Go Back
Court Notices published in Govt. Gazette No. 19,062 of the 28th March 2013
01/01/2013
Notice 483
483By a decree of the Court of Magistrates (Malta) of the 12th February 2013, the publication of the following extract was ordered for the purpose of service in terms of Article 187(3) of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12).
Golden Harvest Mfg Co Ltd C-176 of UB21, Industrial Estate, San Ġwann, filed a Claim on the 30th October 2012, whereby they asked the Court to condemn Vanguard Gaming Limited (C44634) of Vanguard House, Triq Luqa Briffa, Gżira and George Galea (I.D. 41573M) of Il-Ħarruba, Triq Santa Marija, Magħtab/Naxxar, to pay the plaintiff company the sum of €3,524.46 which amount is due to the plaintiff company.
With costs and legal interests.
The case (Notice Number 365/12CSH) is put off to the 4th April 2013 at 9.00 a.m.
Alexandra Debattista
For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Notice 484
484By means of a decree given by the First Hall Civil Court, on the 15th March 2013, in the records of the Sworn Application, in the names Bank of Valletta plc vs Abela Vincenzo et, application number 85/13 AE, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the respondents, in terms of Article 187(3) of Cap. 12.
By means of a Sworn Application filed in the First Hall Civil Court, in the names Bank of Valletta p.l.c. (C 2833) vs Vincenzo and Romina spouses Abela (I.D. number 362869(M) and 379174(M), on the 29th January 2013, the applicants Bank of Valletta p.l.c. (C 2833) asked this Honourable Court:
1.To declare and decide that there occurred one or more of the events mentioned in the contracts and private writings mentioned in the application and condemn Vincenzo and Romina spouses Abela, to pay the plaintiff company, the sum of ninety-three thousand, nine hundred forty-three Euro and fifteen cents (€93,943.15) balance of debt in the ‘Loan and Overdraft Accounts’ of Vincenzo and Romina spouses Abela, with the Bank of Valletta p.l.c. together with further interest, from the 15th September 2012, till the date of effective payment.
Witnesses.
List of Documents Exhibited.
Applicant company: Bank of Valletta p.l.c. (C 2833)
1/5, Misraħ San Ġorġ, Valletta VLT 1190.
Defendants: 1. Vincenzo Abela,
Sunrise, Flat 4,
Triq l-Għaġuża,
Marsakala
2. Romina Abela,
111, Carmel Court, Flat 2,
Mensija Road,
San Ġwann.
The Sworn Application in the names Bank of Valletta plc vs Abela Vincenzo et, application number 85/13 AE, has been put off for hearing to the 24th April 2013, at 8.45 a.m.
Adv. Frank Portelli, LL.D.
For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Notice 485
485By means of adecree, given, on the 26th February 2013, by the Court of Appeal, in the record of the Application in the Court of Appeal, in the records of the cause in the names AIC Joseph Barbara et vs Nathalie Scicluna, application number 61/09 FS, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the respondent, Nathalie Scicluna, in terms of Article 187(3) of Cap. 12.
By means of an Appeal Application filed in the Court of Appeal, in the cause in the names AIC Joseph Barbara and by decree of the 8th June 2009, the records were transferred on to the name of Josephine Azzopardi, Anna Maria Saddemi, Patricia Anastasi and Greta Bartolo Parnis, following the death of Architect Joseph Barbara, Josephine wife of Raymond Azzopardi proprio as well as mandatary of the absent Anna Maria wife of Salvatore Saddemi, Patricia wife of David Anastasi and Greta wife of Anthony Bartolo Parnis vs Nathalie Scicluna, on the 29th May 2012, the applicants Josephine (I.D. 179376M) wife of Raymond Azzopardi proprio as well as mandatary of the absent Anna Maria (passport number 644084) wife of Salvatore Saddemi, Patricia (ID 198063M) wife of David Anastasi and Greta (I.D. 331365M) wife of Anthony Bartolo Parnis, humbly pray:
That by means of a cause in the names premised and in virtue of application number 61/09 FS, the applicants prayed that, ‘saving any necessary and opportune declaration and for the reasons premised this Honourable Court:
i. Declare and decide that for the reasons brought forward in the same sworn application, the respondent is to pay compensation for the illegal and illicit occupation of the appartment number 52, Block D, St. Julian’s Court, Triq is-Sur Fons, St. Julian’s, which compensation is to be calculated, till the date of effective eviction.
ii. Liquidate the compensation for the said occupation if necessary by the appointment of referees.
iii. Condemn the same respondent to pay the applicant the amount so liquidated, with costs.
