo) in its Superior Jurisdiction, General Section, ordered the publication of the extract reproduced hereunder for the purpose of service in terms of section 187(3) of the Code of Organization and Civil Procedure.
By virtue of a judicial letter presented in the Registry of the Court of Magistrates (Gozo) Superior General Jurisdiction on the 23rd May 2013, (letter number 253/2013) Dr Carmelo Galea, and others called upon Henry Zammit, (I.D. 44332G) and Michael Zammit (I.D. 31156G) both of “Villa Zammit”, Pope John Paul II Street, Victoria, Gozo to pay the total sum of €16,556.31c comprising:
1. €15,502.60c representing judicial expenses and VAT as resulting from the taxed bill of costs issued in the records of the lawsuit “Agnes Zammit vs. Joseph Xuereb et”, Appeal No. 39/2006, withdrawn by virtue of a note presented in the registry of the Court of Appeal on the 28th September, 2011;
2. €403.09c representing judicial expenses and VAT as resulting from the taxed bill of costs issued in the records of the lawsuit “Agnes Zammit vs Registrar of Courts et”, Appeal No. 107/2012, decided by the Court of Appeal on the 22nd February, 2013;
3. €650.02c representing judicial expenses and VAT as resulting from the taxed bill of costs issued in the records of the lawsuit “Agnes Zammit vs. Joseph Xuereb et”, Sworn Application No. 92/2010, which was declared deserted on the 18th January, 2012.
A copy of the relative taxed bills was attached to the judicial letter and the taxed bills were being rendered executive titles in terms of s. 253(c) of Cap. 12 of the Laws of Malta.
Defendants were asked to pay the costs of the judicial letter and warned that if they did not pay within 7 days of the letter, further action would be taken against them.
Superior Jurisdiction, General Section;
Anthony Mizzi
For the Registrar,
Gozo Courts and Tribunals
Notice 1165
1165By means of a decree given, on the 10th June, 2013, by the Court of Appeal (Inferior Jurisdiction) in the records of theAppeal Application, in the names Catherine Darmanin et vd Miriam Cutajar Fiorini et, application number 116/10 GG, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the respondent Simone Georgina Meech, in terms of Article 187(3) of Cap. 12.
By means of an Application of Appeal filed in the Court of Appeal (Inferior Jurisdiction)Application Number 116/10 GG, in the names Catherine wife of Joseph Darmanin (I.D. 328838M) and the same Joseph Darmanin (I.D. 0482134M) and Joseph Camenzuli (I.D. 0467970M) 7, Rose, Edgar Ferro Street, Gwardamanġa vs Miriam Cutajar Fiorini (I.D. 300564M) and Simone Georgina Meech (I.D. 003179A) and Advocate Karl Briffa as mandatary of the sbsent Sylvia Bellamy, on the 13th May. 2013, the applicants Catherine Darmanin, Joseph Darmanin and Joseph Camenzuli, respectfully pleaded:
That the facts which gave rise to this dispute are the following;
1.That the applicants are the owners of one third undivided of the premises 102 previously 28, Triq Santa Katerina, Birzebbuġa which they lease to the respondent Miriam Cutajar Fiorini, towards the rent of €61.67 yearly, payableyearly in advance every 1st October.
2. That this premises was leased as an ordinary residence to Miriam Cutajar Fiorini.
3.That the applicants by means of a judicial letter of the 16 th November 2005, informed the respondent that they do not intend to renew the lease since she is no longer protected in the lease of the premisesbecause she is the lessee of an undivided share of the property in question and thus does not enjoy protection in terms of Cap. 69 of the Laws of Malta.
4. That effectively by a contract of the 14th November 2003, in the records of Notary Clinton Bellizzi, Doc B, she acquired one half undivided share of the premises mentioned andthus she is the owner of one half undived of the said premisesand a lesseee of the other half undividedwhereby she pays one third of the rent to the applicants and one sixth of the other rent to the respondent Sylvia Bellamy.
5. Tha furthermorethey came to know that Sylvia Bellamy ceded the premises to the respondent Simone Georgina Meech, without the knowledge of the applicant and without the consent and their approval.