That in reply to these demands, the respondent answered, by pleading in the first instance that the action is untimely, in view of the cause, pending in the same names ..omissis... besides, that consequently, none of the demands can be upheld and thus they should be rejected, with costs.
That in virtue of its judgement of the 18th May 2012, the Honourable First Hall Civil Court, decided the cause, in the names premised, and this after it rejected the plea that the action was untimely and consequently the other plea that none of the demands can be upheld, the same Honourable Court, found that the demands were justified and declared and decided for the reasons brought forward in the same judgement, that the respondent is to pay compensation forthe illegal and illicit occupation of the appartment number 52, Block D, St. Julian’s Court, Triq is-Sur Fons, St. Julian’s, liquidated the compensation for the said occupation, in the amount of €10,000, with costs, against the respondent.
That the applicants, felt aggrieved by the above mentioned judgement, limitedly as regards that part of the judgement which liquidates the compensation due to them by the respondent, in the sum of (€10,000) and thus is submitting this humble appeal from the same head of the judgement.
That the facts which gave rise to the above mentioned action, as they result from the totality of the proof brought forward, can be summarised in the following points;
a) That the applicants are the owners of the appartment number 52, Block D, St. Julian’s Court, Triq is-Sur Fons, St. Julian’s. During the proceedings Architect Joseph Barbara, died, and the records of the cause were duly tranferred on to the name of his children, the rest of the applicants.
b) That the respondent was originally witholding the possession of the premises above mentioned by title of temporary sub-empytheusis,which lapsed on the 14th June 2002.
c) That following the said date, the respondent, is occupying, thepremises without any valid title at law and this in view of that decided by the Constitutional Court, by means of its judgement in the names ‘AIC Joseph Barbara vs Cachia’ and by the Court of Appeal, by means of the judgement, in the names ‘Nutar Dr Herbert Cassar vs Alice Turner’ decided on the 30th June 2004. In virtue of these two judgements, it had been decided that the protection offered, by the Ordinance regardingthe Control of Rural Leases’ (Cap. 158 of the Laws of Malta) was not applicable to emphyteusis like that in question.
d) That subsequently to these decisions, by means of Act XVIII of 2007, Art 12 A of the same Ordinance regarding the Decontrol Act, in virtue of which a retroactive right to the sub empytheutae, like the respondent, was given.
...omissis…
e) That in any case the applicant was informed that the respondent was not occupying the premises as her ordinary residence and this because she went to reside with her ‘partner’ in Ħaż-Żebbuġ.
...omissis...
That the grievances were clear and manifest and consist in the following.
1. That it is opportune that in the first place it is cleared that the present cause was being proceeded with, that in the same names, application number 34/07, which related to the demand for the eviction of the respondent, from the same premises, which demand was upheld by a judgement dated 18th May 2012, the present cause with application number 61/09 FS, related to the demand for the compensation of damages suffered as a consequence of the said occupation.
2. That thus the present appeal, is limited only to that part of the the judgement given in the application number 61/09 FS, in virtue of which the Honourable Court of First Instance, limited the compensation due by the respondent to the applicants, in the sum of €10,000, only. It appears that the Honourable Court of First Instance, limited the compensation due by the respondent to the applicants only to the sum of €10,000. It appears, infact that the Honourable Court of First Instance, agreed ‘in toto’ with the legal submissions made by the applicants, in their note of submissions. However when it came to apply the legal principles resulting from the said case law, the Honourable Court of First Instance, decided so:
‘When the Court considers, the circumstances of the case, it is of the opinion, that it is very difficult, to do simple multiplications which the applicants mention and feels that it should evaluate all the factors and arrives at the figure of €10,000.