6. That thus this cause for eviction of the respondent had to be made since the respondent Miriam Cutajar Fiorini,is the lessee of an undivided share is juridically unacceptable and illegal and thus is occupying the premises without a valid legal title besides she sublet the same premises without the knowledge of the applicant.
7. Thus the applicants by means of their application, filed, on the 1st October, 2010, asked this Honourable Rent Regulation Board, so that saving any necessary and opportune declaration and for the reasons premised:
1. It declare and decides that the respondent is occupying and holding the premises 102, previously 28, Triq Santa Katerina, Birzebbuġa,without a valid title at law.
2. Consequently order the respondents so that withina short and peremptory period established by this Court,they vacate the said premises and return it to the applicants.
3. Alternativley order the taking back of the premises 102, previously 28, Triq Santa Katerina, Birzebbugia,since the respondent Miriam Cutajar Fiorini,sublet , ceded or transferred the lease of an undivided share ofthe premises on to Simone Georgina Meech, without the knowledge of the applicants.
4. With costs.
8.That in virtue of her reply the respondent pleaded;
1. That in the first place the cause as brought forward by the applicants is completely irregular.
2. That in the first place also the first demand of the applicants whereby it is alleged that the applicants are occupyingthe premises merit of this cause without a valid title at law does not fall within the competence of this Board.
3. That as regards the merit and without prejudice to the premised, it is not the case, that the applicantsare occupying the premises with any titleand there was no subletting or cession of the lease in the sense of the law.
That by meansof the preliminary judgement given by this Honourable Rent Regulation Board on the 29th April 2013, in the names premised, the Board decided the cause by rejecting the first plea of the respondent, whilst upholding the second plea of the respondentnamely thatthe Board is not competent rationae materiae, and thus abstainsfrom taking further cognizance of it, which competence belongs to the Ordinary Courts.
That the applicants felt aggrieved by this decision of the Honourable of First Instance andare thus humbly filing an appeal therefrom. That the grievance of the applicants is clear andf manifest and consists in the fact thatwith all due respect the Board gave a mistaken interpretation of the competence given to it in terms of Article 1525 (1) of Chapter 16 ofthe Laws of Malta as amended by means of Act X of 2009 and this since the said Article gave exclusive competence to the Board to decide disputes connected with contracts of lease.
That the grievance of the applicants consists in the fact:
1. That the Rural Leases Control Board did not apply the provision in the Ordinance which regulated the Renewal ofthe Leases of Urban Property or rather Article 16(4) of the same Ordinance which stipulates;
(4) Despite of the provisions of every other law the Board is also to decide all the matters which affect the leases of urban premises, which include residential premises as well as commercial premises and this in terms of Title IX of Section 11 of the Second Bookof the CivilCode.
2. It is evident that by the amendment which was made in the law or rather Act X of 2009 , the Rent Regulation Board, has jurisdiction to determine disputes like the one in question.
3.That the Rent Regulation Board, was not correct when it decided that disputesof occupation of the premises whereby the applicant appellant is alleging that it was terminated does not fall within its competencebut of the Ordinary Courts sincehere it is the case of a lease which was terminatedwhen the respondent bought 2/3 undivded share of the premisesand thuswas no longer a lease of the whole.
4. That this amendment in the law of Act X of 2009extendedthe competence of the Board for similarcauses where the Boardhas thejurisdiction to investigate whether a lease is still valid or notand whether the occupation of the premises by the lessee was terminated or not.
5....................omissis...............
6....................omissis..............
7. Thatfurthermore the proviso to Article 1525 (1) of Chapter 16 of the Laws of Malta stipulated that:
The Rent Regulation Board...omissis... has exclusive competence to decidedisputesconnected with lease agreementsrelating to urban tenements,residential and commercial premises. Other leases fall under the competence ofthe Courts of Civil jurisdictionin the case of land falling under the Rural Leases Control Board, appointed by the provisions of the Act relating to the Renewal of Agricultural Land.
8. That thus with the reading of the Article mentioned it appears clear that the Rent Regulation Board has jurisdictionif three elements are satified:
a) the cause is filed after the 1st January 2010, when the amendments stipulatedin Act X of 2009 came into force..
b)That the premises is urbanor a residential premises or commercial premises.
c) That the dispute is related to a lease.
9. That there is no doubtthat the present cause was filed after Axt X of 2009 came into force once the original application was filed on the 1st October 2010, or rather after the 1st January 2010.