3. That apart from that quoted above, the Honourable Court of First Instance, did not offer any indication as to which were those legal reason and/or facts whichled it to liquidate the damages in the above mentioned amount. Contrary to thisit appears that the same Honourable Court, evaluated the legal principles, applicable to the cause, however for some reason or other, which are not indicated in the judgement appealed, it arrived at the conclusion that these damages had to be limited to the above mentioned sum.
4. That once the damaging factor is established and namely the fact that the respondent was occupying the premises without a valid at law and thus illegally and abusively ...omissis... there only remains that there be establishedthe damage effectively suffered by the applicants.
5. That in this regard our jurisprudence provides the following principles which had definitely to be applied in this cause.
...omissis...
6. That in this regard the Techincal Referee Valerio Schembri, concluded that the value of the lease is of (€6,600) ...omissis... and thus there was no reason for which the Honourable Court of First Instance, should not have liquidated the damages suffered by the applicants in that amount, which reflects the value of the lease which the relative premises could achieve.
...omissis...
7. That thus it is totally unjust that the damages suffered by the applicants, be quantified in the sum of (€10,000) when the same respondent was granting the premises on lease towards the rent of (€400) monthly ...omissis... It is evident also from the report of the techincal referee Architect Valerio Schembri, as well as from the evidence given by Adriano Gusman, in the cause which was being heard with the present one that the damage being caused to the applicants is much greaterfrom that liquidated by the Court of First Instance.
8. That finally there exists no reason and in fact no reason was given, in the judgement appealed, which justifies that there be liquidated in favour of the applicants, compensation which is less from that resulting from the sum obtainedafter the amount of rent which the premises can obtain on the market is multiplied.
...omissis...
Thus the appellants whilst referring to the proofproduced both in the present cause as well as in the cause in the same names and by means of application number 34/07 and whilst reserving from now the right to bring forward all the admissible proof according to law, respectfully pray, this Honourable Court, for the reasons submitted, to confirm the judgement appealed, dated 18th May 2012, given in the records of the application number 61/09 FS, as stated in this application and liquidate the compensation for the said occupation, in the amount that results according to that above submitted, with costs of both instances against the same respondent.
Appellant: ‘Pepita’ Triq il-Baħar l-Iswed, St. Julian’s.
Respondent: Flat 52, Block D, St. Julian’s Court, Triq is-Sur Fons, St. Julian’s.
ADV. FRANK PORTELLI, LL.D.
For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Notice 486
486By a decree of the 14th March, 2013, given by the First Hall Civil Court, the Court ordered that the extract hereunder mentioned be published for the purpose of service according to article 338(1) of the Code of Organization and Civil Procedure (Cap. 12).
That by application and a Schedule of set-off filed contemporaneously by Michael Attard Limited, on the 8th March, 2013, the approval of the said judicial acts is being demanded for the amount of €54,660.00 euro following the judicial sale by auction 7/13 in the names Michael Attard Limited vs Albert Vella, held under the Authority of the said Court on the 25th February, 2013.
According to Article 338 (2) of Chapter 12: Any person who may have an interest and the persons so served shall be allowed the time of twenty days to file an answer stating in detail the reasons for their opposition and the amounts in contestation; and where such opposition is based on a claim against the proceeds of sale an alleged cause of preference, they are to state the amount of such claim and the basis for the preference. Such persons shall with the answer file all relevant evidence to substantiate their opposition.
Marvic Farrugia
For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Notice 487
487It is hereby notified that by a decree dated the 26th March 2013, the Court of Magistrates (Gozo) Superior Jurisdiction, General Section, ordered the publication of the extract reproduced hereunder for the purpose of service in terms of sections 187(3) and 931(3) of the Code of Organization and Civil Procedure.
Whereas by a decree dated the 26th March 2013 by this Court upon an application of Neville Agius and of Sabine Agius Cabourdin, identity card number 326871M and 349378M respectively, whereby it was ordered that deputy curators be nominated in terms of law to represent the unknown persons who are entitled to receive the herein mentioned ground rent, and this in the records of schedule of deposit and concurrent redemption of ground rent bearing number 69/2013 in names “Neville Agius et versus … deputy curators to represent the unknown persons who are entitled to receive the herein mentioned ground rent,” filed on the 25th March 2013 in the Court of Magistrates (Gozo) Superior Jurisdiction, General Section, as well as in all the other related and subsequent acts.
This schedule of deposit relates to the redemption of ground rent imposed the unnumbered premises, denominated “Tal-Ġordan” accessible from a common pathway in Triq il-Ponta, formerly Triq il-Kappillan Franġisk Vella, Żebbuġ, Gozo, which annual and perpetual ground rent amounts to thirty three cents two mils (33c2m).
Whoever is interested to be nominated as a curator is hereby called upon to call at this Registry within six (6) days and make known their interest through a declaratory note to accept such an assignment and in default, this court will proceed to nominate an official curator.
Issued by the aforementioned Court of Magistrates (Gozo) Superior Jurisdiction, General Section under the signature of Dr Josette Demicoli, a Magistrate of the said Court.
Superior Jurisdiction, General Section
Anthony Mizzi
For the Registrar,
Gozo Courts and Tribunals
Notice 488
488By decree given by the COURT OF MAGISTRATES (GOZO) INFERIOR JURISDICTION, on the 28th December 2012 on the application of Joseph Grech the records of judicial sale by auction number 48/2012 (after warrant of seizure number 303/2012) in the names of Joseph Grech vs Sylvia Zammit, Monday, 15th July 2013 at 10.30 a.m. and until the highest bid is adjudicated, has been fixed for the SALE BY AUCTION to be held at the Gozo Court’s edifice in Cathedral Square, Victoria, Gozo, of the following items:
Television 42inch Samsung
Microwave Oven
Television 42inch with video Samsung
Clock
Walnut Coffee Table
Mirror with frame
The said items are the property of Sylvia Zammit (I.D. 13841A).
Jaclyn Magrin
For the Registrar
Gozo Courts and Tribunals
Notice 489
489By means of a decree given, by the Civil Court First Hall, on the 25th January 2013, in the records of the judicial letter number 3392/12, in the names Automated Revenue Management Services Ltd (C 46054) vs Neville Spiteri (I.D. 228369(M) the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the respondent Neville Spiteri, in termsof Article 187(3) of Cap. 12.
In the First Hall Civil Court
To Neville Spiteri, Identity Card number 228369(M).
By the present, Automated Revenue Management Services Ltd (C 46054) (‘ARMS’) of ‘Gattard House’, National Road, Blata l-Bajda, Malta, calls upon you in its own name and on behalf of the Enemalta Corporation and the Corporation for Water and Electricty Services, to pay the amount due by you of twenty-three thousand, nine hundred and thirty-eight ewro and seventy-three ewro cents (€23,938.73) consisting in the following:
i. as for bill number 101000208395 the amount of €23,158.16 in the premises with address 12, El Shaddai, Triq Balaguer, Balzan and
ii. as for bill number 101000178402 the amount of €780.57 in the premises with address C/Part, Dorset Gges, Triq il-Kbira, Balzan;
Theamount represents balance due by you for water and electricity consumption,rent for the water and electricity meter, administrative expenses, disconnection fees, together with interest due on the Amount according to law.
Despite that the interpellantcalled upon you various times to pay the amount due you remained in default and did not pay.
Thus, the interpellant, is calling upon you so that within seven (7) days from the date that this letter is notified to you, you pay the amount due.
In default, the interpellant, shall have no other option but to proceed further against you, without any other prior notice, including the issuing of the opportune warrants against you.
So much so that you may know how to proceed and regulate yourselves.
With costsand saving the right of interest till the date of payment.
Interpellant: ‘Gattard House’ National Road, Blata l-Bajda, Malta.
Respondent: 12, El Shaddai, Triq Balaguer, Balzan.
Adv. Frank Portelli,LL.D.