10.....................omissis................
11......................omissis...............
12................. omissis....................
13.................omissis.......................
14. That there is no doubt that at the present there is a lease, infact it emerges from the appealed judgement itself,that the actual lease is being attacked and it is being asked that it be declared that the lease ended.
15. That the appellants feel aggrieved by the decision appealed since the Board failed to consider that once the first two demands of the applicant are based on an attack on the validity of the lease..omissis.. thus the Board has the sole competence to decide the said cause and this because in terms of Article 1525 (1) of Chapter 16 of the Laws of Malta andArticle 16(4) of Chap 69 of the Laws of Malta, the Board has the exclusive competence to decide disputes related to leases, including the validity or not of the said lease.
16. That effectively Article 1525 (1) of Chapter 16 does not leave room for interpretation and it is extensive in its interpretation since it refers to every disputewhich is somehow related to a lease, is to be decided by the Board as stipulated by article 16(4) of Chapter 69 of the Laws of Malta.
17...............omissis...........
18...............omissis...........
19.............omissis..............
20. That effectively once the respondentenjoyed the lease of all the premises however subsequently this lease by the acquistion of 2/3 undivided of the premises lost protection in terms of Chap 69 of the Laws of Malta since according to our jurisprudence you cannot have a protected lease of an undivided share of a premises more so because the respondentis subletting the premises in question to Simone Georgina Meech, there is no doubt that actually there is a relationship of lessor and lessee between the partiesand in this manner the Board has the exclusive competence to examine if this relatinship was lost and /or was finished and consequently the lease in question was no longer valid according to law due to the subletting and because it relates to a lease of an undivided share of the premises.
21.............omissis................
22.............omissis.................
23.............omissis................
24............omissis..................
25. That in the cause Trevor Buttigieg vs Martin John Easby et, decided on the 7th January 2013, by the Small Claims Tribunal, it was decided that every obligation which results from a contract of lease falls within the competence of the Rent Regulation Board and in case the tribunal considers the disputerefers to a lease there is no longer room for any interpretation once the dispute is between lesseeand owner.
26. That such considerations are to apply to the present dispute.
27..........omissis.............
Thus the appellants whilst refrring to the records and all the proof produced in the First Instance and whilst reserving to bring forward all the proof permitted to them by law they are asking this Honourable Court ofAppeal to reform the judgement appealed in the names Catherine Darmanin et vs Miriam Cutajar Fiorini et decided by this Honourable Rent RegulationBoard on the 29th April 2009, by whilst confirming the judgement in the part where the Honourable Board,rejected the first plea of the appellants, it revokes the part whereby the Board upheld the second plea of the respondents as demanded and sends backthe records before the RentRegulation Board so that this dispute be decided.
With costs, of both instances against the respondents.
Notify Appellants; 7, Rose, Edgar Ferro Street, Gwardamanġa.
Respondents:.....................omissis.....................
Simone Georgina Meech, 102, Triq Santa Katerina, Birzebbugia.
Adv. Frank Portelli,LL.D.
For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Notice 1166
1166By means of an application filed in Civili Court of Voluntary Jurisdiction Section, on the 25th June 2013, Application number 648/2013 by Marlene Mifsud Chircop and others,whereby they prayed that it be declared open in favour of Marlene Mifsud Chircop in the quota of one fifth (1/5) undivided share;in favour of Albino andJohn brothers Said, children of the late Lorenzo, and this in the quota of one fifth (1/5) undivided share between them;in favour ofDoris Cassar, Carmen Schembri, Rita Mifsud and Louis Camilleri, children of Domenica Camilleri, and this in the quota of one of twenty five (1/25) undivided share each one of them; infavourof Mark and Maria brother and sisterCamilleri, children of the late John Mary Camilleri, the later son of the late Domenica Camilleri, and this in the quota of one oftwenty five (1/25) undivided share between them;in favour ofRomi Agius, Doris Camilleri andJoseph Agius, all children of the late Giuseppa Agius and this in the quota of one of fifteen (1/15) undivided share each one of them; in favour of Joseph Said son of Giovanni Said and this in the quota of one fifth (1/5) undivided share the SUCCESSION ofMaria Assunta Said, unmarried, daughter of the late Giuseppe Said and Carmela née Attard, born and resided in Mosta and died in Luqa on the 5th January 1991 aged 79who died intestate.