For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Notice 490
490By means of a decree of the 4th February 2013 of the Civil Court First Hall in the records of judicial letter number 2949/12, in the names Emanuel Grixti vs Paul Pulis, the following publication for the purpose of effecting service on the respondent was ordered in terms of Article 187(3) of Cap. 12.
In the First Hall of the Civil Court
To Paul Pulis of 5, Triq Iris, Santa Lucia.
By the present Emanuel Grixti (I.D. 128558M) of 30, Dorman Crt, Triq il-Karozza, Qawra, in the first instance reference is made to the deed of sale of the 30th March 1982 that by which you purchased and acquired the building site in Ħaż-Żabbar forming part of the field called Ta’ Santa Domenica marked as plot 1 measuring about 282.1 meters squared free and uncumbered in equal shares between you which land was effectively developed and the part of the development was transfered to third parties except for six (6) garages that until today are still held by you in common in equal shares between you.
The interpellant does not want to remain in co-ownership with you and so he is calling upon you so that within 48 hours you indicated the date, time and place to go to a Public Notary to effect the relative partition.
Consider this act as notice required by law and you are formally warned that if you fail legal procedures shall be instituted according to law.
So much for your own guidance.
Alexandra Debattista
For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Notice 491
491By means of a decree given, by the First Hall Civil Court, on the 1st March 2013, in the names Caruana Mark et vs Sultana Marion, application number 106/13 JA, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the defendant, in terms of Article 187(3) of Cap. 12.
By means of an Application filed in the First Hall Civil Court, in the names Mark Caruana (holder of identity card number 590851M) Dolores Rita sive Doriette Caruana (identity card number 497456M) in her own name and as mandatary of the absent Mother Jean Caruana (Maltese Passport number 744091) vs Marion Sultana (identity card number 125570M) on the 4th February 2013, the applicants Mark Caruana (identity card number 590851M) and Dolores Rita sive Doriette Caruana, identity card number 497456M, in her own name and as mandatary of the absent Mother Jean Caruana, on the 4th February 2013, asked this Honourable Court:
1. To decide the cause according to the following demands, without proceeding to a hearing in terms of Article 167 et sequitur of Cap. 12 of the Laws of Malta, 2. declare that the defendant is occupying and holding without a valid title at law, the property mentioned in the application and namely premises number 4, forming part of a block of appartments, with the name St John Flats, in Trejqet Nicola Cottoner Gżira, and uphold the other demands in the application.
With costs, as demanded in the application.
Applicant: Doriette Caruana, Dar il-Pellegrin, Triq l-Ortolan, San Ġwann.
Mark Caruana, Oakleaf, Sagħtar Street, Mosta.
Defendant: Marion Sultana, 4, St John Flats, Trejqet Nicola Cottoner, Gżira.
The Sworn Application, in the namesCaruana Mark et vs Sultana Marion, application number 106/13 JA, has been put off to the 15th May 2013, at 9.30 a.m.
ADV. FRANK PORTELLI, LL.D.
For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Bann for Curators
492Republic of Malta
To The Marshall of the Court
By means of a decree by this Court, on the 3rd October2012, following a request of Mario Apap, it was ordered that Deputy Curators be chosen to represent the absent Tetyana Apap, in the records of the Sworn Application Number 209/12 RGM, in the names ‘Mario Apap vs Deputy Curators’ and in the relative and subsequent acts.
By means of a Sworn Application filed in the Civil Court (Family Section), in the names Mario Apap (I.D. 79756M) vs and as Deputy Curators to represent the absent Tetyana Apap (I.D. 27174A) of Ukrainian Nationality, on the 18th September 2012, the applicant Mario Apap, asked this Honourable Court:
1. To declare the marriage between the parties celebrated on the 16th March 2004, in the Public Registry in Malta, null and without effect, for the reasons mentioned in the application.
With costs, against the defendant summoned so that a reference to her evidence be made.
Notify: Deputy Curators, Courts of Justice, Valletta.
You are therefore ordered to affix an official copy of this bann at the entrance of this Superior Court and to summon whosoever wishes to act as curator to appear before this Registry within six days and by means of a minute to submit a declaration that he wishes so to act.
You are also ordered to inform each one that if he fails to make this declaration within the stipulated time, the Court will proceed to the selection of Curators of Office.
And after so acting or if you ahould encounter any difficulty in the execution of this bann, you are to inform forthwith this Court.
Given by the Civil Court (Family Court), above mentioned, with the witness of the Hon. Mr Justice Joseph Zammit Mckeon, LL.D., Doctor of Laws.
Adv. Frank Portelli, LL.D.
For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Bann for Curators
493Republic of Malta
To The Marshall of the Court.
By means of a decree by this Court, on the 28th November 2011, following a request of Salvatore sive Saviour Borg et,it was ordered that Deputy Curators be chosen to represent the unknown owners in the records of the Schedule of Deposit of Redemption of Groundrent and deposit in the names Salvatore sive Saviour Borg et vs Deputy Curatorsand in the relative and subsequent acts.
By means of a Schedule of Redemption of Groundrent and Deposit, in the names Salvatore sive Saviour Borg (I.D. 139560M) and Charles Borg (I.D. 188958M) born and residing in Saint Paul’s Bay and Anthony Borg (I.D. 402564M) and Josephine wife of Edmond Fenech (I.D. 107168M) born and residing in Saint Paul’s Bay, brothers/ sisters Borg, children of the late Salvatore Borg and Agnes née Micallef vs Deputy Curators to represent the unknown owners, on the 18th January 2013, the applicants Salvatore sive Saviour Borg (I.D. 139560M) Charles Borg (I.D. 188958M) Anthony Borg (I.D. 402564M) and Josephine wife of Edmond Fenech (I.D. 107168M) respectfully pleaded:
That the interpellants are the owners of the premises number sixty seven (67) in Triq San Pawl Milqi, Burmarrad, which premises is a barn, which is used for the storage of straw, which barn does not enjoy the airspace, together with an adjoining piece of landon the back of this premises with a total area of circa (702.8m2) as shown on the plan attached with a deed of partition dated 20th September 2011, in the records of Notary Dr Daniela Mercieca;
That the said properties are subject to the annual and perpetual groundrent of €0.01.9 as regards the barn and (€0.48,5) as regarding the land on the back;
That the interpellants want to redeem the said groundrent and thus are availing themselves of the faculty granted by Article 1501 of Cap. 16 of the Laws of Malta, to redeem the said groundrent in terms of the same Laws;
That the global groundrent in the amount of €0.50.4 burdening the same properties capitalised at the rate of 5% in terms of the preceeding Article 1501 of Cap. 16 amounts to (€10.08).
Thus the interpellants are calling upon this Honourable Court and under its Authority depositing the sum of €10.08, representing the redemption of groundrent at the rate of 5% of the annual and perpetual groundrents burdeningthe premises with number sixty seven (67) in Triq San Pawl Milqi, Burmarrad and the attached plot of land and on the back of this premises with a global area of (702.8m2) which sum is to be freely given to the respondents nomine and this after the due reciept according to law is left and according to any other provision which regulates the Redemption of Groundrent.
Interpellants: Salvatore sive Saviour Borg (I.D. 139560M) ‘Twilight’, Triq Ġdida in Triq San Pawl, St Paul’s Bay.
Charles Borg (I.D. 188958M) ‘Tranquilla’, Triq Ġdida in Triq San Pawl, St Paul’s Bay.
Anthony Borg (I.D. 402564M) ‘Houbara’, Triq Ġdida in Triq San Pawl, St Paul’s Bay.
Josephine wife of Edmond Fenech (I.D. 107168M) ‘La Villa Strangiato’, Triq Ġdida in Triq San Pawl, St Paul’s Bay.
Respondents: Deputy Curators.
Notify: Director Public Registry, Merchants Street, Valletta (two copies).
You are therefore ordered to affix an official copy of this bann at the entrance of this Superior Court and to summon whosoever wishes to act as curator to appear before this Registry within six days and by means of a minute to submit a declaration that he wishes so to act.