Thus whoever considers that he has an interest is called so that by means of a note he enters his opposition according to Article 537(1) et seq of the Code of Organization and Civil Procedure (Cap 12).
Alexandra Debattista
For the Registrat Civil Court and Tribunals
Notice 1167
1167By means of an application filed in Civili Court of Voluntary Jurisdiction Section, on the 30th May 2013, Application number 547/2013 by Emanuel Debattista,Suzanne Debattista, daughter of Emanuel Debattista and Therese Debattista,holding identity card number 349775(M) was INTERDICTED by means of a decree given on the 28th June 2013.
Alexandra Debattista
For the Registrat Civil Court and Tribunals
Notice 1168
1168By means of an application filed in Civili Court of Voluntary Jurisdiction Section, on the 25th June 2013, Application number 647/2013 by Marlene Mifsud Chircop and others,whereby they prayed that it be declared open in favour ofMarlene Mifsud Chircop in the quota of one seventh (1/7);in favour of Albino andJohn brothers Said, children of the late Lorenzo, and this in the quota of one seventh (1/7) undivided share between them;in favour ofDoris Cassar, Carmen Schembri, Rita Mifsud and Louis Camilleri, children ofDomenica Camilleri, and this in the quota of one of thirty five(1/35) each one of them; infavourof Mark and Maria brother and sisterCamilleri, children of the late John Mary Camilleri, the later son of the late Domenica Camilleri, and this in the quota of one ofthirty five (1/35) undivided share between them;one seventh (1/7) in favour of Maria Assunta Said; , in favour of Romi Agius, Doris Camilleri andJoseph Agius, all children of the late Giuseppa Agius and this in the quota of one of twenty one (1/21) undivided share each one of them; in favour of Joseph Said son of Giovanni Said and this in the quota of one seventh (1/7) undivided share; and in favour of Noe Said and this in the quota of one seventh (1/7) undivided share the SUCCESSION of Salvinu Said, bachelor, son of the late Giuseppe Said and Carmela née Attard, born and resided in Mosta and died in Pieta on the 7th January 1985 aged 62 who died intestate.
Thus whoever considers that he has an interest is called so that by means of a note he enters his opposition according to Article 537(1) et seq of the Code of Organization and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12).
Alexandra Debattista
For the Registrat Civil Court and Tribunals
Notice 1169
1169By means of an application filed in Civili Court of Voluntary Jurisdiction Section, on the 25th June 2013, Application number 651/2013 by Carmen Grech and others, whereby they prayed that it be declared open in favour of the same Carmen Grech, wife of the decujus and this in the quota of one half undivided share; and in favour of Mark Paul Grech and Maria Lorraine Farrugia, children of the decujus and this in the quota of one fourth (1/4) undivided share each one of them the SUCCESSION of Reynold Grech, husband of the same Carmen Grech, son of the late John Grech and Frances née Cremona, born in Ħamrun, resided in Santa Venera and died in Tal-Qroqq limits of Imsida on the 22nd August 2012 aged 64holding identity card number 0165648(M) who died intestate.
Thus whoever considers that he has an interest is called so that by means of a note he enters his opposition according to Article 537(1) et seq of the Code of Organization and Civil Procedure (Cap 12).
Alexandra Debattista
For the Registrat Civil Court and Tribunals
Notice 1170
1170By means of an application filed in Civili Court of Voluntary Jurisdiction Section, on the 11th June 2013, Application number 593/2013 by Dornise and Genesia sisters MacKay children of the decujus,whereby they prayed that it be declared open in their favour in the quota of one half (1/2) undivided share each one of them the SUCCESSION oftheir father Dennis Mackay, legally separated, son of the late Anthony and Josephine Mackay sive Mc Kay née Agius, born in Pietà, resided in Valletta and died in Tal-Qroqq limits of Imsida on the 31st January 2013 aged 39holding identity card number 0076974(M) who died intestate.
Thus whoever considers that he has an interest is called so that by means of a note he enters his opposition according to Article 537(1) et seq of the Code of Organization and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12).
Alexandra Debattista
For the Registrat Civil Court and Tribunals