You are also ordered to inform each one that if he fails to make this declaration within the stipulated time, the Court will proceed to the selection of Curators of Office.
And after so acting or if you ahould encounter any difficulty in the execution of this bann, you are to inform forthwith this Court.
Given by the Civil Court First Hall above mentioned with the witness of the Hon. Mr Justice Mark Chetcuti, LL.D., Doctor of Laws.
Adv. Frank Portelli, LL.D.
For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Notice 494
494By means of a decree given by the First Hall Civil Court, on the 13th February 2013, and another on the 13th March 2013, in the records of the Sworn Application, in thenames Farstone Limited vs Farrugia Anthony et, application number 63/13 JA, the following publication was ordered for the purpose of service of the respondents, in terms of Article 187(3) of Cap. 12.
By means of a Sworn Application filed in the First Hall Civil Court, in the names Farstone Limited (C 6880) vs Anthony Farrugia and his wife Rita for any interest she may have, on the 24th January 2013, the applicants asked the defendants to state why for the reasons premised, thisHonorable Court should not:
1. Declare that the defendants are occupying the premises ‘Tanamera’, Triq l-Insiġ, Żebbuġ, without a valid title at law and uphold the other demands in the application.
With all costs against the defendants, summoned so that a reference to his evidence be made.
Applicant: Farstone Limited of Tavistock 148, Mdina Road, Żebbuġ.
Respondents: ‘Tanamera’, Triq l-Insiġ, Żebbuġ, Malta.
The Sworn Application in the names Farstone Limited vs Farrugia Anthony et application number 63/13 JA, has been put off for hearing to the 12th April 2013, at 9.30 a.m.
Adv. Frank Portelli, LL.D.
For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals
Notice 495
495By decree given by the Courts of Magistrates (Gozo) Superior Jurisdiction, General Section, on the 15th March 2013 on the application of Eugenio Cefai et in the records of judicial sale by auction number 4/2010in the names of ‘Eugenio Cefai pro et noe et vs Michael Cefai et’, the day of Monday 29th July 2013 at 10.00 a.m. and until the highest bid is adjudicated, has been fixed for the SALE BY LICITATION, to be held at the Gozo Court’s edifice in Cathedral Square, Victoria, Gozo, of the following property:
A plot of land denominated “Tal-Andar” situated in a passageway leading to Triq Għajn Melel, Żebbuġ, Gozo, bounded on the North by property pertaining to Randu Zammit, on the South by property pertaining to Joseph Cini and on the East by property pertaining to Mary Zammit, having a superficial area of approximately 160sq.m., valued at €163,056
The said property forms part of the estate of Rose Cefai.
N.B. The said property will be sold as described in the report sworn to by AIC Angelo Portelli on the 29th January 2008.
Jaclyn Magrin
For the Registrar, Gozo Courts and Tribunals
Notice 496
496By means of a decree of the 21st March 2013 given by the Courts of Magistrates (Malta), in the records of the judicial letter number 76/13, in the names Commissioner of Tax vs Antonio sive Anthony Vassallo, ordered the following publication for the purpose of service of the respondent in terms of Article 187(3) of Cap. 12.
By means of a judicial letter filed in the Courts of Magistrates (Malta) against Antonio known as Anthony Vassallo (I.D. 314959M) of 64, Petite Chateau, Triq il-Witja, Tarxien,on the 9th January 2013, the Commissioner of Tax of Centre Point Building, Ta’ Paris Road, Birkirkara, calls upon you in terms of the Act about Customs and Excise Tax of 1997, so that within two daysfrom service of this act you pay the sum €2,403.68 representing the tax of customs and excise (CET) due by you.
The said amount is still due by you although called upon several times for payment.
This calling is being made for all effects and purposes of law in paricularly but not exclussivly, to render the executive title that the Commissioner of Value Added Tax has against you;
In default that you abide with this judicial letter, the interpellant warns you that he is going to execute the said executive title that he has against you.
With costs andinterest.
So much so that you may know how to regulate yourself.
Alexandra Debattista
For the Registrar, Civil Courts and Tribunals